https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

The DC movie line still looks like a mess

Multiple Joker movies (but one that’s going into a not-yet-fully-branded “DC Dark” line). A Flash movie that tries turn a tragic time travel tale into Back to the Future. Random characters being thrown at the wall to see what sticks (though, generally speaking, mostly trying to emphasize something lighter, except for the “DC Dark” stuff).

I mean, it’s good that they’re trying to do something after a series of missteps with Superman and Batman and the Justice League (we’ll throw in a half-stumble for Suicide Squad), but it’s not at all clear that, besides kicking the folk who had been leading the DCEU at the executive level to the curb, that the course corrections have been all that coherent or interesting.

I do hope they get it right. There’s some great material in the DC Universe, and Marvel’s efforts (even if they were an improbable series of flukes) show that you can definitely make big-screen comic book movies work.




Warner Bros. Shifts DC Strategy Amid Executive Change-Up
Two Joker movies and a ‘Back to the Future’-style ‘Flash’ are among the new initiatives as the studio plots an Affleck-less Batman and stops dating movies far in advance.

Original Post

How do you solve a problem like the Batman?

I commented in my review of Justice League that the movie has a terrible power imbalance problem, and this article (which has SPOILERS) extends on that to note that the DCEU in general has a terrible problem with Batman in particular. Perhaps because of too many Frank Miller Dark Knight re-readings (yes, looking at you, Zack Snyder), Ben Affleck’s Batman [1] does exactly the flashiest but least useful thing as Batman: strength training and buying / building bigger and flashier vehicles in order to compete with metahumans like Aquaman, Wonder Woman, Superman, and the various cosmic monsters they’re fighting. And that’s a prescription for failure, both for the character and for the use of the character in the DCEU movies.

Batman, from a comics perspective, has four advantages:

1. Superb Training, letting him take out any mook he runs into and survive any more powerful foe. This isn’t just being a bruiser; it’s being a more effective fighter.
2. A Keenly Analytical Mind, letting him be the detective who susses out ever clue and who knows all the hidden information, the strategist whose long game is always five steps ahead of everyone else (including the villain), and the tactician who can respond to abrupt changes of circumstance both in and out of battle.
3. Masterful Psychology, letting him half-win most battles before they are fought, through intimidation, fear, bluff, and timely reveals of himself or information or other forces he’s put into play.
4. Indomitable Will, letting him parlay his strategic sense and his ability to survive into eventual victory, and victory as often as not on his own terms, without compromising aspects like being unwilling to kill.

His 5th advantage, massive disposable income (and the only one that gets flagged in the JL movie, repeatedly) is nice, but only as valuable as the first four. I mean, Tony Stark has gobs of money, too, but who would you most want on your side (or most fear being on the other side)?

It’s those four attributes that make Batman one of the DC “Trinity,” capable of standing alongside Superman and Wonder Woman. And none of them are on display in JL or in BvS, just a brooding, bloodied bruiser with expensive weapons that get immediately torn apart.

There’s a new non-Affleck Batman movie on DC’s schedule, and plenty of indication that this particular Batman won’t be returning for future DCEU engagements. So here’s a chance for WB/DC to fix this problem, before they do serious damage to an incredible character.

——

[1] I keep calling him the Ben Affleck Batman, though it’s unclear to what degree the actor should take credit/blame for all this. This is, though, clearly also the Zack Snyder Batman.




Justice League proves that the DC Extended Universe doesn’t know what to do with Batman
The villains and fights keep getting bigger. And that hurts Batman the most.

View on Google+

Why I am not necessarily a good judge of comic book-related pop culture

Because I was not in the least bit confused by the Justice League post-credit cameo that this article is all about. Indeed, that was one of the least-confusing parts of the movie.

But, then, I’m probably part of the “certain geek circles” that the author snarks at. And, also, I’ve been buying and reading comics since that character’s creation date (indeed, I have the comic it happened in), so, again, no surprises. Also, I watch TV super-hero stuff, so also no surprises from that vector.

In fact, the author’s suggestion that the character was confused for a different character (color schemes, people!) was, in fact, confusing to me.

I have to assume the author was trolling a bit.

(The only spoiler in the article is the identity of one of the characters in the post credit scene at the end of Justice League. So … avoid it if that’s at all important to you.)




Explaining That ‘Justice League’ Post-Credits Scene

View on Google+

A No-Spoiler 13-Item Quickie Review of “Justice League”

I was really hoping WB/DC would be surprisingly successful with this one, despite all the warning signs. Instead, it’s a cluttered, uneven, multiple-writers-awkwardly-edited-together mess. I mean, it’s not horrible, and I’ve spent money to go see more disappointing movies … but, honestly, while it was fun going and seeing it with my teenager, I sort of wish I’d waited for it to come available on streaming video.

I will endeavor to avoid anything that speaks to more than what was visible in the trailers. There’s at least one significant reveal that will be spoiled very quickly, but not by me.

1. The movie is famously a Zack Snyder movie that (due to tragedy in Snyder’s private life) Joss Whedon had to come in and finish, complete with partial rewrites and re-shoots, and no doubt with studio folk sticking their oars in.

The result is a movie with too many moods, too many characters, too many stories, and too much that just doesn’t quite mesh together, from plot lines to fight sequences.

In that latter point, the climactic fight sequence in particular feels like it went through too many drafts and tweaks. The pacing is awful (violent action! incidental dialog! critical moment! people running off! desperate fighting! people chatting!), and the sense of menace never builds beyond “So precisely how will they defeat the bad guy, because there’s absolutely no tension that they won’t, or even that anyone will get killed in the process.”

(Spoiler: They defeat the bad guy.)

2. There’s an effort to give every hero their own character arc. This works well for some (Flash), less well for others (Cyborg). While I laud the effort, it also means that we spend a lot of time distracted from the main plot by character engagement with their supporting cast. That we have, if not origin stories then heavy background stories, detracts from the core tale being told here.

There’s some very interesting thematic work around broken people having to be convinced that they are not only heroes, but can inspire others to greatness (and, indeed, have to, because everyone’s acting like hopeless nihilists since Superman got killed, two or three or four DCEU movies ago). Indeed, it’s a theme that’s actually explicitly stated in a couple of the better scenes. Unfortunately, it vanishes for long stretches of time, and too often when it comes up (as in the film’s wrap-up) it’s handled ham-handedly.

There are also elements of the “How difficult it is to bring a bunch of reluctant people with clashing personalities together onto a team” trope, but besides a few brief flashes of interpersonal conflict, that all sort of gets lost in the busy action of the final act.

3. Power balance is always a trick in super-group films. Avengers figured out how to have both Thor and Black Widow, Hulk and Hawkeye, all as effective combatants in battle. This movie has everything from a hero who can single-handedly beat the bad guy (as is clearly demonstrated, such that they have to keep coming up with poor reasons to distract them) to a guy whose power is that he’s rich enough to buy expensive vehicles that immediately get trashed, and there’s never a sense that they contribute equally to the team’s efforts. This makes the battle sequences feel terribly imbalanced.

4. The Big Reveal I mentioned (but won’t spoil) has some of my favorite moments in the movie (in terms of personal moments), but the underlying “What exactly is going on here” is muddied, and the whole thing feels anticlimactic both in what happens on-screen and in its effect on the world beyond.

5. For a movie with a Jack Kirby Fourth World villain and creatures and tech and so forth, nearly everything actually Kirbyesque was scrubbed out of the story except for the names and a few visuals. The movie was dying for some follow-up to the villain’s defeat. But we never got it.

Indeed, if you made the villain Mongul and replaced the parademons with generic alien mooks, it would make no different to the film. That’s poor use of the source material.

6. As the previous point suggests, the (virtually) moustache-twirling maniacal god-like CGI villain is about as interesting and realistic and engaging as that description makes him sound.

Also, how dreadfully convenient that the Bad Guy grunts in this movie are mindless aliens. This lets the Good Guys basically slaughter them without any moral issues being raised, I guess.

7. There are some fun uses of musical cues for these heroes that reference back to many-decades-ago cinematic versions of them. That’s helped in part by having Danny Elfman (who also did the Michael Keaton Batman films) doing this score. The problem is, Elfman is so over the top when in dramatic mode, that the movie’s effort to balance epic with personality moments and character humor jars.

8. Why is that guy in sweat pants? Because that’s not what he was wearing in the previous scene.

9. Flash kind of runs funny. His arm movements look more like swimming. That said, he’s my favorite character in the movie. Even if too many of his beats parallel the TV show, I would still like to see a solo movie with him.

