After the Columbia disaster, there were reports about a Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) interviewer asking whether American “arrogance” had led to the disaster, with implications (according to folks who heard the interviewer) that it was US arrogance regarding the Middle East that was in question — either as karma or in terms of tempting a terrorist attack.
I’ve seen several reports from folks who heard or saw the broadcast, including the person to whom the question was asked, and that was the interpretation that came back.
I sent a note to the CBC Ombudsman, and today got back this response from the senior executive producer of the CBC News:
The CBC Ombudsman has sent me your complaint about part of our coverage of the Space Shuttle disaster last week.
I must tell you that I was driving to the CBC building when the remark in question was made so I didn’t hear it. But since I was in our control room producing our coverage beginning about 15 minutes later and ending after midnight, I know the tone we set. There wasn’t a hint of anti-Americanism in what we did. So I was very surprised to hear about the nature of the complaint.
I have now watched the videotape of the interview you cited. You are, of course, accurate in saying that our anchor used the word, “arrogance” in a question. It came in a conversation with a writer about how confident NASA had become with shuttle flights. The shuttle had a proven track record, said the writer, so naturally there was a high level of confidence at NASA.
Our anchor then asked, albeit in an awkward fashion, if that “confidence” had spilled into “arrogance”. Her intent, it seems to me, is clear. She wondered if healthy confidence had become willful blindness to trouble, based on the belief that any problem could be overcome with NASA’s combination of brain power and ingenuity. I think, in the context of the conversation, that was a reasonable thing to ask.
But I concede that the anchor mangled enough words into her question to blur her meaning.
I have spoken to her about the question. She is aghast at the interpretation that some people have put on her words. She says anti-Americanism never entered her mind. I believe her.
I think her true sentiments were expressed just a minute or two earlier when she said, “We are all watching horrified…”
As I am sure you appreciate, anchoring a LIVE news special as a story is happening, is not easy. The anchor is getting information from untold numbers of sources and trying to formulate articulate questions at the same time.
As I said, I think the question could have been worded much more clearly. I’m sorry it wasn’t. It left some viewers reaching conclusions we had not intended.
Mark Bulgutch
Senior Executive Producer
CBC News and CBC Newsworld
Well, that all sounds very good and quasi-apologetic. But some folks are not impressed by the apology in general or the excuses.