https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Trademarking prayer style

What?

It doesn't matter to me whether Tebow is doing this to protect the sanctity of prayer or to make a million-zillion dollars.  What matters is that it's asinine that this could be trademarked.

Embedded Link

Jets QB Tim Tebow trademarking ‘Tebowing’ to assure it’s used ‘in the right way’
FLORHAM PARK, N.J. — Dropping to a knee like Tim Tebow might cost you now.

Google+: View post on Google+

55 view(s)  

38 thoughts on “Trademarking prayer style”

  1. That's just bizarre to me
    Following your convictions and walking out the life you preach should be all that's necessary to validate and secure your public image. People may still ridicule you, but that's part of life, especially the Christian one.

    I'm a little confused on this one.

  2. That's just bizarre to me
    Following your convictions and walking out the life you preach should be all that's necessary to validate and secure your public image. People may still ridicule you, but that's part of life, especially the Christian one.

    I'm a little confused on this one.

  3. I've always found Tebow's practice distatefully gaudy (and not quite in keeping with Matt. 6:1-6), but to each his own.

    But something that can be (whether or not it should be) trademarked?  I'd love to see a legal challenge to that.

  4. I've always found Tebow's practice distatefully gaudy (and not quite in keeping with Matt. 6:1-6), but to each his own.

    But something that can be (whether or not it should be) trademarked?  I'd love to see a legal challenge to that.

  5. Agreed.

    Further, trademark is intended to protect the integrity of a brand, and prevent potential customers from getting confused.  I'm not sure a judge would rule that another football player (let alone an actor on stage or something else of the like) would possibly be confused with the real Tim Tebow, or that Tebow's presumed intent of protecting the sanctity of an act of prayer is an intended goal of trademark law.

  6. Agreed.

    Further, trademark is intended to protect the integrity of a brand, and prevent potential customers from getting confused.  I'm not sure a judge would rule that another football player (let alone an actor on stage or something else of the like) would possibly be confused with the real Tim Tebow, or that Tebow's presumed intent of protecting the sanctity of an act of prayer is an intended goal of trademark law.

  7. Actually, I suspect the linked article got it a bit wrong. I thought it was odd first reading it so looked at a few more sources and what he's done is ask for trademark status for the term "Tebowing." That makes perfect sense, since he is trying to protect his "brand" against "using it inappropriately." I don't think the act of dropping to a knee and putting a clenched fist against one's forehead is covered. On that, I agree with +Dave Hill  that it is in poor taste at best and could easily be interpreted as anathema to scripture, but he's the one who needs to deal with God on that.

  8. Actually, I suspect the linked article got it a bit wrong. I thought it was odd first reading it so looked at a few more sources and what he's done is ask for trademark status for the term "Tebowing." That makes perfect sense, since he is trying to protect his "brand" against "using it inappropriately." I don't think the act of dropping to a knee and putting a clenched fist against one's forehead is covered. On that, I agree with +Dave Hill  that it is in poor taste at best and could easily be interpreted as anathema to scripture, but he's the one who needs to deal with God on that.

  9. Actually, +George Wiman, I think if SNL were to use it, it would fall under the parody/fair use section of copyright law. What's he's really trying to get some control around, at least according to one of the articles I reviewed, are the t-shirt and poster sales that have apparently started to grow up around the term.

  10. Actually, +George Wiman, I think if SNL were to use it, it would fall under the parody/fair use section of copyright law. What's he's really trying to get some control around, at least according to one of the articles I reviewed, are the t-shirt and poster sales that have apparently started to grow up around the term.

Leave a Reply to The Bruce, Mile High Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *