https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

I’m sure this means something

Things I watch on DVD while Margie is off gaming: The Manchurian Candidate The Batman/Superman Movie (“World’s Finest”) 1776 And, interestingly enough, The Manchurian Candidate has an actor Henry Silva…

Things I watch on DVD while Margie is off gaming:

The Manchurian Candidate
The Batman/Superman Movie (“World’s Finest”)
1776

And, interestingly enough, The Manchurian Candidate has an actor Henry Silva (who voiced Bane in Batman: The Animated Series), while 1776 has an actor, Henry Da Silva.

It’s a small world, after all.

UPDATE: Okay, not so small. It’s actually Howard Da Silva.

Tuesday

Hence, This-or-That: TV Shows/Movies Edition….

Hence, This-or-That: TV Shows/Movies Edition.

Continue reading “Tuesday”

The Fabtastic Four?

Breathless press release prose aside, this article on the in-developmentFantastic Four movie sounds pretty good. Just like Spidey was just about a guy who can swing on webs, so the…

Breathless press release prose aside, this article on the in-developmentFantastic Four movie sounds pretty good. Just like Spidey was just about a guy who can swing on webs, so the FF has always had a strong focus on family (the good, bad, and ugly) and on celebrity. The origin (tak-tak-tak-tak-tak) is really secondary to that.

So using the Beatles as a leaping off point for the overall story sounds rather clever to me. (Hmmm. Reed as Paul, Ben as John, Sue as George, and Johnny as Ringo?)

The Dr. Doom stuff sounds kind of lame, though. But I thought Keaton would be an awful Batman, so I’ve given up trying to second-guess these sorts of projects, at least until they’re in the can. And the writer’s enthusiasm about the first ish cover art is a good sign.

(via Blogatelle)

World’s Finest?

Why am I always the last to hear about these things? I knew that Warners was still trying to figure out a Superman movie, and I’d heard that Batman: Year…

Why am I always the last to hear about these things? I knew that Warners was still trying to figure out a Superman movie, and I’d heard that Batman: Year One was also on the drawing board (so to speak), but I hadn’t heard a ‘Batman vs. Superman’ flick was in the offing.

This is not going to be easy. Comics, especially in the last decade or two, have struggled with how to get these two icons to duke it out without the whole thing ending up as a smear of Bat-paste on the asphalt. Comics have the advantage of lots of static panels. Even cartoons (the “Worlds Finest” Batman/Superman crossover, for example) can get away with a lot of stuff that a live action film cannot.

The other problem is that — fanboy “look at the pretty CGI and other fx” rapture aside — I’ve found superhero films at their best when they are about character. Yeah, Spidey swinging around Manhattan was kind of fun, but what made Spider-Man a great movie was Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker. What made Burton’s Batman great was Keaton’s psychodrama performance.

But Batman points out the danger here. It can be difficult in an action flick to give enough “character” time to a single lead role. Make it two lead roles, and you end up short-changing one or the other. Keaton’s Batman was overwhelmed by Nicholson’s screen time and scenery-chewing as the Joker. Dafoe was a supporting role as the Green Goblin, and did well at it, but, really, did we get to know about Norman Osborne all that well?

You might argue that everyone knows who Batman is, and everyone knows who Superman is, so you don’t need half the movie to develop their characters first. Well, yes, you do. Unless you’re going to concede that it’s just a big slug-fest between costumes, you have to provide the background to make the motivation behind the conflict click. “(Superman) is clear, bright, all that is noble and good, and Batman represents the dark, obsessive and vengeful side. They are two sides of the same coin and that is material for great drama,” says the new director for the project. That’s great — but you’re going to have to show it, explain it, make us believe it, before you start trying to make us believe the conflict (let alone believe that either Supes can out-think Bats, or Bats can out-fight Supes).

Tricky, especially if this thing has to be kept at 2 hours.

Squawk

Coming this fall on the WB is Birds of Prey. It sounds like it is based — loosely — on the quite fine comic book of the same name, though…

Coming this fall on the WB is Birds of Prey. It sounds like it is based — loosely — on the quite fine comic book of the same name, though they are playing fast and loose (understandably) with some of the Gotham/Batman stuff.

It could be fun and dramatic, like the book is. Or it could be jiggly dreck.

We’ll see come Wednesday nights.

Getting it right

Kudos to Sam Raimi, et al., for Spider-Man. Moreso than Burton’s Batman or the first two Superman flicks, this film captures both the spirit and the story of an iconic…

Kudos to Sam Raimi, et al., for Spider-Man. Moreso than Burton’s Batman or the first two Superman flicks, this film captures both the spirit and the story of an iconic comic book character.

Spidey has never been my favorite character (only Joe Straczynski’s current stint on the book has placed it in the coveted “Must Save Best for Last” category), but he’s often been solid comic book entertainment. I’ve reread the old Lee/Ditko tales, and the later creative teams, multiple times.

When you make a movie about a well-known story — whether it’s The Scarlet Letter, or Spider-Man — you have a couple of choices. You can try to make the story your own, emphasizing some particular aspect of the story or characters to zoom in on and emphasize. That’s what Burton did, turning Batman from brooding detective to borderline schizo. (It worked brilliantly, by the by.)

Alternately, you can try to find the heart of the tale, what makes it so well-known and iconic, and crank up the volume on that. Raimi takes this approach, blending the well-known lesson of “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility” with the tale of a nerd who gets what any nerd would dream of — strength, grace, skills — and discovers that it does not automatically make his life wonderful. The result is something that Lee and Ditko from 1962 would find recognizable and probably enjoy very much.

(SPOILER warnings for what follows.)

Continue reading “Getting it right”

The Killing Joker

Some months back, I recall reading (but, evidently, not blogging about) a direct-to-video Batman Beyond movie, The Return of the Joker. The controversy at the time was that WB had…

Click for the full-sized imageSome months back, I recall reading (but, evidently, not blogging about) a direct-to-video Batman Beyond movie, The Return of the Joker. The controversy at the time was that WB had announced it was making significant edits in the film to make it more children-friendly.

There were loud howls of censorship (which is nonsense, since that’s a governmental action, not an action by someone who owns an artisitic property) and aesthetic visigothism (which held more weight as an accusation). Of particular anger was that WB had passed on everything in the script, but was seemingly cowed at the last moment by various Washington rumblings about violence and kids (the video was released uncut in Europe and Asia). They forced the creators, after the fact, to go in and re-edit (some said gut) the film, and then pretended that was the plan all along. Only the availability of pre-release “screener” copies of the video allowed the public to know what had been excised. It was all a nasty enough tale to make me resolve to eschew the regular video release.

A special uncut version, though, has finally been released by WB, after a long letter-writing campaign. And I picked it up, and loved it.

First, I’ll say that WB had the right idea, but the wrong implementation. The Uncut version is too intense for little kids. It’s rated PG-13, and that may be too harsh, but I wouldn’t want to show it to kids in the single-digits of age. There are some extremely harsh psychological moments in this film, the stuff of nightmares, and it just would be wrong to run a kid through that (which, ironically, is one of the conflicts in the story).

Even the creative team behind the movie tacitly admits this in the audio track, made before the original release schedule was made, where they nervously chuckle, “I can’t believe we did that,” and “That’s just evil.” They also note some areas that WB asked them to tone done in storyboard, and admit the story came out better for it.

What WB should have done, though, is issued both versions at the same time, or at least announced that the uncut version would come out two months after the kid-friendlier one. Maybe they just didn’t realize there was enough demand. Silly boys — anime, super-heroes, and all that is hot-hot-hot.

The Original and BestI know of some folks who really despise Batman Beyond. Just to establish my quals here, I loved the original Batman: the Animated Series, and really liked The Adventures of Batman & Robin (better animation, not quite as good stories).

I was upset when that was all cancelled for Batman Beyond, a reconception of the character as a rebellious teen in a dystopian future.

For one thing, it seemed like a cop-out. Batman has been running in comics since the 1930s. You mean to say that they ran out of dynamically visual ideas for the cartoon already?

Part of it is annoyance at the economics of television. Most shows don’t actually make money during their first run. They don’t make it until they’re in syndication, which usually requires about three seasons worth of shows (since that’s enough for the syndicator to “strip” it, running an episode every day). That’s why low-margin, fair-rating shows have a hard time after three seasons, because there are automatically bean-counters who say, “Hey, let’s cancel it and sell it.” Even if there’s enough of an audience to justify it continuing were it one of the first three seasons, there’s an economic incentive to cut the cord after the third season’s over. I’ve always had the impression that it was this pressure that was behind WB cycling through different DC hero cartoons so quickly.

There was also a sense I had that the creators were just “tired” of the traditional Batman tales, and wanted to do something new. And that WB thought it could pump up the ratings by making it a show about a rebellious teen.

So, we toss out nearly all that we know, all the characterization and history and universe-building that’s been done, and head off to the future.

Feh. Been there, done that. And, frankly, even with the orignal Batman’s retro look, there isn’t much in the future that can’t be found in the “current day” setting.

The 40-years-ahead future Batman? Teen troublemaker Terry McGinnis. His dad getting bumped off sends him over the edge. When he stumbles on elderly Bruce Wayne’s former secret ID, Terry steals an experimental Bat-suit and goes out to avenge his Dad. Wayne likes the kid’s spunk, and a new partnership is born.

Frankly, teen drama doesn’t do anything for me. I was a teen once. I endured the drama. I don’t need to see more of it. Terry’s character gets to actually shine a bit in this DVD, as he tackles the Joker in a way the original Bats never did. But aside from those brief moments, toward the end of the flick, there’s not much to recommend Terry. He whines. He pouts. He worries about his girlfriend. He manages to bollix things up time and again despite having a (yawn) super-cool, strength-augmented, stealth bat-suit. Again, yawn. Spider-Man was doing that forty years ago.

What ever *did* happen to Robin?No, what’s always held appeal for me in the BB universe comes to the fore here. Bruce Wayne. The original Batman. Still a strong, brooding figure, full of dark secrets, betrayed by a failing heart into giving up crime-fighting. Wayne, voiced by Kevin Conroy, is in many ways the heart of both the show and the movie. And for those missing the original Batman animated series, there’s an extended flashback in the middle of this DVD that returns us to those glory days — and reveals the secret around the disappearance of the Joker and what broke up the old Batman/Robin/Batgirl team.

The creators had one guiding principle in the new series, and that was not to simply resurrect all the old Bat-villains. Despite the presence of anarchistic “Joker gangs” in mid-21st Century Gotham, the real Mr. J. has been absent, with nobody talking about what happened to him, but hints of dialog between Terry, Bruce, and the current Police Commissioner, Barbara (Batgirl) Gordan. The “returned” Joker, voiced once more by Mark “Luke Skywalker” Hammill, is even crazier and darker than the original back in the old Bat-days. As he pursues his destructive vendetta against Gothan, Batman, and Bruce Wayne, secrets are revealed, stomachs are churned, and the ghosts of the past do all sorts of nasty things to all the remaining players in the present. Heck, we even learn why the elderly Bruce Wayne walks with a limp.

Despite frequent bouts of fisticuffs and some really nice blowing-up imagery (the animation here is a definite cut above the TV show), at the bottom of it this is a character piece. We learn why the Joker (and his sociopathic side-kick, Harley Quinn) were not to be laughed at. We learn more about the interactions between Robin, Batman (Wayne), and Batgirl, and what finally tore them apart. In Terry’s whining, we even learn more about his relationship with Wayne. Even Ace the Bat-dog gets some nice character scenes.

By turning an action/fantasy into a psycho-drama, the creators here (Paul Dini at the fore) have done something special. And while it’s not for little kids, older kids (as well as adults) have something to learn here, too, about dedication, danger, evil, and forgiveness. It strips the G-Rated veil away from what it would mean to have a psychopath like the Joker as your opponent, what you would be likely to suffer, and why you would have to ultimately prevail.

As much as BB has never fired my imagination, I wish the makers of live-action Batman flicks could come up with something half as good as this. And it just makes what WB did with the original version of this all the less forgiveable — not that they wanted something they could release to the little kids, but that they hid the more powerful version from the viewers who are older.

TV Geekyjoy

Sunday nights are currently TV happytime for me. Watch the Farscape tape from Friday. Watch Justice League and Batman on the Cartoon Network. Tape Nero Wolfe on A&E. Dave’s Inner…

Sunday nights are currently TV happytime for me.

  • Watch the Farscape tape from Friday.
  • Watch Justice League and Batman on the Cartoon Network.
  • Tape Nero Wolfe on A&E.

    Dave’s Inner Child capers and frolics.

  • It’s Thursday, so it’s time for …

    … the Friday Five! 1. What’s your favorite TV show and why? Currently the only (adult) TV show I am managing to watch with regularity (now that it’s back on)…

    … the Friday Five!

    1. What’s your favorite TV show and why?

    Currently the only (adult) TV show I am managing to watch with regularity (now that it’s back on) is Farscape, so I guess that’s the answer.

    2. Who is your favorite television star?

    Robert Culp. I’ve always enjoyed the shows he’s been on, from I, Spy, to some keen episodes of The Outer Limits, to even The Greatest American Hero.

    3. What was your favorite TV show as a child?

    I once locked my folks out of the back half of the house because they wouldn’t let me stay up to watch Star Trek.

    On the other hand, I really enjoyed Hobo Kelly, too. And I grew up watching I Love Lucy (in reruns, of course) during dinner time.

    4. What show do you think should have been cancelled by now?

    Seventh Heaven. The show has never had any appeal for me, but at least early on in its run it looked like decent, wholesome entertainment. Now the ads, at least, make it look like Torrid Family Drama. Bleah.

    5. What new show do you hope escapes the axe this season?

    Are there new shows on? Hmmmm. The new Justice League cartoon.

    6. UNOFFICIAL BONUS QUESTION: What are you doing this weekend?

    Friday:

    • Work on finishing up some Business Continuity policy documents.
    • Play Star Wars at Doyce’s house.Saturday:
    • Sleep in. A little bit.
    • Clean, clean, clean!
    • Host a dinner party for 16 (a church group that rotates dinner hosting between different houses monthly)Sunday:
    • Church.
    • Help do yardwork at the church.
    • Do yardwork at the house, too. Plant trees that didn’t get planted.Boy, sure sounds like a church-y kind of weekend. Fortunately I’m playing an Evil Role-Playing Game on Friday night, so that will help balance me, karmically.

    Another icon bites the dust

    Sic transit gloria Saturday Morning Network Cartoons. According to this article, the networks have largely gone out of the cartoon biz, conceding it to cable networks catering to kids and…

    Sic transit gloria Saturday Morning Network Cartoons. According to this article, the networks have largely gone out of the cartoon biz, conceding it to cable networks catering to kids and cartoons. While Saturday morning still may see cartoons on network TV, they will not be produced by the networks themselves, and are likely to fade away altogether.

    From the 1950s through much of the 1970s, the biggest weekly block of cartoons and kids’ shows appeared on Saturday mornings. Millions of American children grabbed a bowl of Cap’n Crunch and plopped down for a good three or four hours of network cartoons such as “Bugs Bunny” and shorts such as “In the News.”
    “One of the things I remember about TV when I was a kid was cartoon Saturday morning. You did not want to miss it for anything,” said Sue Ellen Kelly, 38.
    Kids still get up early on Saturday, but many are more likely to follow an activity-filled schedule like that of the Kelly kids. Or, if they’re sitting in front of a TV, they may be playing a video game instead of watching a show. And, of course, there’s the Internet.

    I can remember creeping down the hallway on Saturday mornings, ninja-like, to avoid awakening my folks (in particular my dad). Turn on the TV — rolling the volume all the way down to zero first (this being the Good Ol’ Days of analog controls), then finding cartoons — whatever cartoons I could find — to watch with my brother.

    Super Friends. Scooby-Doo. Batman/Superman/Aquaman. The Wacky Racers.

    So long, guys. I’ll miss you. Or, if not you, your memories.

    (Via Rooba)

    Justice League: A Quickie Review

    Overall grade: B+ All the negatives I note below are based on the first episode. Which means there’s plenty of opportunity to change and improve things. There are lots of…

    • Overall grade: B+
    • All the negatives I note below are based on the first episode. Which means there’s plenty of opportunity to change and improve things. There are lots of rough edges here that can be sanded down.
    • The first episode of a new series is always tough, because you end up spending a lot of time introducing the characters. This one-hour premiere gives them extra time, but it’s still slow slogging. To that end, it’s clear that JL is going to face a problem that neither Batman nor Superman alone did — a wide array of characters makes for more surface presentation of each.
    • The animation: Good, but a distinct tick below the Superman grade. Ambitious all the way through, the execution often exceeded the ambition, at least a bit. I’m trusting that this will improve with time, as the show’s behind-the-scenes processes and personnel get into the groove.
    • The music: Bleah. It varied between barely-passable Epic Heroic to pretty tinky electronic fight stuff. Both Batman and Superman had excellent accompaniment, and I believe that in an animated show, what you hear is as almost as important as what you see.
      The story: Why not trust Superman to disarm the world and protect it himself? Because, when the going gets tough, he ends up getting slapped down by energy beams again. So he needs pals — “What, like a group of super friends?” Flash quips. Throw in ancient Martian civilizations and homages to War of the Worlds and Independence Day, you’ve got what should be a pretty exciting episode. Alas, there’s a bit too much deus ex machina to hold things together when the “Who are you?” questions get asked.

    • Batman: Still the brains of the group, and the aloof brains as well. Classic Bats-in-the-JL problem: with all the cosmically powerful types lurking around, how do you take a (highly-trained) mere human and make him a reasonable competitor? By brains, usually, as “the World’s Greatest Detective.” Or by making him a mysterious character who will only show up when it’s appropriate. Bats, by the way, looks more 30s in style than in previous incarnations — extra-long ears, “structured” cape and all.
    • Superman: It’s going to take a while to get used to the “new” voice — the voice artist is trying too hard to be heroic, and doesn’t seem to have the range that the previous one did. Given Supes’ key role in the JL, that’s going to be a problem. That aside, Supes spends a lot of time getting slapped down, hard, by various powerful energy beams. Ouch. But it’s the classic Superman problem: when you’re the most powerful hero of them all, how do you keep from showing up everyone else? By showing that he can get zapped as well as the next guy. Problem is, you do that too much, you stop thinking of him as that powerful of a guy …
    • Wonder Woman: It’s a bit strange seeing WW as the “rookie.” She does okay, though. They simplify her origin, but keep the important parts (though I always pronounced Thymiscera with emphasis on the second syllable, not on the first and third). The voice artist needs to give her a bit more oomph — some of her “Hera help me!”s are a bit weak — but they haven’t shied away from the idea of a modern character praying to the Greek gods.
    • Hawk Girl: They’ve kept her as Thanagarian (will we get to see her husband?), which means the JL has three aliens on staff — or more, if you consider how much time GL spends in space, or if you think of WW as an alien in her own right. She’s definitely a warrior woman, even more than WW, which is kind of odd in places. She swings a mean energized mace, and actually flies with animated wings that don’t look too goofy.
    • Green Lantern: Even though he’s named John Stewart, this GL is nothing like that DC character. Instead, he comes across as a military man, shouting orders and plotting strategy. (Interestingly enough, the other actual military man in the cartoon is also black.) It;s an odd change, but one that I can get used to, since it potentially makes sense. The drawback is that there’s little imagination to GL’s use of his ring — blasts, shields, and flying bubbles, that’s it. Which is a shame, because he could be one of the more dynamically visual characters.
    • Martian Manhunter: Since this episode deals with his introduction and origin, you’d think we’d get a good feel for Jonn Jonzz (which they keep from sounding too goofy by making the “j” sounds more like “zh”). Well, we do get to know more about Mars, and the origin actually works, sorta, but we don’t end up getting any better feel for him at the end than we did when he first appeared. His powers have been reduced to telepathy, “ghosting,” flight and shape-shifting. He has potential … but just potential.
    • Flash: As in his Superman appearance, Flash here is brash, obnoxious, and the guy whose one-liners keep the dialog from being grim and boring. His main problem is that he doesn’t really do that much except dodge stuff. They’re going to need to find some more interesting uses for super-speed (another power liable to editorial abuse) if they want his participation to be meaningful.
    • Group dynamics: The team is surprisingly aggressive in places — both GL and Hawk Girl are take-no-prisoners types. It’s not clear why these are the characters being pulled together to form this team (nor where the other metahumans were during the festivities), but JL is not the first animated show to beg that question. So far there’s little basis for a “team” — but that doesn’t stop them from creating one.

    So … a rough but acceptible beginning. I’m not overwhelmed, but I’ll be checking out the next episode Monday night.

    And I expect it run longer than Howard Stern’s TV show did. If there’s justice.

    Coming. Saturday night. Be there.

    Coming. Saturday night. Be there. From the folks who brought you the recent Batman and Superman cartoons comes … the Justice League. This looks really cool….

    Coming. Saturday night. Be there.

    From the folks who brought you the recent Batman and Superman cartoons comes … the Justice League.

    This looks really cool.

    Okay, here’s something to cheer about.

    Trailer for the new Justice League cartoon coming in November. Cool….

    Trailer for the new Justice League cartoon coming in November. Cool.