
After a few days, a few more stories in the news illuminating how the Don Armstrong case went from 20-odd felony theft indictments by the grand jury to “no contest” on one felony theft and one misdemeanor theft case.
First off, the Colorado Springs Gazette:
As part of the agreement, Armstrong admitted guilt to a new charge, misdemeanor theft, said Pueblo District Attorney Bill Thiebaut. A sentencing hearing on this charge will happen before the end of the year.
Armstrong’s sentence could include a fine of up to $5,000 and up to 18 months in the El Paso County Jail. Misdemeanor charges are brought for thefts between $500 and $1,000.
On the felony count, Armstrong has been placed on four-year’s probation. If violated, he will be a convicted felon and could face four to 12 years in prison, Thiebaut said. A restitution hearing will be held, probably in January, to determine how much money Armstrong must pay back to Grace Church.
The bottom line seems to be that the cases looked decently strong, but the statute of limitations ran out on most of the charges.
The biggest factor, [Armstrong lawyer] Hartley said, was that 19 of the 20 counts might be dismissed due to the statute of limitations, which is three years in a Colorado criminal case.
But apparently the timing and strength of the remaining case was enough to get everyone to the table for the plea bargain.
The Denver Post offers a few more details from the DA:
However, Thiebaut said it was “a fairly complicated plea agreement” with more to it than a single misdemeanor count. According to the plea agreement, obtained by the Post Monday, Armstrong pleaded “no contest” to one class-three felony, the theft of $15,000 or more. The other 19 charges were dismissed.
The sentence for this count will be deferred for a period of four years. The El Paso County Probation Department will supervise Armstrong during this period. If he complies with terms set by the judge, no conviction will be entered. If the judge revokes the deferred sentence, the conviction is entered and the court could imprison him.
Armstrong also entered an Alford plea, which means pleading guilty with a protestation of innocence, to a single misdemeanor charge. The agreement states there is no factual basis to the misdemeanor charge, but the defendant pleads to it to obtain the benefit of the plea agreement.
The judge will consider ordering Armstrong to pay restitution at an upcoming hearing, but no amount or date has been set. With the misdemeanor conviction, the judge also could fine Armstrong up to $5,000 or sentence him to up to 18 months in jail, Thiebaut said.
So, net-net, one could consider it a victory for Armstrong, who ran out the clock on most of the charges, and whose single felony conviction will be laid aside in four years if he keeps his nose clean.
On the other hand, truth and the law aren’t always on the same page, and it’s pretty clear that the theft charges had significant substance. That his die-hard supporters consider this a vindication of his innocence demonstrates their devotion to Armstrong and his ability to somehow turn the case into a referendum on gay rights in the Episcopal Church.
It will be interesting to see how the whole “restitution” thing goes.
A bit more info in the aftermath of the case. Apparently Armstrong’s attorney wasn’t quite right about what the misdemeanor he pled to could mean in terms of jail time or fines. http://www.csindy.com/colorado/no-trial-no-problem/Content?oid=1854958
The plea agreement is here: http://www.csindy.com/general/pdfs/ArmstrongPleaAgreement2010.pdf … key points:
1. Armstrong is under supervised probation by the Probation Department for the next four years. If he violates his probation, he could get slapped with 4-12 years and $3-750K in fines.
2. There’s no agreement on the sentence for the misdemeanor charge. The punishment for that class is 6-18 months in county jail, and/or $500-5000 in fines. That’s still to be determined.
3. “The defendent will be ordered to pay restitution” — but it’s unclear (to me) of the quantity, or if it’s based on the felony, the misdemeanor, or both. That’s still to be determined.
It’s worth noting (from the CS Independent article above) that Armstrong’s parish has taken down the “official” parish announcement about the resolution, now that the plea bargain documents are public. While that statement had basically said it was all over and done (and neglected to mention the felony plea) with except for some far-distant restitution hearing, items 2 and 3 above (plus the felony plea) seemed to indicate otherwise, which might be why the statement was taken down.
Armstrong’s
CANAACNA bishop, Bp. Marty Minns, has written a pastoral letter to St George’s Anglican, Armstrong’s new parish. He starts off noting “While a number of definitive actions have been taken, there are still more decisions to be rendered and hearings to be held; therefore at this juncture it is not appropriate for me to comment on specific legal issues. I am looking forward to my visit next month when I will meet with members of the leadership and legal teams to more fully understand the situation and its likely trajectory.”But he then goes ahead to suggest that all of this petty brouhaha should never have been brought to court, and Don’s a keen fellow, and he has a lovely family, and Minns has studied the matter thoroughly and clearly all should be forgiven.