First time I've heard legalized abortion blamed — well, yeah, there's been that "Oooooh, culture of death!" thing, but the idea that legal abortion means kids "these days" are suffering from "survivor syndrome" that leads to … um … shootings? Yeah, that's … novel. And/or doltish.
Never mind that Roe v. Wade was in 1973, which means we should be seeing a bunch of 40-year-olds also suffering from "survivor syndrome." That abortion rates have been falling in the US since the early 80s (for a variety of reasons) doesn't seem to track here, either.
Of course, this isn't being presented as an excuse, per se, but as a way to place blame on others that this guest speaker, the Executive Director of "Priests for Life" wants to blame for pretty much anything. Still, I'd be amused (as well as sickened) if the accused killers actually picked up on this and used it as a defense.
(h/t +Lorne Lehrer and others)
Reshared post from +Media Matters for America
So this happened. Only on Fox will you hear someone suggest that a factor in the Oklahoma shooting was that the "post-Roe v. Wade" kids had "survivor syndrome" because they "could have been aborted."
Fox Guest Suggests Oklahoma Shooting Resulted In Part Because Shooters “Could Have Been Aborted”
It's hard to argue, though, that if they had been, the shootings almost definitely wouldn't have happened.
Ah, the irony, +Kingsley Lintz.