https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

ReCAPTCHA

I love it when a plan comes together … 

Last August, I noted with glee the introduction of reCAPTCHA. Rather than a CAPTCHA schema that just grabs random words, reCAPTCHA actually serves a purpose other than “just” security. 

To archive human knowledge and to make information more accessible to the world, multiple projects are currently digitizing physical books that were written before the computer age. The book pages are being photographically scanned, and then transformed into text using “Optical Character Recognition” (OCR). The transformation into text is useful because scanning a book produces images, which are difficult to store on small devices, expensive to download, and cannot be searched. The problem is that OCR is not perfect.

reCAPTCHA improves the process of digitizing books by sending words that cannot be read by computers to the Web in the form of CAPTCHAs for humans to decipher. More specifically, each word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is placed on an image and used as a CAPTCHA. This is possible because most OCR programs alert you when a word cannot be read correctly.

But if a computer can’t read such a CAPTCHA, how does the system know the correct answer to the puzzle? Here’s how: Each new word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is given to a user in conjunction with another word for which the answer is already known. The user is then asked to read both words. If they solve the one for which the answer is known, the system assumes their answer is correct for the new one. The system then gives the new image to a number of other people to determine, with higher confidence, whether the original answer was correct.

That is so wildly, incredibly cool that I simply cannot stand it. Though the reCAPTCHA prompts are mildly annoying (not surprisingly, they are not always readable, though you can refresh them), that they are being used to “digitize books from the Internet Archive and old editions of the New York Times” is so spiffy, I’m willing to inconvenience myself and others, especially since it will cut down on spam at this site.

A couple of notes:

  1. I’ve set reCAPTCHA to show up in two places. First, if you register at this site, it will use reCAPTCHA to try and verify that you are real, not some evil SpamBot. If you are registered, then it won’t prompt you when you go to comment. If you aren’t registered and try to comment, reCAPTCHA will pop up to validate that you are a Real Human.
  2. I’ve deleted the already-registered users to this site (four of them) whose names I didn’t recognize. My apologies if you are a real person. Re-register (which will force you past a reCAPTCHA) and you’re set again.

We’ll see how this works. If I get a lot of complaints, I’ll reconsider. But … so cool …

125 view(s)  

17 thoughts on “ReCAPTCHA”

  1. All registration does at this point is let you bypass the comment CAPTCHA and skip filling in info at the comments (name, mail addy, etc.).

    In theory I could use it to allow folks to post stuff here, and Margie got registered during the import because there were a couple of posts here under her name; it also lets me set her up to be a backup editor if, for some reason, it was required.

  2. I just wanted to point out that my reCaptcha for this entry is “tingling nowhere”.

    I hope that’s not commentary . . .

  3. I don’t know that I’d call it easier. Probably more unambiguous, but it also required me several seconds to figure out the correct sequence of letters. An interesting idea, though, thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *