https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

More airline security news

Updated news on the Mighty Security Standards being put into place on Friday. For the moment, it looks like bag matching will only be done on the first legs of…

Updated news on the Mighty Security Standards being put into place on Friday.

  • For the moment, it looks like bag matching will only be done on the first legs of flights, not on connections. Yeesh. Anybody remember that the Lockerbie bombing was on the second leg of a flight? Nearly worthless, folks.
  • Actual examination of all baggage is schedule (mandated) by the end of the year. There are serious doubts whether the equipment (be it machines or dogs) will be available in sufficient numbers by then.

More interesting times ahead.

Bag checks

Tomorrow has been dubbed “Black Friday” by many of the nation’s airlines, as it is the day by which Congress mandated all checked luggage be somehow “screened” before it is…

Tomorrow has been dubbed “Black Friday” by many of the nation’s airlines, as it is the day by which Congress mandated all checked luggage be somehow “screened” before it is loaded. This article discusses some of the issues at DIA.

Most airlines are expected to choose bag matching. The other three options are deemed hopeless, because there are not enough explosive-screening machines, bomb-sniffing dogs or staff to hand-search millions of bags. However, airlines may use a combination of these alternatives.
DIA has just three explosive-detection machines, where it will need 20 to 40. It has just five dogs, and processes up to 10,000 bags an hour.

Bag matching (confirming that the passenger who checked the bag has boarded) is certainly the easiest to implement, though as a security measure it provides no defense against a suicide bomber.

Still to be determined is whether airlines will be able to exempt connections from the bag matching (which would render this effort completely pointless).

What’s particularly interesting about this, as the airlines scramble to provide some rock-bottom minimal amount of screening, is that the majority of people I talk to actually think this is already going on. Everyone already thinks that every bag is X-rayed or sniffed or otherwise confirmed to be okay — and if they aren’t, they should be. I fear the airlines are not going to get much sympathy from the public on this one, esp. if service further deteriorates.

The article also mentions a United statistic that 1-3 passengers, on average, check in but miss a flight — usually business people on an important call who decide to take a later flight. I suspect this will have some interesting consequences, one way or another.

Another item I’ve not heard discussed in this context is where flights are overbooked and passengers are offered the opportunity to board a later flight. In such cases in the past, any checked luggage of the person accepting the offer has simply been shipped onwards on the original flight, waiting for them on the other end. Will that still be allowed?

And, if not, is there going to be provision for someone to pick up their (removed) luggage there at the gate? Nobody’s going to want to have to exit the concourse and the secure area, pick up their luggage (somewhere), then go through a re-check process. Yeesh.

Of course, the other ironic aspect to all of this effort to make it less convenient and more difficult to check bags is that the airlines (and security people) would also like to require all bags be checked, i.e., no carry-on. That’s a whole other kettle of fish, of course, but it seems further away than ever under the present circumstances.

How the Bush administration can avoid the Enron scandal

The answer is easy and ironic. They can do it by taking a page out of the Clinton handbook and painting it as petty politics on the part of the…

The answer is easy and ironic. They can do it by taking a page out of the Clinton handbook and painting it as petty politics on the part of the opposition (the Dems, the liberals). They can only pull this off, though, if the other side plays into it — which, with Lieberman’s self-righteous streak, and the unrestrained rhetoric from liberal pundits, they are doing magnficently.

Clinton got out from under most of Whitewater and Interngate by recasting the debate as Evil Ken Starr against a beleagered, admittedly fallible, but basically decent President Bill. If Joe Lieberman isn’t careful, Bush will be able to do much the same, with the Senator as the Simon LeGree figure.

By focusing on the overblown rhetoric of the accusers, defenders of the President can discredit any substantive allegations that come up — if any really do.

Spinsanity has an excellent article on this. It should be required reading, for both sides, like most of that site’s work.

A pretzel?

I really feel sorry for celebrities in general, and the President in particular. I mean, I, as an ordinary Joe Sixpack, can do things like trip over my feet, or…

I really feel sorry for celebrities in general, and the President in particular. I mean, I, as an ordinary Joe Sixpack, can do things like trip over my feet, or wear odd clothes, or even end up passing out because a piece of pretzel hit some nerve that lowered my blood pressure and caused me to pass out and bruise my face. I mean, these things really do happen to ordinary people, and it becomes something that everyone has fun with in a friendly fashion.

But let Jerry Ford trip, or Jimmy Carter wear frumpy sweaters, or Dubya do the pretzel thing … and it’s front page news and water cooler fodder for weeks to come, and proof positive that the individual in question is a serious doofus.

Still …

Civil discourse

Now that the New York Times includes e-mail addresses for its op-ed writers, Michael Wolff shares some of the charming remarks forwarded to him by the teeming masses. You deserve…

Now that the New York Times includes e-mail addresses for its op-ed writers, Michael Wolff shares some of the charming remarks forwarded to him by the teeming masses.

You deserve to be hit by the next terrorist strike. And after we’re done with the Taliban it’s time to start on clearing out the real terrorist threat to America . . . the Left.
Too bad Osama doesn’t have a suitcase nuke to finish off the rest of New York. Hitting the NY Times would be a good start and one of the best things to happen for the good of the country.
If there is another terrorist strike I hope it hits your home, your city, your children’s school, your families airplane, and not mine. (It would also be fine with me if they’d wipe out Berkley.)

The subject lines fly by: Get over it . . . Pinko . . . I bet you loved Slick Willie . . . I guess having two skyscrapers fall on you isn’t enough . . . Bitter person . . . Watch out . . . You’re a jerk! . . . 89% approval rating, you lost, deal with it . . . Asshole!

Ah. I love America. Even the most foul-mouthed yahoos can spew their venom without worrying (too much) about the FBI coming to their door. At least, as long as they only threaten journalists, not the President.

Wolff notes that this is not a Right vs Left thing.

But it is not just right-wingers; you also have people who think they agree with you — though the right-wing goons out-number the left-wing weirdos by probably four to one. The vilifying subject lines that sweep by are, actually, interspersed with their opposite number: Unmitigated bullshit . . . Incredible insights . . . You don’t know what you’re talking about . . . You are a mind-reader . . . Brilliant! . . . Dung!
The lefties certainly have their own tortured worldview. While the right wing’s fundamental analysis, or at least the analysis of right-wingers who send e-mails, is manhood-oriented — to be critical of the military is to be a homosexual, obviously — the left wing, as helpfully, continues to believe that all military-industrial-intelligence motivations are the product of conspiracies and, almost always, wants to send you further information (“I want to share with you some things that would give you the biggest story in the world. And it is all 100 percent true and I have the facts to prove it”).

It’s a great article, and Wolff’s speculation about the causes behind such diatribes is interesting as well.

(Via Cursor.org)

Whatever happened to …

… anthrax? No, not the band, but the mail stuff. Seemed to disappear over the holidays. Weird….

… anthrax?

No, not the band, but the mail stuff.

Seemed to disappear over the holidays.

Weird.

… But not too deadly

There is an increasing market for frangible bullets — ones which will stop someone, but not create a blow-through or riccochet hazard. Immediate possible application: arming air marshals. Our bullet…

There is an increasing market for frangible bullets — ones which will stop someone, but not create a blow-through or riccochet hazard. Immediate possible application: arming air marshals.

Our bullet can penetrate a bad guy’s head, but it won’t come out the other side.
&nbsp&nbsp — Dan Smith, Director of Technology, SinterFire

(Via Sonic Blog)

Perhaps he should have offered to have them call the Attorney General

A guard of Arab descent from President Bush’s security detail, rerouted onto a commercial flight, is kicked off the American Airlines flight because nobody would believe he was in the…

A guard of Arab descent from President Bush’s security detail, rerouted onto a commercial flight, is kicked off the American Airlines flight because nobody would believe he was in the Secret Service, despite his credentials.

Once seated, he was confronted by airline security personnel, the Secret Service said, and was asked to exit the plane and submit to additional security checks.
After a delay of an hour and 15 minutes, during which the [armed] agent was questioned by the flight’s pilot, airline officials and airport police, the agent was ordered removed from the flight even though he had offered to have the Secret Service confirm his identity.

I wonder if this will have any impact on the President’s Homeland Security plans, or provoke a call to his Secretary of Transportation.

(Via Boing Boing)

Who da Man?

Time has named Rudy Giuliani to be Man … er, Person of the Year. Now, it’s their magazine, and they can do whatever they want. But Rudy doesn’t meet their…

Time has named Rudy Giuliani to be Man … er, Person of the Year.

Now, it’s their magazine, and they can do whatever they want. But Rudy doesn’t meet their stated criteria. It’s supposed to be the person who had “greatest impact, for good or ill” during the year. Rudy may be the “most admired man” in some quarters, but his impact on events was, frankly, trivial compared to many others.

Some folks have claimed that Time chickened out, not wanting to name Osama bin Laden as PoY. But bin Laden isn’t the best choice, either.

It’s George Dubya Bush.

Bin Laden had a tremendous impact, no doubt, even though it’s unclear how directly or indirectly he’s been manipulating the Al Qa’eda network, etc.

But it was Dubya’s response to 9-11, one part President, one part Dictator (in the classic, Roman sense), one part Wrath of God, that set the tone for the US, and the World, post-9-11. He’s established more of a New World Order than his dad ever did. He and his appointees have had more of an impact on domestic politics and civil liberties than anyone else of late. Even before 9-11, a new President always has had a broad influence over the nature of events. Bush, thrown into the deep end of the pool by bin Laden, has put his stamp on this year, on the US, and on the world. His reaction, over the past months, outweighted bin Laden’s triggering action.

But I don’t think the Time editors wanted to give it to him. Partly it’s because he won last year (though I thought that was wildly premature). Partly I think it was politics.

I’m not a big Bush fan, by any means. But by the criteria, the award should have been his.

(I’m not much of a Giuliani fan. I think he handled post-9-11 extremely well, even heroically. The news clips I saw of him speaking were moving and inspiring. I also think he’s been a pig in his private life, and if he does move on to the national political scene, I hope that all of those folks who were spewing such venom over Clinton’s peccadillos choke over having to swallow Rudy’s.)

But nailclippers are a big no-no

There have been plenty of stories of late about travellers who’ve had nail clippers, corkscrews (ahem), knitting needles, etc., confiscated by airport security. There have also been other stories –…

There have been plenty of stories of late about travellers who’ve had nail clippers, corkscrews (ahem), knitting needles, etc., confiscated by airport security. There have also been other stories — impressively, not too many — about other screwball actions (or overreactions) that got people booted off of planes.

But what actually happens when someone tries to bring a knife or a gun on-board, and then is caught? Well, at DIA … not a whole heck of a lot.

In the past three years, authorities at DIA have caught 76 people trying to take guns or illegal knives onto airplanes, according to police records. But only one ended in a felony conviction, while a second felony case is pending, court records show. The rest were let off with what amounts to a slap on the wrist: unsupervised probation, or $100 fines, or 20 hours of community service. Often, cases were dismissed without any punishment at all.
At least 15 of those 76 people were caught trying to take loaded guns onto a plane. Many more had unloaded handguns, but plenty of ammunition in their carry-on bags.

If they’d been terrorists, these airport visitors easily could have grabbed their guns and started firing. Yet hardly anyone was charged with a felony, or even with a misdemeanor. Most drew the charge of violating a city ordinance. In most cases, police merely confiscated their guns, gave them tickets and let them board their flights.

In most cases, folks got off easy because they convinced police, judges, etc., that it was inadvertent.

Okay, on the one hand, I can appreciate forgetting that you have something in your pocket, bag, or elsewhere on your person. Particularly if you, for example, always carry a gun, it might be possible to forget to leave it at home for the trip, or pack it, check it and declare it.

On the other hand, if you’re regularly carrying a gun, should you be allowed to be that forgetful about it without any penalty?

Perspective

In the words of Molly Ivins: If you want to know what this story is about, pretend Bill Clinton is still president. Pretend Clinton’s long-time, all-time biggest campaign contributor, a…

In the words of Molly Ivins:

If you want to know what this story is about, pretend Bill Clinton is still president. Pretend Clinton’s long-time, all-time biggest campaign contributor, a guy for whom Clinton has carried water for over the years, a guy with unparalleled “access,” a shaper of policy — imagine that this guy’s worldwide empire has tumbled into bankruptcy in just three months amid cascading reports of lies, monumental accounting errors, evasions, iffy financial statements, insider deals, a board of directors rife with conflicts of interest, top executives bailing out with millions while regular employees see their life savings shrink to nothing — imagine all this back in the day of Bill Clinton.
We’d have four congressional investigations, three special prosecutors, two impeachment inquiries and a partridge in a pear tree by now. Republicans would be drumming their heels on the floor in full tantrum.
But this is not President Clinton, it is President Bush — so of course different standards must apply. The fact that Ken Lay, Enron’s chairman, has been Bush’s chief money man since he first went into politics is mentioned only in passing. The media don’t want to be impolite.

Given the billions of dollars involved, the huge impact on the economy by Enron’s fall, and the tangle of ties between Enron and the Bushies — this makes some dubious land deals in Arkansas sound like a the po-dunk contretemps it really was.

The question being, what, if any, impact will this have on the Bush Administration.

(Via Trance Gemini)

Hear the mighty engines roar

When we moved into our house, we knew that Centennial Airport was just a few miles away. A small, private airport, there are still the occasional private/business/charter jets that take…

When we moved into our house, we knew that Centennial Airport was just a few miles away. A small, private airport, there are still the occasional private/business/charter jets that take off and land there, since it’s next to the Denver Tech Center, the largest employment hub in the region.

An ongoing legal fight has been going on between the Airport (supported by the local communities) and at least one company that wants to have regularly scheduled commercial flights into Centennial.

I’m certainly not in favor of such flights, but I’m also grown-up enough to realize that that’s one of the possible dangers of being near an airport.

Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has let stand an FAA ruling that would deny Centennial just under $2MM/yr in federal maintenance assistance if it doesn’t accept scheduled flights. The airport is considering its options, which could include trying to make up the money from local citizenry (which would truly be a case of folks putting their money where their ears are).

Catch a clue, folks

Colorado has, miracle of miracles, adopted a law to let people register to not receive telemarketing calls. Hoody-freakin’-hoo, since I despise the things, make it a point never to buy…

Colorado has, miracle of miracles, adopted a law to let people register to not receive telemarketing calls. Hoody-freakin’-hoo, since I despise the things, make it a point never to buy anything through them, and still they interrupt my time at home (not to mention, if I screen them via caller ID, they still wipe out my WLAN due to my 2.4GHz cordless phone).

The effort to get this law passed (it goes into effect 1 July 2002) was made by the non-profit Bighorn Center. As part of that effort, they set up a site where people could pre-register their names for the exclusion list. The Public Utilities Commission reasonably decided that those names could be automatically transferred to the official list, if the Bighorn Center took some reasonable efforts to validate them.

Not surprisingly, AT&T and WorldCom are both petitioning the PUC to reconsider. They, along with other companies that telemarket, bitterly fought the registry in the first place.

Any bets whether this ends up in court?

Legal non-sense

The highest French appeals court has decided, in effect, that those with Down’s Syndrome have a legal right to have not been born, and can sue doctors for not aborting…

The highest French appeals court has decided, in effect, that those with Down’s Syndrome have a legal right to have not been born, and can sue doctors for not aborting them.

Say what?

In the case in question, Baby Lionel’s mother was not informed that genetic screening indicated that Lionel might have Down’s Syndrome. She’s indicated that should would have aborted had she knwon.

The judges in Lionel’s case decided that the doctor was “100 percent” liable for the cost of the care needed for the child, since the diagnostic error meant that the mother was not given the chance to abort. The court had already awarded damages of around $100,000, five years earlier. Last week’s ruling ordered the sum to be substantially increased. The exact amount is to be announced at the end of January.
[…] The most worrying aspect is that the ruling confirmed a similar decision by the same court last year. In November 2000, the court ruled that Nicolas Perruche – born severely disabled – should receive damages from his mother’s doctor, who had failed to warn her of the dangers of rubella (also known as German measles) during pregnancy. That case immediately caused widespread consternation, but many thought the ruling was an exception.

And, in keeping with the Law of Unintended Consequences …

The cases have also alarmed doctors, who fear a growing number of lawsuits. Bessis says many specialists have already stopped carrying out prenatal scans ….

I thank my lucky stars that, thus far, I have never been faced with such a decision, and, frankly, I don’t know that I can say how I would decide were I faced with the knowledge that my impending child would be severely handicapped. I don’t think anyone, frankly, can make such a judgment before actually being faced with it.

That having been said, even in a case where I wasn’t told ahead of time, it seems to me that to therefore decide the doctors were responsible for all the costs, etc., involved is just wrong. And to extend that to a right not to be born seems to be judicial sophistry.

(Via Boing Boing)

Trust us. And shut up.

The Attorney General was a tad upset that Congress had the gall to question whether his recent actions, and those of the Administration in general, were constitutional. “To those who…

The Attorney General was a tad upset that Congress had the gall to question whether his recent actions, and those of the Administration in general, were constitutional.

“To those who pit Americans against immigrants, citizens against non-citizens, to those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty, my message is this: Your tactics only aid terrorists for they erode our national unity and diminish our resolve,” Ashcroft told the Senate Judiciary Committee. “They give ammunition to America’s enemies and pause to America’s friends. They encourage people of good will to remain silent in the face of evil.”

Get it? The folks questioning the Administration are actually aiding and abetting the terrorists. Hey, that makes them traitors! Hey, wasn’t there something in that stuff we did about military tribunals? Excellent!

But seriously, folks, I’ve seen a lot of very reasonable, learned, and/or intelligent eople questioning some of the activities of the Justice Department and the Administration. I’ve also seen a number of reasonable, learned, and/or intelligent people pointing out that, during war-time, some temporary tightening of civil liberties is both desirable and not something to get hysterical over.

But the point is — there is that discussion going on. That debate. So far it’s relatively reasoned (aside from the normal fringe lunatics who’d be ranting regardless of the situation). It hasn’t reached a level (IMO) where it represents a weakness, where it’s keeping us from doing the things that need doing.

For the Attorney General to basically say that not only is the Administration acting constitutionally, but that to even question that is “aiding the terrorists” is, itself, kinda terrifying. It indicates either an ignorance of our democratic system, or a contempt for it.

A right sneaky old elf

A gent who has traditionally gone Christmas shopping whilst dressed in a Santa suit has been booted out of a St. Louis area mall. Security management at the mall says…

A gent who has traditionally gone Christmas shopping whilst dressed in a Santa suit has been booted out of a St. Louis area mall. Security management at the mall says that, post-9-11, nobody is allowed in the mall in costume.

It’s not just about terrorism, said Sean Phillips, Westfield’s associate regional customer service and marketing manager. “An unidentified person dressed as Santa Claus approaching children is a security concern, especially someone that can’t be identified other than ‘he looked like Santa Claus.'”

This despite the fact that nobody has complained in the five years the gent has been doing this, nor does he approach children or pose for pictures with them.

I’m sure the Attorney General is taking notes, though.

(Via The Obscure Store)

Stimulus

PunditWatch’s Quote of the Week “In Europe they call it socialism, here we call it a stimulus package.”               –David Brooks…

PunditWatch’s Quote of the Week

“In Europe they call it socialism, here we call it a stimulus package.”
              –David Brooks

A case for wartime censorship?

I am a huge proponent of the First Amendment. But this story — about US government policy to quash news about the Japanese “balloon bombs” gives one cause to think….

I am a huge proponent of the First Amendment.

But this story — about US government policy to quash news about the Japanese “balloon bombs” gives one cause to think. The Japanese, in WWII, launched some 9000 balloons, with various explosives, into the wind currents that would carry them over the US. The idea was to (a) cause massive forest fires in the West, diverting US manpower, and (b) cause mass hysteria among the US population.

About 300 of the balloons are recorded in government records as having actually made it. But the government quashed the story at the time, both to avoid the panic that the Japanese were looking for, and to deny the Japanese the intelligence that the balloons were actually making it (and where they were landing, and what was or wasn’t working when they got here).

If it were happening today, I’ve little doubt folks would be screaming about censorship, about government cover-ups, about the public’s right to know. We’re more cynical about the government’s motivations these days — with more than a little reason, to be sure. Still …

Of course, if it were happening today, would we know? And would that be a good thing?

(Via InstaPundit)

Geeks and spooks

Here’s a transcript of Bruce Sterling’s speech at “Global Challenges, Trends and Best Practices in Cryptography,” the Information System Security and Education Center, Washington, DC, on 20 November. It’s a…

Here’s a transcript of Bruce Sterling’s speech at “Global Challenges, Trends and Best Practices in Cryptography,” the Information System Security and Education Center, Washington, DC, on 20 November. It’s a fascinating story about where we are on cryptography, thus computer privacy.

So: flame on. Here’s the story as I see it. The big story about crypto is a power struggle between two American tribes: geeks and spooks. Occasionally innocent people blunder into this situation, but they get lost, either because they don’t understand the technology (that’s what geeks say) or they’re not to pry any further into stuff beyond the reach of mere civilians (that’s what the spooks say).
[…] The truer and sadder story of crypto was that the spooks and the geeks both beat the hell out of our democratic process, rendering lawyers, consumers, the Congress, the industry, and the Administration totally irrelevant, and leaving crypto as a blasted technical wasteland, in a kind of Afghan-style feud, where every single party was necessarily a crook, or a scofflaw, or a deceiver, or weirdly suspect, and there was no legitimacy, and no common ground, and still, today, no good method to assemble any.

Fascinating reading — and scary, especially since he paints the geeks as adolescents who want the world to be run on their terms, and the spooks, by their nature, lack the oversight (thus the discipline) to be simply, blindly relied upon.

(Via Boing Boing)

It’s best you don’t know

Wisconsin has an “Employees Right to Know” law (section 101.58 in the Wisconsin Statutes) that requires employees to be informed if toxic chemicals are used or stored at the workplace….

Wisconsin has an “Employees Right to Know” law (section 101.58 in the Wisconsin Statutes) that requires employees to be informed if toxic chemicals are used or stored at the workplace. One exception, despite containing lye, explicitly noted by the statute (101.58(2)(j)(2)(f)), is lutefisk.

Mercifully, a Scandinavian delicacy that Margie’s family has never thrust upon me …

(Via Overlawyered)