https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Oh, the weather outside was frightful

Got up this morning, already concerned about how things were going to go today. Schools announced closed. After Amanda IMs me, I start watching the news. Looks grim. Margie gets…

Got up this morning, already concerned about how things were going to go today.

Schools announced closed. After Amanda IMs me, I start watching the news. Looks grim.

Margie gets up around 7:30. “Let’s head to the airport.”

Okay … we have two options here. We can try to get through to Frontier to see if we should even bother (“Average wait time for the next available agent is … sixty … minutes …”), or we can drive to the airport before the roads get too bad and see if they can get us on an early morning flight to LA … San Diego … San Francisco … Las Vegas … somewhere we can either get picked up from or get a plane down to OC.

The drive in was mildly hairy. The roads were beginning to get covered, but there was still a lot of pavement visible, especially as the high winds blew the snow away. Averaged about 40 mph on the highway getting to the airport.

All lots were open. Margie gave me sheltered parking for Christmas. 🙂

Got inside. Massive, lengthy, horrifically long line at Frontier. Rumors of all flights being canceled, Pena Blvd. being closed, mass hysteria …

Got in line. Margie suggested I go down to baggage claim, find the display with alll the local hotels with shuttle service, and book us a room for a couple of nights in case we get snowed in there. After several tries, finally found the Doubletree, over on Quebec, had a room.

Upstairs the line was moving pretty decently (and growing by leaps and bounds). Went to the Seattle’s Best and picked up coffee and cider.

Got back in line. Stepped out of line to hop onto a business call i was scheduled for. Cell traffic and reception was more awful than usual, no doubt because every other person I saw was talking with someone on the cell phone (most of which was along the lines of “… canceled … trapped … doomed …”). Looked out the windows at the progressively worse weather.

We kept sliding forward … and were just about to enter the (very full) switchback lines, when a Frontier rep came out and basically said (a) all flights today were canceled (duh, we could see the signs), (b) the counter folks were working with individuals to rebook them elsewhere, but it was taking a lot of time, and (c) Pena Blvd. (the main arterial out of the airport) wasn’t closed but could close soon, and was already highly congested. So her suggestion was that folks go home (who could) and try to
get hold of Frontier by phone.

Yeah. We decided probably as good an idea as any.

So we schlepped back to the car. Katherine was pretty upset over not going to California today, but we promised her we’d get there before Christmas.

The plan was to see how the airport drive and Pena Blvd were, snow-wise. If too awful, we’d go to the Doubletree and camp out there. If okay, we’d try to make it home.

The cashier at the parking booth told us that Pena was already closed.

Traffic out of the airport was awful, but once we got on E470, things were fairly clear. The quality of the roadway varried — a few windswept passages, some areas were there was good ruts, other areas that were pretty bad, and a few mile where we were behind a snowplow.

Took us about two hours to make the normally 45 minutes-tops trip, averaging 20-40 mph, but we made it — unlike a few others, about whom we developed the Safety Mantra: “Don’t be that guy.”

Meanwhile, Jackie was supposed to be house sitting for us, but she had gone into the office today like a lunatic (and because she was supposed to look after a cat at a co-worker’s house up there). Margie had encouraged her to come down to the house this morning as we left, figuring it would be a better place to be snowed in. She ended up coming down C470 while we were traversing E470, got to the house a short bit before we did … and, knowing we were coming home (the miracle of the cell phone is that
everyone who needed to knew our status) started shoveling the driveway. Wow.

She was about half done by the time we got home, and that let us get the Subaru (a fine, fine, fine, excellent snow vehicle, QED) up into the garage. So Jackie gets to be snowed in with us.

So … now what?

  1. Cancel the hotel.
  2. Contact Frontier to see if they can rebook us on Friday.
  3. If they can’t, plan on driving to SoCal (the southern route, via New Mexico) on Friday — arrive early Saturday morning in the wee hours (assuming we don’t hotel around Flagstaff) and be there.

Sounds like a plan.

Meantime, most unfairly, I have to work today and tomorrow. Yikes!

Mad props to Margie for keeping us organized and in good spirits. She might even be on the Channel 4 news this evening, as she had a nice chat with a camera man there to check out the Long Lines at the Airport.

Mad props also to Katherine for being a Very Good Girl under trying circumstances. She kept herself pretty well entertained.

Snow

From the north end of the terminal. this post enabled by airblogging.com….

From the north end of the terminal.

this post enabled by airblogging.com.

Oh, the humanity

A bit of a line for Frontier … switchbacks in front of the counters … around the north end of the terminal … down one side of the terminal ……

A bit of a line for Frontier … switchbacks in front of the counters … around the north end of the terminal … down one side of the terminal … across the bridge … down the other side …

UPDATE: It took us about two hours to get to the beginning of the in-front-of-the-counters switchbacks. At which point … well, I’ll tell the story above.

DIA did a very solid job with folks there guiding the lines and answering questions. Props to them.

this post enabled by airblogging.com.

That sleigh is looking like a good idea

On the road to DIA. this post enabled by airblogging.com….

On the road to DIA.

this post enabled by airblogging.com.

Maybe we can catch a sleigh ride, Part III

The good news is, the Winter Storm Warning is canceled. The bad news is, as of 4:21 a.m. this morning … … Winter Storm Warning is cancelled… … Blizzard Warning…

The good news is, the Winter Storm Warning is canceled. The bad news is, as of 4:21 a.m. this morning …

… Winter Storm Warning is cancelled…

Blizzard Warning in effect until 12 PM MST Thursday

The National Weather Service in Denver has issued a Blizzard Warning… which is in effect until 12 PM MST Thursday. The Winter Storm Warning has been cancelled.

Snow will quickly develop early this morning and will be heavy today and tonight. Total accumulations of 12 to 20 inches can be expected in most locations before the snow decreases Thursday morning. As much as 2 feet of snow will fall in the southern suburbs and Palmer Divide area.

North winds increasing to around 25 mph with frequent gusts to 35 mph especially east of I-25 will produce considerable blowing and drifting snow.

A Blizzard Warning means severe winter weather conditions are occurring or imminent. Sustained wind and/or frequent wind gusts of 35 mph or higher will combine with considerable falling and blowing snow to produce widespread visibilities below one quarter of a mile. Travel will be extremely dangerous and is discouraged in these whiteout conditions. If you must travel… have a winter survival kit with you. If you get stranded… stay with your vehicle and wait for help to arrive.

Hi. Welcome to our home in the “southern suburbs.”

There is an inch or so on the ground outside this morning, which is close to what we expected. We’ll be monitoring the situation to determine if (a) we should go to the airport this morning and try to get on an earlier flight, or (b) if our travel is in fact going to be completely aborted today/tomorrow, and that we should just sit tight and enjoy being at home rather than at the airport.

Whatever the decision, safety first.

We’ll keep you posted.

UPDATE: Katherine’s school is posted as closed today. Hrm. Well, that makes life marginally simpler, though for complicating reasons …

Weighty matters

Well, I took what was probably my last official weighing of the year (for various logistical and metrics reason), and came in solidly (so to speak) under 200, at 197….

Well, I took what was probably my last official weighing of the year (for various logistical and metrics reason), and came in solidly (so to speak) under 200, at 197. A nice way to end the year, especially given my diet over the last week-plus. That I’m headed off to Faerie and its sumptuous feasts there for the holidays doesn’t fill me with optimism about how I’ll actually cross the end-of-year line, but …

And, as of last night, I’m just 57 miles from my 1,500 for the year. We’ll see how that goes. Again, going off to Faerie is going to knock my walking schedule all to heck, but there’s plenty of periods of intense activity there, so there’s a good chance I’ll make it.

Maybe we can catch a sleigh ride, Part II

Better and better … The good news is, the Winter Storm Watch is canceled. The bad news is, that’s because it’s now a Winter Storm Warning. Statement as of 7:52…

Better and better …

The good news is, the Winter Storm Watch is canceled. The bad news is, that’s because it’s now a Winter Storm Warning.

Statement as of 7:52 PM MST on December 19, 2006

… Winter Storm Warning remains in effect from 6 am Wednesday to5 PM MST Thursday…

Snowfall will become widespread late tonight and continue into Thursday with total snowfall amounts of 10 to 20 inches. Northwinds at speeds of 10 to 25 mph will cause some blowing and drifting snow.

Remember… a Winter Storm Warning means hazardous winter weatherconditions are imminent or highly likely. Significant snow accumulations are occurring or expected. Strong winds are also possible. This will make travel very hazardous or impossible.

The half-good news is that the 10-20 inches is through Thursday evening. It should be about half that by tomorrow night.

That said, we’re going to be watching the weather. If need be, we’ll leave for the airport much sooner and try to go stand-by on an earlier flight, rather than waiting for our 6 p.m. take-off. Except … hrm … flying Frontier, which only flies to SNA three times a day (morning, evening, night).

Well, heading for the airport early is probably a good idea, regardless.

All together now … I’m dreaming of a White Christmas …

Maybe we can catch a sleigh ride

Well, this should make flying out to California tomorrow evening a bit more interesting … … Winter Storm Watch in effect from Wednesday morning through late Wednesday night… The National…

Well, this should make flying out to California tomorrow evening a bit more interesting …

… Winter Storm Watch in effect from Wednesday morning through late Wednesday night…

The National Weather Service in Denver has issued a Winter Storm Watch… which is in effect from Wednesday morning through late
Wednesday night.

Snow will develop early Wednesday morning and may be heavy at times through Wednesday night. Total snowfall of 8 to 12 inches
are possible.

Remember… a Winter Storm Watch means there is a potential for a hazardous winter weather event in and close to the watch area.
Significant snow accumulations may occur that could impact travel. Stay tuned to the National Weather Service or your local news media for the latest updates and possible warning concerning this potential winter storm.

Bad week for classic animation

Joe Barbera (of the Hanna-Barbera team) died Monday at 95. With his partner, they created Tom & Jerry, and the whole H-B line (Flintstones, Jetsons, Yogi Bear, Huckleberry Hound, Scooby-Doo,…

Joe Barbera (of the Hanna-Barbera team) died Monday at 95. With his partner, they created Tom & Jerry, and the whole H-B line (Flintstones, Jetsons, Yogi Bear, Huckleberry Hound, Scooby-Doo, Jonny Quest, etc.).

And it was just announced that Chris Hayward, one of the writers for Bill Ward and the Rocky & Bullwinkle team (as well as being one of the creators of The Munsters, and a writer on numerous TV shows, including Barney Miller and Get Smart), died back in November.

Are we ready?

NPR has been running a two part series, yesterday and today, on whether the American public is “ready” to elect (a) an African-American, or (b) a woman to be President….

NPR has been running a two part series, yesterday and today, on whether the American public is “ready” to elect (a) an African-American, or (b) a woman to be President. Yesterday’s segment was on black electability, today’s touches on women.

Part of what was interesting about it was the “man on the street” commentary and polls. In polling, a significant majority said they’d be willing to vote for a black man for president, but many expressed skepticism that the public as a whole would be willing to (that skepticism goes significantly up among blacks polled).

I’m optimistic/idealistic enough to think that an African-American man could, indeed, be elected. I don’t labor under any illusions that racial prejudice in this country is dead, but I think for many, it’s become at least moribund, especially in the context of all the issues that go into selecting a president. For most, whether, say, Barak Obama is black will be, if not irrelevant, far down the list of things that will decide their vote — unless he (or any other black candidate) makes it an issue.

And there’s the tricky part. A black man can’t run successfully as a candidate for the blacks. That would be alienating to every other group out there, and blacks don’t have a majority to work with. That’s been the problem with so many past possible contenders (Sharpton and Jackson, most notably). The trickiest question is how a black candidate plays in black communities if he doesn’t reach out to them directly as their candidate. It’s been dealt with in other political campaigns, but the more
national an audience, the bigger the issue.

The resolution of the conundrum above — that Americans think they’d individually be willing to vote for a black man, but aren’t sure that their fellow Americans could — is that it depends on the candidate, both in terms of what issues they’re running on (like any other candidate) and how they play the race card (if at all). In a simplistic but fundamental way, if being an African-American becomes no more of a distinguisher than being a Texan, then we’re probably in fine shape.

But if a black man can be fairly easily perceived as being little or no different from a white man of the same political philosophy, the same cannot be said for a woman candidate. That’s not to say at all that a woman cannot be a good candidate, or an excellent office-holder; there’s no question in my mind about both of those propositions. But while people are becoming increasingly used to women in the workplace, and in government office, it seems unlikely that, any time soon, people will relate to male and female
candidates the same way, or perceive them as the same thing, because of, frankly, genetic hardwiring.

Gender relationships are a foundation for our psyche, our socialization, our actions in a million things large and small. The baggage and association of those relationships — regardless of the gender we are or that we seek after — affects how we relate to others of different genders in an intrinsic fashion, how we perceive them, what assumptions we make about them. I’m not necessarily talking about harassment and harmful prejudice here, but just a profound, gut-level, “here’s how I relate to women, here’s how
I relate to men” thing that’s so inculcated in our thoughts and emotions and our glands that it’s foolish to think it can ever been eliminated (“Men and women are the same!”) but only dealt with positively (“Men and women can both accomplish great things, possibly in different ways, though there’s a lot of individual variation as well”).

Racial humor is dangerous in many corners of our society, unless it is self-deprecating (i.e., about one’s own ethnic/racial group). But “the battle of the sexes,” though different in a lot of ways (the vast majority of them good) than ten, twenty, thirty, forty years ago, is still a subject for humor and discussion — and that’s because while the opportunity for race-based conflict and competition and interaction is relatively limited, nearly all of us deal with gender relations in our personal lives (negatively
or positively or both), and will for the foreseeable future. I, myself, am always going to, at some level, look at women differently from men, because so many of my personal relationships — family and friends and romantic — are different with women than with men.

Put another way, Barak Obama can work the election so that race is a trivial issue, unnoticed by many, or of tertiary importance to most. There’s no way that Hillary Clinton’s gender, however, can be so masked or ignored, only acknowledged and worked through. That’s not necessarily a good thing or a bad thing, it’s just a thing to be dealt with. But it makes, in a vacuum (e.g., without looking at any of the other political baggage or positioning either of them have) Clinton’s hypothetical quest for the White
House a bit more complicated than Obama’s.

And that said, I’d be a lot more likely to vote for either them than most of the potential GOP candidates I see coming down the pike.

Pesce Party

We went to a faboo Christmas party last night at Pesce Fresco — a prix fixe menu, all of which was terribly yummy, with wines to match each course. Add…

We went to a faboo Christmas party last night at Pesce Fresco — a prix fixe menu, all of which was terribly yummy, with wines to match each course. Add to that live entertainment, mostly of a holiday nature, much of it turning out to be sing-along (be it by design or Pavlovian).

Margie and I ended up at our own table, romantically enough, and got tapped to be the “Five Golden Rings” part of a restaurant-wide rendition of the Twelve Days of Christmas. We did great in the role, managing to come up with seven different harmonizations/duets to keep folks entertained.

Stayed too late, ate and drank too much, and it definitely was not what our “Trying to get Christmas prep, including packing, finished before Wednesday night” plans needed — but a great time that I’m glad we made time for.

(And many thanks to Jackie for looking after Kitten.)

Time Magazine cops out

The Man Person of the Year is … You? But look at 2006 through a different lens and you’ll see another story, one that isn’t about conflict or great men….

The Man Person of the Year is … You?

But look at 2006 through a different lens and you’ll see another story, one that isn’t about conflict or great men. It’s a story about community and collaboration on a scale never seen before. It’s about the cosmic compendium of knowledge Wikipedia and the million-channel people’s network YouTube and the online metropolis MySpace. It’s about the many wresting power from the few and helping one another for nothing and how that will not only change the world, but also change the way the world changes.

Talk about a meme that’s outlived it’s usefulness — or, at least, the abilities of the editorial staff of Time to make a non-cop-out decision about. Even their “People Who Mattered” gallery is pretty lame.

Who can arrest the President?

In case you were wondering. What we’re talking about here is presidential immunity. The Constitution is silent on this question. It says the president can be impeached, but that raises…

In case you were wondering.

What we’re talking about here is presidential immunity. The Constitution is silent on this question. It says the president can be impeached, but that raises as many questions as it answers. Can the president be indicted and tried? If so, must the president be impeached first? If convicted of a crime but not impeached, could the president be required to serve a sentence while still in office? If the president is impeached, does the double jeopardy clause prevent subsequent criminal prosecution on the same
grounds? If the president can’t be prosecuted while in office, what happens if the statute of limitations runs out before his term expires? If convicted while in office, could the president pardon himself?

Catching up with Doctor Who

Our TV watching sort of got knocked for a loop a month or so back. We went from staying caught up with Doctor Who, Heroes, and (for me) Battlestar…

Our TV watching sort of got knocked for a loop a month or so back. We went from staying caught up with Doctor Who, Heroes, and (for me) Battlestar Galactica to … well, not being caught up. I’ve managed to get relatively current on BG, and last night we completed watching the two Doctor Who eps we were finally behind on.

The Satan Pit” is the second half of a two-parter (“The Impossible Planet” being the first — and I’m finding mildly irksome that DW’s two-parters aren’t called out that way by name, vs. having different titles), wherein the Doctor and Rose deal with Something Awful and Evil buried deep within a planet on the edge of a black hole. Both characters get lots to do (Tennant as the Doctor finally seems to find a voice), the action
is fast and epic, with bits of Aliens and Quartermass thrown in to keep things hopping. The FX are pretty spiffy, too. Classic Who, and one of the better eps this season, getting an A-.

