And by "inimitable" I mean, "What the hell drugs did she take before writing and delivering this speech, and does anyone else thank their lucky stars that she's not 'a heartbeat away from the Presidency'?"
It's a remarkable speech, full of random campaign sound bites, unrelieved bitterness from 2008, and a hip-hop[1] stream of consciousness that beggars the imagination. And all while, the Donald stands there with a shit-eating smirk.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the faces and voices of this year's GOP.[2]
For a transcript (if you don't want to wade through 20-odd minutes of Sarah's squamous and non-Euclidean verbiage), I recommend Jim Wright's annotated version (http://www.stonekettle.com/2016/01/non-sequitur.html). It says far more and far better than I could.
[1] Or Suessical
[2] Given that Trump leads in the polls, and his next closest rival is notable, not for any significant policy difference, but only in being an actual (God help us) Senator.
So she slams Obama for negotiating with our enemies before telling us that Trump is "the one who would know how to negotiate" and that he has mastered "the art of the deal"? Umm…
And he's "beholden to no one but we [sic] the people"? If "we" are his stockholders, sure.
She mentions his "track record of success" but not, strangely, his failures. Trump Airlines, Trump Vodka, Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. (three bankruptcies???), the worst board game ever…
I weep.
Donald…may the farce be with you.
+Scott Randel But don't you know, Obama is a horrifyingly brilliant arch-enemy of America who with fiendish precision is destroying the heart of what makes this country great …
… except when he's a clownish buffoon who can't tie his own shoes and needs teleprompters (unlike, say, Sarah's note cards) and is utterly incompetent to lead out of a paper bag, let alone our nation.
(Today's term is "cognitive dissonance")