I have no problem with FEMA funds going to assist / reimburse churches that are providing relief and shelter for hurricane victims. That’s the sort of thing that, if the churches weren’t doing it, FEMA or other governmental relief agencies would have to (or it would be left undone).
I have huge problems, however, with the idea using FEMA funds to rebuild church sanctuaries and other aspects of the worship life at places of faith that have been damaged by storms and flooding. There are other ways to do so through SBA loans and other post-hurricane relief, the same as businesses and individual residents. Federal tax money going to restore a place of worship strikes me as a huge overreach with the First Amendment. Even Trinity Lutheran v. Comer was about church facilities that are used for a broadly secular purpose.
Will Trump Direct FEMA to Fund Churches Hit by Harvey? – The Atlantic
The president weighs in on a long-standing debate over using public money to support religious organizations.
I don't know dude, aren't churches tax exempt because they are supposed to do this sort of stuff without recompense?
+Paul Gatling They are certainly called to do so morally, and, on a day-to-day basis are expected to do so. In an emergency situation like this, I think it's reasonable that, if possible, they be compensated for an extraordinary outlay — but for the service rendered, not for the physical plant that was damaged by the storm.