Fear Her” is, in comparison, lightweight fluff. In London 2012, as the Olympic Torch is being relayed through the city, one little street is suffering from children (and pets) vanishing. There are some nicely humorous bits in this ep, and a few scary ones, but for the most part, serious matters (stolen kids) are taken far too lightly, and the glurge at the end (including the Doctor’s involvement in the Olympics) is just too
darned goofy. C+

Note that, for some reason, there’s an episode (“Love & Monsters”) that seems to fit between the two that didn’t get recorded on the DVR. Rrg.

And next up … this Friday, in fact … a two-parter, “Army of Ghosts” and “Doomsday,” which are the season wrap for Series Two (and involve Something Big that I got spoiled for, but which I, in turn, will not spoil for anyone). Need to reverify the DVR is set up properly for it …

Series Two, by the by, will be out on DVD 16 January.

Amazon fiendishly makes shopping easier

A few years back I complained about how Amazon’s Wish List technology was way too limited, allowing you only a single list, and having it only oriented around yourself. Wouldn’t…

A few years back I complained about how Amazon’s Wish List technology was way too limited, allowing you only a single list, and having it only oriented around yourself. Wouldn’t it be great if you could build lists for other people (“hey, that book looks interesting, I’ll have to remember it for Margie come her birthday”)?

Well, if you’ve done much poking around on Amazon over this season, you can now see you can. More specifically, Amazon now has a “Gift Central” gift organizer for your account. Underneath that, you can identify folks you make Amazon purchases for, tie those folks to their Amazon wish lists (if they have them), note key gifting dates (to get a reminder beforehand), save gift ideas for them, and save what you’ve previously
bought for them (which, in turn, creates more recommendations of other stuff they might want). Whenever you buy something, you’re given the opportunity to say if you were buying it for someone, and add to or create their gift list (Amazon will also run you through your history of purchases to let you identify past stuff to jump-start those other lists).

It’s all fiendishly clever, let me tell you. Given the amount of stuff you can get through Amazon, it’s likely a whole bevy of gifts can be purchased that way. Glee!

Yule Rules

The latest meme, via Les: Egg Nog or Hot Chocolate? Hot chocolate is certainly good (esp. with a bit of peppermint schnapps), but I love egg nog. Especially good…

The latest meme, via Les:

  1. Egg Nog or Hot Chocolate? Hot chocolate is certainly good (esp. with a bit of peppermint schnapps), but I love egg nog. Especially good egg nog. Never mind it’s a zillion calories per tablespoon. The real stuff — spiked or not — is faboo. And then there’s my Mom’s “recipe,” which is essentially booze with cream and, maybe, eggs, that gets served up on Christmas morning. Yum.
  2. Does Santa wrap presents or just sit them under the tree? There is always wrapping involved. If worse comes to worse, it’s wrapping in a giant Target bag, but it’s wrapping nonetheless. Except, as I recall, Katherine’s bicycle, which was unwrapped (but hand-delivered by Santa at home, so it was there when we returned from the holidays).
  3. Colored lights or white on tree/house? Growing up, we had colored lights, but I kind of like white ones — let the color come from the ornaments. Though we’re talking here about tree lights, not house lights, which was never a Thing growing up, and remains not. Though Katherine is expressing a serious yen for them (we’ll have to do something about that next Christmas — perhaps lining the living room windows).
  4. Do you hang mistletoe? Never been a trad in either of our families. Not that it stops us from doing the face-mooshing thing,, mind you.
  5. When do you put your decorations up? Never before Thanksgiving. Afterwards — well, it depends on when we get off our keisters. There have been years when it hasn’t been until just before our Twelfth Night party in January … This year, though, with Jim and Ginger here for the Thanksgiving weekend, we got them up in a very timely and expeditious manner. Yay.
  6. What is your favorite holiday dish (excluding dessert)? Probably my mom’s cheesy potatoes. Oh, yum. I could gorge myself on those things (and, in the past, have).
  7. Favorite holiday memory as a child? Probably when we lived in Diamond Bar. Our bedroom window overlooked the driveway, and we weren’t allowed into the living room until Nono and Nona arrived, so we sat with our faces glued to the windows, watching eagerly …
  8. When and how did you learn the truth about Santa? I don’t really recall, to be honest. I seem to recall possibly spoiling it for John, but that may be a miscollection. It wasn’t traumatic or anything, and I don’t even know that it was a big “Aha!” moment. I think, for most kids, there’s sort of a period of consensual fantasy, until it becomes annoying and “kidlike.” Kitten, so far as I know, still believes, but is also happy not to poke too mightily at the myth …
  9. Do you open a gift on Christmas Eve? Only one year, growing up, did we do a Christmas Eve thing. Given our current travels, we usually have some sort of quick pre-Christmas here at home before heading to the airport — but nothing happens Christmas Eve proper, except lots of carrying of gifts downstairs …
  10. How do you decorate your Christmas Tree? We haul it up from the basement. Put it together. Break open boxes of ornaments, and start (whoever is around) putting them up. Garland goes up before ornaments, if we’re doing the garland thing. Then, until the tree comes down, I obsessively shift ornaments around and bend the branches in different directions to make the Perfect Tree Decor.
  11. Snow, love it or dread it? I like snow. Yeah, it can be a serious pain, but I don’t need to worry about it too much (being able to work from home as need be) — and it’s not like it’s ever a problem when we’re in California for Christmas …
  12. Do you know how to ice skate? I’ve tried it. Once. Not my cuppa. 🙂 Kitten, though, does great on skates (so does Margie).
  13. Do you remember your favorite gift? Crikey. No, not really. I can remember playing with Hot Wheels in Santa Barbara — and some cool “Hot Wings” metal jets when older. I don’t recall a single favorite, though.
  14. What’s the most important thing about the holidays for you? Hmmm. Definitely time with the family. Good food. Swag, sure, but more the giving thereof than the getting.
  15. What is your favorite holiday dessert? The endless array of cookies at the Ks. Especially some of the layer bars, and the lemon squares. Mmmmmm. Maybe I’ll bake a pecan pie this year, just for kicks.
  16. What is your favorite holiday tradition? Gotta be our Standard Migratory Pattern during the holidays, pretty much unchanged since our marriage. We stay at the Ks. We have Christmas Eve dinner there (my folks come down to join in). We open gifts at the Ks Christmas morning. In the afternoon we go to my folks or my brother’s, and open gifts there, then have dinner. Then we head to where the Ks are for dessert (either Margie’s brother’s or his in-laws).
    That can mean a triangle route of as little as 60 miles or as much as 150-200 miles (never actually clocked it), but it’s a really neat way of spending time with everyone.
  17. What tops your tree? Margie has this very nice angel with lights in her hands that plugs right into the tree lighs. Spiffy.
  18. Which do you prefer giving or receiving? Well, I love getting stuff, like a kid, but the adult in me loves giving gifts and seeing expressions of joy and pleasure when they’re opened.
  19. Favorite Christmas Song? Standard carol? Probably Adeste Fideles or Joy to the World. But run the first third (the Christmas part) of Handel’s Messiah past me, and I’m in choral heaven …
  20. Favorite flavor of Candy Canes? If it ain’t peppermint, it’s not a candy cane (just as if it’s not gin, it’s not a martini).

Ch-ching

Well, we finished 99.5% of our catalog shopping (and, thus, 95% of our Christmas shopping), after a marathon day of catalog poring-through and web site navigation. A number of…

Well, we finished 99.5% of our catalog shopping (and, thus, 95% of our Christmas shopping), after a marathon day of catalog poring-through and web site navigation.

A number of sites were still within the normal shipping period. The ones that weren’t were balanced by our doing some online discount code Googling.

We probably spent too much on too many people for too much stuff — but I’m at least a bit pleased that our motivation wasn’t to Impress, or Keep Up, or Fulfill Obligations, but to simply share a bit of our good fortune with folks, and brighten their days. With swag, to be sure, but nice swag.

And it’s not like we’re bankrupting ourselves, or that Katherine won’t be able to find a full scholarship somewhere, eventually, right? And the bank doesn’t mind the occasional missed payment — especially in January, ’cause, I mean, who’s expecting other bills to be paid in January, right? Right?

Restaurant Review: Aquarium Restaurant

My local IT department had our holiday dinner at the plainly named Aquarium Restaurant last night. That’s the restaurant attached to the also simply named Downtown Aquarium here in Denver….

My local IT department had our holiday dinner at the plainly named Aquarium Restaurant last night. That’s the restaurant attached to the also simply named Downtown Aquarium here in Denver. More on the Aquarium below …

The restaurant serves both families and visitors to the Aquarium, as well as hosting special groups (the adjoining bar and Nautilus Ballroom was hosting a very fancy soiree while we were there). That mixed usage, as well as trying to be a destination restaurant in its own right makes it a challenge for the Aquarium Restaurant to figure out it’s mission.

I’m not sure the degree to which the restaurant is associated with Landry’s, which bought the Aquarium a while back (prompting many jokes about what happens to the denizens of exhibits that close).

Overall
Food Service
Ambiance Prices ???

Food: As a group function, we were on a fixed menu — house or ceasar salad or lobster bisque; Mediterranean chicken, pasta primavera, or grilled salmon; cheesecake; two drink tickets. That didn’t give us a good feel for the breadth and overall quality of the food (though a couple of people cajoled the waitress into offering a couple of hamburgers), but from what we did taste, the quality was pretty good.

My caesar salad had a bit of garlic bite and was made with anchovy paste (though not overpoweringly so). Margie’s lobster bisque was reputedly quite good (I heard this echoed up and down the table). My salmon was tasty and well-cooked, solid, with a nice hickory and salmon flavor. It was served with a skewer of roasted veggies that were perfect for each bite of salmon. The rice pilaf was a bit less successful; the flavoring and texture was mixed.

I had a gin martini for cocktails, which was made well, and a glass of undistinguished cab. The wine list looked decent enough, if not spectacular, and there was a good array of beers and specialty drinks advertised.

I’d recommend the food to anyone, especially given that it was a limited “banquet” menu.

Service: This was where things fell apart quite a bit, for reasons not altogether clear. They were very late in seating us — we had an 8 p.m. reservation, and we didn’t get seated until 8:30, and didn’t get our orders in until closer ot 9. Part of that may have been confusion over the size of our party — initially reserved at 25, turned out to be 10, but the manager/maitre d’ didn’t seem to realize that (though I’m sure they were called on Thursday) until well after 8.

The waitress we had started off brisk and business-like, except for long intervals between visiting us. Her manner became a lot more grumpy over the course of the evening, radiating off little “I don’t want to be here” rays from her head that were almost visible. Despite the slow service, when she was there she was highly professional in her service and style (voice tone aside), got all the orders right and served properly. Not sure if she was cranky because of folks cajoling her for exceptions to the meal, to
pool drink tickets for a bottle of wine, because she was getting a smaller tip (because of a smaller group) than expected, or some sort of backstage melodrama. It was still irksome.

They were also clearing tables for some sort of function (presumably this morning) that involved actually clearing the table and chairs out of the dining room, while we (and a few other closing-down-the-place-at-10:15 folks) still sat. This involved opening the back door repeatedly out into the night and carrying the tables and chairs out there — complete with a gust of Arctic Air into the dining room, leading to shivering, slowness, and a bit of confusion. That was just sort of rude.

Ambience: The restaurant wraps round the south end of the building, and that inward curve has a massive fish tank visible from all over the room. That’s a nice touch. The rest of the decor is mixed — rough-textured walls and decor to make one feel as though they are “under the sea,” but the style of the decor is too much, too mixed, too abstract in some places and concrete in others (not unlike the Aquarium itself). The result was mixed.

That’s not counting that Chill Wind we kept being subjected too more and more frequently during the evening.

Prices: Hard to say, since it was a departmental function. Given that it’s a family restaurant in addition to everything else, the prices were probably pretty reasonable. Note that parking across the street is $6, but that’s just the cost of dining downtown.

Overall: I’d go back here again, but I’m not sure when. Not so much into crowds (the place was packed when we arrived around 7), the food is good but not faboo (and not everything I’d want, given the other options downtown), and the service was a bit off-putting. I don’t expect to visit the Downtown Aquarium any time again soon, and even if I did, I doubt I’d make the Aquarium Restaurant my dining pick.

That said, if I were invited to go there, for another function or just by someone else, I wouldn’t shrink away. Draw your own conclusions.

The Aquarium Restaurant, The Downtown Aquarium, 700 Water St., Denver, CO 80211.


 

We hadn’t been to the Downtown Aquarium since shortly after it opened several years ago, dubbed at the time Ocean Journeys. At the time it was a small aquarium, with very nice exhibits that paralleled two different river journeys down to the ocean, culminating in a humongous fish tank full of sharks and other denizens of the deep. Some great stuff — otters and ducks were particularly nicely situated, and there was even a set of tigers in a large enclosure that was pretty cool.

Problem is, it was too short a visit for the admission price. And once folks had seen it, the return traffic was pretty minimal. Despite public funding, the place was going to go under, until it was saved at the last second by Landry’s Restaurants, which bought it lock, stock, and shark.

The evolution since then has been mixed. The place is definitely still in business, which seemed unlikely at the time. By the same token, while Landry’s has kept it going, it’s done so with a lot of “cost-added” features. You can pan for gold. You can feed the mantas. Ch-ching. The added atmospherics — a sunken ship, an underwater temple — are a bit tawdry, and numerous displays are lacking info on the fish and other critters therein. It’s one part education, one part side show, one part Disney, one part zoo,
one part gift shop — mix briefly.

And, honestly, it’s still a pretty short visit. Adult admission is $13, kids are $8, but Margie and I toured the places, reading most of the signs and stopping along the way to watch the exhibit, in about half an hour, not counting eating and gift shopping. That’s pretty steep. After 6 p.m. prices drop to $10 and $7, still steep. And the shortness of the exhibit means it’s not something folks are going to go to once or twice a year, like the zoo (whose admission rates are cheaper), but more like once every 3-4
years. How Landry’s makes a go of it, I’m not sure — though I’m glad they do, and I suspect facility rental and restaurant income are a big part of it. Indeed, props to them for their hours being open until 10 p.m. Sun-Thu, 11 p.m. Fri-Sat; those extended hours not only provide more opportunity for folks to visit, but make it a decent “after dinner, what?” destination, too.

One billion gay Asians can’t be wrong

The culprit has been found in the rise of homosexuality! No, it’s not nihilistic philosophy and situational ethics. No, it’s not the Top Secret Gay Agenda. It’s … soy. Soybean…

The culprit has been found in the rise of homosexuality! No, it’s not nihilistic philosophy and situational ethics. No, it’s not the Top Secret Gay Agenda. It’s … soy.

Soybean products are feminizing, and they’re all over the place. You can hardly escape them anymore.

I have nothing against an occasional soy snack. Soy is nutritious and contains lots of good things. Unfortunately, when you eat or drink a lot of soy stuff, you’re also getting substantial quantities of estrogens.

Estrogens are female hormones. If you’re a woman, you’re flooding your system with a substance it can’t handle in surplus. If you’re a man, you’re suppressing your masculinity and stimulating your “female side,” physically and mentally.

[…] If you’re a grownup, you’re already developed, and you’re able to fight off some of the damaging effects of soy. Babies aren’t so fortunate. Research is now showing that when you feed your baby soy formula, you’re giving him or her the equivalent of five birth control pills a day. A baby’s endocrine system just can’t cope with that kind of massive assault, so some damage is inevitable. At the extreme, the damage can be fatal.

Which explains the increase of child fatalities after drinking soy-based formula over the years.

Soy is feminizing, and commonly leads to a decrease in the size of the penis, sexual confusion and homosexuality. That’s why most of the medical (not socio-spiritual) blame for today’s rise in homosexuality must fall upon the rise in soy formula and other soy products. (Most babies are bottle-fed during some part of their infancy, and one-fourth of them are getting soy milk!) Homosexuals often argue that their homosexuality is inborn because “I can’t remember a time when I wasn’t homosexual.” No, homosexuality
is always deviant. But now many of them can truthfully say that they can’t remember a time when excess estrogen wasn’t influencing them.

Except, of course, for the Lesbians. Unless that’s cause by an excess of estrogen, too. But, then, gay women are usually left out of the equation in debating over homosexuality because, well, they’re women — not very important, and just waiting for the right Manly Man to come along, right?

Of course, it’s not just homosexuality we have to worry about from the Soy Agenda.

Research in 2000 showed that a soy-based diet at any age can lead to a weak thyroid, which commonly produces heart problems and excess fat. Could this explain the dramatic increase in obesity today?

Good Lord! Who’da thunk it?

P.S.: Soy sauce is fine. Unlike soy milk, it’s perfectly safe because it’s fermented, which changes its molecular structure. Miso, natto and tempeh are also OK, but avoid tofu.

Given that tofu consumption is significantly higher in parts of Asia, one would expect a much higher incidence of homosexuality there, wouldn’t one?

Yeesh.

(via Avo)

Potpourri for $200, Alex

Can’t post … clowns will eat me … Bill Gates thinks DRM, as it currently exists, has (and causes) “huge problems.” Users of MySpace are better (a bit) at passwords…

Can’t post … clowns will eat me …

  1. Bill Gates thinks DRM, as it currently exists, has (and causes) “huge problems.”
  2. Users of MySpace are better (a bit) at passwords than corporate system users. “We used to quip that ‘password’ is the most common password. Now it’s ‘password1.’ Who said users haven’t learned anything about security?”
  3. Creators and players of violent video games could face jail time in Germany. Use a virtual gun, go to prison?