10. Too many of Batman’s movements look CG or guy-wired. Yes, I realize that real people (let alone Ben Affleck) can’t do Batman-class stunts. They just need to be done better somehow.

11. All that Amazonian armor that got developed for Wonder Woman and which was available for use in shooting this movie? Nah, they went with something different, both for Modern-Day Amazons (more skin) and Bygone Age Flashback Amazons (leather, and lots more skin). Because Zack Snyder, apparently.

12. We saw the movie in 3D (because of timing issues). No problems with it, but I didn’t feel like it made the movie much better.

13. The movie has two end-credit scenes — one about a quarter of the way through, one at the very end. Both are worth waiting for, and are in their own way more enjoyable / engaging than much of the main movie.

In sum …

As I mention above, the obvious comparison in movies is between this film and Avengers. In my opinion there’s no comparison. Not only did Marvel set up most of the Avengers with their own establish-the-character solo movies beforehand (meaning audiences came in already engaged and knowledgeable about their background and personalities and capabilities), but the handling of character conflict, difficulties in building a team, and the overall smoothness of the plot and pacing of the battles in Avengers was significantly better handled than in Justice League.

And, even more fundamentally, while Avengers left me wanting more (I want a Hulk movie! I want a Black Widow and Hawkeye movie! I want another Avengers movie!), with Justice League I didn’t really find myself rooting enthusiastically for the heroes. All of them were, at various times, kind of jerks, or weak, or uninspiring, and I never really saw them meshing well as a team.

As a result, if you told me this is the final Justice League movie, I wouldn’t be pining for what else might have been, and if this were the last time we saw most of the individual characters, I wouldn’t send nasty letters to Warner Bros., either. I want more Flash, I want more Wonder Woman, I want … well, the others can have cameos in those films.

Bottom line: you could do worse than seeing Justice League, but wait until you can order it on-demand at home.

View on Google+

How long should a movie be? How long is a piece of string?

A movie should be as long as it needs to be to tell its story in a coherent, engaging fashion. Making it longer by throwing in bits and bobs of assorted backstory and side tales that don’t contribute to the overall narrative? That’s padding, and it’s annoying. Making it shorter by cutting out bits and bobs of assorted backstory and side tales that actually do contribute to the overall narrative? That’s cutting to the bone, and it’s annoying, too. [1]

For myself, I like seeing a fuller tapestry. It’s rare I walk out of a movie saying, “Wow, they could have cut all this stuff” vs “Gosh, I wish we’d seen more about Character X, but most of her scenes were cut.” [2]

Sure, there are extended-cut / Director’s Cut versions for when it’s released on disc / online. But if I’m paying double-digit costs to sit in a theater for 2 hours, I’m usually happy to make it 2½ or even 3, if the story needs that. Less is not always more. [3]

Regardless, whether it’s too short or too long in theatrical release, it’s only a movie, fergoshsakes. Issuing threats of violence and death over reporting about the film length is really, really stupid.

——

[1] Especially when it’s done to keep the run time short enough to get an additional showing in at the theater, i.e., for the sake of profit, not storytelling.
[2] Similarly, in my writing group, I’m usually the guy going, “I want to know more about this character, this scene needs a bit more explanation, this came out of left field,” not the one suggesting that scenes or chapters could be easily lopped off. So bear in mind that this is my aesthetic, not necessarily an objective value statement.
[3] The exception here is when the length is added to allow for more Big Explosions, Slow Pans Across Virtual Settings, or other visual gimcrackery. I’m talking story here, not spectacle.




Does it really matter if Justice League isn’t insanely long?
News broke over the weekend that the next movie in the (unofficially named) DC Extended Universe, Justice League, has a running time of two hours and one minute.

View on Google+

Oh, and there was a final trailer for “Justice League”

More fun than Batman v Superman, but less interesting than Wonder Woman.

The interactions between the heroes is what should make this movie, not the SFX set piece battles, and I’m not sure how much of that we’re seeing.

Bruce and Diana acting as the “grown ups” for the family is … cute.

Aquaman, aside from having horrible tactics, seems to be much more of the happy warrior than the sullen warrior he was first showcased as. Flash is the excited kid, which is fun. Cyborg … um … flies?

Not much sense of the menace involved here (I mean, I know what it is, but the trailer doesn’t give us much in the way of stakes).

That said, it all seems pretty battle-heavy, sort of a Michael Bay version of the Justice League.

I’m more interested than I’ve been previously (so success for the ad there), but I’m still a lot more excited about Thor: Ragnarok.

View on Google+

“Batman: The Animated Series” is coming to Blu-Ray

Welp, that’s going on the Christmas list … in 2018. There’s discussion in the comments about what the Blu-Ray release will improve from the DVD box sets — the picture should be crisper, and the sound quality likely better. For me the big bonus is freeing up about three inches of video shelf space.

I just posted the other day about some of the history behind BTAS. The article quoted there, plus this announcement, are part of the 25th Anniversary (!) of the show, which was a ground-breaking super-hero animation effort in style and substance. Glad to see it’s going to be getting a more convenient format with better quality.




At Long Last, Batman: The Animated Series Is Coming to Blu-Ray
Batman: The Animated Series turned 25 this past September, and while it’s one of the most beloved animated shows of the past three decades, it’s been confined to DVD box sets for years. That’s about to change, because the animated Dark Knight is finally coming to HD.

View on Google+

An Oral History of “Batman: The Animated Series”

BTAS was groundbreaking, a revolutionary taking of super-hero cartoons as something potentially serious and cinematic, not “The Justice Friends Meet the Harlem Globe-Trotters” kind of 2nd Grade low-quality silliness.

This lengthy article has quotes from the major creators of the series — producers, writers, artists, and voice actors. They emphasize how special BTAS was — and still is.




An Oral History of ‘Batman: The Animated Series’

View on Google+

Ranking DC’s Animated TV Series

I don’t necessarily agree with this force-ranking (who ever does?), but it’s a great reminder of some fantastic (and a few not-so-fantastic) animated series of decades past, and it’s worth it just for that.

If you don’t want to page through show by show, here are their rankings:

22. Teen Titans Go!
21. Beware the Batman
20. The Plastic Man Comedy/Adventure Hour
19. “Various Sixties Batman/Superman Shows”
18. The Zeta Project*
17. The “Super Friends” series
16. Superman (1988)*
15. The New Adventures of Batman
14. Krypto the Superdog
13. Legion of Super-Heroes
12. Justice League: Action
11. The Batman
10. Green Lantern: The Animated Series
9. Batman: The Brave and the Bold
8. Superman (1940s)**
7. Batman Beyond
6. Static Shock
5. Teen Titans
4. Superman: The Animated Series
3. Young Justice
2. Justice League / Justice League Unlimited
1. Batman: The Animated Series

[*] Never encountered this one before.
[**] Yes, that’s not a DC animated TV series

I’d probably reshuffle things most in the middle — LSH and Brave and the Bold both need to rise in the rankings a few steps, IMO — but +/- 3 in any given case I’d agree with pretty much everything here.




Ranking Every DC Animated TV Series From Worst To Best
They’re the proverbial kings of superhero animation, but what’s the best series that DC have done?

View on Google+

Honest Trailers does "Suicide Squad"

Yeah, mostly this.

Though I actually liked the Joker portrayal in this movie.

View on Google+

Reign of the Supermen

With Hank Henshaw — the "real" Hank Henshaw — showing up on Supergirl as "Cyborg Superman" (which sounds a lot dorkier just picked out of the ether), I had to stop a moment and explain to the family about the Reign of the Supermen, the four individuals claiming the mantle who showed up after Superman "died" fighting Doomsday in 1992.

Which set me to gathering up some images of them, thus this collection, which I might as well post publicly as just flag for +Kay Hill.

The four were named (mostly) from other nicknames for Superman:

"The Man of Tomorrow" – Known more prosaically the Cyborg Superman, this was secretly previous Superman villain Hank Henshaw, a sort of weird variant on Reed Richards in the DCU, who blames Superman for the death of his wife and friends, and … is a cyborg … and … destroys a city … and it gets complicated. Anyway, this is the fellow who (sort of) showed up in Supergirl a few weeks ago. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hank_Henshaw]

"The Man of Steel" – John Henry Irons, genius engineer and inventor who invents an armored super-suit and, inspired by Superman's legacy, tries to fill in for him. He is later known as just Steel, has had his own comics, and was one of the more successful characters to come out of all of this. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel_(John_Henry_Irons)]

