https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Ars gratia artis

In this age, it is difficult to avoid giving offense in some fashion or another (people being so eager to search it out), so coming up with “art that does…

In this age, it is difficult to avoid giving offense in some fashion or another (people being so eager to search it out), so coming up with “art that does not offend anyone” is probably an impossible task, short of abstract designs (perhaps classical Islamic art had something there).

But is it okay to censor stuff just because it’s frickin’ ugly? Or for someone to make an aesthetic judgment not to publically fund an art project, or, at the very least, to decide that a rather unsightly “reaction … to 9/11” is probably not an proper subject for public art at an international airport?

Frankly, I don’t think that’s censorship. That’s just good sense.

109 view(s)  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *