Hey, I'm all in favor of law and order, and of seeing people who violate the rules that the citizenry (which ostensibly includes them) are appropriate punished (or, better yet, deterred from committing in the first place).
That said, when it becomes a racket on behalf of the municipal government (esp. when privatization raises it's for-profit head) — when it becomes a major source of their income (because we can't possibly raise taxes for stuff), and so they are incented to do whatever they can to keep the fees and fines and add-ons growing and flowing … then the idea of justice itself is corrupted.
Originally shared by +Yonatan Zunger
Note to the reader: Some people have been upset that I'm writing more about issues like these lately, and don't want to hear about things like race in America. If you feel this way, you may continue to be disappointed: these things are important, and we need to talk about them. Consider yourself forewarned: there will be more of this. If this makes you unhappy, you may want to stop reading now. But you probably shouldn't: if you find that this brings up lots of complicated emotions for you, that's a sign that you should read more, not less.
I wish that I could give you a short version of this article. But you need to read this, because it's going to be important to our national conversation about many things. Radley Balko has written a deeply researched, detailed article about the system of institutionalized corruption by which municipalities across Missouri are essentially treating their poor — especially their black poor — as a resource to be harvested and consumed to line their own pockets.
The basic idea is simple and should be familiar to anyone who's watched loansharks at work: they start with a fine for something — say, having expired tags on your car, not having proof of insurance, or (I kid you not) "wearing saggy pants." If you don't have a lawyer (and they've made sure that you won't have one unless you're rich enough to hire one), then you don't simply pay the fine; instead, you have a series of court dates. The message seems to somehow have gone out to the public that if you go to one of these dates and can't afford the fine, you'll go to jail — so people miss the dates, and are then arrested for that, instead. Then they get fined for that, as well. As well as fines for not paying the fines, and so on, and so forth.
It's brutally effective, and it's why you hear so much concern about towns which are 90% black with a police force that's almost entirely white and living in a different town: that police force is, generally, running one of these schemes, together with a local government that's arranging all of the payments. (Guess where all the money for this goes? Hint: it's not the town general fund. At least, not the town where any of the people being imprisoned live.) When the people writing and "enforcing" (I use the term loosely) the laws have no ties to the people being charged under them, you have a sophisticated extortion racket, and no rule of law.
This article is extensive and detailed, and by the time you get through it, you should have a painfully clear picture of how it works. There are probably two other things you should read in conjunction with it: Ta-Nehisi Coates' now-famous article about similar corruption of the housing system (http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/05/the-case-for-reparations/361631/), and the book I'm working through now, Douglas A. Blackmon's Pulitzer Prize-winning Slavery by Another Name. (http://www.amazon.com/Slavery-Another-Name-Re-Enslavement-Americans/dp/0385722702) I suspect that these three will give you a very good picture of some of the "hidden corruption," of the darkest form imaginable, which plagues our country to this day.
How municipalities in St. Louis County, Mo., profit from poverty
The uprising in Ferguson was an inevitable reaction to the institutional racism coursing through the area for decades.
And don't forget the whole prison-industrial complex. Privately-run for-profit prisons are pure evil. They have a vested interest in locking up as many people as possible.
+Tim Hall Sufficient to spawn scandals over payoffs to judges to increase convictions. Yeah. There are areas where privatization can make sense; core public services where the government is the contractor are rarely among them, since the point of government is not about turning a profit.