https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Rucka rocks

I first encountered Greg Rucka in the pages of his Oni Press graphic novel White Out, a tale of a US Marshal dealing with murder in the Antarctic. Fell in…

I first encountered Greg Rucka in the pages of his Oni Press graphic novel White Out, a tale of a US Marshal dealing with murder in the Antarctic.

Fell in love.

I’ve kept my eyes open since then, and found Rucka running the core of DC’s Batman books. And he’s done a great noir/crime/detective bit there. Not perfect, but while he deals with personalities, mysteries, and crime (and stays away from super-power stuff) he does great.

I became aware a few months back that he’s actually written “real” books, too. I picked up the first one of his Atticus Kodiak series, Keeper, a week or so back.

Good, good stuff.

I became a fan of Robert Parker and his Spenser series quite some time ago. Keeper and Kodiak remind me of Spenser in the Good Ol’ Days, before Parker became comfortable with his formula (which formula is good enough, mind you, to keep me reading each new installment, not to mention his other two series). In some ways, Rucka outdoes Parker. His Kodiak is less philosophical, and doesn’t spend as much time in the kitchen, but Rucka does his research, and when he talks “body guard” talk, it feels authentic. It may or may not be, but it feels that way.

In Keeper, Kodiak, a professional bodyguard, gets a job protecting a prominent doctor who is the target of anti-abortion activists. Things get deadly very quickly, and Kodiak and his team have their work cut out for them keeping the activists — and others — at bay … not always successfully.

Like Spenser, Kodiak is the archetypical tough guy (though he doesn’t discuss it nearly as much). Both men are strong on the outside, passionate and oddly vulnerable on the inside. I think the two of them would end up either as fast friends or in a macho fist fight within minutes. I suspect Kodiak would think Spenser a bit pretentious, and Spenser think Kodiak decent but dull.

Rucka handles the abortion issue with decent balance. Anti-abortion folks range from lunatics to demogogues to folks who simply feel it’s wrong. Pro-choice folks don’t get quite the range, but Kodiak, dealing with his own issues here, gets to express some of the sad ambivalence of many folks on the pro-choice side of the debate. Given that much of the book centers around an upcoming conference trying to find a non-violent way to deal with the debate, Rucka does a reasonable job of being balanced while not being blandly neutral on the subject.

If there’s any flaw in this 1996 book, it’s that Rucka isn’t content to give Kodiak some down time. Instead, he moves him (and his team) through increasing threats and dangers, not to mention personal emotional turmoil. There’s almost a Saturday Serial feel to it, as though whatever disaster Kodiak has just been through, Rucka feels compelled to trump it a chapter or two later. Kodiak doesn’t actually act so much as react to the various things that happen. We feel for him enough that we forgive him this, but I’ll be curious to see how or if it changes in future books.

Because there are future books. Rucka’s written four or five since then. And I’m confident enough in what I’ve read that I’ve already purchased all the ones that have made it into paperback, as well as a couple other works of his.

If you enjoy Spenser, or the whole Chandler/Runyon tough-PI-with-a-heart-of-gold-and-feet-of-clay genre, you’ll enjoy Keeper.

But I Digress

I’ve been subscribing to the Comic Buyer’s Guide for — well, heck, it’s actually going on five years now. It’s a tabloid mag that discusses the comic book industry, upcoming…

I’ve been subscribing to the Comic Buyer’s Guide for — well, heck, it’s actually going on five years now. It’s a tabloid mag that discusses the comic book industry, upcoming news, restrospectives, etc.

I’d picked up individual issues in the past, usually at the San Diego Comic-Con, where Krause Publishing always passes out free issues.

The one item in it that I always found the most entertaining was the “But I Digress” column by Peter David. Enough so that I actually bought at one SDCC the collection of the column that CBG published.

Well, David (who now has, natch, a blog now — doesn’t everyone?) has begun reprinting his old columns, starting this week with his July ’90 column.

It’s good, entertaining stuff (shock and surprise). Check it out.

Perdition

Xkot’s seen Road to Perdition. He says it’s incredible. Given the original graphic novel, that’s no surprise. Now to just figure out how to get to it ……

Xkot’s seen Road to Perdition. He says it’s incredible. Given the original graphic novel, that’s no surprise. Now to just figure out how to get to it …

World’s Finest?

Why am I always the last to hear about these things? I knew that Warners was still trying to figure out a Superman movie, and I’d heard that Batman: Year…

Why am I always the last to hear about these things? I knew that Warners was still trying to figure out a Superman movie, and I’d heard that Batman: Year One was also on the drawing board (so to speak), but I hadn’t heard a ‘Batman vs. Superman’ flick was in the offing.

This is not going to be easy. Comics, especially in the last decade or two, have struggled with how to get these two icons to duke it out without the whole thing ending up as a smear of Bat-paste on the asphalt. Comics have the advantage of lots of static panels. Even cartoons (the “Worlds Finest” Batman/Superman crossover, for example) can get away with a lot of stuff that a live action film cannot.

The other problem is that — fanboy “look at the pretty CGI and other fx” rapture aside — I’ve found superhero films at their best when they are about character. Yeah, Spidey swinging around Manhattan was kind of fun, but what made Spider-Man a great movie was Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker. What made Burton’s Batman great was Keaton’s psychodrama performance.

But Batman points out the danger here. It can be difficult in an action flick to give enough “character” time to a single lead role. Make it two lead roles, and you end up short-changing one or the other. Keaton’s Batman was overwhelmed by Nicholson’s screen time and scenery-chewing as the Joker. Dafoe was a supporting role as the Green Goblin, and did well at it, but, really, did we get to know about Norman Osborne all that well?

You might argue that everyone knows who Batman is, and everyone knows who Superman is, so you don’t need half the movie to develop their characters first. Well, yes, you do. Unless you’re going to concede that it’s just a big slug-fest between costumes, you have to provide the background to make the motivation behind the conflict click. “(Superman) is clear, bright, all that is noble and good, and Batman represents the dark, obsessive and vengeful side. They are two sides of the same coin and that is material for great drama,” says the new director for the project. That’s great — but you’re going to have to show it, explain it, make us believe it, before you start trying to make us believe the conflict (let alone believe that either Supes can out-think Bats, or Bats can out-fight Supes).

Tricky, especially if this thing has to be kept at 2 hours.

Graphic advice

Some comments on some graphic novels cluttering up my breakfast table….

Some comments on some graphic novels cluttering up my breakfast table.

Continue reading “Graphic advice”

Rot, rot, rot, rot, it’s a plot, plot, plot, plot

Run out of ideas for your next story? Character stuck in a rut? Hell, not sure what sort of nastiness to run your players through your next D&D-style game? Check…

Run out of ideas for your next story? Character stuck in a rut? Hell, not sure what sort of nastiness to run your players through your next D&D-style game?

Check out the Stupid Plot Tricks page.

Comics, comics, comics

Yet another set of mini-reviews, segregated out for your skipping-over pleasure ……

Yet another set of mini-reviews, segregated out for your skipping-over pleasure …

Continue reading “Comics, comics, comics”

Do we read comics?

Why, yes, we do. Many of them. So many, I’ve realized that my previous efforts to record and rate all of them were futile — not to mention prone to…

Why, yes, we do. Many of them. So many, I’ve realized that my previous efforts to record and rate all of them were futile — not to mention prone to leaving even more big stacks of comics down in the family room.

So here are a few from the past few weeks that I heartily recommend. They should still be in stores if you missed them.

Continue reading “Do we read comics?”

Squawk

Coming this fall on the WB is Birds of Prey. It sounds like it is based — loosely — on the quite fine comic book of the same name, though…

Coming this fall on the WB is Birds of Prey. It sounds like it is based — loosely — on the quite fine comic book of the same name, though they are playing fast and loose (understandably) with some of the Gotham/Batman stuff.

It could be fun and dramatic, like the book is. Or it could be jiggly dreck.

We’ll see come Wednesday nights.

Getting it right

Kudos to Sam Raimi, et al., for Spider-Man. Moreso than Burton’s Batman or the first two Superman flicks, this film captures both the spirit and the story of an iconic…

Kudos to Sam Raimi, et al., for Spider-Man. Moreso than Burton’s Batman or the first two Superman flicks, this film captures both the spirit and the story of an iconic comic book character.

Spidey has never been my favorite character (only Joe Straczynski’s current stint on the book has placed it in the coveted “Must Save Best for Last” category), but he’s often been solid comic book entertainment. I’ve reread the old Lee/Ditko tales, and the later creative teams, multiple times.

When you make a movie about a well-known story — whether it’s The Scarlet Letter, or Spider-Man — you have a couple of choices. You can try to make the story your own, emphasizing some particular aspect of the story or characters to zoom in on and emphasize. That’s what Burton did, turning Batman from brooding detective to borderline schizo. (It worked brilliantly, by the by.)

Alternately, you can try to find the heart of the tale, what makes it so well-known and iconic, and crank up the volume on that. Raimi takes this approach, blending the well-known lesson of “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility” with the tale of a nerd who gets what any nerd would dream of — strength, grace, skills — and discovers that it does not automatically make his life wonderful. The result is something that Lee and Ditko from 1962 would find recognizable and probably enjoy very much.

(SPOILER warnings for what follows.)

Continue reading “Getting it right”

The Killing Joker

Some months back, I recall reading (but, evidently, not blogging about) a direct-to-video Batman Beyond movie, The Return of the Joker. The controversy at the time was that WB had…

Click for the full-sized imageSome months back, I recall reading (but, evidently, not blogging about) a direct-to-video Batman Beyond movie, The Return of the Joker. The controversy at the time was that WB had announced it was making significant edits in the film to make it more children-friendly.

There were loud howls of censorship (which is nonsense, since that’s a governmental action, not an action by someone who owns an artisitic property) and aesthetic visigothism (which held more weight as an accusation). Of particular anger was that WB had passed on everything in the script, but was seemingly cowed at the last moment by various Washington rumblings about violence and kids (the video was released uncut in Europe and Asia). They forced the creators, after the fact, to go in and re-edit (some said gut) the film, and then pretended that was the plan all along. Only the availability of pre-release “screener” copies of the video allowed the public to know what had been excised. It was all a nasty enough tale to make me resolve to eschew the regular video release.

A special uncut version, though, has finally been released by WB, after a long letter-writing campaign. And I picked it up, and loved it.

First, I’ll say that WB had the right idea, but the wrong implementation. The Uncut version is too intense for little kids. It’s rated PG-13, and that may be too harsh, but I wouldn’t want to show it to kids in the single-digits of age. There are some extremely harsh psychological moments in this film, the stuff of nightmares, and it just would be wrong to run a kid through that (which, ironically, is one of the conflicts in the story).

Even the creative team behind the movie tacitly admits this in the audio track, made before the original release schedule was made, where they nervously chuckle, “I can’t believe we did that,” and “That’s just evil.” They also note some areas that WB asked them to tone done in storyboard, and admit the story came out better for it.

What WB should have done, though, is issued both versions at the same time, or at least announced that the uncut version would come out two months after the kid-friendlier one. Maybe they just didn’t realize there was enough demand. Silly boys — anime, super-heroes, and all that is hot-hot-hot.

The Original and BestI know of some folks who really despise Batman Beyond. Just to establish my quals here, I loved the original Batman: the Animated Series, and really liked The Adventures of Batman & Robin (better animation, not quite as good stories).

I was upset when that was all cancelled for Batman Beyond, a reconception of the character as a rebellious teen in a dystopian future.

For one thing, it seemed like a cop-out. Batman has been running in comics since the 1930s. You mean to say that they ran out of dynamically visual ideas for the cartoon already?

Part of it is annoyance at the economics of television. Most shows don’t actually make money during their first run. They don’t make it until they’re in syndication, which usually requires about three seasons worth of shows (since that’s enough for the syndicator to “strip” it, running an episode every day). That’s why low-margin, fair-rating shows have a hard time after three seasons, because there are automatically bean-counters who say, “Hey, let’s cancel it and sell it.” Even if there’s enough of an audience to justify it continuing were it one of the first three seasons, there’s an economic incentive to cut the cord after the third season’s over. I’ve always had the impression that it was this pressure that was behind WB cycling through different DC hero cartoons so quickly.

There was also a sense I had that the creators were just “tired” of the traditional Batman tales, and wanted to do something new. And that WB thought it could pump up the ratings by making it a show about a rebellious teen.

So, we toss out nearly all that we know, all the characterization and history and universe-building that’s been done, and head off to the future.

Feh. Been there, done that. And, frankly, even with the orignal Batman’s retro look, there isn’t much in the future that can’t be found in the “current day” setting.

The 40-years-ahead future Batman? Teen troublemaker Terry McGinnis. His dad getting bumped off sends him over the edge. When he stumbles on elderly Bruce Wayne’s former secret ID, Terry steals an experimental Bat-suit and goes out to avenge his Dad. Wayne likes the kid’s spunk, and a new partnership is born.

Frankly, teen drama doesn’t do anything for me. I was a teen once. I endured the drama. I don’t need to see more of it. Terry’s character gets to actually shine a bit in this DVD, as he tackles the Joker in a way the original Bats never did. But aside from those brief moments, toward the end of the flick, there’s not much to recommend Terry. He whines. He pouts. He worries about his girlfriend. He manages to bollix things up time and again despite having a (yawn) super-cool, strength-augmented, stealth bat-suit. Again, yawn. Spider-Man was doing that forty years ago.

What ever *did* happen to Robin?No, what’s always held appeal for me in the BB universe comes to the fore here. Bruce Wayne. The original Batman. Still a strong, brooding figure, full of dark secrets, betrayed by a failing heart into giving up crime-fighting. Wayne, voiced by Kevin Conroy, is in many ways the heart of both the show and the movie. And for those missing the original Batman animated series, there’s an extended flashback in the middle of this DVD that returns us to those glory days — and reveals the secret around the disappearance of the Joker and what broke up the old Batman/Robin/Batgirl team.

The creators had one guiding principle in the new series, and that was not to simply resurrect all the old Bat-villains. Despite the presence of anarchistic “Joker gangs” in mid-21st Century Gotham, the real Mr. J. has been absent, with nobody talking about what happened to him, but hints of dialog between Terry, Bruce, and the current Police Commissioner, Barbara (Batgirl) Gordan. The “returned” Joker, voiced once more by Mark “Luke Skywalker” Hammill, is even crazier and darker than the original back in the old Bat-days. As he pursues his destructive vendetta against Gothan, Batman, and Bruce Wayne, secrets are revealed, stomachs are churned, and the ghosts of the past do all sorts of nasty things to all the remaining players in the present. Heck, we even learn why the elderly Bruce Wayne walks with a limp.

Despite frequent bouts of fisticuffs and some really nice blowing-up imagery (the animation here is a definite cut above the TV show), at the bottom of it this is a character piece. We learn why the Joker (and his sociopathic side-kick, Harley Quinn) were not to be laughed at. We learn more about the interactions between Robin, Batman (Wayne), and Batgirl, and what finally tore them apart. In Terry’s whining, we even learn more about his relationship with Wayne. Even Ace the Bat-dog gets some nice character scenes.

By turning an action/fantasy into a psycho-drama, the creators here (Paul Dini at the fore) have done something special. And while it’s not for little kids, older kids (as well as adults) have something to learn here, too, about dedication, danger, evil, and forgiveness. It strips the G-Rated veil away from what it would mean to have a psychopath like the Joker as your opponent, what you would be likely to suffer, and why you would have to ultimately prevail.

As much as BB has never fired my imagination, I wish the makers of live-action Batman flicks could come up with something half as good as this. And it just makes what WB did with the original version of this all the less forgiveable — not that they wanted something they could release to the little kids, but that they hid the more powerful version from the viewers who are older.

Ah, the smell of it!

At long last, I’ve gotten ComicBase back installed on my PC. This is the world’s premiere comic book inventory database. About two years ago, I had it up and running…

At long last, I’ve gotten ComicBase back installed on my PC. This is the world’s premiere comic book inventory database. About two years ago, I had it up and running and cranking with loading comic books in. Then a reformat, and a software upgrade, and my Muse decided it was Not the Thing to Do this season.

Well my Muse is back, poking me in the butt with her ice pick, so I got ComicBase 6.0 installed last night, and then spent a while trying to get it to read in my old ComicBase 4.0 file.

(This is a great program, really, no question about it, but it has a few distinct quirks that betray its Macintosh background. Just like Mac users complain about interface oddities and rough edges on programs ported from Windows, so this program is always just a slight bit off true in its behavior, sort of like the difference between American English and English English. Only less amusing. But don’t let that scare you off. It’s a great program.)

So, anyway, my collection, when last I left it two years ago, was about a third to a half entered into the database.

The issue count? Almost 6,000 comics.

And that was at most half of them.

Two years ago.

I have some work to do …

Livin’ in the (comic book) ghetto

A nice note by Tom Tomorrow on some snarky reportage by the New York Times regarding the theft of a an Amazing Spiderman #1, priced at $6,500. Quoth the Times:…

A nice note by Tom Tomorrow on some snarky reportage by the New York Times regarding the theft of a an Amazing Spiderman #1, priced at $6,500. Quoth the Times:

And for the more literary-minded, it also undoubtedly raised the serious question of just how much any book could be worth when its message is conveyed through word balloons.

Tom opines:

And this, of course, is in a paper whose real estate section manages to report that shoebox-sized condominiums are now selling for half a million dollars without editorializing, and whose Style section treats the price of designer shoes and handbags with similar matter-of-factness.

(Via BoingBoing)

Thor and Spidey

James Lileks has some nice commentary (now there’s a shock) on comic books in his life. While he’s wrong about Thor (the whole “Ye gods, he’s a god!” thing has…

James Lileks has some nice commentary (now there’s a shock) on comic books in his life. While he’s wrong about Thor (the whole “Ye gods, he’s a god!” thing has actually been touched on now and again), and I disagree with this disdain for organic webshooters, his comments on the secret world of comics readers — and on the marvel that is the book Marvels — are spot on.

Hey, kids! Comics!

Saturday, 4 May, is Free Comic Book Day. All sorts of publishers, as well as retailers around the US (and 29 other countries) will be handing out special free comic…

Saturday, 4 May, is Free Comic Book Day. All sorts of publishers, as well as retailers around the US (and 29 other countries) will be handing out special free comic books. There look to be some pretty keen issues being handed out free, including Star Wars, Tomb Raider, and, natch, various super-heroes. Some publishers are sending out short “special” issues, others recent-but-not-current issues.

Check it out! And bring a friend!

Free Comic Book Day

Blogger Insider: ShanMonster Does the Dave

Here’s the second half of this week’s Blogger Insider pairing between myself and the ShanMonster, this time with her questions of me. UPDATE: It’s also up at the ShanMonster’s site!…

Here’s the second half of this week’s Blogger Insider pairing between myself and the ShanMonster, this time with her questions of me.

UPDATE: It’s also up at the ShanMonster’s site!

SHANMONSTER: I see you are a comics fiend! I used to be a comic/game shop manager, a few years back, so I’ve got more than my fair share of small press publications. What are your favourite titles?

DAVE: Right now, in terms of current titles, looking at the stack sitting in front of me waiting for reviews … Ruse, Powers, Rising Stars, Dork Tower, Strangers in Paradise, Captain Marvel, Alias, Usagi Yojimbo, Exiles, Hellblazer, Girl Genius, and Barry Ween.

SHANMONSTER: Are comics dead?

DAVE: No, I don’t think so. I think monthly comics are a dying form, just as monthly serials in magazines have more or less died out, but more extended productions (“direct to graphic novel”) will take their place.

SHANMONSTER: What’s the most money you’ve ever shelled out for a comic-related purchase, and why did you do it?

DAVE: I’ve never been much for shelling out big bucks for back issues. A couple of expensive purchases (and I don’t recall the precise prices, so I can quote them) were:

  • A cold cast porcelein of Harley Quinn as a gift to Margie, because she likes
    the character.

  • A similar figure of the Manhunter (a la Walt Simonson), because he was one
    my earliest favorite characters.

  • The hardbound/dust-sleeved edition of Crisis on Infinite Earths. Can’t get enough of that George Perez. A few other hardcovers (Kingdom Come comes to mind) were pretty pricy, too. But worth it.
  • A signed litho of an Usagi Yojimbo print.
  • Tickets (and airline tickets) to the San Diego Comic Con a few years back (we were regular attendees back when we lived in SoCal). We might do that again this year, or not, depending on when a family reunion thing out there happens.

    SHANMONSTER: If you had to choose between comics and the internet, which would you pick?

    DAVE:

    AAAAAAAAUUUUGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

    Probably the Internet. But I’d be very bitter about it, and complain a lot.

    SHANMONSTER: What games do you play?

    DAVE: RPGs, I’ve played in a D&D 3E, and am currently playing in D20 Star Wars and Oriental Adventures. And I’m currently running a supers campaign using the beta version of the Tri-Stat Silver Age Sentinels system. Other systems/settings I’ve run in include Amber Diceless (both GM and player), Big Eyes Small Mouth (various settings), various flavors of GURPS (mostly fantasy, but a little Supers), Mayfair’s DC Heroes, and a lot of roll-your-own systems, mostly fantasy-flavored.

    Computer games I’m mostly into first person shooters, starting with Doom, Quake, the different HalfLife incarnations, various others. I usually do them stand-alone, because I really don’t want to get sucked into the multi-player-on-the-web thing.

    Board games we usually play Scattergories, Outburst, Pictionary and Taboo when folks come over, plus a smattering of others. Uno, too.

    SHANMONSTER: When and why did you start blogging?

    DAVE: August 2001. It seemed like all the In People (meaning friends like Doyce, Rey, and Randy) were all doing it, and it seemed like fun. And heaven knows I never get tired of expressing my uninformed opinions on things.

    SHANMONSTER: What’s the most embarassing thing you almost did (stopped yourself from doing, but realized the repercussions)?

    DAVE: Gah. Hard to say, since I usually end up doing it, then blotting it out of my memory until I remember it, cringe like I was struck with a bullwhip, and try to forget it again. Really.

    SHANMONSTER: Why do you suppose people are so fascinated with the boxer vs. briefs question? Have you ever heard the bloomers vs. thong question?

    DAVE: I think it provides a faux sense of intimacy. What could be more personal, more intimate than underwear? I think it’s an interesting commentary on out society that (a) we would ask such questions, and (b) people would answer them, and (c) nobody would really find it at all unusual.

    (And, for the record, briefs until about five years ago, at which time, being mindful of stats which show a slight percentage decrease in fertility rates for guys who wear briefs, I switched over to boxers, and have never gone back.)

    SHANMONSTER: What’s the strangest search request that led to your site? Did it make you do a similar search to see what you could find?

    DAVE:

    “seventh heaven slash fiction”

    That’s just wrong.

    “hot slave princess Leia pic” was understandable, I suppose.

    “mysterious tarot ipaq” isn’t, on the other hand.

    Whenever I actually find one of these in my referrer logs, I always run it, trying to see where else it may be pointing (and just to figure out how it found my site).

    SHANMONSTER: What is the oddest news story you’ve seen recently?

    DAVE: I usually post these, so the one that comes immediately to mind is from today, when some guy from the EPA actually indicated with a straight face that filling in streams and rivers with rock and dirt from mining operations ought really not be considered a violation of the Clean Water Act.

  • Heroes

    Has anyone noticed how much Winter Olympians are beginning to look like super-heroes? Skin-tight aerodynamic glossy body suits, goggles, and, of course, lean, muscular builds? (I meant to link about…

    Has anyone noticed how much Winter Olympians are beginning to look like super-heroes? Skin-tight aerodynamic glossy body suits, goggles, and, of course, lean, muscular builds?

    (I meant to link about this several weeks ago, when all the banners were still up at the airport, but didn’t get around to it. The UAL page shows up with an IP address, which makes me think it will be going away soon, too.)

    Isn’t it about time for comics reviews again?

    [N.B. This post was started but never finished.] Why, yes, I suppose it is ……

    [N.B. This post was started but never finished.]

    Why, yes, I suppose it is …

    Continue reading “Isn’t it about time for comics reviews again?”

    Blogger Insider — to me

    Hey, it’s (finally!) Blogger Insider time again. My partner is Lee Anders, a quite charming lady with a nice site to visit. Here are her questions for me … see…

    Hey, it’s (finally!) Blogger Insider time again. My partner is Lee Anders, a quite charming lady with a nice site to visit. Here are her questions for me … see the next post for the special bonus of my questions for her.

    Question 1: If you were forced to sell your entire comic book collection save one, which one would you keep? And why?

    Yeesh. “If you were forced to cut off all your fingers and toes save one, which one would you keep?” That sort of question, only multiplied by some several hundred. That being said …

    uxmen059.jpg… I really have no idea. I don’t think I have anything that isn’t replaceable. Probably, if push came to shove, an old Neal Adams X-Men I have, oh, around #59 or so, “The Last X-Man.” Fabulous art, really left a lasting impression on me. Got it as a kid, and it defined a lot of the wonder and love of comics that led me back to collecting in high school.

    Question 2: Of all comic creators and artists, living or dead, who would you most like to meet? And why?

    Well, I’ve actually gotten to meet a number of them at the half dozen or so San Diego Comic Cons I’ve been to (which was a heck of a lot easier when I lived in California, though we may make it back there this summmer). In terms of meeting more than “Hey, I love your stuff, can you sign this for me?” sort of things, and more along the lines of, “Who would you like to have dinner with?” I’d probably say Peter David (whose writing I am a serious fan of), though I’d be intrigued by Terry Moore as a close second (I’d love to learn more about the genesis of Strangers in Paradise. Phil Foglio would be entertaining, and Stan Sakai is a neat guy, and would be fun to spend more time with.

    Question 3: You began reading at an early age, and you even recall the first book you ever read … Was there any one book that you (as a child) loved above all others?

    Somebody’s been looking at my web pages … 🙂

    That’s a tough one, though. I’ve been reliving some of the early stuff in buying books for Katherine. Probably Yertle the Turtle, for early stuff. Bambi and Bambi’s Children later on — and I never saw the Disney version until I was an adult. And later on after that, A Wrinkle in Time.

    Question 4: Out of all the books you’ve read (as child and/or adult), which one would you most like for your daughter to someday read?

    All of them. No, seriously, I can’t think of many I wouldn’t want her to read. The ones I mentioned above. The Lord of the Rings (I’ll cheat and call that one book). The Bible. The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Zelazny’s Amber. David and the Phoenix. Eleventy-dozen others. I get no greater joy than someone else enjoying a book I’ve read.

    Question 5: You have an amazing collection of quotes you share with the public (WIST). Who, or what, inspired you to start the collection?

    I’ve always enjoyed a good turn of phrase. When I was in high school, I started scribbling quotes down in a little 3×5 spiral binder. That grew into a Tolkien “blank pages” journal while in college. At some point, my (first) wife and I decided to put them together as a Christmas gift (a cheap one at that) for folks. And it grew from there.

    Question 6: Do you remember the first quote you saved?

    There was a lot of Tolkien in that first binder. One of the oldest I can think of, though, was:

    No man, for any considerable period, can wear one face to himself, and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be the true.
        — Nathaniel Hawthorne (1804-1864), The Scarlet Letter

    Question 7: It is obvious you are a devoted family man, but what one thing about you do you believe will most stick out in your daughter’s mind when she is an adult?

    My sense of humor and the absurd, I think. Or the constant litter of books around me. Or, hopefully, my love for her.

    Question 8: What quality of yours would your wife say is your best?

    Heh. She reads my blog, you know …

    I’d probably guess it would be my devotion. I have a sense of duty Above and Beyond, I am told by her.

    Question 9: And your worst?

    She probably wouldn’t say what my worst quality is. I’d say it’s being too adverse to confrontation when it’s needful.

    Question 10: Your job forces you to travel quite a bit, and most people in your position would consider a vacation being able to stay at home. How about you?

    Oh, I can stay home and veg and surf the net and watch TV and sleep in and read for a long time before I get bored, especially these days. That hasn’t removed my desire to travel and see neat things, though. Katherine has made it a bit more difficult, both in terms of logistics, and in terms our our regularly spending our vacation time (and travel dollars) going back to see our families in California, rather than touring the highways and byways of the world.

    Question 11: What about blogging most appeals to you, as a reader and/or a writer?

    As a writer, I enjoy sharing with folks things that I find interesting — whether it’s bits of my own life, or links, or humor or deep socio-political insights (heh). As a reader, it’s finding folks who have similar interests or opinions to my own (which isn’t to say I don’t like being challenged, but it’s kind of neat to find out that your own tastes and sensibilities aren’t utterly unique).

    Question 12: You can only recommend three links to your readers (blog and non-blog), which do you choose? And why?

    Hey, I think *I* asked that question. Hmmmmm …

    Well, one’s got to be Google, the sine qua non of using the web these days.

    James Lilek’s Bleat is always entertaining, and frequently thought-provoking. And he has a little girl just younger than Katherine.

    And Amazon.com. Because, damn, I could only have dreamed about such a wonderland as a child.

    Question 13: Are you familiar with Random Ruminations?

    No, but I am now. 🙂 He goes onto the Likely List o’ Links — blogs I like well enough to read through them once, and then put them in my Favorites. If, when I spend some Friday night sifting through that list a second time, I again like what I read, then I’ll make them a part of the ever-burgeoning Link List o’ How Dave Spends Too Much Time Blogging.

    (Lee mentioned, re the last question, that “I like to use this opportunity to promote lesser known blogs, and I always try to match my interview partner to someone whose blog I think they would like.” A neat idea I’ll have to swipe.)

    Comics Galore!

    I’ve been remiss. Reviews a-plenty below ……

    I’ve been remiss. Reviews a-plenty below …

    Continue reading “Comics Galore!”