https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Google for Blogs, Part II

Lots of folks are saying this is the End for Technorati, since the idea of having a search engine of blogs that’s not Google when Google is now doing it…

Lots of folks are saying this is the End for Technorati, since the idea of having a search engine of blogs that’s not Google when Google is now doing it is kind of silly, plus Technorati’s performance has been truly sucky for some time.

Maybe so. Technorati does have the ostensible advantage of instant access (when it’s up and responding), but, well, Google is Google.

I do expect, at some point when I have a few spare minutes, to delete the Technorati links here and modify the Google ones to use the new Google blog stuff.

I did find something … interesting, as I played with the Google Blog search. I put in my blog URL to see what came up as links to it.

Interestingly enough, there are a number of obviously commercial/spam Blogger sites that have quotes from posts of mine and links back to them, e.g., this one.

Hmmm.

Obviously they’re trying to get lots of links on bottled water for some nefarious purpose. But what does quoting my blog and linking to an entry of mine give them (aside from a touch of class)? Does the link keep it from looking like a link farm to spam hunters? Does the text make it look more legit?

It is a puzzlement. And there are several of them. Should I be worried? And, if so, what should I do about it?

25 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Google for Blogs

Google has a new search page (blogsearch.google.com, but really www.google.com/blogsearch) that focuses on Blogs. It resolves the issue of how to tell the difference between a blog and another site…

Google has a new search page (blogsearch.google.com, but really www.google.com/blogsearch) that focuses on Blogs. It resolves the issue of how to tell the difference between a blog and another site by indexing off of RSS feeds/pings, which limits its history a bit (back to about June), but is a fairly neat bit of behavioral filtering.

Though, interestingly, it still seems to require crawling, vs. actually reading the pings. Does the feed/ping simply tell Google to include it in its blog crawl (or its subsetting of the sites it already crawls)? The site says that it indexes feeds, but that doesn’t explain why posts of mine from yesterday aren’t there. (It also raises questions about sites that only feed a limited number of words, or that don’t feed comments, both of which can be search-worthy and neither of which I do.)

My main concern with this is that some folks, including Google, have made noises in the past about blogs and blog results in Google proper obscuring “real” information sources. Granted, depending on the topic you might find actual news items buried amidst wingnut and moonbat rantings on the same, but I often find information presented in or pointed to from blogs much more searchable than the original news sources (esp. when blogs quote news text that slips away thereafter). If this new Beta service from Google is meant to make searching just blogs easier, great. If it’s a first step toward ghettoizing blogs out of the main Google search, I don’t care for it at all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *