https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Anti-spam update

Comments are tending to remain spam-free (thank you, TinyTuring). A few occasionally are popping up as added by real (evil) people at keyboards; these tend to be fairly obvious on…

spam

Comments are tending to remain spam-free (thank you, TinyTuring). A few occasionally are popping up as added by real (evil) people at keyboards; these tend to be fairly obvious on all my blogs, and get deleted as soon as they’re spotted. I’m hitting the Manage Comments section of my MT installation at least every few days, in case something comes up on one of my less-watched blogs (I don’t always see the Comments e-mails).

Trackbacks continue to be the biggest problem, but are largely managed. Basically, trackbacks on all blogs except this one and BD’s are moderated (the exceptions are because we both are more likely to spot stuff quickly), and both blogs have low thresholds for flagging stuff to be moderated (or junked) anyway. 

By the same token, some very crafty trackbacks have been showing up lately that aren’t easily filtered — titles and excerpts from “real” text, and links to domains that look relatively innocuous. These have the greatest likelihood of slipping through, but I’ve been monitoring both my e-mail notifications and the MT trackbacks screen pretty closely, as well as noting IP ranges for those innocuous domains (and, quel surprise, they often are part of the same bloc, which then gets IP-banned).

It does remain intensely frustrating — like having a wall that invisible taggers keep spray painting — but I refuse to let the bastards grind me down.

Other tools used: AutoBan (which throws a temporary IP block into the .htaccess file any time something.gets flagged as junk, thus reducing processing burden — right now blocking 151 IP addies for the next 2 days), and the built-in SpamLookup (which includes IP blacklist lookups at bsb.spamlookup.net, sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, and bl.spamcop.net and domain blacklist lookups at bsb.spamlookup.net, sc.surbl.org, and multi.uribl.com).

Um … no …

Sometimes these guys don’t even seem to be trying very hard: From: Internal Revenue Service Subject: Tax Notification Internal Revenue Service (IRS) United States Department of the Treasury After the…

Sometimes these guys don’t even seem to be trying very hard:

From: Internal Revenue Service
Subject: Tax Notification

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

United States Department of the Treasury

After the last annual calculations of your fiscal
activity we have determined that you are eligible
to receive a tax refund of $184.80.

Please submit the tax refund request and allow us
6-9 days in order to process it.

A refund can be delayed for a variety of reasons.
For example submitting invalid records or applying
after the deadline.

To access the form for your tax refund, use the following personalized link:
http://[gobbledygook redacted]/www.irs.gov/  

Regards,
Internal Revenue Service

 

Document Reference: ([more gobbledygook])

Riiiiight. I’ll just click right through, accept any downloads, tell you my SSN and bank account number (so you can “deposit my refund”), and then wonder what happened to my bank balance and why does my computer keep crashing …

If the above doesn’t look suspicious to you, you probably shouldn’t be on the Internet.

Spim Doctor

Is Spim (the Instant Messenger version of Spam) getting worse? Or has my Yahoo account gotten on some bulletin board somewhere as an easy mark? I’ve been getting a…

spam

Is Spim (the Instant Messenger version of Spam) getting worse? Or has my Yahoo account gotten on some bulletin board somewhere as an easy mark?

I’ve been getting a ton (relatively speaking — say 3-5 messages a day) of Spim lately — always a “Howdy” and a link, most of which look fairly unsavory.

Annoying. I’ve set myself to Ignore anyone not on my Messenger list, but … feh. Some people suck.

Back on the Spam front …

I’ve been working with the Hosting Matters folks to get FastCGI up and running on the server I’m on.  The biggest problem (from a spam perspective) that Movable Type…

spam

I’ve been working with the Hosting Matters folks to get FastCGI up and running on the server I’m on. 

The biggest problem (from a spam perspective) that Movable Type has is that it’s all script based, and everyone who hits a script spawns a new instance of it (as I vaguely understand), which, during heavy attacks, means a lot of serious overhead on the server.  Since 99% of the anti-spam measures in MT are script-based (fired off after someone invokes the comment or trackback script), that’s a real problem.

MT supposedly works now with FastCGI.  Under that setup, a script, once fired off, stays in memory, and is reusable from there.  That would seriously reduce the impact of spam attacks.  Problem is, I haven’t been able to get even a simple “Hello World” FCGI script to run.

I tried working this back last January and had no luck.  Hopefully I can get it running now.

I’m also seriously pondering making the move over to MT4 while I’m off here in Faerie (but not these couple of days I’m in the office).  It won’t specifically address the spam issue, but I’d like to be on something approaching the latest-greatest.  My biggest question mark at this point is the fork between MT Open Source and MT4 proper.

UPDATE 1:  HM reports they’ve gotten one of the Hello World scripts running, huzzah, and I’ve verified it, huzzah.  That should mean, once I’m at a computer I can access the error log from (just to monitor) that I can try the general conversion to FCGI with my MT 3.34 installation.

UPDATE 2:  And the server is under “attack” again, meaning I can’t do diddlysquat.  *sigh*

UPDATE 3:  Server is clear again.  HM suggests (and is facilitating) the MT4 conversion, so I’ll be doing some testing tonight, with an eye toward converting sooner as opposed to later.

Meanwhile, in EMail Spam Land …

Google Mail has one of the most faboo spam filters out there — but it seems flummoxed by the “Hello, I am bored / tired / spammy tonight /…

spam

Google Mail has one of the most faboo spam filters out there — but it seems flummoxed by the “Hello, I am bored / tired / spammy tonight / today / this morning” spam messages I’ve been getting for the number of weeks.  Weird.

Back on the Spam front …

I’ve been working with the Hosting Matters folks to get FastCGI up and running on the server I’m on.  The biggest problem (from a spam perspective) that Movable Type…

spam

I’ve been working with the Hosting Matters folks to get FastCGI up and running on the server I’m on. 

The biggest problem (from a spam perspective) that Movable Type has is that it’s all script based, and everyone who hits a script spawns a new instance of it (as I vaguely understand), which, during heavy attacks, means a lot of serious overhead on the server.  Since 99% of the anti-spam measures in MT are script-based (fired off after someone invokes the comment or trackback script), that’s a real problem.

MT supposedly works now with FastCGI.  Under that setup, a script, once fired off, stays in memory, and is reusable from there.  That would seriously reduce the impact of spam attacks.  Problem is, I haven’t been able to get even a simple “Hello World” FCGI script to run.

I tried working this back last January and had no luck.  Hopefully I can get it running now.

I’m also seriously pondering making the move over to MT4 while I’m off here in Faerie (but not these couple of days I’m in the office).  It won’t specifically address the spam issue, but I’d like to be on something approaching the latest-greatest.  My biggest question mark at this point is the fork between MT Open Source and MT4 proper.

Spamero delenda est!

So more spammy badness this morning.  Nothing got through to the page — the application layer held up — but the attacks caused serious site problems as the applications…

So more spammy badness this morning.  Nothing got through to the page — the application layer held up — but the attacks caused serious site problems as the applications spun into high gear to keep the Visigoths at bay.  And, in this case, it was a comment script attack, rather than the more common (these days) trackback script.

I’m just damned sick of it.  I renamed both scripts (twice), but it had a heavy enough impact that the kind folks at Hosting Matters sent me a note about it and took some interventions themselves.

Rrg.

I’ve pondered shutting down the trackback bits, even though I make a lot of use of them myself within the application (as an internal cross-reference).  But as today’s attack showed, it’s still a problem on the comment side.  Indeed, one of the key protections I have — TinyTuring, which has kept every single casual bot comment spam since August 2006 — probably made things worse in this case, as it meant that every faux comment attempt fired off the comment script before being blocked (and if it had hit the junk filters and been blocked, AutoBan would have pushed the IP address into htaccess and blocked further attacks from that source).

As it stands, I have a number of IP ranges generically blocked (sorry, all my potential readers in Russia and China); that doesn’t prevent IP spoofing, I suppose, but at the moment it’s the best I can do, on top of the other tools.

(Ironically, most people gripe about e-mail spam; I’ve gotten to the point where the majority gets filtered and the rest I can toss with as much ease as junk mail at home.  It’s the blog spam that’s taking up too much of my time.)

A suggestion has been received that I bail on Movable Type and move over to WordPress or some other blogging tool (not that they’re immune to spam attacks, but the type of scripting that MT has means a lot more system resources are chewed up in defending against it).  I can’t tell you how much I don’t want to do that for a variety of reasons (the vagaries of migration, learning a new platform, etc.).  I’ve had a vague hope that MT4 will be a bit more robust in this, but I don’t recall reading anything about that one way or the other.

So time to crack the books again on MT and anti-spam.  Just what I want to do on my Winter Vacation.

Any other thoughts out there? 

Spam, spam, spam, spam …

The trackback spammers here have been been getting more persistent, and, of course, sneakier.  I still get all the typical pharmaceutical ones (though even those are getting more varied),…

spam

The trackback spammers here have been been getting more persistent, and, of course, sneakier.  I still get all the typical pharmaceutical ones (though even those are getting more varied), but I’m also getting a lot more with random text blocks for everything other than the link itself (and the site names isn’t anything immediately, obviously evil, and aren’t immediately blacklisted).

I now actually watch all the TB messages that come up, and am hopping on things relatively fast.  I still don’t want to disable the facility, since I extensively make use of it for my own internal cross-referencing (and enjoy the occasional legit TB from someone), but I may have to move it all to moderation.  Bleah.

I’m also going to expand the blacklist resources that MT’s SpamLookup uses.  This article suggests a few.  Ah, and this MT article notes that one of the default blacklisters MT was using is no longer available (which was probably slowing down comment and trackback posting) and suggests an alternative (though that seems problematic, and it’s important, for performance reasons, not to overdo the blacklist lookups).

We’ll see how that works.

 

 

You know that post about torture?

I think I would have absolutely no compunction about waterboarding spammers.  Not to get any information out of them, mind you — just to make them suffer. Yeah, yeah,…

I think I would have absolutely no compunction about waterboarding spammers.  Not to get any information out of them, mind you — just to make them suffer.

Yeah, yeah, I know …

But having just spent a few hours trying to fix comment spam in my old photo galleries, I’m not feeling terribly nice toward the group as a whole.  And it’s not even the various “performance enhancer” types of spams I’m talking about here, but pretty nasty and disgusting pr0n links spambotted alongside pictures of my wife and daughter.

Yeah, a bit of good thuggish bloodletting and infliction of gratuitous pain sounds pretty good right about now.

(For the record, I thought I had addressed this particular security gap, but I happened to run across some things showing up in my web site visit logs, and tracked them down to discover that (a) I hadn’t stopped folks from adding comments in all areas, and (b) even where I had, it was still possible to search for the comments.  Rrg.  I’ve turned off all the comment options, and 600ed both the comment add module and the search module.  Which should do the trick, a lot more easily than individually deleting each of the several hundred-or-more spam comments.)

Note:  No, I don’t think I would torture a spammer.  Not really.  But I might enjoy shackling one up and making him/her think I was going to torture them … Or, failing that, I might be convinced to seriously key their car.

How many ways is this wrong?

Received as a Yahoo Instant Messenger spam: andry_bcobetty21: whatz up myuserid, man its awhile LOL,  Hey you have to check out this Adult dating site i found yesterday, it’s amazing!!!…

Received as a Yahoo Instant Messenger spam:

andry_bcobetty21: whatz up myuserid, man its awhile LOL,  Hey you have to check out this Adult dating site i found yesterday, it’s amazing!!! check it out, http://www.ohboysexypersonalads.com

To summarize:

  1. I don’t know anyone named andry-bcobetty21.  Since I reported them as ignore/spam, I never will.
  2. My userid (redacted) is, amazingly, not how friends refer to me.
  3. I don’t “hang” in “the hood” with folks who write like this (syntax, grammar, punctuation, spelling, what have you).
  4. I don’t know anyone who goes to “Adult dating sites” with that sort of name, let alone anyone who would recommend such a site to me (with three! exclamation! points! no less).  Especially since I am happily married.

I don’t know if this is particularly lame, or if Real People actually respond to this sort of thing.

Yeesh.

A different firewall story

So  the previous firewall note had to do with the office Internet gateway firewall.  This one’s about my PC. I started running a firewall on my laptop about a year…

So  the previous firewall note had to do with the office Internet gateway firewall.  This one’s about my PC.

I started running a firewall on my laptop about a year ago.  Between the office and home and various hotels and the like, my PC’s exposed more than I like to the Bad Guys.  XP has a default firewall which operates at kindergarten level, better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick but not quite robust enough for my paranoia.  So I installed Comodo Personal Firewall.  It’s done a good job for me since then, and I recommend it to anyone who wants a personal firewall.

I mentioned this to one of our Security guys at a meeting a few months back, and he mentioned that we actually license (and, upon request, recommend) Symantec Client Firewall, to go with our corporate Anti-Virus standard (as part of the Symantec Client Security package).

So I just got that done today.  It seems a bit more fiddly than Comodo, though it does have the capability of recognizing different locations (and so allowing different rules).  But I’ve found one thing that makes me seriously love it:

It can block the ads in Yahoo Instant Messenger. 

Huzzah.  That’s worth the inconvenience right there.

I’m sure I’ll find things about it to hate or at least be annoyed by, but that one feature is soooooo nice.

What’s the .info?

I was surprised, and a bit dismayed, to run across this article in PC Magazine.  It seems that the .info Top Level Domain (TLD) has become a haven for…

spam

I was surprised, and a bit dismayed, to run across this article in PC Magazine.  It seems that the .info Top Level Domain (TLD) has become a haven for spammers and malware artists, to the point where Microsoft Live Messenger is blocking messages that contain the string “.info” in them.

Microsoft claims that there was a “malicious advertising effort” targeting Windows Live Messenger users. The messages had URLs with “either .info or another URL,” and the site they led to asked for the user’s Windows Live user ID and password. If the user complied, everyone on their contact list received the string.

Pretty standard worm stuff. But Microsoft went on: This was not a Microsoft sponsored effort, and in order to prevent the spread of it through our service, instant messages that include the words “.info” and a few additional key words have been blocked. This action may block some safe, reputable sites and we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause our customers; however, given the circumstances this action was necessary. We are investigating options to ensure legitimate domains that have “.info” in part of their name and other key words are not blocked and will have an update to share in the near future.

Never mind that there are plenty of perfectly legit .info domains.  Like www.mta.info, the site for New York’s Metropolitan Transit Authority.  Or, as another example, www.wist.info, my quotations website.

The problem seems to be promotional policies by groups that manage the .info TLD.  By offering .info domains at cheaper prices than .com domains (sometimes even free), it makes it easier for spammers to buy up blocks of them. 

The number isn’t huge, but it’s been enough to provide a reputation.  Based on a McAfee study released in March:.

The “.info” domain ranked first among generic TLDs for its percentage of risky sites, at 7.5 percent, McAfee said. The domain also hosts many Web sites that send “spammy” e-mail, the vendor said.

SiteAdvisor submits an e-mail address to Web sites and counts how many e-mails are received. Users have a 73.2 percent chance of receiving a spam e-mail by giving their address to a random “.info” site, McAfee said.

The “.com” domain — created in the 1980s — came in second for risk, with 5.5 percent of its Web sites considered questionable, McAfee said.

I’d hate to think that I ended up  building WIST in a “bad neighborhood.” I’m not planning on moving the domain any time soon — but I will be watching.

Trackback spam

Been getting a fair amount of spam here which seems more designed to test or overload spam defenses than actually do anything.  It’s all made up of single links…

spam

Been getting a fair amount of spam here which seems more designed to test or overload spam defenses than actually do anything.  It’s all made up of single links to something like “http://www.google.com/search?q=fgfrfpjq” and other nonsense terms.  Clicking through the searches lead to no such string being found in Google.

If the trackbacks aren’t coming off of blacklisted sites, there aren’t a lot of options, short of turning off trackbacks (which I decline to do) or banning google.com references from trackbacks (possible, but I need to think of the implications).  Or, of course, being diligent in checking trackbacks.

Bacon-bacon-bacon!

Doyce notes the New Slang of the Week: Spam = Email you don’t want. Bacon = Email you want, but not right now (google alerts, newletters, mailing list messages,…

spam

Doyce notes the New Slang of the Week:

Spam = Email you don’t want.

Bacon = Email you want, but not right now (google alerts, newletters, mailing list messages, etc).

And, yes, as he suggests I’ll argue that bacon, per se, is rarely something I don’t want right now, but bacon, in this context, is indeed a problem.  It’s “information overload.”

So, for example, looking at my Google inbox — and bearing in mind that I’ve tossed most of the spam that wasn’t already caught, I have:

  1. Some ads/announcements from companies (e.g., Amazon) that I actually buy things from (so it’s not really spam).
  2. Some e-mail from some friends/family that’s very low priority to read.
  3. Some newsletters/mailing lists I do want to get around to reading, but not right now.
  4. An update from a site about the quality of Katherine’s school.
  5. Various e-mail exchanges from people I do want to talk with and would like to pay attention to as soon as updates come in.
  6. Some bill notifications that I need to review at some point, but not right now.
  7. Quite a few other things I want to look at, but not right now.

The problem is, how do I get the stuff I really want to read (let’s call it the fillet, since we’re on a meat kick immediately visible and read, without letting the bacon sink into obscurity such that it never gets read.  That’s an extension of the problem of cutting out the spam but not the bacon, but it’s even more immediate. 

The fact is, I get more e-mail that probably should be read than I can (or want to) read.  That’s a personal time management issue, to some degree.  But it’s also a reality.  What I need is a personal assistant that’s quite a bit brighter than a spam filter or folder filter to go through and prioritize my e-mail for me.  Unfortunately, GMail’s filters (and pretty much any other e-mail system I’ve seen that works on a keyword basis) isn’t up to that.  We need a mail system that watches behavior and draw conclusions:

  1. Dave reads mail from these people as soon as it comes in.  Make it high priority.
  2. This mail gets left around for a while.  Make it medium priority.
  3. Dave reads this e-mail, sooner or later, before it gets deleted. 
  4. Dave saves this e-mail for a while, but eventually deletes it.
  5. E-mail with these subject lines gets read faster than e-mail with these subject lines.

etc.

Heuristics.  Bayesian filters (in reverse).  Whatever.  We need smarter software (or smarter people).

UPDATE: According to BoingBoing, it’s actually “bacn.” Don’t ask me why — I guess it sounds 1337.

Potpourri for the Feast of St Bernard of Clairvaux

  Who was St Bernard of Clairvaux?  See also. I find it … interesting that the emoticon and the compact disc are turning 25 right about the same time. Disney-MGM…

 

  1. Who was St Bernard of Clairvaux?  See also.
  2. I find it … interesting that the emoticon and the compact disc are turning 25 right about the same time.
  3. Disney-MGM Studios in Florida is going to be renamed Disney Hollywood Studios
  4. Do you just delete all e-cards without reading on the assumption they’re spam (or worse)?  It’s a problem, because I do send out e-cards to some folks (family, mostly).  When I get them, though, I do look to see if it’s ostensibly from a person I know, if it’s from a provider I’m familiar with, and if it “looks” right.
  5. I blogged about it on Doing Write, but De’s post about Lester Dent’s Rules of Pulp Fiction would make a nice GM’s plotting guide for any sort of pulpy game.
  6. Abp. Akinola — long-suffering martyr to righteousness, faith, forbearance, and patience?  Or, not?
  7. Are we living in The Matrix?  Does it matter? (via GeekPress)
  8. How the thriving bottled water business is changing the soft drink business:  “Diet Coke is 99% Water!
  9. And, on a related note, in keeping with recent studies indicating that caffeinated drinks only somewhat reduce retention of water (you still net about 70-80% of the fluid consumed), I was amused Saturday to see “Coke Plus” touting its “hydration” benefits.

Most Intriguing Spam of the Week

(unknown sender) <>  Date: %CURRENT_DATE_TIME %MESSAGE_BODY Coy little devil, ain’t he? (Yes, it’s really spam — I checked the mail headers.)…

(unknown sender) <> 

Date: %CURRENT_DATE_TIME

%MESSAGE_BODY

Coy little devil, ain’t he?

(Yes, it’s really spam — I checked the mail headers.)

The least attractive spam invite in some time

suckafree138: Hi, davehill, how are u? long time no chat lol, Ne way i came acrross this free dating site, and thought u might wanna check it out, [redacted], let…

suckafree138: Hi, davehill, how are u? long time no chat lol, Ne way i came acrross this free dating site, and thought u might wanna check it out, [redacted], let me know what you think if it

i am fine.  i wanna think if it not at all.  u r bad spellr lol. Ne way dont spam my IM k? Plzthx. Now i report u lol.

Oh, the spamming outside is frightful

Getting hit pretty nastily over the past few days by spambots here — not that anything has actually made it to the live pages, but my “junked comments” and…

spam

Getting hit pretty nastily over the past few days by spambots here — not that anything has actually made it to the live pages, but my “junked comments” and “junked trackbacks” listings are long and nasty-looking — various kills from the SpamBlocker plug-in for MT and from scripts trying to bypass the TinyTuring text CAPTCHA.  And I have AutoBan blocking things on an IP level based on the junking filter — and that’s generating lots of access errors in the site error log.

All of which leads to occasional performance snafus around here, but the shields are holding and my animus toward the spammers remains unabated.

(I like this spambot slowdown method .. I might have to play with it some time.)

Potpourri for the Feast of St Philaster

Etc., etc. Who was St Philaster? DOF writes persuasively that a conservative Supreme Court (at least a 5-4 one) might not be as bad as liberals think, if it…

Etc., etc.

  1. Who was St Philaster?
  2. DOF writes persuasively that a conservative Supreme Court (at least a 5-4 one) might not be as bad as liberals think, if it gets them (us) to come up with better ways to do things that don’t rely solely on the fiat of a court majority.  Such a majority could, of course, do a lot of other damage in the meantime, of course.
  3. Cool — Micro$oft has a patent to basically scan your hard drive in order to push focused adverts at you from all directions.  Of course, they would never actually do that without your consent, right?  Read any of those “Do you agree?” EULAs that flash on your screen before you install software you need lately?
  4. A remarkable number of folks who shout for religious equality also take the tack of “but some religions are more equal than others.”  Witness the brouhaha from Christian partisans when the Senate was opened with a Hindu prayer by a Hindu chaplain.  Eek!  From the rhetoric you’d think the Lord was about to go all Sodom and Gomorrah over DC …
  5. I made a Main Titles screen for “Ill Met by Gaslight” — not the greatest thing since forever, but it was fun to do.
  6. Loving the Blackberry Curve, but wish there was a utility like Central for it.  In particular, I wish there was something out there that would add a bit more sophistication to the Auto-On/Off feature.  Some of it I can do via switching the Profiles (esp. now that I know how to easily turn that feature on and off, and have a theme that shows the profile status), but I wish there was something I could schedule between “Curve is turned completely off” and “Curve is on and rings and dings like a lunatic with alarms and calls” — and something that recognizes more than just Weekend vs Weekdays.
  7. “Mommy!  The Jolly Green Giant scares me!
  8. When to compartmentalize your religious feelings from your scientific pursuits — and when not to.  Interesting.

Mmmmmmaybe not

If you are going to send me a message saying, “Hello! I am bored this evening.  I am a nice girl that would like to chat with you.  Email me…

If you are going to send me a message saying, “Hello! I am bored this evening.  I am a nice girl that would like to chat with you.  Email me at …” you might want to have your Spam-o-Matic 3000 choose a random sender name different from “Calvin Kirby.”

Just saying.