https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Micro-mini-movie review

A few old standards I watched while telecommuting this week.  (Intentionally chosen due to their familiarity and low need to be paid constant attention to): The Mummy:    A rippingly fun adventure…

A few old standards I watched while telecommuting this week.  (Intentionally chosen due to their familiarity and low need to be paid constant attention to):

  1. The Mummy:    A rippingly fun adventure that still holds up in plot and fx despite being pre-milennial.  The good guys are good, the bad guys are bad — but everyone’s got just enough of a human face under the serial masks to give it oomph.  This is one of my “desert island” flicks.

  2. Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl:    A bit darker and more complex than the previous, but great fun.  Watched it in particular to see if, post-WDW, it might be good Kitten fare.  Nope — a bit on the (PG-13) violent side (and complicated, to boot).  But glad I watched it again.

  3. The Last Starfighter :   The CG is crude, the masks rubbery, the clothes and hairstyles soooooo 80s, and the sophistication of plot and acting lower than most cartoons on today, but it’s, again, a hell of a lot of fun.  And who hasn’t thought that someone might be watching us, see us for our hidden and unappreciated talents, and pluck us away to save the galaxy (and impress our girl/boyfriend)?

Stardust trailer

Hmmm.  A number of bits I don’t recall from the book (where the whole lighting hunters sky boat thing was a brief interlude), and the trailer has a Princess Bride-style…

Hmmm.  A number of bits I don’t recall from the book (where the whole lighting hunters sky boat thing was a brief interlude), and the trailer has a Princess Bride-style humorous bent.  Still looking forward to this, but it’s a bit worrisome.

(via Les)

Movie Review: 300

Went to see 300 this morning at the local IMAX with Stan, Randy, and Jackie. I’d just finished rereading the Frank Miller graphic novel, so I knew what I was…

Went to see 300 this morning at the local IMAX with Stan, Randy, and Jackie. I’d just finished rereading the Frank Miller graphic novel, so I knew what I was getting into. Bottom line: great for what it is, beautifully rendered, but not destined to go down in cinematic history as much more than that.


300 (2007)

OverallStory
ProductionActing

Story: The movie closely follows Miller’s retelling of the Spartan “victory” at Thermopylae, where 300 Spartans (along with sundry other Greeks) made a stand against the invading Persian armies of Xerxes, inspiring by their brave deaths the rest of Greece to eventually hurl back the invaders. That’s pretty much it, and there’s plenty of speechifying, blood, gore, battle, and Warriors Code to satisfy an IMAX theater of Klingons.

Zack Snyder (who directed), padded out the script some with two other writers, largely because the actual graphic novel would have been about an hour-long film. We now also get to see King Leonidas queen, Gorgo, dealing with political rivals at home who threaten to leave Leonidas in the lurch and sell out the nation to Xerxes. These additions may have been necessary, time-wise, but they are far more conventional and less involving than the original Miller material.

Beyond that, the characters are not all that interestingly fleshed out. That’s part of the “myth” aspect of the tale — nobody ever gets a lot of motivation and backstory from Greek Myth characters, nor do we get more in 300. Leonidas is brave, sees the Greeks as protectors of liberty (ironic coming from the king of the most brutal, most slave-holding, and least democratic of the Greek republics), and loves his wife and his homeland even unto death. The rest of the Spartansget even shorter shrift, with a father-son thread inserted that telegraphs tragedy a mile away.

And, at that, they fare better than the Persians, who are more noteworthy for their sneers and piercings than as their complexity as anything more than villains.

Acting: Within the bounds of the limited character stories, the actors all do quite well. No hamminess, despite some of the lines and speeches to be delivered. The bad guys are bad, the good guys are noble brutes, and everyone plays well their part.

Production: As an adaptation of a Frank Miller graphic novel, the standard for comparison is Sin City, and like that movie, 300 maintains a close adherence to Miller’s visual imagery. Making heavy use of CGI for backgrounds and other effects, computerized blood spatters, and heavy (bordering on excessive) use of “bullet time” super-slo-mo to highlight various action. (Indeed, if all of the slow motion were cranked up to full speed, this would be a 90 minute film, nota two hour one).

The only place where this falters is with some of the prosthetic “monsters” — a misshapen Spartan, a berserker giant, and the imperial executioner. Especially the first (who’s the only character from the graphic novel, and who gets the most screen time), these creations never quite look real enough, especially in close-up.

But beyond that, not only is the imagery, costuming, and set-work a close match for Miller’s novel, it’s just gorgeous. It also lends the whole production a slightly unreal air that keeps the gore, the horror, and the melodramatic speeches from seeming as over the top as they are. This is myth, legend, not gritty realism, and as such it works beautifully.

Overall: As a kickass bloody war film, 300 is great. Violent, yes, but steeped in blood in such a way that it’s not gratuitous, just part and parcel of the legend. As history, 300 is okay, with the basic outline of the historic events being as portrayed (IMDB FAQ) — the only disadvantage being that most of the folks who see it will still not recognize the name “Thermopylae.” As a characterpiece, it’s sorely lacking; only Leonidas gets more than one dimension, and he not much more than that.

But, then, that’s probably not why people are coming to see the film, but to see a big, bloody action spectacular, and 300 fills the bill. The movie’s rated R for violence (a-plenty), nudity (lots of nipplage, male and female alike) and sex (softcore), and is definitely not for youngsters (I’d wait until late teens on this one). I’m pleased I went to see it, though I don’t think I’ll probably get the DVD — I have the graphic novel, after all, which does at least as good a job.

Potpourri for 1200, Alex!

A variety of web tabs I kept open this week, waiting to blog about them.How Alice in Wonderland was published in the Soviet Union. The Queen of Hearts would approve….

A variety of web tabs I kept open this week, waiting to blog about them.

  • How Alice in Wonderland was published in the Soviet Union. The Queen of Hearts would approve. An official responsible for non-Soviet socialist literature was leafing through the list of books recently published in the countries of the “people’s democracy,” as the Eastern European satellite states were called back then, when he stumbled upon the Bulgarian publication of a book about a girl called Alice. Thinkingit was a Bulgarian book, he ordered a Russian translation to be done and published in Sofia for future importing into the Soviet Union (this was a standard procedure for such publications, which were sponsored by Soviet money). The Bulgarians were surprised, and it took some effort and persuading to find someone to translate the book from English and not from Bulgarian.
  • A collection of Replacement Cliches. I don’t know if I like “Everyone gets ice cream!” or “You poop it, you scoop it” better.
  • The Anglican Primates have given the Episcopal Church an ultimatum. Or else what? I am aware that one can respond to the questions I am asking by saying that the Episcopal Church should do the moral thing and let the chips fall where they may. I recognize that that response is appealing to those on both sides (myself included) who think they know what the moral thing is. But just for the sake of argument, let’sconsider what would be best for the health of the Episcopal Church, and the viability of its future, because that, in some measure, must inform our response.
  • Web Typography Sucks. I need to read these links in more detail.
  • MTLookup. One-stop searching for articles and help on Movable Type.
  • If Star Wars were made today. Oh, the humanity! I think it would be more damatic if Luke arrives just as his family is getting killed. So we get to see them die. More dramatic. Also, I think the family needs a pet. Some cute animal, like a space-dog or whatever. Maybe he leaves thinking the dog is dead and finds out it’s still alive at the end. Symbol of hope and all. Put the fuzzy little guy in the trailerand bring in some kids to see the movie. Anyway, he shows up and the troopers see him, and we could have a great chase scene where they go after him in his hovercar. Some shooting. Kind of show that even though he’s a farmboy he can handle himself.

Star Trek XI

Paramount has announced the director (J.J. Abrams) and release date (Christmas 2008) for the next Star Trek movie. The movie is supposed to harken back to the early days…

Paramount has announced the director (J.J. Abrams) and release date (Christmas 2008) for the next Star Trek movie. The movie is supposed to harken back to the early days of the Kirk era. The lead roles haven’t been formally cast, but …

IGN reported yesterday that Paramount was eyeing Matt Damon, Adrien Brody and Gary Sinise for the key roles of Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock and Dr. McCoy, respectively. With a director and start date now set, we’ll soon know for certain who will play the Big Three.

I do like the logo/poster. Very classic.

(via Doyce)

Is there a need to fear?

The new Underdog trailer is up. It’s cute, though it would be better seen in a theater without knowing you’re seeing an Underdog trailer. And the official site (which, oddly,…

The new Underdog trailer is up. It’s cute, though it would be better seen in a theater without knowing you’re seeing an Underdog trailer.

And the official site (which, oddly, doesn’t have a link to the trailer yet) is up, too.

My question is — how is this “Underdog” again? Granted, the original cartoon was a bit thin on the ground, concept-wise (in a world or both people and anthropomorphic dogs (?), nebbish Shoe Shine Boy is secretly rhyming super-hero Underdog, who regularly gets trounced in round one, takes an Underdog Energy Pill, and beats the baddies in round two), but there seems little beyond the name and the idea of a super-powered dog here that relates to even that.

Oh, well. Maybe Katherine will enjoy it.

The Scream

Yet another review of everyone’s favorite sound effect, the Wilhelm. In the 1951 movie Distant Drums starring Gary Cooper, a small band of soldiers were crossing a swamp in…

Yet another review of everyone’s favorite sound effect, the Wilhelm.

In the 1951 movie Distant Drums starring Gary Cooper, a small band of soldiers were crossing a swamp in pursuit of Seminole Indians. While wading through the Everglades one unnamed soldier was attacked and dragged underwater by an alligator. His last sound as he died was a startled scream.

In The Charge at Feather River two years later, a soldier named Private Wilhelm screamed in what sounded like alligator-assaulted agony when he was struck by an arrow. In fact, his cry of pained surprise was practically identical to unnamed soldier’s. Both men would soon be forgotten as a bit parts in B-movies, seen by relatively few moviegoers. But the holler they bellowed went on to be heard by millions– if not billions– of people worldwide.

Previous references here: 1, 2. Other oft-heard effects: Castle Thunder and Red-Tailed Hawk.

The biology of Godzilla

A review of the scientific lit on Godzilla, a field sometimes known as kaiju-biology (where kaiju means, naturally, “monster”). What kind of dinosaur is Godzilla, how does he stand,…

A review of the scientific lit on Godzilla, a field sometimes known as kaiju-biology (where kaiju means, naturally, “monster”). What kind of dinosaur is Godzilla, how does he stand, how does he spew radioactivity? Inquiring minds want to know!

Godzilla is meant to be something like 100 m tall and between 20,000 and 60,000 tons in weight (his size fluctuates in the various films). Of course lots of people who like doing sums and talking about cubes and so on have used the mathematics of scaling to show why – duh – Godzilla couldn’t really walk, stand, or even exist. Michael Dexter presents the argument here, and also brings in thoughts on blood pressure, circulation and physiology to show that a living Godzilla would variously fall to pieces, tear itself
apart, have its organs turn to jelly, explode due to a build-up of internal heat… you get the picture.

Nevertheless, much like the movie fans, the biologists tend to think better of the “old school” Godzilla than the 1998 Americanized version (known also as GINO, “Godzilla in Name Only”).

Indeed TriStar’s GINO did look far more realistic, with its horizontal body posture and flexed hindlimbs making it look like an immense theropod; this despite the fact that it was meant to be a mutated lizard of some sort. The TriStar Godzilla also behaves a bit more like an animal than the real Godzilla: it doesn’t seem to have a sense of honour, doesn’t talk to other monsters, doesn’t use martial arts, and doesn’t have atomic breath, for example. But given that it’s over 120 m long, 90 m tall and weighs
over 24,000 tons, yet is slim-legged and slender, able to run at over 300 mph, and capable of leaping over skyscrapers and such, I somehow sense that Devlin, Emmerich and their colleagues were not striving for biomechanical accuracy in creating the new-look monster. Or, at least, let’s hope not.

The Music of Alfred Hitchcock

Or, at least, of his movies. From Saturday’s NPR Morning Edition, “‘Hitchcock’s Music’ Scores Big on Suspense”: American Studies professor Jack Sullivan examines the celebrated director’s relationship to sound in…

Or, at least, of his movies. From Saturday’s NPR Morning Edition, “‘Hitchcock’s Music’ Scores Big on Suspense“:

American Studies professor Jack Sullivan examines the celebrated director’s relationship to sound in his new book, Hitchcock’s Music.

Hitchcock’s fruitful and sometimes volatile collaboration with such composers as Bernard Hermann Psycho, Vertigo, North by Northwest) and Miklos Rozsa (Spellbound) created some of the most gripping scores of all time.

Sullivan tells Scott Simon about some favorite musical moments, notes Hitchcock’s fondness for waltzes and discourses on how his use of music has influenced generations of filmmakers.

Fun article (and, appropriately, an audio one).

(via Avocet)

No more Wonder-ing

Well, poop. Joss Whedon is off of Wonder Woman. You (hopefully) heard it here first: I’m no longer slated to make Wonder Woman. What? But how? My chest… so…

Well, poop. Joss Whedon is off of Wonder Woman.

You (hopefully) heard it here first: I’m no longer slated to make Wonder Woman. What? But how? My chest… so tight! Okay, stay calm and I’ll explain as best I can. It’s pretty complicated, so bear with me. I had a take on the film that, well, nobody liked. Hey, not that complicated.

Let me stress first that everybody at the studio and Silver Pictures were cool and professional. We just saw different movies, and at the price range this kind of movie hangs in, that’s never gonna work. Non-sympatico. It happens all the time. I don’t think any of us expected it to this time, but it did. Everybody knows how long I was taking, what a struggle that script was, and though I felt good about what I was coming up with, it was never gonna be a simple slam-dunk. I like to think it rolled around the rim
a little bit, but others may have differing views.

The worst thing that can happen in this scenario is that the studio just keeps hammering out changes and the writer falls into a horrible limbo of development. These guys had the clarity and grace to skip that part. So I’m a free man.

Well, sorta. There is that “Goners” movie I can finally finish polishing, and plenty of other things in the hopper I’ve wanted to pursue. I’m as relieved as I am disappointed, and both of those things lead to drink, so that’s a plus. Truly, you may be hearing some interesting things brewing in the coming months. But all potential jets therein will be visible.

But most importantly, I never have to answer THAT question again!!!! And you don’t have to link to every rumor site! Finally and forever: I never had an actress picked out, or even a consistant front-runner. I didn’t have time to waste on casting when I was so busy air-balling on the script. (No! Rim! There was rim!) That’s the greatest relief of all. I can do interviews again!

Almost two years since the original announcement.

It may turn out to be a fine movie — but I’m really sorry Joss isn’t the one doing it.

Kinda-sorta Stardust

Evidently Paramount’s changed its mind as to how it wants the website for the movie of Neil Gaiman’s Stardust to be focused. But Gaiman managed to talk them into letting…

Evidently Paramount’s changed its mind as to how it wants the website for the movie of Neil Gaiman’s Stardust to be focused. But Gaiman managed to talk them into letting him post the nearly-ready-to-go previous version under his site. Fun.

Movie Review: Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines

Let’s just say it makes nice background while working at home.     T3: Rise of the Machines (2003) Overall Story Production Acting I’m a big fan of Terminator 2,…

Let’s just say it makes nice background while working at home.

 


 

T3: Rise of the Machines (2003)

Overall Story
Production Acting

I’m a big fan of Terminator 2, so I shied away from this one while in the theaters, hearing tell it was a bit … disappointing.

And … it was. But only a bit.

Story: There’s not a huge amount new here. John Connor is a bit older. Despite what we saw at the end of T2 (alternate ending), John’s mom has died and he’s an “off the grid” wanderer, certain he’s going to be tracked down by The Machines.

Which, of course, he is. At which point we have (stop me if you’ve heard this one) John and a companion fleeing a super-duper hi-tech Terminator out to kill him, protected by a Schwarzenegger-class Terminator, and trying to get into a top secret installation to prevent Judgment Day from occurring.

Um … ho-hum. There are a few twists, but, really, it’s much the same story, except for the end — and end that falls a bit flat, as we go from “there is no fate but what we make” to “sometimes a man’s gotta do what a man’s gotta do.” There’s no “win,” just survival … and if the Terminator from the future fails its mission — the primary objective at least — it’s hard to say that the “good guys” win, either. Indeed, it’s arguable that the good guys are worse off than they would have been if they hadn’t succeeded
quite so well in the second movie, which is kind of odd.

Indeed, T3 in that respect resembles another film that followed a James Cameron blockbuster: Aliens 3.

Production: The fx are a bit better (CG, you know), the car chases are more spectactular, the baddie is badder (and a girl), the body count is higher, and … well, the whole thing feels a bit flatter, a lot less edgy (lacking the paranoid manic intensity of Linda Hamilton’s Sarah), and somehow smaller (the exteriors are more focused, the interiors less ambitious).

The music? Huh. I guess there was music. Didn’t really notice, until the end titles rehash of the Terminator tune.

The fx, as I said, are technically spiffier (esp. when used to mix with real life, as in some of the initial car chase action), and they’re effectively used, but just not as exciting as the T1000 liquid metal of T2 — perhaps because there’s not much here we hadn’t seen in the dozen years since the ’91 predecessor.

Acting: Nick Stahl’s John Connor is a worthy successor to Edward Furlong — only more whiny and less ballsy. Claire Danes starts off shrill, ends up decent enough. Kristianna Loken as the T-X has less personality (in a bad way) than Robert Patrick as the T-1000. Schwarzenegger is just going through the motions. And everyone else … is just showing up for the paycheck.

Overall: T3 isn’t a bad movie. It’s an amusing romp, something to have fun with over a few beers. Alas, it’s main failing is the degree to which it falls short of its predecessor, somewhat tiredly going through the motions and tarnishing one of the spiffier future histories just a bit. Ah, well — not going to lose any sleep over it.

 

 

 

The real “New Hope”

Oh, this is delicious. If we accept all the Star Wars films as the same canon, then a lot that happens in the original films has to be reinterpreted in…

Oh, this is delicious.

If we accept all the Star Wars films as the same canon, then a lot that happens in the original films has to be reinterpreted in the light of the prequels. As we now know, the rebel Alliance was founded by Yoda, Obi-Wan Kenobi and Bail Organa. What can readily be deduced is that their first recruit, who soon became their top field agent, was R2-D2.

And from there the author, Keith Martin, is off and running, spinning the entire “A New Hope” (and elements of the following movies) into a vast conspiracy that … actually makes sense.

And in a related bonus, the trailers for Star Wars III, V (alt), V.

(via kottke and kottke)

Dwonka

Whilst watching (for about the fifth time in two days, due to a sudden enthusiasm by Katherine) the Gene Wilder version of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, I had…

Whilst watching (for about the fifth time in two days, due to a sudden enthusiasm by Katherine) the Gene Wilder version of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, I had an epiphany.

Willie Wonka is Dworkin.

 

(All this means a lot more if you’ve read Roger Zelazny’s Amber series, and, in fact, have played in Amber Diceless Roleplaying, or in an RPG based on Amber …)

willy-wonka-wilder

No, but, really — think of it …

Omnipotent, omniscient, master (yet reclusive prisoner) of his own incredibly creative (and multi-dimensional) domain …

… ostensibly friendly and a bit crazy but also dark and paranoid and more than willing to watch (and even encourage) others spiral down into self-annihilation …

… owner of an army of ubiquitous dwarven servants from a “distant land” …

… captain of a boat that goes on hell rides …

… someone who enjoys observing parent-child relationships …

… and who’s looking for an innocent to take over his works.

There is so definitely an Amber game in there somewhere. “Nine Children in Wonkamber …” Golden Tickets with the Face of Wonka upon them, which, when gazed upon, trump some very special children to a strange realm where they are tested to destruction through their own greed and gluttony …

 

(via BD, thanks for reminding me)

 

The Wizard of Speed and Time

SEB posts a reminder of this faboo Mike Jittlov <s>video</s> film from back in the day, now up on YouTube. I didn’t do SF conventions back when this was hot…

SEB posts a reminder of this faboo Mike Jittlov <s>video</s> film from back in the day, now up on YouTube.

I didn’t do SF conventions back when this was hot property — but I did go to a number of animation festivals, and this one always drew huge applause. Remembering that the stop-motion stuff was all done frame-by-frame, it’s just astonishing.

Movie Review: Casino Royale

So I think Margie and I were among the last two people on Earth who wanted to see CR while in the theaters — at least based on the very…

So I think Margie and I were among the last two people on Earth who wanted to see CR while in the theaters — at least based on the very scanty attendance in the theater last night. Of course, it’s been out since Thanksgiving, so it’s not like it’s a disappointing opening weekend or something …

No real spoilers below … but if you haven’t seen it and think you’re going to soon … go ahead and skip this post.


Casino Royale (2006)

Overall Story
Production Acting

This is no Citizen Kane, but CR is one of the best Bond movies of the franchise — and, probably, the best movie that’s been labeled a Bond move since the original Doctor No.

Story: Bond movies are usually about The Bad Guy and His Plot and How James Foils Them and Gets the Girl. This film, instead, is about how James Bond went from being a cocky, arrogant SOB to being the suave assassin we know him as (and finally catch a glimpse of at the very end) — and, more importantly, what that transformation cost him.

As such, it almost accrues more credit than it deserves. It’s not a terribly original idea (even within the Bond corpus — it’s been touched on briefly over the past several films, esp. in Goldeneye), but it’s driven home well here. Indeed, that final scene creates an initial rush of applause (“He’s back!”) followed by a discomfort of what deeds and loss lie behind that debonair grin.

Something that makes all this work is that Bond is not (yet) an invincible superman. Physically he’s superb, yes, but he can be hurt (tortured, even), and he gets some marvelous somewhat-persistent facial scrapes and bloodied knuckes over the course of the film. By the same note, though clearly clever as all get out and aware of it, he’s more than capable of making mistakes and underestimating others, usually with punishing consequences.

The novel, as I recall, was about both violence and suspense — brutality and danger behind the sights of a gun and across a baccarat (sigh) table — but not so much about high-paced action scenes. Those do exist in the movie — but not nearly as much as one would expect from a Bond flick (especially after the first marvelous chase scene); that and the near-climactic battle in Venice are the closest the movie comes to being another Big Budget Bond Action Film, and … it was (since they were done so well) enough. Nicely
played.

The movie itself is long (the longest of any Bond flick), and goes through a maze of wheels within wheels — indeed, there were multiple moments where it seemed the movie was going to end at any moment (“X is dealt with – roll credits!”), though the ultimate ending successfully wraps things up. There are some moments, at the Casino itself, where there are some odd jumps in time and contnuity, and the movie has both prolonged, tight action and long leaps of time, and on occasion that feels a bit jarring.

While wandering a bit afield of the original novel, a number of elements from that (including the torture scene) are there. The book was less interested in dealing with the “creation” of Bond than in his introduction as a hard-living (to the point of destruction) not very nice guy who happens to be on Our Side.

There’s all sorts of references to the past, including commentary on martinis, a revisit to the famous 1964 Aston Martin model of Goldfinger and Thunderball, and, of course, yet another Felix Leiter for folks to enjoy. These get a bit of trivia squirming goodness — but don’t distract from the movie itself.

Production: The production values of the film are excellent. The location work is marvelous (with Prague doubling for most of Eastern Europe, including Montenegro). The initial Parkour chase scene in Africa is marvelously choreographed and executed. The car chase … is excellently executed (and marvelously unexpected in that execution),

The make-up and costuming were nicely done.The fight scenes are bloody and brutal and every bit as nasty as they should be. Things are generally polished when they should be, rough-edged when not.

While I was disappointed in David Arnold’s “Shaken & Stirred” music project, he does a good job with the music composition here. The main title is a bit shrieky-man-rock for my taste, but Arnold does a nice job of incorporating it into the rest of the soundtrack. The music doesn’t rise to John Barry’s level, of course, but it’s better than a lot of other non-Barry hands have done.

I’ve heard a few complaints about the main titles, but I thought they were nicely done, visually interesting (at least initially), in keeping with the “casino” theme, and a reasonable representation for the movie. While the sequencing on the Bond theme and the down-the-gunbarrel stuff was non-standard, it was there, which was a good thing.

The only caveat I would have to the production is that the waters of Venice are not known for their clarity, especially in the presence of a lot of fast-moving masonry. Well, I’d add the caveat that the Sony product placement (courtesy of Sony Pictures, cough) got a bit much at times.

Acting: Okay, Daniel Craig has secured himself in the Bond canon. He brings the boyish charm of Brosnan, the rough wit of Connery, the brutality of Dalton, and even a bit of (as Margie noted) Harrison Ford “Indy” humanity to the role. I’m not prepared yet to say he’s best, but he’s tackled the character in ways that nobody else has had the opportunity to, and has done it well.

Once you get past Craig (and the always-marvelous Judi Dench), the cast becomes a lot less solid. Bad guys are bad guys, and I was actually a scosh disappointed in Mads Mikkelsen’s Le Chiffre who couldn’t decide if he was going to be steely, whiny, or just marvelously made up. Eva Green’s Vesper Lynd was competent — she shone in the middle (during and after the stairwell fight), but outside of that she was interchangable with any number of Bond girls.

The rest of the supporting cast is good enough, speaking or not — most notably, though, the other non-thug bad guys all have their own distinguishing appearance and reality and presence (even if it’s just standing/sitting there), which makes the overall production seem richer. However, there’s such a plethora of additional criminal masterminds and various mooks that I did have trouble keeping track of them.

Overall: Me like. Going into the DVD pre-order queue. I can definitely see watching this again in the future (and, heck, wouldn’t take much argument to get me to see it in a theater again).

It’s not the most fabulous film of all time, by any means — but it is a significantly richer and deeper film than most of the ones in the franchise. Some folks might not like that, but I think the movie-going public is ready for the evolution. My biggest question is, now that they’ve mined this particular vein, how will they make the next film as interesting as this one?


(Amusing note: ran into this problem again today … I did an internal blog search on “Casino Royale,” but couldn’t get to any of the links because … wait for it … the URL (with the search conditions) of the originating (search results) page had the “c” word in it, and so was seen as a spam site …)

Dave and Margie go on a date!

Review to follow. this post enabled by airblogging.com. And now for the rest of the story. Came home expecting dinner with guests, only to be told that Jim and Ginger…

Review to follow.

this post enabled by airblogging.com.


And now for the rest of the story.

Came home expecting dinner with guests, only to be told that Jim and Ginger were looking after Kitten for the evening, so we could do whatever we wanted (so long as we didn’t scare the horses). Neither of us was particularly hungry at the time, so we we ended up going to an evening showing of Casino Royale, which had long been on my list of Movies I Really Want to See.

Didn’t regret the time investment at all — a fine movie.

Afterwards, we were a bit peckish, and thirsty. So we went to Downtown Disney and Catal, ate some appetizers and dessert, drank some champagne, and came home.

A very nice evening, in excellent company. I will treasure it.

FF2 trailer

Mmmmm … Silver Surfery goodness … I can’t tell, of course, whether the second Fantastic Four movie will be at all any good, but the clips here look pretty fun…

Mmmmm … Silver Surfery goodness

I can’t tell, of course, whether the second Fantastic Four movie will be at all any good, but the clips here look pretty fun (in an — intentionally? — understated fashion).

(via Randy)

There’s certainly is a need to fear …

… what with war, violence, poverty, corruption … and, oh, yeah, this … due out in August (and based, of course, on the classic). Why, one might ask, if…

… what with war, violence, poverty, corruption … and, oh, yeah, thisdue out in August (and based, of course, on the classic).

Why, one might ask, if they’re completely switching the story around (“A lab accident gives a hound named Shoeshine some serious superpowers — a secret that the dog eventually shares with the young boy who becomes his owner and friend.”) are they using the name, aside from cashing in on Boomer sentimentality. Which, as any number of remakes-in-name-only demonstrate, is a great way to alienate your prospective customer base.

And 2007 was looking to be such a good year so far …

(via Les, who’s chortling over the tag line that will no doubt have the Fundies providing the film with a lot of unwarranted publicity)

Previously kvetched about here.

Indiana Jones and “Lucas Likes the Script so We’re DOOOOOOMED!”

George Lucas has announced that filming on the next Indiana Jones film will commence next year, to be in theaters May 2008. Lucas said he and director Steven Spielberg recently…

George Lucas has announced that filming on the next Indiana Jones film will commence next year, to be in theaters May 2008.

Lucas said he and director Steven Spielberg recently finalized the script for the film.

Lucas kept mum about the plot, but said that the latest installment will be a “character piece” that will include “very interesting mysteries. … I think it’s going to be really cool,” Lucas said.

“It’s going to be fantastic. It’s going to be the best one yet,” the 62-year-old filmmaker said during a break from preparing for his duties as grand marshal of Monday’s Rose Parade, the AP reported.

Given that he thought Star Wars I-III were cool and fantastic …

Still, one can but hope. And the SW-related stuff for the Rose Parade is sounding very cool.