It’s hard not to chortle a bit over Tom DeLay’s “fall” and resignation from Congress. Here’s a man who both led and epitomized the hardball “We’re in charge, so back the hell away” GOP politics of the last five years. Here’s a man whose political epitaphs speak nothing of the good he did, but that he was “a hard fighter” and “effective” (the “effective” word keeps showing up over and over). Here’s a man who led Congress at a time of unparalleled (at least in recent years) spending, civil rights incursions, and entanglement of religion with law.
And now he’s, effectively, gone, brought down not just by corruption charges but by convictions on his staff and an electorate that seemed finally fed up with the whole thing.
DeLay will linger, like Newt Gingrich. He’ll write. He’ll serve on boards. He’ll be a fund raiser. He’ll attract attention (intentially and not). He certainly won’t go away. But his direct political power has been broken, fairly or not, either due to things he did or the sense of things he did. He’s done the best thing he could do “for the party” right now, falling on his sword and telling the public it’s because “liberal democrats” were using negative attacks and that he didn’t want the election to be “a campaign focused solely as a referendum on me” (why not?). It might — might — deflect some attention and let some voters forget about it all by November. But …
I’m glad to see him go. Hope he’s the first of many.
He will certainly become a correspondent for Fox news. Newt, Bill Bennett and he can bemoan the decline of morality together.
From what I’ve been hearing, this resignation might have 1.3 million reasons for occuring.
Apparently DeLay has about $1.3 million in campaign contributions right now. Under your election law, if DeLay resigns he’s allowed to keep his campaign war chest. Among the things he’s allowed to spend it on are legal fees.
He’s up to his armpits in the Abramoff scandal. I’m guessing that $1.3 million will be badly needed to keep his jail time down. While he may be mouthing the words “for the good of the party” in the end it appears to me that his intentions were far less altruistic.
Yay, Marn!
I think you hammered…er, hit the nail on the head. 🙂