https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Boom!

Amazing set of photos from the “Licorne ” French nuclear tests in 1970.  Beautiful and horrifying, all at once….

Amazing set of photos from the “Licorne ” French nuclear tests in 1970.  Beautiful and horrifying, all at once.

Real life is complicated

Kottke quotes from a William Gibson interview in which he says: If one had gone to talk to a publisher in 1977 with a scenario for a science-fiction novel that…

Kottke quotes from a William Gibson interview in which he says:

If one had gone to talk to a publisher in 1977 with a scenario for a science-fiction novel that was in effect the scenario for the year 2007, nobody would buy anything like it. It’s too complex, with too many huge sci-fi tropes: global warming; the lethal, sexually transmitted immune-system disease; the United States, attacked by crazy terrorists, invading the wrong country. Any one of these would have been more than adequate for a science-fiction novel. But if you suggested doing them all and presenting that as an imaginary future, they’d not only show you the door, they’d probably call security.

I have to wonder if that’s not always true.  Any of the items that Gibson mentioned would be the subject of a full-blown novel — with each of the items taking up nearly full-time the attention of all world leaders and top scientists and the like.

But imagine a writer in 1947 going in with a proposal about a novel set in 1977.  Would an editor consider it too improbably busy to include the launch of Voyagers 1 and 2, the first nodes of ARPAnet (later the Internet) going online, the first test of the stealth fighter, the opening of Star Wars, the first space shuttle test flights, the eradication of smallpox, and the Tenerife 747 disaster (amongst many other 1977 events)?

And those are strictly 1977.  Gibson’s scenario encompasses items in the news for the last 5-7 years — encompass all the items from 1971-77, and you’d have a panoply of events each of which would make for a world-focus-encompassing novel.

Heck, anyone who came up with a list as complicated as that 1977 events list and tried to sandwich that into a novel would be greeted with a lot of red ink, I suspect.

 By definition, any novel is going to be a narrow view of events.  Nothing short of an immediate planetary disaster of diplomatic crisis is going to keep any more than a few folks focused on one thing for more than a few days.  It’s always a shock to me to read one of those “year in review” sorts of items because some of the events described seem like that can’t have happened just in the last year — last January can feel like last decade.

Things are always busier than they seem.  Just as a sculptor chips away everything except the subject being portrayed, a novelist perforce shaves away all but the critical events, simplifying the world to make events match the message seeking portrayal.  It’s always an abstraction, I suspect, because life — macro and micro — is always more complicated than even the best novelist can make it (or would want to). 

Popular catchphrases and buzzwords of 2007 …

… in Japan. (via kottke)…

in Japan.

(via kottke)

Creating a better pocket calendar

I’m not sure who uses pocket calendars any more … but is there a better design than “absurdly small type” arranged in twelve blocks of thirty-odd numbers?  Here are some…

I’m not sure who uses pocket calendars any more … but is there a better design than “absurdly small type” arranged in twelve blocks of thirty-odd numbers?  Here are some tries.

My candidate … probably

At Dave N.’s suggestion, I re-ran this “Who’s your ideal candidate?” test, which looks at policy positions both of the candidates and of my own (positions and weighting). 1.  Theoretical…

At Dave N.’s suggestion, I re-ran this “Who’s your ideal candidate?” test, which looks at policy positions both of the candidates and of my own (positions and weighting).

1.  Theoretical Ideal Candidate   (100%)
2.  Hillary Clinton   (78%)  Information link
3.  Joseph Biden   (76%)  Information link
4.  Bill Richardson   (73%)  Information link
5.  Barack Obama   (70%)  Information link
6.  Dennis Kucinich   (70%)  Information link
7.  Michael Bloomberg (says he will not run)   (69%)  Information link
8.  Al Gore (not announced)   (68%)  Information link
9.  John Edwards   (68%)  Information link
10.  Wesley Clark (not running, endorsed Clinton)   (67%)  Information link
11.  Christopher Dodd   (64%)  Information link
12.  Alan Augustson (campaign suspended)   (64%)  Information link
13.  Mike Gravel   (60%)  Information link
14.  John McCain   (44%)  Information link
15.  Ron Paul   (42%)  Information link
16.  Kent McManigal (campaign suspended)   (41%)  Information link
17.  Mike Huckabee   (40%)  Information link
18.  Mitt Romney &n
bsp; (38%)
  Information link
19.  Rudolph Giuliani   (38%)  Information link
20.  Tommy Thompson (withdrawn, endorsed Giuliani)   (35%)  Information link
21.  Elaine Brown   (32%)  Information link
22.  Newt Gingrich (says he will not run)   (31%)  Information link
23.  Alan Keyes   (30%)  Information link
24.  Chuck Hagel (not running)   (30%)  Information link
25.  Sam Brownback (withdrawn, endorsed McCain)   (28%)  Information link
26.  Tom Tancredo   (26%)  Information link
27.  Fred Thompson   (24%)  Information link
28.  Duncan Hunter   (19%)  Information link
29.  Jim Gilmore (withdrawn)   (18%)  Information link
30.  Stephen Colbert (campaign ended)   (16%)  Information link

The results haven’t changed that much from my original take.  Clinton has bumped Biden as the top runner for me, but both remain are pretty close.

Story Time

‘Nuff said….

‘Nuff said.

O Tanenbaum

Christmas decor is in da house!…

Christmas decor is in da house!

“Foosa aaaahhhh!”

Having watched Madagascar again last night (great movie), I did some quick research on the “foosa,” since it was a critter I was not familiar with by that name. …

Having watched Madagascar again last night (great movie), I did some quick research on the “foosa,” since it was a critter I was not familiar with by that name.  Turns out it really is a critter known by that name (actually spelled “fossa”), the largest mammalian carnivore on the island (the largest carnivore is a croc), related to the mongoose, and is very cat-like in appearance and behavior (less dog-like than in the movie).

The Fossa is a carnivore. It is a ferocious hunter that eats small to medium sized animals, from fish to birds, but is particularly adept at hunting lemurs, and is the predominant predator for many species, with only Madagascar’s large snakes having any other significant predatory impact. Malagasy folklore often exaggerates the ferocity of the Fossa, claiming that it will prey upon cattle, or even humans.

(Emphasis mine.)

And now you know.

The End of the Upstairs Shuffle

So a few years back, we embarked on a home improvement program that turned out to be (stop me if you’ve heard this one) a lot longer to execute than…

So a few years back, we embarked on a home improvement program that turned out to be (stop me if you’ve heard this one) a lot longer to execute than initially thought.

It sounded simple.  Katherine needed a larger room.  So we’d move her into the old guest room, which meant turning a room into a guest room in lieu of that.  So we’d take the old office, turn it into a guest room (and office), move Kitten into the old guest room, and take her old room and make it into an arts / crafts / sewing room for the variety of things of that sort we have (and which we’re rarely able to do because, really, there was no space for it except on the breakfast table (and rarely space there)).

The overall program was complicated by a sad fact — we are pack rats, and not neat pack rats at that.  The old office had always been a “what do we do with this box? let’s put it in the office” kind of place, and, despite occasional cleaning, the room had gotten that kind of “old reclusive woman found dead in home, crushed under box of newspapers from 1956” look to it.  The fact that we didn’t really use the room for anything else (until recently) allowed assisted in that happening.

So anything we did in that room required moving and sorting a plenitude of, um, Stuff.  Shift the Stuff out of the office (sort / toss / put away / box) out of the room, do work in there, move some Stuff back in, shift Stuff out of the old guest room, do work in there, move some Stuff back in, shift Stuff out of the old Katherine room, do work in there, move some Stuff back in.

Looking at that breakdown will show three things.  First, we have a lot of Stuff.  Second not all Stuff moved out gets back in, meaning a steady accumulation of Stuff elsewhere.  And, finally, we would need a place to move Stuff to as a staging area.

Fortunately, for that last point, we did.  Two places, in fact.  Some went into our bedroom (thank heavens for a huge bedroom).  But most went into our loft (and thank heavens for having a loft with solid construction underneath it).

This week’s activities have basically been wrapping up that effort, at least to te 99% mark.  The new office / guest room is functioning superbly for guests (and backup office space), and remains Stuff-free.  Katherine’s room is all moved into now, including a full panoply of books (even as some have been culled to go to other famillies or to charity) and clothes (old / outgrown clothes similarly culled).  And the art / craft / sewing room is fully refloored and moved into now, too.  That last bit was what Jim and I were doing.

Margie and Ginger have been going through boxes in our room, similarly sorting for use, posterity, or others.  The mess there has been 90%+ reorganized and dealt with.

But best of all — and something I’ve only lately realized was really bothering me — we have our loft back.  While there had been an accumulation of Stuff there, it was actually pretty well organized and pre-sifted.  Which meant it was as much a matter of moving things as doing additional work.  And while I was doing moving and putting away, Jim was tidying and organizing the place.  And the loft now has chairs, a desk (yet another desk for Kitten to work at), the sofa, and is suited for lounging and relaxing probably better than it ever has been.  Now when I get to the top of the stairs, I’m looking at our library, and a pleasant place to be, not stacks of furniture and boxes.

It’s nice.

(An incidental positive part of this has been doing a lot of work both to counter the Thanksgiving day food indulgences — and adding a lot of steps to my Walk to Nowhere.)

And that’s close to a wrap for the upstairs rooms remodels and shuffle.  We still have some follow-up — a lot of hanging art is still leaning against the bookshelves which needs to be given a home of one sort or another, and the books behind it reshelved, and there are boxes of stuff (now actually boxed in a coherent fashion) in the master bedroom that need disposal.  But I feel a lot better about the house interior than I have in quite some time.  Many thanks (appropriately) to Jim and Ginger and Margie and Katherine for all their hard work.

And what does that leave for future, inevitable home improvement projects?  Lots of noises being made about bathroom remodels … but that’s for next year …

Music, hark!

I’ve not started diving into my Doctor Who – Series 3 DVDs yet (waiting to finish up the House – Season 1 set we’ve been plowing through), but I’m disappointed…

I’ve not started diving into my Doctor Who – Series 3 DVDs yet (waiting to finish up the House – Season 1 set we’ve been plowing through), but I’m disappointed that the final ep’s commentary track has been changed.

Doctor Who – The Complete 3rd Series, released on DVD earlier this month in North America, was quickly noticed to have an issue with the final episode on the set, “Last of the Time Lords” (the last part of a 3-part story) having a “wrong commentary track”. The booklet and the pre-release materials indicated that David Tennant (“The Doctor”), Freema Agyeman (“Martha Jones”) and John Barrowman (“Capt. Jack Harkness”) recorded a commentary track for the DVD release of this episode. However, fans only found a re-run of the internet podcast by the show’s Producers.

Well, these things happen.  Bu evidently the commentary track is on the UK DVD release, and the (speculated) reason for why it was changed seems particularly irksome.

    From BBC Worldwide
    “Unfortunately, though we make every effort to offer identical content in our Doctor Who releases to every territory, the original commentary track for Series 3, Episode 13 featuring David Tennant, Freema Agyeman and John Barrowman could not be cleared for the North American DVD. We acknowledge that the booklet accompanying it has the incorrect credits and they should read Russell T Davies, Julie Gardner and Phil Collinson. The booklet will be corrected as soon as possible.”

“Could not be cleared”…the message boards all over the ‘net are speculating on what this means. The consensus is…singing. Folks who have access to the U.K. release know that there is singing on the commentary track, led by Barrowman, and everyone figures that the rights to the different songs (there are more than one) were unable to be cleared for use outside of the United Kingdom. Is that accurate? The BBC won’t say for sure on the record, so we’ll just have to leave you hanging right there…sorry. If true, though, I think we can expect a “no singing” policy to be instituted pronto for future commentary track recordings!

Give me a break.

If the DVD had instead been issued (and promoted) as “John Barrowman’s Greatest Sing-along Hits,” that would be one thing.  Copyright exists to protect against people exploiting the works of others and depriving them of compensation to which they would otherwise receive.  I have no problem with that.

But if a single commentary track of a DVD includes some folks impromptu singing some songs — does that really require obtaining rights to the tunes?  Or, rather, since we know it does, should it?  Am I less likely to go out and buy a copy of (whatever it was) because, hey, I can just listen to the cast of Doctor Who on this DVD I have

Silly and stupid.

Not that there’s anything wrong with a track by the folks described.  But I count it as yet another example of the silly extremes of current media companies regarding intellectual property “rights” they “own” and how they end up neither profiting themselves, only inconveniencing the public.

Lines of communication

Fortunately, Katherine has yet to hear (or understand, at least) the phrase “Little Pitchers Have Big Ears” — which still allows for all sorts of “adult channel” communications around holiday…

Fortunately, Katherine has yet to hear (or understand, at least) the phrase “Little Pitchers Have Big Ears” — which still allows for all sorts of “adult channel” communications around holiday gift plans and the like …

I take some comfort in this, knowing that soon enough, she’ll have her own lingo that I don’t understand by which she will communicate things with her friends that I’ll be utterly clueless about. 🙂

Set your DVR

Battlestar Galactica: Razor — the series “prequel” — airs tomorrow, the 24th….

Battlestar Galactica: Razor — the series “prequel” — airs tomorrow, the 24th.

Holy cow, we have a loft!

Many thanks to Jim….

Many thanks to Jim.

We have a craft room!

And, miraculously, we have more storage than stuff to store! Yikes!…

And, miraculously, we have more storage than stuff to store! Yikes!

The afternoon after the night before

Had a nice Thanksgiving soiree yesterday.  Jim and Ginger were here, and also Doyce, Kaylee, Jackie, Stan, Lee, De, Rachel, and Dave Newman.  We ate plenty of turkey, stuffing, potatoes,…

Had a nice Thanksgiving soiree yesterday.  Jim and Ginger were here, and also Doyce, Kaylee, Jackie, Stan, Lee, De, Rachel, and Dave Newman.  We ate plenty of turkey, stuffing, potatoes, green beans, and yummy desserts, and had some good (and not-so-good) wine.

Thanks for the pleasant afternoon and evening, all.

Nash-up

Kitten enjoys reading Ogden Nash to us.(And many thanks to BD for giving the book to Margie for her birthday. Fun stuff.)…

Kitten enjoys reading Ogden Nash to us.

(And many thanks to BD for giving the book to Margie for her birthday. Fun stuff.)

Thanksgiving

A few selected quotations on the day and subject: ‘Twas founded be th’ Puritans to give thanks f’r bein’ presarved fr’m th’ Indyans, an’ … we keep it to…

A few selected quotations on the day and subject:

‘Twas founded be th’ Puritans to give thanks f’r bein’ presarved fr’m th’ Indyans, an’ … we keep it to give thanks we are presarved fr’m th’ Puritans.
— Finley Peter Dunne (1867-1936) – Mr. Dooley’s Opinions, “Thanksgiving” (1900)

ANYA: To commemorate a past event, you kill and eat an animal. It’s a ritual sacrifice. With pie.
— Jane Espenson, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, “Pangs” (19 Oct 1999)

All jocularity aside, I am thankful this day for all that I have.  A lot of that is material, a bounty beyond anything the Pilgrims could have dreamt of, but more important are the people in my life. 

I’m thankful for my friends, too many of whom I don’t get to see nearly often enough.  Good times, bad times, soap operatic times, they are all good people to know.

I’m thankful for my family back in California — my parents, Nona, my brother and his clan.  It is always a pleasure to be with them, and I’m grateful to share the bonds of relation.

I’m thankful for Margie’s family, too.  Stereotypes about in-laws are, mercifully, just fodder for jokes, not any sort of description of what they’re like.

I’m thankful, of course, for my daughter, the greatest kid in the whole world, the light of my life.

And, of course, I’m thankful for Margie, who makes it all worthwhile — and who makes a pretty spiffy Thanksgiving dinner, too.  Yum!  Yes, I give many, many thanks for her.

Happy Thanksgiving, all!

Windows Gmail

“What if Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft?”  Yeah, it’s about that bad (and funny). I love Gmail. There are things I wish it did differently, but by and large it…

What if Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft?”  Yeah, it’s about that bad (and funny).

I love Gmail. There are things I wish it did differently, but by and large it seriously rocks as a mail interface.

On the other hand, maybe the whole e-mail client debate is moot …

Lock and Load

I really wanted this list of the top 50 fictional weapons to be really cool, but instead, it’s really dorky, too pop-culturish, too video-game-oriented, too “here’s where to buy a…

I really wanted this list of the top 50 fictional weapons to be really cool, but instead, it’s really dorky, too pop-culturish, too video-game-oriented, too “here’s where to buy a replica,” and just … goofy.

  1. Any list that includes the really stupid “Golden Gun” (of Bond fame) is just wrong.
  2. Any list that ranks He-Man’s Power Sword over Glamdring, Stormbringer, or the Sword of Omens is hard to justify, too.
  3. And lightsabers get on there twice?

There are a few good elements, and a few nice reminders of items I would have forgotten, but …

On the other hand, this list of 10 Cheesiest Creatures from the original Star Trek is modestly funny … if sometimes cruel (especially if you’re just critiquing late 60s TV SFX).  And actually there are some pretty cool critters there …

(via Neatorama and Neatorama)

The Brand-New Comcast!

A review of Comcast’s new logo.  Which is, in fact, a lot like its old logo.  What, you expected huge changes from a media goliath?…

A review of Comcast’s new logo.  Which is, in fact, a lot like its old logo.  What, you expected huge changes from a media goliath?