Grassfire.org is trying set itself up as a grass roots “resistance” movement to All Things Obama and Liberal and Socialist and Gay and Democrat. To which end they are trying to sign up a million supporters by Inauguration Day. They have a bit short of a quarter of that right now.
When you sign the petition joining them, the following items are all conveniently checked:
Socialistic wealth redistribution including any and all tax increases and big-government welfare programs. [Fascinating how “tax increases” is now equated with “socialistic wealth redistribution”]
It’s every right-wing cause, bundled in one big bag of infra-Red goodness.
But wait, there’s more! You get to identify the issues that you want to receive periodic e-mail updates about. Some are the same, some are oddly different.
- Secure borders, stop illegal immigration [pick your own veggies! wash your own dishes!]
- Expose liberal media bias
- Stop NAFTA, North Am. Union [Fascinating that both of these have been Bush babies, too. The whole North American Union thing is one of these cool crackpot conspiracy theories you can hear all about on late-night radio.]
- Defend rights of the unborn
- Oppose government waste, earmarks [Except, of course, the ones that benefit me.]
- Reform taxes/eliminating the IRS [Why to people always think that if we “reform” taxes that anyone but the very richest will actually pay less?]
- 2nd Amendment right to bear arms [Wait, what happened to our verb?]
- War on terror and national security
- Keep the Pledge of Allegiance
- Defend traditional marriage [Teen brides, multiple wives and dowries for all!]
- Uphold broadcast decency standards [But not the Fairness Doctrine. Got it.]
- Pardon Agents Ramos/Compean [I had to look this one up. Apparently it’s a huge deal in the Right Wing press. Ironically, the bulk of the sentences are driven by mandatory sentence add-ons for use of firearms. FWIW, I give even odds that Bush will commute these guys on his way out.]
- Expose and defeat the ACLU [Expose them? They’re already all over the media.]
- Defund Planned Parenthood [Another WorldNetDaily / ACLJ holy cause.]
- Stop liberal judicial activism [Only conservative judicial activism should be allowed.]
- Oppose radical global warming activism [Can we engage in moderate global warming activism? Wait, is that being active in favor of global warming? Or are they talking about being activists against radical warming of the globe? Did anyone proofread this thing?]
The odd thing to me is that any of the above items lends itself to some serious, quiet discussion of pros and cons, risks and rewards, definitions and nuance and trying to find compromises amongst differing principles. “Men of good will can disagree.” But by bundling them together into a single “platform,” it comes across as … well, wingnuttery.
I’ll be curious to see what they say their numbers are come January 20th.
(via Pam)
My reply to this: “Your ideas do not appeal to me and I’m not interested in receiving you newsletter.”
Yowsa! That is a big ol’ pile of crazy right there!