https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Doing the wrong thing

According to Homeland Security Czar Tom Ridge, “I’ve got to tell you . . . I don’t think random checks enhance security very much at airports. ” Great. Thanks for…

According to Homeland Security Czar Tom Ridge, “I’ve got to tell you . . . I don’t think random checks enhance security very much at airports. “ Great. Thanks for that analysis. It makes the last several months of traveling feel so much better.

Ridge, though, is pushing a plan to let frequent fliers (about 20% of all fliers fly half the miles in the US) register in some sort of security database, submit to background checks … and fast-track their way past security.

Where can I start in listing the problems with this?

  • We do a crappy job of profiling terrorists. All this does is give someone a profile to try to match to slip through security.

  • Americans are willing to put up with a lot of hassle and inconvenience … but only if it’s fair. If they think someone else is unjustly getting a break, there will be blood in the aisles.

  • At best, given the above-cited statistic, it only will impact 20% of the fliers.

  • Ridge wants the airlines to run this program. Yes, the airlines, the ones who ran airport security before and did so piss-poor at it (because their primary incentive was to keep security cheap and keep lines moving) will now be back in charge of security again.

  • Ridge wants the program to pay for itself by having people pay for these fast-track passes. See the notes above on “fair” and on the history of conflict between commercial interests and security interests.

    Ridge notes, with some justification, that picking 85-year-old grandmothers out of the line for frisking is probably not terribly productive. But that’s an extreme example. The alternative is to try to pick folks who “look suspicious” — which is going to inevitably lead to (a) racial/ethnic profiling (which may be understandable, but is hardly fair), and (b) letting people through who didn’t “look suspicious” but who were really mad-dog whackos.

    There may be a better way to deal with airport security than we are presently doing. But this proposal isn’t it.

    76 view(s)  
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *