https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Doctors, Dungeons and Dragons

Watched the series (“season” in American) finale of Doctor Who, featuring the farewell of Christopher Eccleston and arrival of David Tennant as the Doctor. Bittersweet, as a big, suitably epic…

Watched the series (“season” in American) finale of Doctor Who, featuring the farewell of Christopher Eccleston and arrival of David Tennant as the Doctor.

Bittersweet, as a big, suitably epic climactic episode, revealing some, though not all, of the machinations that have gone on this series, complete with sacrifice and heroism and death and destruction and redemption and …

Well, great stuff.

The only problem I had with the series was that, with a limited number of episodes (what was it, 13?), and some of those being two-parters or direct plot links to previous eps, it all felt like it built to a climax too quickly, too straightforwardly. A big plot that lasts too little a time becomes cheapened by so doing. That said, the idea of shorter stories but an overarching arc, worked well.

As to the change, I will seriously miss Eccleston. But my biggest question now is, when does Series 2 start airing here in the States?


On the other hand, I hope folks will forgive me for getting Katherine hooked on the Dungeons & Dragons cartoon.

Running in the evil that was the 1980s cartoon era, D&D was goofy, stupid, and a horrible waste of time, but I was riveted to it because, well, it was a fantasy cartoon, and it involved D&D. So what if I was a college grad? So what if the powers were stupid (and never ever ever used offensively, to hurt someone)? So what if the episodes were hackneyed and the few bits of “arc” were cliched even then? It was a fantasy cartoon about D&D, fergoshsakes. I’d have watched something five times worse (and probably did).

Anyway, I spotted it in the DVR menu while looking for something else, and I started recording it on a whim. And Katherine just loves it. Go figure.

Mark Evanier, one of the series “developers,” has some fine creator insights into the show (including why the team had that PitA Eric along with them). And then there’s the rumored “Final Episode” of the series, written by show scriptwriter Michael Reeves, but never actually produced.

Good News, Bad News, Good News, Bad News

Good News: A The Tick animated series DVD set is coming! Spoon! Bad News: The first collection is not the full first season, but a partial “best of” compiliation! The…

Good News: A The Tick animated series DVD set is coming! Spoon!

Bad News: The first collection is not the full first season, but a partial “best of” compiliation! The horror!

Good News: Well, it’s not really a “best of” pick-and-choose compilation.

Bad News: It’s not the full season either, but 12 of the 13 episodes thereof (the 13th, whichever one that is, being tied up in some sort of legal dispute — even money whether it’s a contract issue with a voice artist or some sort of “satire” that raised some legal hackles).

Still, 92.3% of a season of The Tick is better than nothing. Again, I say, Spoon!

We are Legion

Right about the time that I saw the Legion of Super-Heroes episode of JLU (a few weeks back), I read that there was a Legion of Super-Heroes series in the…

Right about the time that I saw the Legion of Super-Heroes episode of JLU (a few weeks back), I read that there was a Legion of Super-Heroes series in the works. Yay!

Interestingly, though, based on this picture (reduced right), there’s no link between the JLU LoSH and the series LoSH. Instead, the line-up has changed some and we have much more Teen Titans-like art.

Which isn’t necessarily bad or good, just sort of curious. Though I’ll miss Supergirl, vs. Superboy.

One can argue over which version of costumes (or team line-up) is more canonically true to the comic until one’s blue in the face — but the comic has gone through so many reboots post-Crisis that you could make them all monkeys dressed up in clown suits and you could probably find a reboot that worked with that.

According to the associated article:

Series producer James Tucker, who was a producer on Justice League Unlimited, explained the look of the show for The Continuum.

“Artistically, the style of the show falls somewhere between Superman: The animated series and Clone Wars,” Tucker told The Continuum. “It’s definitely not anime-based at all.”

Asked about villains on the series, Tucker said, “It’s safe to say that the Fatal Five will be showing up several times, as well as a few other well known Legion foes.”

Looking forward to it.

Launch Vipers and … oooh, donuts!

The Battlestar Galactica crew, drawn Simpsons-style. Fun….

The Battlestar Galactica crew, drawn Simpsons-style. Fun.

Zim!

Wikipedia has a disturbing amount of Invader Zim information on it. Actually, I find Wikipedia to be a really valuable source of data. For “controversial” stuff, caveat lector — though…

Wikipedia has a disturbing amount of Invader Zim information on it.

Actually, I find Wikipedia to be a really valuable source of data. For “controversial” stuff, caveat lector — though it’s kind of nice that one can simply be aware of that, vs. the implicit trust most people put in “real” media.

But for geeky fun things like Zim, it’s sort of like going to a really nice, well-formatted, nicely considered fan site, without having to really Google for it.

Ruh-roh

Kill me. Just … kill me now. The new Scooby-Doo cartoon, coming soon, under the odd title Shaggy and Scooby-Doo Get a Clue … In the new cartoon, Shaggy and…

Kill me. Just … kill me now.

The new Scooby-Doo cartoon, coming soon, under the odd title Shaggy and Scooby-Doo Get a Clue

In the new cartoon, Shaggy and Scooby live in the ‘bling’d-out mansion’ (The WB’s words, not mine) of Shaggy’s Uncle Albert. They still have the Mystery Machine, but it can now transform into one of a number of transportation modes. Scooby Snacks are still available, but they are now infused with nano-technology that allows Scooby to fly or turn into a giant robot. Their mission is to keep the Scooby Snacks away from those who would use them for evil.

Just … please … kill me …

I’ve actually redeveloped an appreciation for the True Classic Scooby-Doo (the original 1969 (!) series), and its most recent incarnation (What’s New, Scooby-Doo). This latest … Vahzilokian incarnation sounds like it will rank right up there with the “Thirteen Ghosts” and “Scrappy-Doo” era for utter suckitude.

(via FFN)

At least we don’t have to worry about a Kim Possible/Rainbow Brite cross-over

Disney evidently owns much or all of the old DIC stable, but is now divesting itself of it. I don’t shed much a tear at Disney no longer being associated…

Disney evidently owns much or all of the old DIC stable, but is now divesting itself of it. I don’t shed much a tear at Disney no longer being associated (even indirectly) with a lot of the following:

On offer at MIPTV will be Inspector Gadget (86 half-hours), Beverly Hills Teens (65 half-hours), Care Bears (11 half-hours), Dennis the Menace (78 half-hours), Dennis the Menace specials (3 hours), Get Along Gang (13 half-hours), Heathcliff (86 half-hours), Hulk Hogan (26 half-hours), The Littles (29 half-hours), MASK (75 half-hours), Photon (26 half-hours), Pole Position (13 half-hours) and Rainbow Brite (13 half-hours), among others.

I mean — do we really need to think of Disney and the Care Bears? Or Hulk Hogan? A good move on their part.

Like father, like daughter

I was quite jazzed this past weekend that Katherine (via the Boomerang items in the Comcast “OnDemand” channel) very much enjoyed some classic Space Ghost. That’s my girl….

I was quite jazzed this past weekend that Katherine (via the Boomerang items in the Comcast “OnDemand” channel) very much enjoyed some classic Space Ghost.

That’s my girl.

Roger Rabbit need not apply

New movie distribution rules in China will forbid mixed live action and cartoon characters. “These human live-action, so-called animation pieces will not receive distribution or distribution licenses,” read the order,…

New movie distribution rules in China will forbid mixed live action and cartoon characters.

“These human live-action, so-called animation pieces will not receive distribution or distribution licenses,” read the order, issued Feb. 15. However, films and shows that have already received permits will continue to air.

CGI and 2-D characters alongside human actors jeopardize “the broadcast order of homemade animation and mislead their development,” according to a report from the state-run Xinhua News Agency.

Huh?

Order comes as the Chinese government attempts to increase local production of Mandarin-language toons and cut the amount of foreign animated programming appearing on Chinese television.

Ah. Protectionism, That I understand.

(via J-Walk)

In a similar vein, evidently one reason the Japanese buy so many cars is that the auto industry there has convinced the government to require costly inspections of cars starting at only a few years old. And now they’ve managed to get a law passed preventing the resale of electronic gizmos more than a few years old, too.

The first ones to talk to the government about this were the car manufacturers, and they convinced the government to enforce a rule that used cars have to go to the technical inspection after 3 years, and this is a costly matter since a check costs between 1500 and 3500 EUR. Once you’re in the system, you have to get your car checked every 2 years, and once your car is 10 years old, you need to go there every year. This is a reson why the Japanese change cars quite fast, usually before the car is 3 years old. Important aspect is that you have no control whatsoever on the cost of possible repairs, because after the technical check, the car is driven to the garage and they do the repairs that the technical check asked them to do, you just get the bill with your car. A very nice rip-off… and this system is being envied by a lot of other domains, like the electronics domain at this moment. So from April 1st 2006, ALL electronic products sold in Japan before 2001 will be prohibited from the 2nd hand market! This means that for example a PC like the Vaio U1 (PCG-U1) will be soon not vailable on the Japanese market anymore, since it was sold in April 2002… and you still have about a month to get a Vaio C1! It also seems that a 5 yeas old product (made after 2001) will Face the same problem in the futur.

I’m sure American industry is watching this trend carefully.

(via BoingBoing)

SPOOOOOON!

The Tick (the animated series) is reportedly on its way to DVD. Huzzah! I enjoyed the live action series, but the animated series rocked. I actually purchased one of my…

The Tick (the animated series) is reportedly on its way to DVD. Huzzah!

I enjoyed the live action series, but the animated series rocked. I actually purchased one of my few bootleg DVD sets from the SDCC in order to get a (crappy, flaky) copy of it, so I’ll be in line to buy the real one when it is formally released.

“Yes, evil comes in many forms, whether it be a man-eating cow or Joseph Stalin, but you can’t let the package hide the pudding! Evil is just plain bad! You don’t cotton to it. You gotta smack it in the nose with the rolled-up newspaper of goodness! Bad dog! Bad dog!”

In the meantime, I’m — amused — to discover that the series is owned by … Disney?!

(via Julia)

“You are such a big geek!”

That’s what the counter lady at Jamba Juice said when I correctly answered the Trivia Question of the Day: “What planet did the Thundercats live on?” Won a free Berry…

That’s what the counter lady at Jamba Juice said when I correctly answered the Trivia Question of the Day: “What planet did the Thundercats live on?”

Won a free Berry Lime Sublime smoothie for it.

(And the answer they are looking for is not “Thundera.”)

Continue reading ““You are such a big geek!””

A beautiful butterfly

A major Pixar talent, Joe Ranft, was killed in an auto accident a few days ago. Ranft was one of the heads of story on both TOY STORY and TOY…

A major Pixar talent, Joe Ranft, was killed in an auto accident a few days ago.

Ranft was one of the heads of story on both TOY STORY and TOY STORY 2, as well as the voice of Heimlich the Caterpillar in A BUG’S LIFE. He had also worked on story for THE NIGHTMARE BEFORE CHRISTMAS, BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, THE LION KING, WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT and THE RESCUERS DOWN UNDER, among other films.

If the elegies are any indication, this is a huge loss for Pixar, for animation, and for those who knew him.

JLU gets its limits pushed out further

Was reading a recent ish of the Comics Buyers Guide, interviewing Dwayne McDuffie — long-time comics writer, then JL writer, now presently producer on Justice League Unlimited. In the course…

Was reading a recent ish of the Comics Buyers Guide, interviewing Dwayne McDuffie — long-time comics writer, then JL writer, now presently producer on Justice League Unlimited. In the course of the interview, he mentioned that JLU has actually be renewed for another season. Great news, which I’d not heard before (though there are already news/rumors/spoilers out on the Web, now that I look for them).

Going to be hard to top this past season’s arcs and finale, though.

Temptation …

Ran across this. Drool … Seasons 1 and 2 of Justice League. All episodes on DVD. $80. Except … … well, looking up the EmpricalFilm.com domain, it’s a Canadian company…

Ran across this. Drool …

Seasons 1 and 2 of Justice League. All episodes on DVD. $80.

Except …

… well, looking up the EmpricalFilm.com domain, it’s a Canadian company (I think), using an Austrialian DNS server. There’s no direct contact information. There are some … oddities in the spelling and graphics. And it highly touts the discs as being Region-free, usuable on DVDs anywhere …

It’s almost certainly bootleg. WB has not released all these episodes to the public (hence it being so tempting). So the quality, and the recourse if there’s a problem, is limited.

On the other hand, they sure seem to be widely advertised through Google, and I’ve not found anything explicitly negative about them, just the same sort of vague warnings that are ringing softly in my own head.

Hrm. Don’t think so.

But … damn … they have a lot of cool stuff collected …

Revoltin’, Part II

Lots of buzz continues online over the new Loonatics cartoons. Everyone either loves ’em or … well, no, everyone hates ’em. Some of the objections are on aesthetic grounds –…

Lots of buzz continues online over the new Loonatics cartoons. Everyone either loves ’em or … well, no, everyone hates ’em.

Some of the objections are on aesthetic grounds — the characters look funny, or scary. Others are on conceptual grounds — “edgy” stuff is dodgy business at best, and almost never something one can intentionally invoke.

But a lot of it has to do with the WB Looney Tunes franchise in general, and here there’s a lot less consensus. The main threads of thought:

  1. The Looney Tunes as they were in [fill in a date, probably mid-late 50s, in the Chuck Jones era] are perfect, and anything done with the franchise since then has only been an abomination. This is one more example. They should just keep rerunning those cartoons in perpetuity. That’s all well and good, but probably not much of a money-making opportunity for WB — and, aesthetic pleasure aside, WB is, in fact, a business. 
  2. Same as above, but they should make new cartoons based on the Looney Tunes of [fill in the date]. Probably a non-starter. Retreads of classics rarely come anywhere near the original — and either the anachronisms we accept from fifty years of repeats would seem ludicrous, or updating them would draw the ire of the purists.
  3. Same as above, but they should try to create something new with the characters, like this. Supporters of the idea point to Tiny Toon Adventures as an example of how that can turn out. Purists shrink back in horror and point to Baby Looney Tunes as an example of how that can turn out.
  4. Time to move on and create new things, WB. Give some new creators a chance, not to mention some new concepts. I’ve been watching Animaniacs reruns with Kitten lately, and it’s amazing how ambitious that whole show was — a collection of dozens of new characters and setups, some really crazy concepts for individual episodes (or whole shows), and some marvelous results (albeit some that feel already dated). Probably not making WB much money these days, though, compared to the “classics.”

The problem is, it’s like the Star Trek franchise at Paramount: some folks want the original (or their “original”) back, some folks want it to evolve forward (though they want it done “right”), and still others think Star Trek should be retired permanently. Thus, anything Paramount does with the franchise is going to draw passionate fire.

Similarly, anything WB does with LT is going to be criticized. If they do nothing, they’re squandering a beloved (and profitable) property. If they do something that’s an evolution of it, it’s either trite or it’s untrue to the original spirit. If they do something radical, they alienate the fan base.

All that said? Loonatics looks pretty lame.

UPDATES: As opposed to Krypto, which may or may not be my cuppa, but has some apparent potential — derivative, without dragging the original down with it, at the very least. Though, again, not everyone agrees.

Sponge-Bob sucks, but …

I really dislike Sponge-Bob Squarepants. I think the animation is crude. I think the writing is awful. And I think it glorifies poking fun at stuff just for sake of…

I really dislike Sponge-Bob Squarepants. I think the animation is crude. I think the writing is awful. And I think it glorifies poking fun at stuff just for sake of poking fun, glorifying stupidity. It’s one of the shows that Katherine just plain ol’ isn’t allowed to watch (“Mommy and Daddy don’t like it”), and which we constantly struggle against, given the character’s iconic status on t-shirts and other tchochkes.

All that said, I think this is the goofiest thing I’ve read in a long time. Well, at least for the past few days.

Conservative Christian groups are criticizing a multicultural children’s video featuring SpongeBob SquarePants and other TV characters, claiming it promotes acceptance of gay and lesbian families.

[…] The video does not explictly mention homosexuality but some Christian groups allege it promotes different kinds of families in singing “We Are Family.” The video encourages children to go to the We Are Family foundation’s Web site to sign a tolerance pledge.

“If you look at the Web site, it becomes pretty clear that a part of the agenda is to change the definition of family to include virtually anyone who chooses to be called a family, including homosexual couples and homosexual couples raising children,” said Peter Sprigg, senior director of policy studies of the Washington-based Family Research Council. “Much of what they have is coded language that is regularly used by the pro-homosexual movement such as `tolerance’ and `diversity.’

“Ultimately we feel that this is being used as propaganda to indoctrinate very small children to accept a different definition of family.”

Why is Sponge-Bob is being singled out for criticism, vs. all the other cartoon characters being used in the video (including such dubious types as Arthur, Barney, Dora the Explorer, and Clifford the Big Red Dog)? Probably because … well … there’s this deep-seated suspicion that Sponge-Bob may be … well … y’know … one of those.

According to the New York Times, James C. Dobson, founder of the Colorado-based Focus on the Family, said the popular cartoon figure SpongeBob SquarePants would appear in “a pro-homosexual video.” Dobson made the comment while speaking at a congressional dinner in Washington Tuesday (Jan. 18).

“We see the video as an insidious means by which the organization is manipulating and potentially brainwashing kids,” Paul Batura, an assistant to Dobson, told The Times.

Well, if James Dobson is against Sponge-Bob, I might have to start watching the damned cartoon. Gee, thanks loads, Jim.

UPDATE: More commentary along this line here and here.

That’s Incredibles!

More info on the upcoming Incredibles DVD set, due out 15 March. Looks like the usual Pixar panoply of extra features, interviews, unseen footage, and “bloopers” — as well as…

More info on the upcoming Incredibles DVD set, due out 15 March. Looks like the usual Pixar panoply of extra features, interviews, unseen footage, and “bloopers” — as well as the “Boundin'” short that ran with it in the theaters.

It’s priced at $30, or $18 pre-order from Amazon.

(via Luxo)

Go, Jack-Jack!

Word is, the DVD release for The Incredibles will include a short, Jack-Jack’s Attack, which chronicles the story behind all those phone messages that Kari the sitter left for Mrs….

Word is, the DVD release for The Incredibles will include a short, Jack-Jack’s Attack, which chronicles the story behind all those phone messages that Kari the sitter left for Mrs. I.

Hee.

Other extras include an alternate opening, deleted scenes, bloopers and commentary from director Brad Bird, Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson) and Frozone (Samuel L. Jackson).

Shiny.

(via Luxo)

WDW – Day 7 – Addendum: Dave’s Million Dollar Disney Movie Idea

Okay, it’s not really a million dollar idea — at least, I’ll never see a million dollars from it. I’ve watched the 1946 Disney feature Song of the South, due…

Okay, it’s not really a million dollar idea — at least, I’ll never see a million dollars from it.

I’ve watched the 1946 Disney feature Song of the South, due to the “underground railroad” of folks selling cross-region DVDs of it, since Disney will not release it in the States (and, to be sure, there are some folks in the US would have apoplexy were it to be released, albeit for reasons I think are goofy).

The fact is, it’s overall a pretty mediocre movie. The live action parts of it, at least, are objectionable not so much for their allegedly racist content (i.e., showing “contented” blacks down in the South), but for just being trite and boring.

brerrabbit.gifThe animated portions, though, are much fun, with the various Br’er Rabbit tales brought to life in vastly entertaining ways. They’re good enough that, despite a lack of video, they’ve been fine fodder for the vastly enjoyable Splash Mountain rides at WDW and DL.

The fact is, though, there are a ton of enjoyable Br’er stories. So why doesn’t Disney just do a Br’er Rabbit movie?

It’s that simple. Leave out the live action parts of the original SotS, make it all-animated, expand the story a bit, pick up on the “Br’er Rabbit takes to wandering to find his Laughing Place, tricks Br’er Fox, and realizes there’s no place like home” story line from the rides and make it a full length animated feature? Or draw on some of the other Harris tales, or make up one using the same characters. Heck, they’ve got the story, the characters, the rides, the merchandising just rarin’ to go — why not make use of them? Is Song of the South so laden with PC horrors that even the source stories — from African and African-American folktales — are also verboten?

Disney’s sitting on a gold mine here. A shame it doesn’t dare exploit it. It can’t do any worse than, say, Home on the Range.

(Your trivia item for today: The “Br’er” prefix on the names of all these Uncle Remus tales characters has nothing to do with the “briar” patch. Instead, it’s short for “Brother.”)

WDW – Day 5 – Addendum: The Stitch Epiphany

Stitch is big. Part of that may be the new Stitch ride — but Stitch is big at the Disney parks. Lots of Stitch swag, of all sorts. Stitch seems…

stitch.gifStitch is big. Part of that may be the new Stitch ride — but Stitch is big at the Disney parks. Lots of Stitch swag, of all sorts. Stitch seems to have “broken through,” at least for the moment, into the canon of Major Disney Icons.

But why? It might be that he’s the most successful recent Disney property that isn’t from Pixar. But it’s more than that. I realized as I was wandering about the Magic Kingdom, seeing the umpteenth display of Stitch Christmas shirts and dolls and hats.

I think Stitch fills an ecological niche that’s been missing.

Stitch is Tink, only for boys.

Tinkerbell is the sassy, attitudinal rule-breaker of the Disneyverse. She’s cute, sure, in that wild child sort fashion. She learns some lessons the hard way, but she’s unabashedly her own person, very little guilt, lots and lots of fun.

There are some other female characters who touch on that a bit, but most of them learn harder lessons. The only other “extreme” Disney female, though, is Jessica Rabbit, who is more of a character for, um, the guys. She still shows up, usually in conjunction with as sexual a message as Disney dares.

So Tink is it. Want a “bad girl” with a twinkle, a mixture of innocence, mischief, and sass? It’s Tink.

Plus, she’s kind of safe. She’s a fairy, after all. No “bad lessons” there. She’s a force of nature, and you can admire her spunk and independence without fear that some kid will really take her on as a role model.

Which brings us to Stitch.

Well, that’s all Stitch, too. Jackie’s comment, after seeing the original movie, was that Stitch is “evil.” Certainly he’s a force of nature, mischievous, sassy, destructive — and, yet, as an artificial life form, he’s also safe. You can laugh at him, admire his independence (which remains a bit innocent because he never learned better until recently), without fearing that he’s being a bad role model for kids.

Hell, I have a lot of fondness both Stich and Tink, for the same reasons, even if they are probably the characters most diametrically opposed to my own personality.

tink.gifStitch has two additional advantages. He’s “fresh” (relative to Tink), and he’s a boy (it is presumed, and he is so labelled). That means that boys, who would never be caught dead with Tinkerbell on their shirt, can have Stitch with no worries about being labelled as, well, a fairy.

He’s even a bit more animalistically aggressive (not just attitudinal) than Tink. Perfect for boys.

There’s nobody else in the Disney canon that fits that. Donald is prissy and egotistical. Peter Pan (Tink’s cinematic buddy) would have been a possibility, but he hasn’t had the exposure of late, and he seems to have fallen out of favor with kids. Simba has his slacker phase, but he eventually becomes his father (a memetic fate worse than death). Who else (villains aside) fits, especially if you avoid the Pixar characters (which, with some minor exceptions, Disney does)? Everyone else is too much of a good guy, too much of a nice guy, too much of a “kiddy” character, and/or too female.

Which leaves us with Tink and Stitch.

Probably this is considered cliched wisdom in some quarters, but I’ve never heard of it. I’m rather proud of the revelation, to be honest.