The #metoo resurgence of accusations against sexual misconductors has led to a resurgence of previously made accusations against Donald Trump. These were mostly raised during the presidential campaign (and indirectly supported by Trump’s reprehensible Access Hollywood tape), but amidst general disbelief that Trump would get anywhere near the White House, they eventually became he-said-she-said charges that people believed or disbelieved as they chose to vote.
Now with a number of people being hounded from office or their jobs for past improprieties, the women who accused Trump across the decades are in the spotlight again. The White House claims that eyewitnesses have debunked these sundry charges, but, in fact, the eyewitness information provided by the White House itself really does no such thing.
Not that that proves anything, but it’s indicative of how the White House will simply lie in order to get people to stop paying attention to something Trump finds irksome. Which does make one wonder what else they will lie (or are lying) about.
A running list of the eyewitnesses who prove Trump’s innocence on sexual misconduct – The Washington Post
Tracking a promise from the White House.
The analysis from ThinkProgress (to whom the White House sent the would-be list): https://thinkprogress.org/eyewitnesses-white-house-exonerate-trump-ce8792f64364/
Trump's never an innocent man.
When Trump was six months old his face was on a wanted poster in the post office for stealing diapers
She looks like she's thinking "God I can't believe how dumb these WH reporters are"
I agree Sarah. I've always been able to understand you the first time you said anything.
Exploits the vulnerability that's revealed when people sacrifice to "to vigorously deny", the meaning of "to disprove", for the verb "to refute". I mean, there's obviously a segment of society of people assumed incapable by themselves of recognizing proofs, and who'll take consensus as the telltale of what's been proved.
Researching claims is hard, and it's much easier for all of us to look at an apparent reliable source – be it Donald Trump, ThinkProgress, my Uncle Bob, cnn.com.reallytrue.cn, or whoever.
Snopes itself (often used as a source for reliability) published a whole series of pages along the lines of "Mr. Ed was a zebra." If you read the entire page and don't click on the "additional information" link at the bottom, you'll never learn "the rest of the story."
"Common sense dictates that you should never fully rely upon someone else to do fact checking for you. But who has time for common sense?"
https://www.snopes.com/lost/mistered.asp
Another "fact" from Snopes:
https://www.snopes.com/lost/closed.asp
+Howie Woeller so that means u speak "Alabama Hick"?
Even Fox News says Moore's supporters are the "Old uneducated whites"
are u one of them??
Are the young Republicans and their "breaking with traditional pedo-friendly Republicans" the indicator of their loyalty to the party?
what exactly would u be asking these young folks to do in voting for Roy Moore??
If you have a liar for president in the white house you need a liar to be white house spokesperson
Is it a list made up of men?
The dawn of the TRUMP is yet to come😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈👿👿👿👿👿👿👿👿pretty scary
Please have a seat.
Can I offer you something to drink?
How about a running list on ones that saw these alleged incidences.
Anybody?
How about anybody that was told by the accusers at that time?
Still nobody?
If you have to prove him disloyal, prove with substantial true evidence
Trending with 46 likes. I wonder why…
+Howie Woeller Per your request:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/11/22/president-trump-and-accusations-of-sexual-misconduct-the-complete-list/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.eb06cb9e4b6c
+John E. Bredehoft The Zebra article is … spectacular.
Trump is a choir boy. He's even shy. I know men.
Good men. ♥
2020
You must be blind as well as foolish, donald is nothing less than a foul mouth sick minded pervert. He still living in the 1800's were a woman is property and not equal and it sounds like you are still there too.
+Nina Houchen Of all the personality traits I would attribute to Donald Trump, "shy" is not one of them.
Not how he treats people.
I'm from Baltimore I used to sell a lot of heroin around a lot of places I see this to tell the people who's outdated or maybe ignorant to what's going on but Washington DC then the capital of hiphopcrisy sex ism from homosexuality from drug using the Pennsylvania Mecca which way I used to make plenty of my money and learnt about corruption and trapping politicians etc etc. So did use this to try to discredit the president I will have to continue to agree with the president cleaning swamp so therefore to overthrow the man who is the only one that I think and believe in my heart that's capable of cleaning the swamp president Donald Trump if nobody can do it excuse me if he can't do it nobody can do it and if nobody can do it just means you had it for civil war that means we will be ready to get it poppin and I have no problem with that war makes my dick hard
Wow what a pile of horseshit. 'I used to sell a lot of heroin, but gays are the real problem.'
Put down the crack pipe and step away from the internet.
If you hate women enough to call 16 victims liars, then you probably voted for Trump
Here we go!…the old set up..nice…sorry not bill
It's not going to work
Oh..thats right you gobalist looked the other way for old Billy boy..what a joke
+Charles Warner Generic background, generic avatar, one post 23 weeks ago … yeah, you're not here for the discussion, are you. Which is likely why you're likely trying to deflect by bringing up Bill Clinton, vs. the current President. Aloha.
Sure