So far as can tell, the claims the voiceover attributes to Kant are correct (I don’t know anything about Kant’s aesthetics).
A more interesting attack on Kant would be that he refuses to help Jewish people to escape from the Gestapo. In a sense this is true since Kant insists that one should never lie. The classic example is whether or not one should lie to the Gestapo when one is hiding a Jewish person in one’s attic. The traditional interpretation is that Kant says one should not lie in such a situation. Hence, in the typical twisted scheme of an attack ad, Kant refuses to help Jewish people. But of course this is a shallow reading of Kant, just the sort of interpretation that others can use against him.
Also, I don’t think Nietzsche would stand for election. Kant might, but not Nietzsche.
What no credit? **pouts** ;P
I found it kind of mildly amusing.
So far as can tell, the claims the voiceover attributes to Kant are correct (I don’t know anything about Kant’s aesthetics).
A more interesting attack on Kant would be that he refuses to help Jewish people to escape from the Gestapo. In a sense this is true since Kant insists that one should never lie. The classic example is whether or not one should lie to the Gestapo when one is hiding a Jewish person in one’s attic. The traditional interpretation is that Kant says one should not lie in such a situation. Hence, in the typical twisted scheme of an attack ad, Kant refuses to help Jewish people. But of course this is a shallow reading of Kant, just the sort of interpretation that others can use against him.
Also, I don’t think Nietzsche would stand for election. Kant might, but not Nietzsche.
BD — Actually, I didn’t get it from you (though I see you posted it first).
Dave — Well, if you’re going to get all *historical* on us … 🙂
Hee!