The original trilogy works pretty well as a silent film.
(via Mary)
The original trilogy works pretty well as a silent film. (via Mary)…
The original trilogy works pretty well as a silent film.
(via Mary)
The martial arts/comedy star admits he made an X-rated flick in his unknown “struggling actor” days, but doesn’t think he has anything to apologize for. […] Chan, an actor and…
The martial arts/comedy star admits he made an X-rated flick in his unknown “struggling actor” days, but doesn’t think he has anything to apologize for.
[…] Chan, an actor and martial arts expert who is famous for his death-defying stunts, appeared in a Hong Kong made X-rated movie entitled All In The Family several years ago when he was an unknown 21-year-old.
Chan revealed to Britain’s Daily Express newspaper: “I had to do anything I could to make a living but I don’t think it’s a big deal – even Marlon Brando used to be exposed in some of his movies.”
Yeah, and you should really see the scene with two ladders, a length of chain, a sawhorse, and a mop handle …
(via Warren Ellis)
If Mary Poppins had been a horror film, the trailer for it would have looked a lot like “Scary Mary” — which is recut/remixed from actual Mary Poppins footage….

If Mary Poppins had been a horror film, the trailer for it would have looked a lot like “Scary Mary” — which is recut/remixed from actual Mary Poppins footage.
The real (literary) Mary Poppins was a bit spooky … and, well, we all know how I feel about the lady.
(via DisneyBlog)
I don’t know that it should be a Wikipedia entry, but this detailed analysis of all eight timelines in the Back to the Future trilogy is pretty spiffy. Read it…
I don’t know that it should be a Wikipedia entry, but this detailed analysis of all eight timelines in the Back to the Future trilogy is pretty spiffy. Read it before it’s deleted.
Your geeky YouTube fixes for today. Another One Bites the Dust (via Randy) Darth Vader Being a Jerk (via Shamus)…
Your geeky YouTube fixes for today.
Another One Bites the Dust (via Randy)
Though Katherine has long outgrown the Wiggles (quickly hides all their music in case she develops a sudden yen for them again), it’s kind of sad to see this….

Though Katherine has long outgrown the Wiggles (quickly hides all their music in case she develops a sudden yen for them again), it’s kind of sad to see this.
The Wiggles have sadly announced today that Greg Page, also known as the Yellow Wiggle, is unable to continue performing with The Wiggles due to a chronic condition and has reached the decision to leave the group.
Greg has been suffering symptoms for many months, affecting his ability to perform. The condition is related to blood pressure and while in no way life threatening it affects his balance, breathing and coordination at unpredictable times and with varying severity. Greg has discovered he is genetically predisposed to this condition and that he now needs to focus on managing his health.
Greg is a founding member of The Wiggles and has devoted 15 years to the group. The whole band, crew, and all Wiggles staff, have expressed their sadness and their wishes for Greg to overcome his health problems.
The news release goes on to say that it’s “orthostatic intolerance,” i.e., his heart doesn’t compensate, blood-pressure-wise, for when he stands up or when other environmental changes occur. Yikes.
The group will continue to tour and record.
I poked fun at the Wiggles above, but that’s part-reflex — in reality, they’re a pretty cool group, and Katherine enjoyed (in her time) singing and dancing to their performances on the TV (Playhouse Disney).
Nowadays she’s much more into cheesy Japanese monster movies, like “Destroy All Monsters” and “”Destroy All Planets” (which, interestingly, have nothing to do with each other, or the Wiggles).
(via Steve)
The (MGM UA) James Bond title sequences. All of them. Except, not surprisingly, Casino Royale. Maurice Binder, who did nearly all of them (along with Robert Brownjohn early on,…

The (MGM UA) James Bond title sequences. All of them. Except, not surprisingly, Casino Royale.
Maurice Binder, who did nearly all of them (along with Robert Brownjohn early on, and Daniel Kleinman since), not only established and maintained the whole idea of the title sequence being an integral part of what makes a Bond film, but had an amazingly distinctive style — naked women in silhouette holding and/or dancing / swimming around guns — became as much a part of the Bond films as the martini shaken-not-stirred.
Very cool.
New Line has decided to play chicken and make a Hobbit film without Peter Jackson. You remember Peter Jackson … the guy who managed to pull off The Lord…

New Line has decided to play chicken and make a Hobbit film without Peter Jackson.
You remember Peter Jackson … the guy who managed to pull off The Lord of the Rings in a way that got both fans and newcomers really excited and generated tons of money for New Line? Aw, who needs someone like that to direct the prequel? Especially since he refuses to cave on an auditing law suit he had against them …
From Peter Jackson himself:
A couple of months ago there was a flurry of Hobbit news in the media. MGM, who own a portion of the film rights in The Hobbit, publicly stated they wanted to make the film with us. It was a little weird at the time because nobody from New Line had ever spoken to us about making a film of The Hobbit and the media had some fun with that.
Within a week or two of those stories, our Manager Ken Kamins got a call from the co-president of New Line Cinema, Michael Lynne, who in essence told Ken that the way to settle the lawsuit was to get a commitment from us to make the Hobbit, because “that’s how these things are done”. Michael Lynne said we would stand to make much more money if we tied the lawsuit and the movie deal together and this may well be true, but it’s still the worst reason in the world to agree to make a film.
Several years ago, Mark Ordesky told us that New Line have rights to make not just The Hobbit but a second “LOTR prequel”, covering the events leading up to those depicted in LOTR. Since then, we’ve always assumed that we would be asked to make The Hobbit and possibly this second film, back to back, as we did the original movies. We assumed that our lawsuit with the studio would come to a natural conclusion and we would then be free to discuss our ideas with the studio, get excited and jump on board. We’ve assumed
that we would possibly get started on development and design next year, whilst filming The Lovely Bones. We even had a meeting planned with MGM executives to talk through our schedule.However last week, Mark Ordesky called Ken and told him that New Line would no longer be requiring our services on the Hobbit and the LOTR ‘prequel’. This was a courtesy call to let us know that the studio was now actively looking to hire another filmmaker for both projects.
Or, as Solonor so quanitly headlines it, “New Line screws themselves out of more wads o’ cash.”
Now, it’s altogether possible that whatever Hobbit comes out of this will be perfectly viewable. It’s also possible that Jackson will eventually be brought back on board. But it’s also possible, even likely, that it will be much less than it might otherwise have been. Though, if worse comes to worse, we’ll always have the Rankin-Bass version.
UPDATE: And just to add three more thoughts:
Sandman! The Black Spidey Suit! Venom! The Green Goblin! Nice stuff. And the sand effects look really good. (Note that this is the Spider-Man Sandman. Not Dream of the Endless.)…
Sandman! The Black Spidey Suit! Venom! The Green Goblin!
Nice stuff. And the sand effects look really good.
(Note that this is the Spider-Man Sandman. Not Dream of the Endless.)
Though I’m a bit miffed over their screwing around again with the canon. Yeah, it’s nice that Peter has a personal motivation to go against the Sandman (“Oh, by the way, this is really the guy who killed Uncle Ben”), and that whole vengeance theme plays nicely into the Venom stuff, but … it grates.
Not that it’s going to keep me away from the theater!
(via Avo)
Fun article on NPR (via BD) on James Bond movie title music over the decades. Yes, it’s been 42 years of Bond films, and the evolution and maintenance of the…
Fun article on NPR (via BD) on James Bond movie title music over the decades. Yes, it’s been 42 years of Bond films, and the evolution and maintenance of the Bond music and title sequence tradition continues with the next flick, Casino Royale, opening Friday.
I’ve got a number of albums that have these tunes, and I enjoy them all, even the cheesy ones (yes, The Man with the Golden Gun has lyrics that give innuendo a whole new name, but they’re still rather clever, and it’s probably the weakest Bond movie in the canon) and the nonsense ones (yes, a-ha’s The Living Daylights lyrics have nothing to do with the movie or the characters therein, but Barry’s talented interweaving of the tune into the rest of the movie demonstrated one of his great
strengths as a Bond composer).
Oddly enough, no mention of the infamous John Barry/Monty Norman legal battle over who wrote the famous Bond theme (the courts finally decided on Norman).
Good stuff.
Doyce cites an an Amazon.com snippet during his review of Dawn of the Dead: The Zombie Archetype easily accommodates almost any satire, but tends to focus on mockery of crass…
Doyce cites an an Amazon.com snippet during his review of Dawn of the Dead:
The Zombie Archetype easily accommodates almost any satire, but tends to focus on mockery of crass consumerism, blind patriotism, anti-war (or anti-militarism) sentiment, fear of pandemic disease, and science-run-amok… all of which saw a lot of satirization in the last four years, as well as in the eighties. All horror–even the worst horror–is a response to the specific pressures and issues of its era (see also: all fiction).
The two main eras of zombie-centric books and film coincide with consecutive terms of Republican presidents.
Democrats, conversely, tend to inspire vampire films.
Not sure if it’s true (the particular political timing), but it sure sounds good.
An interesting article on the relationship between Disney and the Baum’s Oz stories — on the 50-year anniversary of MGM’s The Wizard of Oz being shown on TV. CBS executives…
An interesting article on the relationship between Disney and the Baum’s Oz stories — on the 50-year anniversary of MGM’s The Wizard of Oz being shown on TV.
CBS executives (Who had aired this Academy-Award winning motion picture as part of a special extended version of the “Ford Star Jubilee” program) were obviously thrilled with those ratings. But you know who was even happier? Walt Disney.
“Why Walt Disney?,” you ask. Well, you see, Walt had long been a fan of L. Frank Baum’s “Oz” books. In fact, back in the mid-1930s, just as Disney Studios was starting to search for a story that would serve as a suitable follow-up to “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs,” Walt had Roy inquire about the movie rights to the original “Wizard of Oz” book.
Unfortunately, the Baum family had just sold the rights to this best-selling fantasy novel to rival mogul Samuel Goldwyn for some $60,000. Which is how Disney Studios missed out on the chance to make an animated version of “The Wizard of Oz.”
But even though this initial opportunity had slipped through Walt’s fingers, he never lost his enthusiasm for the Oz books, their colorful characters and spectacular settings. Which is why — in 1954 — when the movie rights to 11 of Baum’s books became available (I.E. “The Emerald City of Oz,” “Glinda of Oz,” “The Lost Princess of Oz,” “The Magic of Oz,” “Ozma of Oz,” “The Patchwork Girl of Oz,” “Rinkitink in Oz,” “The Road to Oz,” “The Scarecrow of Oz,” “Tik-Tok of Oz” & “The Tin Woodsman of Oz”), Walt
quickly snatched them up.
Interesting stuff.
Oh, my. DM of the Rings, a very, very amusing “LotR (the Movie) Done Like a D&D Game” comic. Actually, the wisdom of D&D (at the bottom of each strip)…
Oh, my. DM of the Rings, a very, very amusing “LotR (the Movie) Done Like a D&D Game” comic.
Actually, the wisdom of D&D (at the bottom of each strip) is almost as funny.
No matter how difficult or absurd you make a puzzle, your players will find an even more impossible and preposterous way of solving it.
Oh, yeah.
(via Doyce)
UPDATE: On the other hand, if you think you really know your Middle-Earth trivia, check out this quiz site (via BD).
Indiana Jones and the Denial of Tenure: In his nine years with the department, Dr. Jones has failed to complete even one uninterrupted semester of instruction. In fact, he hasn’t…
Indiana Jones and the Denial of Tenure:
In his nine years with the department, Dr. Jones has failed to complete even one uninterrupted semester of instruction. In fact, he hasn’t been in attendance for more than four consecutive weeks since he was hired. Departmental records indicate Dr. Jones has taken more sabbaticals, sick time, personal days, conference allotments, and temporary leaves than all the other members of the department combined.
The lone student representative on the committee wished to convey that, besides being an exceptional instructor, a compassionate mentor, and an unparalleled gentleman, Dr. Jones was extraordinarily receptive to the female student body during and after the transition to a coeducational system at the college. However, his timeliness in grading and returning assignments was a concern.
No, this isn’t some in-depth, culturally relevant, or even witty comparison between the two — just a pointer to some passel of folks who put together a short kick-ass “I…
No, this isn’t some in-depth, culturally relevant, or even witty comparison between the two — just a pointer to some passel of folks who put together a short kick-ass “I would have sold my soul to see this twenty years ago” video. Fun.
More importantly, consider how infinitely better the fx are on that video than in the originals of either — and for doubtless an infinitesimal fraction of the cost and time. What a world we live in.
Yeah, I know, that title probably made everyone cringe a bit The Clone Wars animated series will be continued for another run — but this time … in 3-D! Um,…
Yeah, I know, that title probably made everyone cringe a bit
Well, I was actually only kidding on that last one. Though it’s hard to tell, isn’t it?
Okay, I would pay good money — good, non-matinee type money — to see a Terry Gilliam-directed adaptation of Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett’s end-of-the-world novel, Good Omens. It’s…
Okay, I would pay good money — good, non-matinee type money — to see a Terry Gilliam-directed adaptation of Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett’s end-of-the-world novel, Good Omens. It’s a damned funny book, and I think Gilliam could really do it justice.
And to think, a few years back, he had a chance to make it, with Johnny Depp and Robin Williams in the lead roles, and Hollywood turned it down.
Robert Downey, Jr., to play Iron Man. Filming begins in February. Marvel’s president of productions, Kevin Feige, said Downey Jr’s “versatility… makes him an ideal fit to play such…

Robert Downey, Jr., to play Iron Man. Filming begins in February.
Marvel’s president of productions, Kevin Feige, said Downey Jr’s “versatility… makes him an ideal fit to play such a complex character”. […] The 41-year-old’s widely reported drug problems led to prison, rehabilitation and probation in the 1990s.
(via BD)
Finally watched a borrowed DVD of V for Vendetta, based on the Alan Moore graphic novel of that name, and was glad I did. The movie, especially for the…
Finally watched a borrowed DVD of V for Vendetta, based on the Alan Moore graphic novel of that name, and was glad I did.
The movie, especially for the first two-thirds to three-quarters, parallels the book pretty well. There are some changes and updates (it’s been a couple of decades, after all), but there’s not much there to complain about as a “purist” — especially if one must assume a need to simplify the typically Alan Moore convoluted and baroque plot. The fundamentals — a fascist take-over of a scared British population, coupled with tyranny and racial/ethnic/gay cleansing (and worse) is all lifted in huge chunks from the
book.
The movie and book diverge most significantly in the last bit — the climax of the film. Again, this is is almost inevitable — the original’s paean to anarchy (in a purist sense), not to mention the destruction of various party members in a way that resembles Shakespeare on acid, would have been nearly unfilmable and certainly unmarketable.The alternative taken — a bloody coup coupled with “People Power” marches (in Guy Fawlkes gear) — rings a more than a bit conventional and facile, though. Moore’s decision
to take his name off the movie is perfectly understandable, if still a bit melodramatic (he had a lot more to complain about with the adaptation of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen).
Beyond that, there’s a lot less about the supporting players — much of the middle of the book is gone, or greatly elided. The corrupt in-fighting at the top is diminished (sadly); the whole “Fate computer” bit is gone (mercifully). (Okay, anyone else think it was pleasantly ironic that John Hurt, who played Winston Smith in a relatively recent 1984 (which was characterized by a giant “V” logo) is now playing the “Big Brother” analog in another British dystopia (with a giant “V” logo)?)
The movie is beautiful in both vision and action — not as unremittingly gray and depressing as the book (or as one might expect from the book), but still a delight to watch. It feels almost comic-booky at the beginning, as V first goes into action, and that gets slightly echoed toward the end, in the Big Obligatory Knife-vs.-Gun Fight Matrix Homage. Still, I was ultimately able to forgive that, in light of the other fun stuff on the screen.
The acting is quite decent. Natalie Portman shows that she can, in deed, act. Hugo Weaving manages to play V effectively tragi-comic without ever showing his face. John Hurt chews up the scenery. Stephen Fry pulls together a couple of the roles effectively (despite their being written a bit heavy-handedly). Stephen Rea’s Inspector Finch effectively adapts the “insider who’s learning uncomfortable stuff” (though without the LSD) role nicely. Everyone does their job without any obvious weaknesses that can’t be
attributed to the adaptation.
So, how was the movie? Entertaining. Fun to watch. Not nearly as profound as Moore would have had it (nor as written), but also a lot more accessible and, ultimately, coherent. It fails to rise to greatness, not because of its turning away from Moore so much as because neither book nor movie have a decent third act, with Moore going all anarcho-Shakespearean and the Wachowski Bros. going all Matrixy action flick and cheap populism. But, failing to reach greatness, it’s still a worthwhile movie to watch, with
plenty of eye candy and with some messages (some of them even decently rendered) that deserve listening to.
The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again. I got an IM from Amanda, complaining she couldn’t post a comment to my post on Casino Royale. I tried as well, and…
The Law of Unintended Consequences strikes again.
I got an IM from Amanda, complaining she couldn’t post a comment to my post on Casino Royale. I tried as well, and got the following server-level message.
412 Precondition Failed
The precondition on the request for the URL /blog/mt/mt-comments.cgi evaluated to false.
Well, that’s odd.
But other posts were allowing comments just fine.
Hmmmm …
I hie myself off to Google to search on the error. I run across a few references, and it sounds like a mod_security error, keying off some Forbidden Spam-like Word.
Could it be …?
I try revising the title. No effect. Then I revise the underlying post file name (“”new_casino_royale_trailer.html”), which included the dreaded word … casino.
See, that word shows up in waaaaay too many spam messages. And doubtless there’s now some server-level anti-spam thang that block stuff that has that word in it (or has links to a file/site with that word in it, or something like that).
I redid the MT basename for that file (“new_cas_royale_trailer.html”) and, hey-presto, the post allows comments.
How many other weirdities do you think might occur out there in the coming months as more people comment on (or link to blog posts on) Casino Royale?
Yeesh.