https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

The name’s the thing

Star Wars or Web 2.0? Can you tell the difference between the name of a Star Wars character and the name of a Web 2.0 company? I got a moderately…

Star Wars or Web 2.0?

Can you tell the difference between the name of a Star Wars character and the name of a Web 2.0 company?

I got a moderately nerdy 37 of 43 right.

(via kottke)

Geek Rivalries

It’s the Geek Rivalries meme: The rules: You must choose one. If you like both, decide which one you like better. If you don’t like either of them, figure out…

It’s the Geek Rivalries meme:

The rules: You must choose one. If you like both, decide which one you like better. If you don’t like either of them, figure out which you dislike less.

  1. Star Trek or Babylon 5? Babylon 5, no question.
  2. Windows or Linux? Have to go with Windows, since I have no experience with Linux worth mentioning. I certainly root for a strong Linux presence in the marketplace.
  3. Windows or Macintosh? I have a fondness for the Mac going back many years, and design-wise I admire it most. On the other hand, I’m a lot more comfortable with Windows, Have to vote Mac here.
  4. Farscape or Stargate? Farscape. Never have gotten much into Stargate — no particular objection to it, but it seems terribly pedestrian compared to the craziness and cliff-hangers on Farscape. Hmmm. I need to start watching those DVDs I borrowed. In my copious free time.
  5. Linux or BSD? Linux, but that’s splitting hairs.
  6. Intel or AMD? AMD as the underdog. Nothing particularly wrong with either.
  7. Star Trek or Star Wars? Star Trek. Star Wars went wrong exactly where B5 went right: a strong creative vision that drove the final product. ST had no such vision (esp. post-Roddenberry), and so was neither driven marvelously upwards or terribly downwards beyond a single episode or two.
  8. Firefox or Internet Explorer? Firefox, duh.
  9. Firefox or Opera? Firefox, but my experience with Opera has been very limited.
  10. WordPress or Movable Type? Movable Type, but that’s at least in part due to familiarity and commitment. Plenty of good WP sites out there.
  11. Marvel or DC? Marvel still stirs the blood from the old days, but I’ve been enjoying DC more for quite a number of years.
  12. Neanderthal or Neandertal? Neanderthal (I haven’t gotten pedantic enough to pronounce it the latter way_.
  13. Slashdot or Digg? Slashdot, I guess. I don’t really frequent either.
  14. Anime: Dub or Sub? Subtitled, which is one reason I don’t watch as much anime as I’d like.
  15. Dr. Pepper or Mountain Dew? Dr. Pepper, if compelled to choose. I’ll take Coke (or Pepsi) over either.

Some of these are so non-issues to me that it causes me to doubt my geekiness. On the other hand, they didn’t ask about “GURPS or D20?” or “WoW or Everquest?” or “Penny Arcade or PvP?” and the comic book question was terribly simplistic (“Batman or Superman?” “Avengers or JL?” “Thanos or Darkseid?”) so I guess I still have some areas of geekiness I’m more into than the test makers.

Star Wars outtakes

No, really. Not sure if this footage showed up on any of the Ultimate Super Final Neodymium DVD Sets (Now with 15% More Tinkering by George Lucas!) of Star Wars…

No, really. Not sure if this footage showed up on any of the Ultimate Super Final Neodymium DVD Sets (Now with 15% More Tinkering by George Lucas!) of Star Wars IV: A New Hope, but there’s some fascinating stuff there, including …

… Han’s girlfriend? At least his girlfriend for the afternoon. Yow.

(via the Flea)

Join the crew

You scored as Serenity (Firefly). You like to live your own way and don’t enjoy when anyone but a friend tries to tell you should do different. Now if…

You scored as Serenity (Firefly). You like to live your own way and don’t enjoy when anyone but a friend tries to tell you should do different. Now if only the Reavers would quit trying to skin you.

Moya (Farscape)
81%
Serenity (Firefly)
81%
Babylon 5 (Babylon 5)
75%
Millennium Falcon (Star Wars)
75%
Nebuchadnezzar (The Matrix)
69%
Deep Space Nine (Star Trek)
69%
Galactica (Battlestar: Galactica)
63%
Enterprise D (Star Trek)
56%
SG-1 (Stargate)
50%
FBI's X-Files Division (The X-Files)
50%
Andromeda Ascendant (Andromeda)
50%
Bebop (Cowboy Bebop)
31%

Your Ultimate Sci-Fi Profile II: which sci-fi crew would you best fit in? (pics)
created with QuizFarm.com

As shiny as that seems, I think living in the insecurity of either Serenity or Moya would drive me batty.

(via David)

The greatest SF movies never made

I don’t know that I would rush out to see all of these, but I can’t argue with the list of 10 or the reasoning behind it: 10. The “Real”…

I don’t know that I would rush out to see all of these, but I can’t argue with the list of 10 or the reasoning behind it:

10. The “Real” Alien 3
9. The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
8-6. Star Wars Episodes VII, VIII and IX
5. A Doom that isn’t a huge turd
4. Starcraft
3. Snow Crash
2-1. The Matrix Prequel and ONE Sequel

A Christmas of Serenity?

At this moment, the top DVD sellers at Amazon.com are: Serenity March of the Penguins (widescreen) The Sound of Music (40th Anniv. Ed.) March of the Penguins (fullscreen) Star Wars…

At this moment, the top DVD sellers at Amazon.com are:

  1. Serenity
  2. March of the Penguins (widescreen)
  3. The Sound of Music (40th Anniv. Ed.)
  4. March of the Penguins (fullscreen)
  5. Star Wars III – Revenge of the Sith
  6. Firefly – The Complete Series
  7. The 40-Year-Old Virgin
  8. Family Guy, Vol. 3
  9. Lost – The Complete 1st Season
  10. The Oprah Winfrey Show (20th Anniv. Coll.)
  11. Madagascar (widescreen)

Not only is Serenity #1, but the Firefly collection — which was available last Christmas, too — is in the Top 10. Very cool.

Even more cool is that (a) the popularity of the Firefly DVDs got Universal interested in a film in the first place, and (b) Universal has indicated that strong DVD sales might interest them in a sequel

Narnia

Went and saw The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe this afternoon with Katherine. I really wanted to like it. I really, really, really wanted to….

Went and saw The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe this afternoon with Katherine. I really wanted to like it. I really, really, really wanted to.

And … I did.

The Story: The movie is remarkably true to story, with only the mildest of patches for more contemporary audiences. Folks expecting something quite as gritty as LotR will be a bit disappointed — Lewis’ modern fairy tale retains a child-like charm — but I was quite pleased by the result.

At that, while some of the overly cute bits get elided, there’s some nice stuff added in. Indeed, while it only takes five pages to get Lucy into Narnia the first time (I know, because I was just reading the book to Katherine last night), it takes several minutes in the movie, which starts out actually providing an explanation (and character building) as to why kids had to leave London during the Blitz (a bit of history that Lewis assumed his readers would know). There’s also a bit more given to Edmund for motivation than simple peevishness and lust for Turkish Delight, which is nice, and the character redeems himself (beyond the metaphysical redemption of the Deep Magic) by the end of the book.

For folks who read the Narnia tales (especially the first) for their Christian allegory, it’s all still here. For people who aren’t interested in that, it is certainly not hammered over the head. Indeed, like in the books, it’s simply presented and the readers are allowed to draw their own connections. It’s nicely played.

The end of the tale is modified slightly, not in any way that would offend lovers of the book, but to work with modern audiences.

Overall — I am most impressed by the adaptation of the story. My fears are definitely unrealized.

The Acting: The kids do well. Hell, I even found myself liking Lucy, which is saying something. Indeed, Lucy feels the least stereotyped character, as opposed to Peter, the reluctant leader; Edmund, the truculent bad boy; Susan, the annoying voice of reason. But they all do well. (Part of the sense of stereotype is, of course, the story — fairy tale characters rarely go more than skin deep, unless their given three movies to work in.)

Tilda Swinton, as the White Witch, plays the evil deliciously. Indeed, there was almost something disturbing about her attitude toward Edmund …

Liam Neeson is beginning to get a name for himself as a serious actor who also does all sorts of keen SF/Fantasy stuff — Star Wars, Harry Potter, and now this, as Aslan’s voice. I agree with one reviewer that I would have preferred something a bit less cultured and baritone than Neeson, but he does well enough, and he certainly doesn’t detract from the tale.

Not much can be said for the supporting characters. Mr. Tumnus is well portrayed. Ginarrbrik the nasty dwarf fills the role well. The beavers, wolves, and fox all come across nicely.

The FX: This is a movie that would never have been made without Peter Jackson’s LotR, and it shows. The mix of critters here is even broader than in LotR, though, with combos of make-up, CG, and mixes of both.

The results are sometimes uneven. Some of it is spectacular. I have never seen centaurs (or fauns, for that matter) that were so believable. Some of the monster types looked a bit too much like latex and/or heavy masks to me (the minotaurs come to mind, as well as a lot of the attendees at the Stone Table). But overall, I was impressed.

When the CG is out to replicate actual animals (beavers, wolves, foxes, leopards, tigers, and rhinos come to mind, not to mention a certain Lion), the results are a bit more uneven. The creature movement is exquisite, and the appearance usually works well, but whenever they talk, it distorts the face in way that seems almost cartoony. How you give a wolf human voice and expressions and not make it seem cartoony is, of course, a major challenge.

Much is made of the Big Battle at the end, at least in the ads, and it is pretty spectacular — if feeling strangely like a budget-rate version of the epic wars of Jackson’s effort. The numbers are smaller, and after the initial incredible clash, things move back into more rocky territory where the scope can be more limited. Still, it’s all both tremendous eye candy and effective at moving the story forward.

The overall judgment: plenty to nitpick (such as where animal feet touch the ground), but it remains nitpicking.

The Suitability for Kids: Margie was more concerned over Katherine (at 5½) than I was. I did check out some reviews beforehand, all of which said it was intense, but non-gory.

And that sums it up pretty well. All the actual violence takes place off-screen, and while some of it is pretty intense, it’s pretty much left up to the imagination. The worst, probably, is the Stone Table scene, perforce one of (non-graphic) suffering. There were also some suspenseful times, plenty of chase scenes (more than Lewis wrote, but what the heck), and some other moments that Katherine found worth cuddling up in my lap over. And, to be honest, there were some places later on when she said, “Daddy, I want to leave this movie right now.”

You can draw your conclusions as to whether I was a bad father for not following along with that statement, but by the end (and on and off during it all) she was bouncy and excited and, overall, considered the movie “awesome.” Favorite part was (a) the kids getting crowned, and (b) Aslan roaring after his return. And she’s tickled that I’ve now dubbed her “Queen Katherine the Brave.”

At 2:12, it might be long for some other kids. But overall, I’m not sorry I took her to see it.

In summary: I am seriously impressed by the adaptation. It rings a solid note between a film that will appeal to modern audiences and the spirit and magic of Lewis’ original. I give it a strong thumbs up and encouragement to see it in the theaters.

The Canon of SF Films

John Scalzi, who’s just publishing the Rough Guide to Sci-Fi Movies, puts out the canon of most significant SF films: All of this is designed to be both interesting and…

John Scalzi, who’s just publishing the Rough Guide to Sci-Fi Movies, puts out the canon of most significant SF films:

All of this is designed to be both interesting and informative, but the part of the book that’s going to get most people’s attention — and raise hackles — is The Canon, which features the 50 science fiction films I have deemed to be the most significant in the history of film. Note that “most significant” does not mean “best” or “most popular” or even “most influential.” Some of the films may be all three of these, but not all of them are — indeed, some films in The Canon aren’t objectively very good, weren’t blockbusters and may not have influenced other filmmakers to any significant degree. Be that as it may, I think they matter — in one way or another, they are uniquely representative of some aspect of the science fiction film experience.

Scalzi had final say on the list (reasons for each are in the book), but he solicited input from others. His list (with the ones I’ve seen in bold):

The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension!
Akira
Alien
Aliens

Alphaville
Back to the Future
Blade Runner
Brazil

Bride of Frankenstein
Brother From Another Planet
A Clockwork Orange
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
Contact
The Damned
Destination Moon
The Day The Earth Stood Still

Delicatessen
Escape From New York
ET: The Extraterrestrial

Flash Gordon: Space Soldiers (serial)
The Fly (1985 version)
Forbidden Planet
Ghost in the Shell
Gojira/Godzilla
The Incredibles
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956 version)
Jurassic Park
Mad Max 2/The Road Warrior
The Matrix

Metropolis
On the Beach
Planet of the Apes (1968 version)
Robocop
Sleeper

Solaris (1972 version)
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

The Stepford Wives
Superman
Terminator 2: Judgement Day

The Thing From Another World
Things to Come
Tron

12 Monkeys
28 Days Later
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
2001: A Space Odyssey

La Voyage Dans la Lune
War of the Worlds (1953 version)

An interesting list. One could do worse than bringing those along on desert island exercise.

(via BoingBoing)

Duel Controls

Though the author of this TheForce.net piece on how to make light saber duels look more realistic is explicitly addressing it toward Star Wars fan film producers, and explicitly not…

Though the author of this TheForce.net piece on how to make light saber duels look more realistic is explicitly addressing it toward Star Wars fan film producers, and explicitly not toward the SW films themselves — it’s clear that he feels much the same about the SW films themselves.

In either case, the fights consist more or less of constant striking at one another?s weapon (instead of seeming to be intent on actually hitting their opponent?what a concept that would be). Not meaning to sound harsh, but why it is people in these films (even the experienced martial artists) seem insistent on finding the longest complicated means of moving their lightsabers around with the most vulnerable of body positions, rather than the quickest, strongest and most efficient, is something that will always puzzle me.

Now, don?t get me wrong, choreography can be “good” while still being “invalid.” What I mean by this is, the display can be viewed artistically as a physical performance of ballet-like balance and timing, judgment of range, hand-eye coordination, and dynamic understanding of movement. But, to the trained eye (and even the untrained yet perceptive eye) it can still be easily seen to be martially unsound, tactically foolish, and technically primitive.

If the purpose of lightsaber fight choreography is simply to convey drama and excitement within the context of a story, then choreographers feel they’ve done their job well. But, from my point of view, if a lightsaber fight is supposed to convince the viewer that individuals of great skill are really trying to kill one another with laser swords while using supernatural powers that heighten their senses and physical abilities, well, they fail miserably.

His advice (much more fleshed out that this):

1. Act Like You Are in a Fight
2. Don’t Forget Physics
3. Moves that Look Cool are Usually the Stupidest
4. Feint, Dodge, and Pause
5. Don’t Stop When You Get in Close
6. Move Your Feet!

Good stuff.

(via GeekPress)

BT05 – When Blog the Mighty!

Quiet house, save for the fan and the music. It’s interesting — some folks are a lot into the “Blogathon Community” — the forums, the “radio,” the chats, etc. Me?…

Quiet house, save for the fan and the music.

It’s interesting — some folks are a lot into the “Blogathon Community” — the forums, the “radio,” the chats, etc. Me? When I’m creating, leave me alone. I have only one chance to transcribe what the Voice in My Head is telling me to write, and if you make me respond to you, I will lose it and the Voice will be angry. The Voice being angry is a bad thing …

Jeez, it’s only 1:30 and I’m beginning to lose it … 🙂

Continue reading “BT05 – When Blog the Mighty!”

Joss stuff

A big Joss Whedon interview. Fun stuff, from Serenity to the other movies he’s been involved in (including how he would have made Revenge of the Jedi)….

A big Joss Whedon interview. Fun stuff, from Serenity to the other movies he’s been involved in (including how he would have made Revenge of the Jedi).

Episode III

Margie and I went to a nearly-deserted showing of Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith last night (the multiplex was definitely not hopping on a Tuesday night,…

Margie and I went to a nearly-deserted showing of Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith last night (the multiplex was definitely not hopping on a Tuesday night, and our theater was empty besides the two of us until the trailers started to run, at which time one popcorn munching fellow wandered in and sat down, of course, immediately behind us).

Brief review:

  • Fabulous special effects
  • A decently strong story line
  • Some pretty awful dialog
  • Acting that ran the gamut from mediocre to terrible

The general consensus is right — this is by far the best of the “new” trilogy, as the suspense and human drama actually exist here. It recalls, in epic sweep, Empire Strikes Back — but, sadly, Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher can act rings around Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman (as scripted and directed by George Lucas, at least), so the top crown remains on the older film.

I’m glad I saw it in the theaters, I’m glad I didn’t wait in a midnight line to see it, and, when it was all over, it was with a faint sense of disappointment, nostalgia, and closure that I left the theater.

For more … there be spoilers below …

Continue readingEpisode III

Why the Jedi fell

Because they tried taking shortcuts like this to make their lightsabers: Two Star Wars fans are in a critical condition in hospital after apparently trying to make light sabres by…

Because they tried taking shortcuts like this to make their lightsabers:

Two Star Wars fans are in a critical condition in hospital after apparently trying to make light sabres by filling fluorescent light tubes with petrol.

A man, aged 20, and a girl of 17 are believed to have been filming a mock duel when they poured fuel into two glass tubes and lit it.

The pair were rushed to hospital after one of the devices exploded in woodland at Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire.

(via BoingBoing)

Swell. One more thing to do this weekend.

I’m actually hearing surprisingly good things about Revenge of the Sith. And not even just “Well, it sucked less than Phantom Menace” sorts of things, but “Holy crud, Lucas actually…

I’m actually hearing surprisingly good things about Revenge of the Sith. And not even just “Well, it sucked less than Phantom Menace” sorts of things, but “Holy crud, Lucas actually produced a movie that makes me glad I didn’t boycott it after the last two grotesqueries” sorts of things. And even, “Best film since Empire — and maybe better than that.”

Yikes.

And, hrm.

Hey, look! Doyce is in PvP!

Right there with ya, Darth, buddy! (via Stan)…

Right there with ya, Darth, buddy!

(via Stan)

“I find your lack of excuse disturbing …”

If you plan on playing hookey from school or work on Thursday, 19 May (Sith Day) … the Geek Squad has excuse letters for you. Not to mention something very…

If you plan on playing hookey from school or work on Thursday, 19 May (Sith Day) … the Geek Squad has excuse letters for you. Not to mention something very plausible you can download to your Outlook calendar …

Of course, this would have been handier, oh, for something a couple of weeks earlier … like, tomorrow. Except that, even if I were considering skipping work because of the anticipated late night, the fact that the CIO is going to be in town probably makes that a Bad Idea …

(via Julia)

Darth Vader’s blog

Delightful. Three parts canon, one part extrapolation, one part black humor, all parts fun. I will say this for being a tyrannical dark overlord: you get great service at restaurants….

Delightful. Three parts canon, one part extrapolation, one part black humor, all parts fun.

I will say this for being a tyrannical dark overlord: you get great service at restaurants.

Star Tours redux?

The irksome tale of how Disney passed up an opportunity to revamp their aging Star Tours ride — and how it may yet happen in time for the ride’s 20th…

The irksome tale of how Disney passed up an opportunity to revamp their aging Star Tours ride — and how it may yet happen in time for the ride’s 20th Anniversary..

Which would be none too soon, as the queues for ST at Disneyland have gone from being out-the-door to walk-too-fast-by-the-cool-stuff-to-see-it.

Well. This is depressing

A major Douglas Adams biographer was invited to a pre-screening of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. His (non-spoiler) review: The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy movie is bad. Really bad….

A major Douglas Adams biographer was invited to a pre-screening of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy. His (non-spoiler) review:

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy movie is bad. Really bad. You just won’t believe how vastly, staggeringly, jaw-droppingly bad it is. I mean, you might think that The Phantom Menace was a hopelessly misguided attempt to reinvent a much-loved franchise by people who, though well-intentioned, completely failed to understand what made the original popular – but that’s just peanuts to the Hitchhiker’s movie. Listen.

And so on…

It’s bad on a big scale because enormous swathes of the story have been dispensed with – most of the Guide entries, whole scenes – or changed beyond all recognition. And it is bad on a small scale because many, many wonderful lines have been cut or in some cases actually rewritten to make them less funny. Whatever your favourite line from Hitchhiker’s, there?s a good chance that it won’t be in the film. Even if it’s really well-known, widely-quoted, much-loved, very funny – it will probably be absent from the movie. Or if it is there, it might have been changed.

Douglas Adams was a dialogue writer. That was his skill – writing great dialogue. And when he had written it, he would rewrite it again and again and again, changing a word here or there because he knew that good comedy writing is like poetry. It has a meter to it and when you get the right words in the right order it just sounds right and nothing else will do. Douglas’ dialogue was perfect. However, the makers of this film, despite all their talk of being faithful to Douglas’ intentions and ideals, have seen fit to piss about with his carefully crafted, wonderfully quotable lines.

To put it bluntly, they have cut most of the jokes out. I’m not being metaphorical here, they really have, in a very literal sense, removed the jokes from the story. There are scenes where all we’re left with is the set-up dialogue, there are jokes where we get the feed-line but not the punchline. It?s astounding. Occasionally, the filmmakers have actually bothered replacing the jokes but they have replaced them with really, really pisspoor, unfunny jokes; they have replaced them with stupid playground humour and pointless slapstick.

[…] The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy movie is an abomination. Whereas the radio show, TV show, books and computer game are all recognisably variations on a theme, this is something new and almost entirely unrelated. It’s not even a good film if viewed as an original work: the characters are unsympathetic, the cast exhibit no chemistry, the direction is pedestrian, the pace plodding, the special effects overpowering (lots and lots of special effects, none of them funny mind you) and above all the script is amazingly, mindbogglingly awful. Oh, and they have taken most of the jokes out.

This is a terrible, terrible film and it makes me want to weep.

And so on.

Oh, my.

The long, spoilerish review is here. The things-not-in-the-film are here.

(via Solonor)

Star Wars IV – A New Hope

Watched Star Wars IV with Katherine last week. Since all she knows about SW is (a) somebody brought Phantom Menace to her day care and she thought it was boring,…

Watched Star Wars IV with Katherine last week. Since all she knows about SW is (a) somebody brought Phantom Menace to her day care and she thought it was boring, and (b) endless Star Wars – Clone Wars ads on Cartoon Network, I thought it would be fun, some “Daddy/Kitten” time.

A mixed success.

She watched along with me for most of it, but her attention began to wander, paradoxically, as the Millennium Falcon is escaping from the Death Star, and her body followed suit as the Rebel ships headed for their mission toward same.

She seemed to be generally entertained prior to that. She liked the trash compacter scene. She liked the idea of Princess Leia, though she wondered why she didn’t wear a crown. She didn’t quite distinguish between the Death Star and the Imperial Star Destroyers. She liked the robots, though she wanted to know more about the silver Threepio at the very beginning. She thought the Jawas were creepy, thought the Sand People were scary, and was entertained by the Cantina.

My own impressions were more mixed. The DVD, of course, has all the latest-greatest digital tweaking that Lucas has done. My thoughts:

The movie varies between cheesy, exciting, and pretty. The lighting is, in many places, very 70s (shadows are a lot more common these days). The ships fly around improbably close to each other (we see much better space dogfights these days, too). The physical acting (the Darth/Obi-wan light saber fight, the shooting being done by Luke and Han) is often clumsy. There’s an awful plastic nature to so much you can see.

On the other hand, the dialog and acting are actually not too bad. The various talking heads scenes, Alec Guiness, and the Han/Luke/Leia bits are all enjoyable (even if Luke still comes off as a whiny, overemotional brat). The story is a classic. And some of the 70s clumsiness in fx has been masked by the digital updates. Though, while the Jabba scene has been improved from the original inclusion, it still doesn’t quite work (Han’s eyes and body don’t focus on him correctly). And, while some of the control panels have been digitally changed to show imperial typography and characters, there are still shots with numeric displays (the macrobinoculars, the “The Death Star Is Coming!” display) that have arabic numerals.

Speaking of fx, it’s not clear to me whether the various 70s computer graphics have been minimized to avoid the embarrassment to modern eyes, but it sure felt like it. It seemed like there were fewer shots of the various computerized targeting systems. I’m honestly surprised that, while they were tweaking other bits, they weren’t improving those. Not sexy enough, perhaps.

Oh, and I’ll chime in to echo that, no, Han shoots first. He doesn’t do it unprovoked, mind you, but he’s not going to wait for Greedo to pull his gun and fire first (or even simultaneously). But I digress.

That all said, Star Wars IV still works. It’s still a fun movie. It has a fundamental joy, drama, tragedy, and comedy that the more technically complex first trilogy has, so far, lacked. And I’ll have to try watching it again with Katherine in a few years …