https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

So … why Episcopalian?

It seems, of late, that most of what I post about the Episcopal Church around here is rants and screeds and snarks at various infighting and political brouhaha that…

It seems, of late, that most of what I post about the Episcopal Church around here is rants and screeds and snarks at various infighting and political brouhaha that is either frightfully boring or offputting to people.  Why, one might well ask, am I Episcopalian?  What does it offer me, other than a big blog topic for kvetching? 

  1. Okay, so I’m a theist. 
  2. I was raised Christian (though, to be sure, some folks don’t think Catholics are Christians), which makes expressing my theism through a Christian setting natural.  While there are elements of my personal theology that would be considered heretical unorthodox by some, even many, my beliefs fit in well enough with the Christian faith that I don’t feel either that I’m compromising or lying by calling myself a Christian.
  3. I like church-going.  Or, further, I recognize that I need it.  Yes, I can be a believer in what I believe without a regular Sunday injection — but, by the same token, I also know that “out of sight, out of mind,” and getting a weekly (at least) reminder / reinforcement / recollection of what I believe, of what it means, of what I think I should be doing is of great value to me.  That might not be what everyone needs, but it’s something that works for me.
  4. I like liturgy.  I like ritual, and the language, and the ceremony, and even a bit of pomp and circumstance.  I find it comforting, familiar, meditative, and meaningful.  I realize that’s not everyone’s cuppa, by a long shot, but it does it for me.
  5. I like that the Episcopal Church is not a pat “Here’s the magic answer, as drawn by our literalist interpretation of the Bible” kind of organization.  Yes, that makes for a wider variety of beliefs (vive la difference), and thus debate, but it also means that members are challenged to actually figure out answers for themselves, drawing on the Hooker paradigm of the three-legged stool — Scripture, Tradition, and Reason (with Experience).
  6. I like that the Episcopal Church, as a whole, has, within its traditionalism in form,  tended toward a progressive, inclusive stance in substance.  From accepting women as priests (and bishops, and, by God, our Presiding Bishop) to increasing acceptance of gays as members of the congregation and the clergy.  There are those in the Church who have yet to accept the ordination of women; I don’t agree with that, but I am willing to live with it, accepting (while disagreeing) that their sentiment is sincere.  It’s a pity that those folks seem progressively unwilling to tolerate those who disagree with them.
  7. I like that, while the Episcopal Church has a structure, it’s not really an authoritarian organization.  As noted, there’s room for dissenting views, less-than-orthodox beliefs, and discussion and discernment amongst one’s fellows.  For most Episcopal congregations, whether one “believes the right things enough” seems to be more a judgment made by the congregant than by the Inquisitorial Board of the Church.  Some folks consider that a weakness of the church — I consider it a strength.
  8. I like the fellowship of the people in my congregation.  I like the social interaction.  I like the friendship.  I like the fact that, even though I might disagree with an opinion someone expresses (or vice-versa), we can break bread together.

And that’s why I’m an Episcopalian.

49 view(s)  

4 thoughts on “So … why Episcopalian?”

  1. Hm…I was wondering whether I shoud do a “So…” post myself and realized I couldn’t really fill in the blank with a word. Post-modernist? Hedonistic-pantheistic-solipsism? Philosophy Nerd?!?

  2. Well … “Episcopalian” sort of summarizes my theology the way that 27 March 2007, 8:57-8:58 p.m. summarizes my life — it’s not a bad snapshot, and I might as well admit I’m there for the moment, but the totality is a lot sloppier, complex, and unclassifiable than that. In some ways, life would be a lot easier if it was. 🙂

    It just occurred to me that I seemed to spend a lot of time recently bitching about stuff going on in an organization I’m usually pleased and proud to be a part of — so I ought to kind of explain why.

  3. Heh. If you’re a solipsist, you can’t really be a pantheist I think. If solipsism is the belief that you are the only being that exists and that every other being is an illusion, then I think that applies to God-beings too, so it seems to me that a solipsist must be an atheist.

    Being a solipsist would also make it impossible to be truly altriuistic, so to the degree that egoism is the opposite of altruism, one must therefore be an ethical egoist. Since ethical hedonism is consistent with egoism, I think you can be a hedonistic solipsist. Of course if you ddn’t mean ethical hedonism then I suppose you could be a nihilist and a psychological hedonist.

    Looking into it a little more, I see that there are metaphysical solipsists and epistemological solipsists. What I said above only applies to metaphysical solipsists. But if you’re an epistemological solipsist, you can’t know the existence of other beings, so then you’d have to be a fideist if you were to be any kind of theist.

    Thanks for spurring me to think about some interesting relationships, Dust!

    Of course to bring it all back to ***Dave, since this IS his blog after all, I think it’s safe to say that ***Dave is neither panetheistic nor solipsistic. Given his love of good food and wine, I’d say he’s something of a psychological hedonist, but I doubt that he’s an ethical hedonist.

  4. Actually, my brain’s dabbled a bit with solipsism as a mental exercise, and I’ve more than a bit of pantheist in me, too. But I am indeed definitely more of a psychological hedonist than an ethical hedonist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *