https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Because a court in Country A shouldn't control the Internet in Country B

Google appeals a Canadian Supreme Court ruling that sets a principle (similar to rulings we've seen from the EU) that if a court in one country says that something should not be on the Internet seen in that country, it should not on the Internet as seen in any country.

Should a Canadian court be able to decided what someone here in the US should see? How about a French court? Or a Russian court? Or a Chinese court? Or an Iranian court?

No. No they should not.




Google brings internet free-speech battle to Supreme Court
Google is fighting a Canadian ruling it says has worldwide implications for access to information online on Tuesday.

View on Google+

49 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *