A week later (and a week before The Big Day), here we are. (+ means an increase, * means unchanged, – means a decrease)
Site | Obama | McCain | Toss-Up |
375 + | 163 – | ||
Electoral-vote.com | 364 * | 157 – | 17 + |
FiveThirtyEight.com | 351 + | 187 – | |
Pollster.com | 306 + | 142 – | 90 – |
270ToWin.com | 277 * | 163 * | 98 * |
Hedgehog Report | 364 + | 174 – | |
FederalReview.com | 338 * | 166 * | 34 * |
3 Blue Dudes | 306 – | 157 – | 75 + |
Electoral Scoreboard | 367 * | 171 * |
|
Obama maintains his significant (if electoral-magnified) lead and lock in all the polls and results. Some sites haven’t shifted much in the last week; most of the others have increased Obama’s lead, but nobody has shown McCain gaining any ground, save in increasing some undecided tallies.
The question, of course, is how accurate this is. I think there is nearly zero chance that McCain could actually win, but the above numbers could be volatile for any number of reasons — the oft-touted Bradley effect, dirty tricks and voter suppression, and lazy Democratic voter turn-out in the face of a “landslide” could all drop the Obama numbers from a few key states flipping back. On the other hand, depressed GOP turn-out and the momentum of “winning” could push Obama up higher, though not, I suspect, over 400 as some have suggested.
Over in the other races, here’s how things are looking (the top number is the current split; the +/*/- refers to the Democrat numbers):
Site | Senate | House (233-199) | Govs (28-22) |
57-41 * | 258-177 + | 28-22 – | |
Electoral-vote.com | 59-41 + | 252-182 – |
|
FiveThirtyEight.com | 57-41 * |
| |
Pollster.com | 55-38 * | 246-166 * | 27-21 * |
3 Blue Dudes | 53-38 |
|
|
Electoral Scoreboard | 53-39 * |
|
|
It doesn’t seem likely that the Dems will get their filibuster-proof Senate. That may be a good thing, for folks who like a bit of friction in their government. If the GOP uses that slender hold to restrain the wildest of the Democratic majority’s wish lists, that’s all fine and good. If they use it to try and block anything significant, there may be trouble. (I wonder how the whole “going nuclear” thing will play this coming Congress — I lot different, I suspect, from when the GOP were in near-domination.)
We’ll see in a week.
Filibustering in Congress can’t be right. How is being able to block something with majority support, just because you can talk for 8 hours, democracy?
It’s a “rule” in the Senate, requiring a supermajority of 60 to close debate. Arguably it makes the Senate a more deliberative body, more prone to compromise and consensus, and less subject to the emotions and exigencies of the moment, or even of the slight majority. Certainly it’s been used to block Good Stuff in the past by an intractable and obstinate minority. It’s also been used to block Bad Stuff in the past by a brave and resolute minority. Which is which depends on whether you’re in the majority or not.
I don’t know that I consider it a bad system, to be honest, but I *usually* think that friction in government and forces that promulgate centrism and compromise are best. Except when it’s my own pet law that’s being blocked by that darned, stubborn, anti-democratic minority party …