"The Metropolis Kid" – He hates being called Superboy, though everyone does, and eventually he goes along with it. He's actually a Cadmus-created clone mixing Superman's genes with … Lex Luthor's. (So, yeah, where they got that shtick for Young Justice.) Aside from having a very, very 90s look (which was eventually fixed of course), he's one of the few heroes ever to be based in Hawaii for a while. He was killed (by another Superboy, really long story), but, as universes have rebooted, got better. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superboy_(Kon-El)]

"The Last Son of Krypton" – A cold-blooded killing vigilante who's a Kryptonian alt-right type, kinda-sorta, and also an energy/robot construct called the Eradicator who shaped Kryptonian history, and, um, yeah, it's even more complicated than that. Anyway, he still shows up in the DCU on occasion (or did, at last, pre-New52). [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eradicator_(comics)]

The storyline ends with the real Superman coming back (of course) with stylish long hair (until it became unstylish), and leading three of the replacements against the fourth, the villainous Cyborg Superman, who just destroyed Green Lantern's home town of Coast City (leading to cross-over events to come).

Thus Endeth the Lesson.

More on the Reign of the Supermen:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Death_of_Superman#Reign_of_the_Supermen.21
http://superman.wikia.com/wiki/Reign_of_the_Supermen
http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Reign_of_the_Supermen

    

In Album 12/2/16

View on Google+

Alas, no more regular Snart snark on "Legends of Tomorrow"

I read some other articles about this last night (after we watched the episode in question), as Wentworth Miller — by far the most enjoyable cast member on DC's Legends of Tomorrow — bows out from the series as a regular, but with a contract that lets him appear on the show in the future, as well as on The Flash, Arrow, etc.

Which is a crying shame, as I found him the most compelling reason to watch the series, and the character most detached from the irksome Hawkdrama. Self-centered, master of the dry quip, always on the look-out for a score, but smart and capable of seeing the bigger picture — and even of being not-quite-so villainous as he pretended to be.

I am glad we'll continue to see him in the Berlantiverse, but sorry it will be only on occasion.

[Article does have spoilers for the most recent DCLoT episode.]




Wentworth Miller Will No Longer Be a Series Regular on “Legends of Tomorrow”
Wentworth Miller Will No Longer Be a Series Regular on “Legends of Tomorrow” – While Miller won’t be a “Legends” regular, he’ll make recurring appearances on the series, in addition to “The Flash.”

View on Google+

Colorblind Casting (and Comics)

Here's a fun project by a fan of actor John Cho, mapping him into some major movie posters to show that there's really no artistic need in the vast majority of cases to cast leading male movie roles with white guys.

http://www.slashfilm.com/john-cho-movie-posters/

I'll focus, from the geeky aspect, on the Avengers: Age of Ultron poster. This is one of the few missteps, as, of all the Avengers, Cap is one of the few who probably should be a white character, given the origin story and the realities of the era; it would be difficult to tweak the origin enough to narratively justify an Asian (or black) actor in the role and still have it, effectively, be Captain America. The same is true of Thor (Idris Elba notwithstanding). Black Widow is so heavily identified with the Russian (Soviet) background, that it would be tough to change her ethnicity as well, though I suppose you could conceive of a Chinese ballet/assassin character.

But when you look at the other Avengers in the film, there's nothing compelling about race/ethnicity about them. Why couldn't Tony Stark be Asian? Why can't Hulk be Asian?[1] Why could Hawkeye be Hispanic? Why couldn't Nick Fury be black? (Oh, wait …). The Maximoff siblings are traditionally from Eastern Europe, but there's little that forces them to be; they could be from Tanzania rather than Transia.

Arguably, there's little here that forces a particular gender, as far as that goes. Iron Man could be Iron Woman (being a drunken egomaniacal genius with poor impulse control doesn't seem gender-specific). All the rest — again, arguably, excepting Cap and Thor — could be women.

(The same could be done, again for argument, with most of the existing ethnically diverse characters — there's nothing intrinsically African-American about War Machine or Falcon, though the point of this mental exercise is to increase diversity, not decrease it. Skipping forward a film, Black Panther, though, probably needs to stay as he is, since his African origins are an intrinsic part of who he is.)

Comics have a bit of a challenge, as do their movies, as most of these characters were created 50-75 years ago, and so reflect the ethnic and gender diversity of the creators and publishers and perceived audiences of that era. And because we're talking, in comic books, about a visual medium and characters who have been published looking as they do for many, many decades, there's a strong inertia against changing ethnicity and gender for fear of changing the characters themselves.

