https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Fire at the Cathedral

The damage to the 800+ year old Notre Dame structure is a cultural tragedy

As an historian, watching the gutting of the Cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris is wrenching. In my life, and in my studies, I’ve come to realize that nothing material is permanent, but watching entropy take its toll is awful.

It appears that most of the external structure is still intact, and at least some of the rose windows as well. What was there can be rebuilt, though as one scholar noted, the “layers of history” — the things that were tweaked, covered over, redone, repainted, revised over the centuries, that “revision trail” has been lost. One can theoretically replace the appearance of everything that was there (in such a highly photographed and studied structure), but it will always be a replacement.

From a Christian perspective, it’s both tragic as a loss, but also darkly ironic as Lent is wrapping up — Remember, man, that dust thou art, and to dust thou shall return. Again, nothing material is permanent, and relying on such permanence is vanity and delusion.

My thoughts go out to the people of France, and Paris, and my appreciation to the fire fighters who struggled in the face of danger to protect what they could.

Do you want to know more?

 

Kitchen Mis-Design

The New Employer moved into this building last summer, everything all new-designed and spiffy and fresh.

The kitchens are a disaster.

They’re huge, certainly — forty feet long, a dozen feet wide. You could hold a small party in here.

Entrances on either end, so traffic flow of that sort is okay.

One wall is taken up with fridges and food/drink you can buy.

But it’s this wall there’s a problem.

“But Dave,” you say, “it’s broad and spacious. Lots of drawers. Lots of cabinets. Lots of microwaves. Two dishwashers! A coffee machine! A water machine!”

But …

Everything is along one counter. So any activity that takes more than one spot means crossing along, across, around, behind, through anyone else who’s at the counter. Like, for example, getting coffee from the coffee machine, then adding half-n-half and sugar and stirring it, then throwing the stirrers and half-n-half container away. Or working at the counter on your lunch or tupperware container or something, or monitoring the toaster — and thus either blocking the tea/coffee creamer/sugar station, or blocking the trash cans drawers.

Want a paper towel? There’s someone putting stuff into the dishwasher who’s blocking your path. Rinsing out your coffee mug? People have to work around you.

If there’s more than one person in this kitchen, one of them will inevitably find someone else in their way. Which seems just crazy for a space so large. Something, anything … an island would have been a fabulous idea. Extending the counter along that short wall would have helped a lot.

Kitchen design usually calls for a “triangle” of locations people move between. This kitchen is just one line. It’s poorly designed.

(It doesn’t make me regret taking this job, of course. But it is a constant low-level irritant.)

 

 

 

Memorial Suspended

The USS Arizona memorial is indefinitely closed, due to structural issues.

For those who had been planning to visit (something that’s been on my list but never quite fulfilled):

Memorials to the Oklahoma and Utah are on the opposite side of Ford Island from the Arizona and are still open. The monument’s visitor center also remains open, and includes a museum, documentary on the attack and harbor tours.




Exterior Cracks Force Indefinite Closure of the USS Arizona Memorial
Workers are currently assessing the damage to the iconic structure that straddles the sunken ship

Original Post

Building Go Boom!

The Jones Cable building has seen better days from a business perspective, with the parent company having sold off its cable business a couple of decades ago and thus losing the need for a headquarters structure. But it was still a very cool, modernish building along I-25 that I passed by regularly.

But won’t be any more, as it was demolished on Sunday morning. The area is going to be built up into a large mixed-use development, which sounds keen but will probably add to traffic problems on both the interstate exits bracketing it.

Cool demolition videos in the attached article (and, an autoplaying TV station, alas).




Building Implosion Kicks Off Development Project
A building was demolished at dawn Sunday in Centennial to make way for a new development.

View on Google+

The Abandoned Poconos

Very cool article of postcards and matchbook covers showing glorious resorts in the Poconos and Catskills, and the abandoned ruins there today.

I’m always fascinated (in a sad way) how things go to ruin over time.

Originally shared by +Les Jenkins:




Abandoned States: Places In Idyllic 1960s Postcards Have Transformed Into Scenes Of Abandonment
The transformation of these Poconos and Catskills resorts is like looking through some sort of dystopian View-Master.

View on Google+

The “UFO Bank” turns 50

Alas, not all buildings of the future will (or did) look like this. But it’s pretty keen. The bank building was designed by Charles Deaton, who, not surprisingly, also designed the “Sleeper House” that overlooks I-70 west of Denver.

(I once ran a supers game where both buildings actually were disguised UFOs, though that part never really came to fruition.)

It’s a cool and noteworthy building, and makes me smile every time I drive past it.




Colorado’s UFO bank is turning 50 (Video) – Denver Business Journal
“It’s so eccentric. It’s so radical,” says an historic preservation consultant.

View on Google+

How NOT to introduce open office floor plans to your business

Apple may very well end up being the subject of future business white papers regarding their new HQ and how they’ve mismanaged their plans for open office seating for their staff. It looks like they’ve every mistake in the book in adding open office to their new “flying saucer” building.

As a caveat, I don’t actually mind open office myself. I’ve had a hard-wall office, and I’ve been in a 3-4 foot open office plan, and while there are definite plusses for the added space, shelving, art-hanging-spots, and closable door of an office, the open plan had certain charms in terms of, yes, engagement and collaboration with others. And I say that as I guy who tends to be fairly quiet and private in a lot of circumstances.

But my old employer’s move to open office was handled a lot better than Apple is doing.

The key to open office, to my mind (certainly what worked for us) is that (a) everyone has to feel like it’s a shared experience — shared pain, if you will, but shared. “We’re all in this together” is always a key to any sort of change in office life. And (b) people need something to call their own. Instead, Apple’s efforts have had the following apparent flaws:

  1. Business group exceptions: In our case, all the business units had to move to the open office setup. Some were able to do some slight tweaks — types of conference rooms available, cubicle size / arrangement variations, etc. But nobody got to opt out.
    The article, though, notes one Apple business group whose top leader basically said “Fuck this,” and had an entirely separate building added to the campus for his team, rather than join into an open office setting. Another group is staying at the old office campus, for the same reason. If some units get to operate by significantly different rules, not sharing in the pain, it only breeds resentment from the rest.
  2. Executive exceptions: In our case, everyone up to the CEO had a cubicle. Now, to be sure, the top execs had double-sized cubicles, often in a corner, or on floors or in areas with limited numbers of other people, and they also had larger or more plentiful meeting rooms and the like. But the symbolism was there: I’ve got a cube, too. The arguments for you having to put up with this mean I should put up with it, too. And, in fact, I heard a lot of execs, at both the office and corporate level, extol the setup’s virtues in their own workday experiences.
    Apple, on the other hand, apparently has their executives in their own office space on their own floor. All that “collaboration is good” and “easy reach-out-and-touch is important” and “incidental synergies from spontaneous proximity-driven discussions” [I just made that one up] stuff only applies to grunts, it seems, not the C-suite types and their cronies. That breeds resentment, too.
  3. Going to extremes: There are a lot of ways to do open office. Apple isn’t instituting “hot seating,” thank heavens (where you grab whatever seat you can, each day, so that no space is truly your own), but the article does mention “bench seating” and “work tables,” which sounds equally awful. We had small cubicles, but they still gave us all space to put some things that belonged to us, and we had actual chairs we could sit in and adjust, stuff like that. Even if it was a compact setup, we were able to call our cubbies our own, in a way that sounds like it will be much sketchier for Apple workers.

Again, this isn’t necessarily a condemnation of open office seating per se, though one of Apple’s problems may be that the trend has come and gone; the new HQ has been six years in the making, and the open office idea as not only gotten less popular in that time, but there’s some science out there that indicates it may very well objectively hurt productivity. I’m not sure I agree, anecdotally, but regardless of whether open office is a good idea or not, Apple’s approach has been … less than innovative or user-friendly.

The end of the 6th Street Bridge

There's a ton of architecture on the east side of downtown LA that's shows up in movies and TV — bridges / viaducts, concrete-lined rivers, industrial areas, etc. The 6th Street bridge is one that everyone's seen, even if they have no idea of it, and the video in this article gives but a small sampling that will have you going, "Oh, yeah, that place there!"

The 1930s bridge apparently has significant structural issues and is being torn down, to be replaced by 2019. Though the new bridge / viaduct looks nice (and draws on the architecture of the old one as an inspiration), it's still a loss for movie-making.

(h/t +J. Steven York)




All The Best Times The 6th Street Bridge Has Been Used In Film
This week, the 6th Street Bridge in LA is being torn down. The iconic structure has been used in numerous films over the years, and Vashi Nedomansky wanted to commemorate its use as a set location throughout cinematic history.

View on Google+

Obladi, Oblada, Life (and architecture) Goes On

This is a fascinating (and longish) article on the 1920s fad amongst wealthy Americans to import Medieval (et al.) buildings from Europe — why it happened, how, how it changed European antiquities laws, and what happened to the stuff once it arrived here. William Randolph Hearst takes point, of course, but he's by far the only one, and the results are all over the board.

It's an interesting look at a subset of what could be called "cultural appropriation," but within primarily American-European bounds. Is it despoiing, or the natural evolution of stuff? If we wouldn't allow it today, does that mean it should be reversed (and, if so, is that any less of an artificial uprooting, almost a century later)?

Lots of questions, and lots of interesting stories. A good read.




The Hidden History of Medieval America
We had been driving through what felt like one continuous Miami strip mall for almost an hour. Our GPS promised that in a few short minutes we would reach…

View on Google+

The rise, and fall, of mail chutes

The first office building I worked in had one, though not nearly so elaborate. I've always thought them delightfully retro — and, in a day of stricter fire codes and fewer letters, attractively obsolete.




New York City’s Mail Chutes are Lovely, Ingenious and Almost Entirely Ignored
If you have ever worked in an old building, the chances are you will have at some point walked past a small mysterious brass box . Located about halfway up…

View on Google+

The Bus Stops of the Soviet Union

They range from ugly to wacky to bizarre to … well, three or four other categories. But, hey, they’re certainly eyecatching and more artistic than most bus stops.




The Crazy-Daring, Concrete Bus Stops of the Soviet Era — Vantage
Crazy and Daring, These Concrete Soviet Bus Stops are Tributes to their Unknown Designers ¶

From Brutalism to sheer whi…

View on Google+

Church Panoramas — from the inside

Very pretty, and a very interesting technique.




Vertigo-Inducing Panoramas of Churches Around the World

View on Google+

Sometimes destroying things is as elegant is building them

I often find the demolition of structures to be equal parts fascinating (deconstruction in the truest sense) and depressing (thinking of the effort that went into building and using the locale in the first place). But controlled demolition of this sort is so artistic that it just becomes … fascinating.




Watch the Spectacular Demolition of a Power Station’s Huge Chimneys
The controlled demolition of old buildings is always a fun thing to watch, especially when demolition experts do extremely accurate math in order to bring down huge structures. Just like in the case of the coal-fired Cockenzie power station in East Lothian, Scotland.

View on Google+

The Sunset Idea House in Denver is a mixture of ideas both good and bad

We went up to the Sunset Idea House here in Denver today. They'd taken a mid-century ranch, popped the top to add a second floor, gutted the interior rooms and made it over in mid-century style.

The Good – Well, mid-century thematically remains one of my favorite decorating motifs, and was the inspiration for what we did with the kitchen.

The bathroom and kitchen tilework and flooring were all pretty nice, as were any number of period decoration accents (including the Star Trek inspired stairway screen).

The fairly open floorplan was a nice revision of what the house originally was like, without being nebulous as so many open floorplans are.

I loved the translucent garage door.

The Bad – The house still routes into the kitchen with little opportunity to divert traffic. The rooftop deck was fun but needed significantly more shading. The wet bar in the entertainment room in the basement had no outlets and no lighting.

The yard was more suggestive than practical. The patio shades were for an area that would never get direct sun, and the areas getting direct sun were fully unshaded. The ash trees have (as Mary noted) a limited life span given current tree problems, and the aspens were in a similar boat. The touted sprinkling system was inefficent, IMO, for the large areas it was to cover. The shade plants were in far too much sun.

The concrete-gray Caesar-stone countertops kind of worked in some areas, but in other areas came across as (deceptively) cheap.

There was no real plan for dealing with visual privacy with the neighbors. The large windows on the south / street side would need (lacking) window treatment and would simply let in a ton of heat in the summer.

The back gate was a very nice two-door gate, but the way it was hinged (and then the sidewalk outside it bent) would make it a real struggle taking the trash cans out.

The Ugly – For a Sunset house, there was a shocking level of quality. Caulk seams missing. Bathroom arrangements (toilets vs shower openings) were cattywampus. Walls and ceiling areas that had either been opened for repairs / fixes and not closed, or closed but not repainted. The cinderblock frame for the back porch was not only unfinished up top (visible from the second floor), but had concrete dribbling down the sides. The trash can storage area is plainly visible from one of the back hard entertainment areas.

Overall, lots of cool ideas, furniture, decorator accents, and lovely tile work, and a remarkable transformation of a house. But lots of small problems and some significant ones makes me … disinclined to approach the $2M selling price, let alone the $470K original purchase price.

See also: http://www.sunset.com/home/idea-houses/denver-idea-house




Sunset’s Idea House in Denver is open weekends through Sept. 13
Sunset’s 2015 Idea House in Denver is opens weekends through Sept. 13

View on Google+

The White Man's Train Station?

I tend to be enthusiastic about diversity and inclusion, but this article strikes me as — well, I'll be polite and say "a unique and challenging viewpoint."

To wit, by restoring Denver's old Union Station to its former architectural glory, we have apparently created a new bastion of white privilege that doesn't attract a racially diverse crowd because … um … the Denver of 1914 had racial problems, and the 1914 architecture is very European, and this just apparently reminds people of all that. Or something. Including a lack of Mexican murals or sushi bars or a basketball court keeping Latinos and Asian-Americans, and Blacks away. And the restaurants are expensive, so only white people will go.

It's a very odd article. But if someone can explain the underlying issues to me a bit more clearly, I'd welcome hearing them.

Originally shared by +The Denver Post:

Denver's rehabbed Union Station isn't drawing a diverse crowd and it may be the building's fault. http://dpo.st/1nvckac




Did diversity miss the train in Union Station’s architecture?
Denver’s rehabbed Union Station isn’t drawing people of color and it may be the building’s fault.

View on Google+

On the Ugliest Government Buildings in Washington

An amusing photo essay, to be sure, but a few note"

1. Ah, I remember the 70s, and its architecture. In fact, I remember it so well that I remember when it was all brand new and pretty and used extensively in various science fiction TV shows and movies as What The Future Will Look Like.

Which aesthetic, like pretty much everything else from the 70s, has been soundly rejected. Alas, you can easily toss that polyester leisure suit and replace that avocado green tile in your kitchen. You can't quite as easily toss that three-city-block government office you built back then.

2. Concrete is a pretty awful material to work with. In retrospect. It does not at all age well. And, let's face it, Washington, DC, sits on a swamp.  Lots of humidity and heat and rain and all that will make any building look a bit worn, and concrete most of all.

(Visit London some time, if you don't believe me.)

Add to that what I strongly suspect is seriously tight capital maintenance funding for government buildings (because why should they be treated any differently from the rest of our infrastructure?), and it's not at all surprising that these structures (and their surrounding grounds) are not aging well.

Sure, they're going to keep the buildings on the Mall and other tourist locales in shape, but if we're letting our major bridges and interstate highways fall apart, what are the odds we're going to keep the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development headquarters looking shiny and pristine. Especially when there are plenty of folk in DC who'd just as soon see it abolished.

The 7 Ugliest Government Buildings In Washington, D.C.
DO NOT PROCEED if you are allergic to concrete.

Planning for Maintainability: The Light Bulb Goes Off

This story's from last fall, but it got raised in a discussion at my office. In particular, the beautiful and "smart" lighting setup in Heathrow's  multi-zillion dollar new Terminal 5.

'Heathrow's Terminal Five currently houses the world’s largest controlled-lighting system, featuring 2,600 sensors designed to automatically switch off when no motion is detected. […] Earlier this year […] it was named best airport terminal building in the World Airport Awards, organised by Skytrax, an aviation research organisation.'

A beautiful controlled-lighting system … that nobody thought of how to reach the light bulbs in order to replace them.

'Sixty per cent of the 120,000 light bulbs at Terminal Five have blown yet not a single one has been changed since 2008, faced with “no viable way to replace them”, according to O’Brien. Various ways of replacing them have been investigated, including gondolas and high-level cherry pickers, none of which were deemed “practical or safe”.'

It's gotten so bad, they've had to bring in "contingency lighting" in order to illuminate the place.

The current proposed solution is a specialty company "using ‘Cirque du Soleil-style’ high-level rope work".  They'll be replacing all the bulbs with LEDs, which should last substantially longer.

Now, it's easy to point and laugh, but it's also the sort of mistake that's so easy to make — designing for beauty, designing for function, even designing for energy savings … but not designing for maintainability.  But a project that can't be sustained afterwards is a failed project, no matter how many other functional requirements it meets or exceeds.

It's certainly something we're trying to keep in mind in our kitchen remodel …

Heathrow seeks high-wire walkers to change light bulbs – Telegraph
Heathrow will require high-wire artists to change the light bulbs at Terminal Five which have not been replaced in more than five years