https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

More on the Don Armstrong case

The conservative voices in support of Rev. Don Armstrong have been ridiculing the Diocesan court for their “evil” “persecution” of Armstrong and noting that no criminal investigation has been…

The conservative voices in support of Rev. Don Armstrong have been ridiculing the Diocesan court for their “evil” “persecution” of Armstrong and noting that no criminal investigation has been started and that the Diocese hasn’t dared refer the “crime” to the authorities for proper investigation, thus proving that the charges were trumped up by a “kangaroo court” under “satanic influence.”

Oh, by the way, the Diocese has in fact referred the crime to the Colorado Springs police, who are investigating. 

28 view(s)  

4 thoughts on “More on the Don Armstrong case”

  1. And now the civil courts can be kangaroo courts under Satanic influence.

    It would be really cool if Armstrong was busy gathering donations for his legal defense fund and then pulled a runner.

  2. From the sunday Post came this intersting bit of info:

    Episcopal Ecclesiastical Court made a preliminary ruling Aug. 2 that Armstrong is guilty of theft, tax fraud, misusing funds and improperly borrowing money. The court found that Armstrong took $392,000 in church funds without authorization of church lay leaders between 1999 and 2006.

    Church attorneys said total restitution for stolen, misused and improperly borrowed funds would total more than $600,000.

    It will be interesting to see how all that plays out, and if his congragation stands behind him to fork over that kind of dough.

  3. Well, the case would have to be made in civil court to compel him and the Grace CANA folks to fork it over; they’re studiously pooh-poohing any need to listen to anything TEC has to say to them. Though, I suppose, if it were put as a lien against Armstrong’s church pension, he might rise to the bait.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *