https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Movie Review: “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” (2019) [SPOILERS segregated]

I am quite satisfied with this wrap-up to the Skywalker Saga

Preliminary, non-spoilery notes:

This is by no means a perfect movie. It is not a cinematic classic. It will win no Oscars for writing or acting or directing.

Neither did any other Star Wars movie, I’m pretty sure. And that’s what this is: a Star Wars movie, full of leaps of illogic and crazy adventure and pew-pew and Force magic and melodrama and the whole series is based on Saturday Afternoon Movie Serials, fergoshsakes. We’re not talking high art.

Which is to say that I was entertained, and I thought it was a fine movie for what it was, and I will buy the Blu-Ray, and will feel like I got my money’s worth, and I will debate the details, and I will try not to lose my patience with people who pooh-pooh it because it isn’t artistic cinama or because it doesn’t cause all of their fanboi pleasure centers to fire off they way they demand.

It was a fun movie. I enjoyed watching it. I will watch it again in the future. I think it wrapped up the “Skywalker Saga” just fine, thanks.

Now for spoilers.

Continue reading “Movie Review: “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker” (2019) [SPOILERS segregated]”

A non-spoiler “Spider-Man: Far from Home” quick review

A fun movie, very Spidey, with some interesting themes layered in

  1. This was a fun movie, with plenty of humor, plenty of heart, plenty of action, plenty of Spider-Man being Spider-Man (i.e., getting whomped on physically, emotionally, and situationally, but somehow finding enough moments of happiness to make his dedication to Great Responsibility worth it).
  2. All those questions we had about how the world dealt with half of humanity returning after being snapped out of existence five years ago? A whole lot of them get answered (a bit glibly in places, but the MCU probably doesn’t need to deal with the cataclysmic economic disruption and likely mass starvation that would actually ensue).
  3. Nothing is as it seems. Appearances can be deceiving. That’s true for a lot of the movie — people, relationships, what’s obviously happening vs what’s really happening — and extends all the way through the (two) mid-credits scenes. It actually adds some layers of depth to an (also) enjoyable comic book action flick.
  4. J K Simmons!
  5. I really liked Mysterio. I can’t say anything more, but — I really did.
  6. As someone in the middle of curating a bunch of vacation photos from Venice, seeing the kids (et al.) in Venice was a hoot.

I think this was a great installment in the MCU, Tom Holland continues to be worth his weight in Spidey-Gold; I definitely look forward to what is coming up next for both the hero and the setting.

Overall rating: 

Worth going to see!

Want a more spoilerish review? ‎‘Spider-Man: Far from Home’ review by Dave Hill • Letterboxd

Looking forward to “Terminator: Dark Fate”

The trailer for this partial reboot looks like an actual grown-up story

Okay, honestly, this Terminator: Dark Fate trailer makes me more excited about the Terminator franchise than I’ve been in decades. James Cameron … Linda Hamilton … no hokey jokes … plenty of menace … plenty of (albeit still-mysterious) purpose.

The movie supposedly ignores the last two films (Terminator Salvation (2009) and Terminator Genisys (2015)), which is just as well, even if I expect lots of people to be confused. This one looks like it was actually done by professionals.

Terminator: Dark Fate is due out on 1 November.

Do you want to know more? Terminator: Dark Fate (2019) – IMDb

My SPOILERIFFIC “Avengers: Endgame” overly-long ramble

Do not read if you are one of the dozen people in the world who have not yet seen “Avengers: Endgame”

The Russo Bros. indicated that two Mondays after opening weekend was time enough to have a spoilery discussion, so that’s when I started this. Of course, there’s been a lot out there already, but I haven’t had a chance to mention any of it, so …

Avengers: Endgame poster

I still stand by my initial, somewhat gushing review of the movie. To be sure, a lot of people have pointed out a number of flaws and opined a number of ways that the movie didn’t do all it could have, or even (gasp) disappointed. So I want to tackle some of those items.

But first … SPOILERS BELOW!

Continue reading “My SPOILERIFFIC “Avengers: Endgame” overly-long ramble”

Movie trailers before “Avengers: Endgame”

A visit to the movies before the movie

It’s always interesting what theaters, distribution companies, and other interested parties think are the “right” trailers for an audience.

At a 2pm Saturday showing of Avengers: Endgame, here’s what showed up at  the local Regal:

Hobbs & Shaw —  I have to say, as someone who’s never had much interest in the F&F franchise, this keeps looking more and more amusing. Snarky banter and over-the-top action violence … wow, I’m not sure I’d pony up for a theater showing, but streaming it some day? Sure.

Long Shot — This political rom-com doesn’t poll well with me.

Gemini Man — This is not a remake of the short-lived 70s SF show, but about an assassin being hunted by his own younger clone, both roles played by Will Smith. Looks interesting, but not quite my cuppa.

21 Bridges — The island of Manhattan is sealed off as the police try to hunt down some cop killers. I guess. There’s other stuff in the trailer, but I think that’s it.

Godzilla, King of the Monsters — This is looking pretty darned good. There is a sense of real awe in the kaiju and their appearance. We may go to the movie theater for this one.

Dark Phoenix — I’m kind of over the Fox X-universe. I’d be willing to watch this sometime on an airplane, but I’m not intrigued to go out of my way to see it any time soon.

The Lion King — This is the trailer that’s been out for the last week. Still looks pretty. Haven’t yet gotten a reason to see this remake.

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker — First shots I’ve seen of this film. I don’t have any sense of story here, just images. I’m sure I’ll see it, but this didn’t excite me.

 

My initial, no-spoiler review of “Avengers: Endgame”

The climactic movie of the MCU cycle to date

(No spoilers in this post. I can’t vouch for the comments.)

I enjoy the Marvel super-hero movies. The Marvel Cinematic Universe has almost always managed to please, to a great or lesser extent. There have been films I’ve been less enchanted with (Iron Man 2 and Thor 2 come to mind), but even they had some bright moments.

So I went to Avengers: Endgame expecting to enjoy myself, thinking that this climatic Avengers movie will hit the needed emotional notes, blend tragedy and triumph, sacrifice and heroism, and probably wrap up one or more of the iconic characters in a satisfying, contract-closing, oh-my-god-no-more-extreme-conditioning way. There would be a few cameos, a few call to mind of past films, the good guys would triumph, there’d be a funeral, and we’d end on a note of hope for the future.

I trusted Kevin Feige and the Russo Brothers and Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely and the actors and Alan Silvestri and all the production crew would give us that.

They gave me that, cranked up to 12.

Avengers: Endgame poster

And not in a “loud, obnoxious” fashion, but as in hitting every single note they needed to, and the several more that I really hadn’t realized I wanted, and a few additional ones I never thought I’d see, and doing it in virtuoso fashion. I’ve never seen a franchise movie that more organically integrated the cameos it felt it had to have, to the extent that they weren’t just shout-outs, but key parts of the plot. I’ve never seen a franchise movie that called back to its predecessors in a way that wasn’t a cheat or fan service, but as a necessary and delightful way to make this movie’s plot all the richer.

We’ve got characters — heroes and villains — acting intelligently, reasonably, in line with their motivations. We have heroic, epic goings-on that most of the time feel like that’s exactly  how it should happen.

While not everything is perfect in Avengers: Endgame (and surely I’ll be having those debates with folk in the future), even the imperfections are still okay, and the rest of it is wonderful.

The movie ran for three hours and one minute … and it didn’t feel like it. They used the time to establish mood, to explain motivation, to provide a chance for action to be balanced with consideration, and to give the cast members the time they need to bring their characters forward or to an end. Characters follow a path that makes sense for them — some of their stories come to a close, while others have new beginnings opened up for them, in a variety of ways. If Marvel never made another movie again (no!), I could find this a fitting conclusion for most of these people.

My hat’s off to the creative team. I expected to enjoy myself. I didn’t expect something this good.

Overall rating:

It’s not “Casablanca,” but it’s superb at what it does.

(Note: the immediate post-movie credits are a lot fun. There is no post-credit scene, thought here is a … brief … thing at the end, which I’m sure people will be debating about. It’s worth sitting in the cinema while the credits role, both to appreciate the talent that went into the film, and to unwind a bit.)

Do you want to know more?

The Mouse vs “The Mouse Guard”

Disney has canceled Fox’s “Mouse Guard” adaptation

While there’s been plenty of nerd glee over Disney’s acquisition of Fox’s movie properties — X-Men and FF in the MCU, huzzah! — it’s not all good news.

Disney has canceled Fox’s adaptation of the fantastic comic series, The Mouse Guard, only weeks before it was to begin production. The movie, which had lined up the voice talents Idris Elba, Andy Serkis, and a number of other noteworthies, was considered to not quite fit into either Disney’s portfolio or where they intend to move the Fox studios line to (more PG-13 and R-rated films).

The Mouse Guard is referred to as “Game of Thrones with mice,” which is about 60% inaccurate. It is an extended saga of tribes of forest creatures with varying levels of medieval technology, focused primarily on the  extended realm of field mice and the elite guard that serves as rangers, protectors, and warriors. Written and drawn by David Petersen, it’s beautifully illustrated stuff, with some strong story lines, and I was very much looking forward to what they were going to do with it in a feature film.

While unfortunate, Disney is letting the producers shop the property around, and some other studios have expressed an interest. So, like the doughty mice of its story, it’s Not Dead Yet.

Do you want to know more? Disney Cancels Mouse Guard, Starring Idris Elba and Andy Serkis

So, tell me again why we have a new kinda-live-action “Lion King”?

Besides the obvious.

That is, besides the fact that it will make Disney massive amounts of money. Which I don’t begrudge them because, well, they’re making something that people will spend money on because they want it.

I just don’t quite get it myself. I like the original just fine. The trailer shows some (mostly) very impressive CG, and looks to be a faithful rendition of the “original,” but … nothing that makes me want to shell out theater prices. Or, honestly, even video prices. Maybe, at some point, streaming prices, but nowhere near the top of my list.

I guess what I’d like to see with these live-action remakes, if not a shot-for-shot of the original (purely from a technical perspective), is something that actually reshapes the story along the way. Gives it a new perspective. Alters the tone, or the focal lesson, something. Justifies a remake artistically, not just financially.

That’s likely the last thing Disney would ever do, because changing things artistically would possibly endanger that financially part of the equation. It would just make me feel better.

Still, pretty. They’re still struggling with having animals “talk” in a consistently non-uncanny-valley fashion, but pretty.

On “Captain Marvel” and the future of the Marvel Cinematic Universe

What Carol’s success might mean for the X-Men and FF, oh, and what about her romantic life?

[Possible spoilers for Captain Marvel, but, really, you should have seen it by now.]

As the movie approaches the $1 billion box office level, Marvel’s Captain Marvel is, along with Black Panther, demonstrating that the MCU’s films (and, perhaps, movies in general) don’t need to primarily focus on white guys as heroes.

Which, honestly, I have no problem with, and in fact, applaud. There are a lot of characters in the Marvel Universe who are not-white and/or not-male, and this only frees up the opportunity to see more of them center screen, too. I would prefer not to see white guys disappear totally from the MCU — but that hardly seems likely. Heck, even the Snap didn’t do that.

I’m not actually worried about running out of white guys in the MCU.

(And, yes, there’s even the possibility that some characters might be cast with people who don’t align with their complexion or even gender in the original comics. Nick Fury’s a kinda-good example of that being workable, as are changes with Mar-Vell. If done well, in a way that doesn’t significantly change something essential about the character, I don’t have a problem there.)

Beyond that, it’s noted that the success of these two heroes that are slated for prominence in the post-Avengers “Phase 4” movies, along with the movies already slated, indicates that Marvel need be in no big hurry to incorporate the massive properties they just inherited with the Fox deal: the X-Men and the Fantastic Four.

FF and X-Men — They’ve both been around for a while.

I mean, I’m as anxious as anyone else to see a decent film rendition of the FF, but I’m totally cool with both properties, esp. the X-Men, getting a few years of rest and reset, and then potentially centerpiece another phase down the line. Aside from the risk of super-hero flicks going out of style (which has been predicted multiple times over the last decade) before they circle around to those sagas, a break makes a lot of sense. Though in the meantime we can get some “hints” (news stories about mutations on the rise due to cosmic radiation or Infinity Stone leftovers; a NASA representative name-dropping Reed Richards; weird shenanigans on the news going on in the Sokovian neighbor nation of Latveria, etc.) to help tee up some excitement.

Another interesting thread of discussion that’s come up lately, viz Captain Marvel, is the question of Carol Danvers sexual orientation. It’s a little weird that it’s being brought up in large part because the character doesn’t have the traditional “boyfriend” in her origin movie, which is supposed to be a good thing because not every woman’s story has to be focused on her relationship with a man — but that’s, in turn, made people wonder if Carol’s relationship with Maria Rambeau or (and this would be an interesting twist) Mar-Vell might be more than just friendship.

I’m, honestly, non-committal. There’s nothing wrong with it, but there’s nothing particularly compelling about it, either. To be sure, I don’t have a personal stake in that particular representation, and I agree that getting some LGBTQ folk into the MCU picture (a million unofficial memes about Steve/Bucky notwithstanding) would be a positive thing in principle. I may just be a bit concerned at a meta level about the amount of heavy-eyerolling-See-it-was-all-a-feminist-plot that would ensue if it turned out that Captain Marvel was a lesbian, or even bi, but that seems inevitable no matter what happens with the character.

Honestly, the question of any sort of relationship for Carol is a more interesting one to me: a highly duty-driven person, whose memories have been messed up, who’s been betrayed by her closest friends, who’s just spent a few decades in deep space (has it actually been that long for her, or 3sd-are we talking some light-speed time contract compressing the interval for her?) … trust issues and understanding how to relate to people at all might be a serious uphill road for her, regardless of which way(s) she swings.

In short, on this as with other things, I’m more interested in good story than in particular agendas. If they want to have Capt. Marvel and Valkyrie as the hottest gay lovers in space-time, great. If she ends up in domestic bliss with Doctor Strange, well, that might be interesting. Heck, if she decides that Rocket Raccoon is her type, I’m cool with that, too. Just give me a good story about it.

Do you want to know more?

Deadly Ninja Assassins!

RT @baddestmamajama: Why are all movies about assassins about “elite assassins” and not ones who are just doing ok and sorta dreading their…

More trailers before “Captain Marvel”

Movie trailers on a Monday aren’t quite the same as opening night

Went to Captain Marvel tonight — the second time for me, the first for Margie (who was sick) and James (who wasn’t in town). It remains enjoyable, perhaps even more so in that I could observe the structure of the mysteries and reveals more easily the second time around.

Anyway, here are the trailers we were given, which were a bit different from what I saw opening night … a combo of a week-and-change passing, the different prominence of opening night vs a week later, and a Monday night at that.

Best of Enemies*  — This based-on-a-true-story tale of a civil rights activist and a KKK member isn’t my cuppa, but it still looks interesting.

Hobbs & Shaw* — Fast-and-Furious-related outing. Looks like a fun film to rent or watch on a long plane flight some day.

The Hustle — Buddy film about a pair of female con men. The humor looks a bit more, um, broad (no puns intended) than my preference.

Long Shot — Rom-com with Seth Rogan (as a scruffy journalist) and Charlize Theron (as a presidential candidate). I’m sure there are people who will find it more interesting than I found the trailer, let alone the concept.

Rocketman* — This Elton John biopic doesn’t wow me, but it looks interesting nonetheless.

Missing Link* — Odd little animated film about an adventurer helping reunite a Sasquatch with their Yeti cousins. Doesn’t quite do it for me, but it could be quite charming.

Shazam — Aside from the irony of this appearing in front of Captain Marvel, I’m trying to figure out if this looks like a really funny, fresh take on super-heroes, or just general silliness. The trailers aren’t quite doing it for me, but I’ll probably watch it eventually.

Dumbo* — Those who find slightly creepy and rococo Tim Burton films will probably find this something they like. Not for me.

Frozen II* — This is looking visually interesting, and the soundtrack presented is also interesting. Might end up seeing it.

*Also shown on opening night.

Trailers that were on opening night that were missing this go-around: Spider-Man: Far from Home, Late Night, Godzilla: King of the Monsters, and Dark Phoenix.

 

“Captain Marvel” does boffo box office

While I had my own minor issues with the movie, I’m delighted to see it’s doing even better than the studio had predicted.

Part of that delight is pleasure that the MCU brand continues hold strong, as we reach a new phase going forward.

But a good chunk of that delight comes from thinking about the broflakes who were vocally certain that such an uber-feminazi anti-male movie (which it most definitely is not, unless you think that “female super-hero” intrinsically means male-bashing) would crash and burn under the weight of its grim SJWness.

Captain Marvel International Poster

‘Captain Marvel’ Box Office: Brie Larson Lands $153 Million Debut – Variety

Welcome to the Second Age of Middle-earth …

If Amazon’s Middle-earth series is going to be set in the Second Age

Well, that really doesn’t narrow it down much. It’s a bit like saying, “We’re setting a series here on Earth, somewhere between King Tut and the modern era.” That’s sort of hard to build a coherent narrative around.

That said, there are two major story arcs taking place in Middle-Earth after Morgoth (Sauron’s former boss and a much more powerful dude than Sauron ever was) is defeated at the end of the First Age. The first is creation of the island of Númenor and the rise of the race of Men living there (who are sternly warned by the Powers that Be that they can do whatever they want, as long as they don’t sail west out of sight of their island, toward the Undying Lands, and you know how that story is going to end).

The other thing going on during this vast 3500-or-so years is Sauron, having survived the fall of his boss Morgoth …

a. … becoming an advisor and friend to the Elves, and advising one of them on how to craft some nifty Rings of Power, and, through charm and wit and a bit of black magic, cutting himself in on that Ring action: forging the One Ring that has power over the ones the Elves have, as well as others he then hands out like candy (“The first powerful mind-controlling artifact is free!”) to lords of the Dwarves and Men.

b. taking over Middle-Earth, except for some areas of resistance by Elves and Dwarves, but then being defeated by the prideful Men of Númenor and taken captive.

c. As a captive, becoming an advisor and friend to Ar-Pharazôn, the King of Númenor. Sauron’s the one who whispers in his ear that all those injunctions against sailing West are “Sad!” and “Unfair!” and “Fake Curses!” This leads to the inevitable Númenórean expedition to conquer the West, which in turn leads to Númenor being sunk Atlantis-style and only some of the Men who were “the Faithful” getting to flee to Middle-earth proper, there founding the kingdoms of Gondor and Arnor.

d. Having survived the drowning of Númenor, eventually launching a new war on the Elves and Men, leading to a Last Alliance between those races, which leads to the defeat of Sauron — for a time — while the One Ring is lost — for a time. And that’s the end of the Second Age.

Some of this may sound familiar …

(The Third Age which follows is basically a slow diminishment of the Elves and Dwarves and even the Men, in part through their own doing, in part from the actions of the rings, in part as guerilla warfare by a slowly recovering Sauron. The northern Man kingdom of Arnor is destroyed by Ringwraith action, the southern of Gondor is ground down by action coming out of Morder, the Dwarves suffer setbacks in Moria and Erebor, the Elves start booking trips to the Uttermost West, and so then we get the whole Lord of the Rings saga.)

So there’s definitely stuff — over thousands of years — that you could build a multi-season story around. The rise of Númenor , Sauron shenanigans, the forging of the Rings, the fall of Númenor … depending on how much they want to butt up against that Peter Jackson prologue, they could go all the way to that Last Alliance.

If you go over that long a period, you have very few characters that are around that whole time — Sauron, certainly, and the Elves. No humans, though, which means either zeroing in on a particular time frame within that period, or having an evolving cast.

The only other candidates might be the Istari, the wizards — but canonically they don’t get sent to Middle-Earth until the Third Age. Still, as Maiar, lesser angels, one or more of them could still show up in some role. It’ll give the purists fits, but that’s almost inevitable anyway.

You could zero in on one particular period, at the end of the age: the fall of  Númenor, the founding of Gondor and Arnor, the Last Alliance of Men and Elves, the fall of Sauron. There are humans whose lives span that period. But that gets squarely into Peter Jackson-adjacent territory chronologically and narratively (“Oh, look, yet another Elves & Men vs. Sauron saga”).

Sadly, despite the desires of the article author below, it’s highly unlikely we’re going to see Cate Blanchett or Hugo Weaving reprise their elvish roles for an Amazon TV series. But the geek in me looks forward to debates over “who’s the better Galadriel?” and the like, so it’s all good.

Or, so I hope.

Do you want to know more? 

Movie Trailers before “Captain Marvel”

This was an interesting set, hitting on all sorts of themes (super-heroes, Disney, diversity, action) that someone thought would appeal to their anticipated Captain Marvel audience.

  • Best of Enemies — A black civil rights activist, a KKK member, and the odd friendship they developed. Interesting, but not my cuppa.
  • Hobbs and Shaw — If you want a Fast & Furious branded film with Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham as frenemies against an evil Idris Elba … well, this is the film you’ve been waiting for.
  • Spider-Man: Far from Home — Spidey in Venice, vs Mysterio, with Nick Fury in the mix. Yeah, I’ll probably watch this.
  • Rocketman — If you’ve been waiting for a biopic of Elton John, this looks pretty good.
  • Late Night — Emma Thompson is an aging female night-time talk show host on the verge of being canceled. Mindy Kaling is the unconventional non-white-guy comedy writer (and director and writer of the film). Hilarity ensues. But not for me.
  • Godzilla: King of the Monsters — Okay, this looks pretty awesome, not least because it really deals with the helplessness of humanity in the face of kaiju battles. Also, King Ghidorah! Might see this one in theaters (I enjoyed King Kong last year).
  • Dark Phoenix — This looks terribly mediocre. And I say that as someone who really enjoyed X-Men: First Class.
  • Dumbo — An elephant with forward-facing eyes still looks weird. I trust all the talent to do something remarkable, but I’m still not sold.
  • Frozen 2 — The trailer looks good and certainly makes me want to see the movie. Will I? Who can say?

Ranking the Marvel Cinematic Universe

With the release of Captain Marvel, we now have 21 films in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. One can look around on the Intertubes and find all sorts of force-ranking of worst-to-best of those films. I figure I should probably do something similar to that.

That said, I hate force-ranking, both because it lacks gradation and because my rating of something has a certain plus-or-minus on any given day or viewing. So instead, I’m going to lump these films into four tiers. Even here, I can be swayed, or can appreciate that a given movie is hardly a uniform blessing or curse — Thor: The Dark World is overall a plodding disappointment, except for any scene where Loki is on-screen.

So, here we go, the movies (I’m leaving out TV/streaming service shows) with release year and MCU “Phase”. There’s no particular order within any given tier, and keep in mind that, even with this ranking, I lurves ’em all.

FOURTH TIER – Problematic, despite some good moments.
Iron Man 2 (2010) I
Iron Man 3 (2013) II
Thor: The Dark World (2013) II
Avengers: Age of Ultron (2014) II

THIRD TIER – Entertaining but not memorable
Incredible Hulk (2008) I
Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 2 (2017) III
Captain Marvel (2019) III

SECOND TIER – Perfectly respectable, enjoyable, noteworthy, and well-done
Doctor Strange (2015) III
Ant-Man (2015) II
Avengers: Infinity War (2018) III
Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) I
Captain America: Civil War (2016) III
Thor: Ragnarok (2017) III
Thor (2011) I

FIRST TIER – Exemplify (in a variety of ways) what a super-hero movie can be
The Avengers (2012) I
Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) II
Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017) III
Iron Man (2008) I
Captain America: Winter Soldier (2014) II
Black Panther (2018) III

The only one not listed above is Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018) III, which, for a variety of unessential reasons, I haven’t yet watched.

Feel free to critique any given rating. This is my opinion, obviously, and I would expect anyone else’s mileage to vary.

Movie Review: “Captain Marvel” (2019)

Short NO-SPOILER version: Captain Marvel, for me, is an entertaining and enjoyable MCU film, but not a great one, largely because it never quite engaged me with enough emotional or narrative stakes to keep me at the edge of my seat.

Brie Larson (along with everyone else) is likeable and strong and interesting, and I don’t feel at all like I got ripped off buying a movie ticket for this (versus, say Iron Man 2), and I even think it’s (just) worth seeing in a theater vs waiting for home release. But if this is the character that Marvel is planning on hinging the next phase of the MCU on, then her anticipated activities in Avengers: Endgame had best be a tick up from what we get here.

Rating: ★★★ ½ of 5 (with a ♥)

Note: The movie has two in-credit scenes, a “big picture” one after the initial animated credits, and then a charming denouement after the credits are over. Worth sitting through.

If you want a few more spoilers, here’s my Letterboxd review.

Where do they get those wonderful toys?

Cool article about an e-waste recycling firm in Brooklyn that culls out classic tech items for use as props in TV shows and movies.

In addition to passing older electronics on to new users, the Lower East Side Ecology Center also repurposes some of the rarer finds for a museum-like collection of over 2,000 vintage items. These include beepers, Royal typewriters, personal computers, CRT monitors, news cameras, vintage Macs, slots machines, and countless more items, all preserved in order to display the development of technology over the last eight decades.

The collection also doubles as a prop library, where art directors and production designers can find the perfect pieces of technology for films and shows based in the past.

Now I want to know if they give tours.

Waiting for “Captain Marvel” (2019)

(And, just to be clear, I’m talking about the Marvel movie by that name, not the Shazam movie coming from DC, starring a character who used to be called “Captain Marvel” but now is called “Shazam.” Got it? Though I’m looking forward to that one, too.)

The pix make it clear that Marvel is taking quite a few liberties in Carol Danvers’ origin / early story, instead tying her into much more active participation with the Kree back in the 1990s, as well as having participation an early SHIELD desk jockey named Nick Fury.

How it all works, how it all ties into GotG (and Avengers 4), let alone Kree shenanigans on Agents of SHIELD (assuming any level of interaction between Marvel’s movies and TV any more) — we’ll have to wait until next March to see.

The pix, at least, look interesting. Carol’s suit is more complicated than even the comic book one, and she’s lost the hip sash (which is somewhat iconic for the character, but, yeah). Marvel is investing a bundle into having this bridge the current and next phase of the MCU, so I hope it all works out well.




‘Captain Marvel’ Photos Reveal the Skrulls, Ronan the Accuser, and Young Nick Fury
The first Captain Marvel photos have arrived, and they introduce us to Marvel’s most powerful superhero, a young Nick Fury, the Skrulls and much more.

Original Post

That THX Music

Y'know, the set of chords they play when they demonstrate that the theater is equipped with THX (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgaqv3eCcgs)? Yup, it has music. And a composer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_A._Moorer).

Cool.

[via +James Hill]

 

Original Post

Famous 80s SF movies as Anime

Here are some really nice images done by Dmitry Grozov, aka Ahriman, of classic SF (Blade Runner, Predator, Terminator, Robocop, etc.) done in an 80s-90s anime style.

I would so watch some of these.




What Aliens, Blade Runner, Jurassic Park & Terminator Would Look Like As Anime

Original Post