https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

If there are seven of them, are they really standards?

This blog has traditionally (i.e., MT 2.x gave me) two RSS feeds, 0.91 (as index.xml) and 1.0 (as index.rdf). MT3 provides templates for RSS 2.0 and for Atom syndication. Now,…

This blog has traditionally (i.e., MT 2.x gave me) two RSS feeds, 0.91 (as index.xml) and 1.0 (as index.rdf).

MT3 provides templates for RSS 2.0 and for Atom syndication.

Now, it seems goofy as all heck to have four different syndication feeds. So I poked around, and found this history of RSS formats (not even counting Atom). There are seven different formats out there right now, with varying histories and owners (and not necessarily in numeric sequence). Yeesh. Another look here.

I have no basis for judging which one is best, which one more RSS readers will handle, etc. So … heck with it. It’s a trivial thing to write the actual feed, upon contemplation. So I’ll now include an Atom feed (atom.xml) and an RSS 2.0 feed (index.rss). And if performance goes in the crapper, or someone sees some horrible error I’m making, I’m sure folks will let me know …

23 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *