It seems pretty clear that "access the Internet" in the regulation described is regarding activities and purposes far more nefarious than updating a profile. That it can be extended to such indicates how loosey-goosey the regulation is, and why it should be revised.
Plus, 90 days in solitary? I'd say it's absurd, but it's far too real.
Reshared post from +Electronic Frontier Foundation
No one should serve 90 days, or even a single day, in solitary confinement for simply having a Facebook page.
New Mexico Inmate Faces 90 Days in Solitary Confinement Over a Facebook Profile
Like more than a billion other people on the planet, Eric Aldaz had a Facebook profile. What made Aldaz’s profile different from most is that he was unable to post to it himself: he didn’t hold the login credentials or even have any kind of access to the Internet. He is an inmate of the New Mexico Corrections Department (NMCD) and his family maintained the page on his behalf.
57 view(s)
It's odd when Arizona is used an example of glorious freedom.