The challenge, then, is to consider — not necessarily act, but consider — where these characters could be portrayed looking different without actually becoming different characters and losing part of what it is you're trying to create on film (those characters).

(The question of whether one should do this is a bit different.[2] IMO, I think it's legit to seek more representation / relatability for a more diverse audience from both civic and pragmatic/commercial standpoints. Not only do you involve a greater part of the population with characters that look like them, you arguably draw in more of that diverse population to buy movie tickets to earn you money.)

Anyway, that was a long and probably overly-heavy read over what is just one of several fun posters in an exercise about how, no, the universe doesn't implode if you have an Asian James Bond or rom-com lead or etc. Which seems pretty straightforward to me, but maybe that's why I'm not a Hollywood casting director.

[1] Actually, the Hulk in the comics at the moment is Asian. So there. Although he's actually a different person, and thus a different Hulk, which is not quite what I'm arguing, which is that there's nothing in the classic story of Bruce Banner and the beast within that requires Bruce to be white, from either a character or narrative perspective.

[2] And the comment section of the article immediately degenerates into nasty arguments about "SJWs" and "cultural appropriation," so stray there at your own risk.

 

View on Google+

The Girl of (Slightly Cheaper) Steel

Supergirl will continue, but will be moving from CBS to the The CW (and, odds are, from LA filming to Vancouver filming). Which doesn't bother me that much, because it always felt a little weird seeing LA landmarks in "National City."

The change in network will mean less money coming into the production, but the (strongly rumored) change to Vancouver will lower location costs (and probably some production costs, since it can share some overhead with the other Berlantiverse shows filming there).

Hmmmm … maybe we need a Crisis on Infinite CW Earths so that Kara can exist alongside Barry and Ollie and the rest.




‘Supergirl’ renewed and moving to The CW
Supergirl has been renewed for a second season — but will be moving from CBS to The CW, EW has learned. Supergirl, which stars Melissa Benoist as…

View on Google+

Who should show up on next season’s “Supergirl”?

Who should show up on next season's "Supergirl"?

An interesting list from Screenrant. My thoughts on their suggestions:

Krypto: Um … no. Not only is Krypto tightly aligned with Superman, it's kind of a goofy character, too, tipping things into more kiddie fare than I think Supergirl deserves to be.

Mr. Mxyzptlk: Um … no, even more so. Although he's perfect for a TV show and for Supergirl (I give him the highest chance from this list to actually show up, in fact), I really dislike him as a character.

Valor/Mon-El: This would provide some possibility of romantic complications for Kara, and isn't all that bad an idea. It would almost certainly have to be a temporary thing (with time travel or dimensional alignment coming into play), otherwise Kara stops being unique.

Legion of Superheroes: Hell yes. It's already been hinted at during a visit to the Fortress of Solitude (downchecks to the TV show for not having the giant key). The biggest problem here would be who to restrict it to. The nice thing about the Legion is that stories can go in both directions (present or future), and you can always time travel back to the status quo when the story is done.

Mary Marvel: It's an intriguing idea, though I suspect WB has bigger plans for the Shazam universe. The other danger is that, while Mary would potentially "get it" about Kara's life, her power set is too close in effect (if not in origin). Still, there are possibilities here.

Selena: Um, not. Shout-out with Kara's adoptive mom notwithstanding, the less the movie gets referenced, the better.

Stargirl and STRIPE: An interesting idea, especially as a potential series spin-off.

Big Barda: I love Barda to death, but WB is not going to let Supergirl mess around with Kirby's Fourth World, esp. if Darkseid is going to show up in the JL movies.

Batgirl: An interesting idea, if WB goes for it; the idea of creating a Batman/Superman dynamic, only with the "-girl" versions, could be intriguing. But do we then openly acknowledge Batman on this world, and does that mean yet another heavy-hitter that is never called in when earth-shattering dangers arise?

The Question: Only if he's the crazy (or is he?) conspiracy nut from the JL cartoon, because that guy was awesome.

Power Girl: The idea of Supergirl dealing with an older version of herself from another dimension could be interesting. (A reprise of the JL cartoon's compromise of Galatea — a forced-aged Supergirl clone created as a weapon against Supergirl would fit even better.)

Miss Martian: Not sure there's room for her and her uncle in the mix, and I doubt she would be nearly as charming as her YJ iteration.

Lori Lemaris: No. Supergirl does not need mermaids. No.

Comet: Okay, now you're just screwing with my head. Kara does not need an intelligent, super-powered centaur horse (who is secretly in love with her). That just gets — weird. Just … no.

Superman: While I admire the desire to keep Kara on her own, the hoop-jumping the show has had to do to keep Superman off-screen even when the story demanded Superman show up has been highly distracting. I'm not sure how to make it happen, but the show needs to do something to resolve that situation.

One additional thought here. One of the interesting things about the Berlantiverse on the CW has been the ability to bring in a wide array of villains / guest stars. Someone who might be good on The Flash can show up first on Arrow if the story makes sense, then go on to the other. That's not as easy with Supergirl being on another network (and another dimension), so how to you split the baby for characters that are not part of one of their specific rogues galleries? Or do you not care and allow there to be different dimensional versions of, say, the Parasite?

(Though, heck, for folk like Mr. Mxyzptlk, there's no reason he can't visit both universes …)




15 Characters We Want To See In Supergirl Season 2
15 classic DC comics characters who should join Melissa Benoist’s Supergirl in a second season of her hit CBS series

View on Google+

The trailer is out for "Batman: The Killing Joke"

Alan Moore and Brian Bolland's The Killing Joke is one of the most iconic graphic novels in the DC catalog, a psychodrama between Batman and the Joker that drags Barbara and Jim Gordon in as tortured victims. Controversial (as so much of Moore's work is, and not without some justification in this case), it's still a remarkable work in my opinion.

This new animated feature is, based on the trailer … interesting. On the one hand, with Kevin Conroy and Mark Hamill back to voice Batman and the Joker, there's a lot of faboo going on along the audio front. On the other hand, I hope this is an early version of the animation, because the frame rate seems awfully choppy.

And it's rated R, which — well, we'll see. I've seen some pretty violent animated DC features in the past that didn't carry that rating, and while the graphic novel is by no means kiddie fare — well, like I said, we'll see.

View on Google+

I am very much looking forward to "Suicide Squad"

And a pretty cool animated GIF, too.

Originally shared by +David Sarachman:

Suicide Squad

This is more than a little bit awesome.

#suicidesquad #DC #gif #gifness #geek

 

View on Google+

Harrison Wells, the sometimes-antagonist and co-star of "The Flash"

Whether or not Tom Cavanagh deserves an Emmy, he deserves a shout-out for a huge, largely unsung, chunk of the popularity of CW's The Flash. He's played, effectively, multiple characters on the show, and each has been neatly crafted and portrayed, either as a villain or as just someone to amp up the pressure on the hero (through encouragement, discouragement, or sometimes both). Scenes with him tend to sparkle with tension as he rarely lines up neatly with what everyone else wants or thinks is right.

Without Harrison Wells, and without Cavanagh playing him (them), The Flash would be a far weaker show.




The Flash: The Many Faces of Harrison Wells
Tonight’s episode of The Flash, “Back to Normal,” may focus on the now powerless Barry Allen. But it’s also an important episode for this season’s Harrison “Harry” Wells.

View on Google+

Now THIS "Batman v Superman" movie trailer excites me!

And the casting is pretty remarkable, though there's kind of a big spoiler at the end.

(via J. MIchael Straczynski)

View on Google+

Another Justice League cartoon is in the works

But it looks like it's going to be kid-oriented — simpler designs, and quarter-hour mini-episodes. Because the only folk interested in animated comic book characters are, of course, kids. Because Teen Titans GO! is the peak of DC's TV animation.

And here's my official disgusted SIGH over the need for Wonder Woman to be carrying a shield and a sword. Also, an UGH. (Bigger picture at http://www.avclub.com/article/cartoon-networks-making-new-justice-league-cartoon-231522 )

On the plus side, Kevin Conroy will be doing Batman, Mark Hammill is said to be doing the Joker, and there are some other fine voice talents signed up as well.

We'll see.




Cartoon Network’s making a new Justice League cartoon
A decade after Justice League Unlimited went off the air—and right on time for justice to dawn again in the upcoming Batman V Superman—Cartoon Network has announced that it’s putting a new animated series about the DC Universe’s hardest hitters into production. Taking its cues from the network’s Tee

View on Google+