https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Talkin’ ’bout Regeneration …

Word’s come down confirming that David Tennant will leave Doctor Who after all the various 2009-2010 one-off specials. The Guardian newspaper this evening broke the story prematurely, reporting on their…

Word’s come down confirming that David Tennant will leave Doctor Who after all the various 2009-2010 one-off specials.

The Guardian newspaper this evening broke the story prematurely, reporting on their website (in a report subsequently pulled down) that Tennant is “vacating the TARDIS and leaving the BBC’s Doctor Who series at the end of next year. Tennant’s decision brings to an end his popular four-year tenure as the time lord.” The article went on to say that the BBC had confirmed that the actor “would complete the filming of four special episodes to be screened this year and in early 2010, as well as 2009’s Christmas special.”

 

Tennant’s truly grown and grown into the role, but it’s not surprising he’s leaving, especially as the timing and direction (Russell Davies giving way to Steven Moffat) of the series evolves. I’ll confess I still prefer Chris Eccleston by a nose (so to speak), but I’ll look back on Tennant with great fondness.

No word on who the Eleventh Doctor might be, but there are some interesting rumors.

A polite question to Undecideds or McCain supporters who are using the standard anti-Obama talking point

HOW CAN YOU NOT KNOW “WHO BARACK OBAMA IS”? WHAT DO YOU STILL WANT TO KNOW? ARE YOU ACTUALLY TRYING TO FIND OUT? ARE YOU EXPECTING BARACK OBAMA TO PROJECT…

HOW CAN YOU NOT KNOW “WHO BARACK OBAMA IS”?

WHAT DO YOU STILL WANT TO KNOW?

ARE YOU ACTUALLY TRYING TO FIND OUT?

ARE YOU EXPECTING BARACK OBAMA TO PROJECT THE INFORMATION STRAIGHT INTO YOUR BRAIN?

ARE YOU EXPECTING GOD TO SUDDENLY APPEAR AND HAND YOU A PERSONNEL FILE TO TELL YOU WHO BARACK OBAMA IS?

WHO COULD DO WHAT TO SOMEHOW EASE THIS GREAT VACUUM IN YOUR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT BARACK OBAMA?

ARE YOU WAITING FOR THE SITCOM? THE STAGE SHOW? THE MOVIE? THE COMIC BOOK?

Barack Obama has been running for president for a couple of years. He’s given a zillion speeches. He’s written books. He’s given eleventy-dozen speeches about what he believes, about where he’s from, about what he plans to do. HE HAS A WEB PAGE, FERGOSHSAKES!

WHAT MORE DO YOU NEED TO KNOW, FROM WHOM, IN WHAT MODALITY, BEFORE YOU FEEL YOU KNOW “WHO BARACK OBAMA IS”?

That is all.

All politics are local

So I’m slogging off the train at the station. I was toward the back of the masses getting off, as I’d been on the front car after rushing to catch…

So I’m slogging off the train at the station. I was toward the back of the masses getting off, as I’d been on the front car after rushing to catch it in the first place.

After getting off the platform, I saw there was some guy handing out stuff by the elevators. A quick second glance betrayed the bright blue and red of campaign literature. So I was clearly curious as to who he was shilling for.

As I got closer, I saw it was fliers for Hank Eng, who’s running as a Democrat to be our local US Rep.

The Eng story is an interesting one. I’ve mentioned more than once that this is heartland Red suburbia around here. Our former state senator was John Andrews, former GOP senate majority leader. And our Representative, until this election, has been Tom Tancredo, former fringe presidential candidate and anti-immigrant zealot.

This has been such a secure GOP seat that when Mike Coffman — our present Colorado secretary of state (who, conveniently, oversees elections) — declared his intent to run for CO-06, the Dems just sort of wrote the seat off, as they usually do.

Enter Hank Eng. Eng’s an interesting fellow. His campaign has been pretty low-key — no bluster, no wild publicity stunts or wedge issues. He’s talked mostly about character and integrity, though he has policies to back that up.

He started the campaign with a shoestring budget, but has managed — maybe, perhaps, depending on whose polling you believe — to pull within serious striking range of Coffman, who’s been hurt both by the state shifting Blue and by various problems with the voting process and voter purges. Heaven knows I’ve seen a lot more Eng signs in peoples’ yards than Coffman ones.

I was inspired enough to actually go out last night and donate to Eng’s campaign for the last few days of the campaign. It’s a bit of a forlorn hope, but it felt good.

So I went over toward the guy handing out Eng literature, looked up —

— and it was, in fact, Hank Eng.

I shook his hand, told him I’d just donated, and wished him the best of luck. He thanked me, assured me that “Together we can make it happen,” and I moved on.

So maybe I didn’t make it to the big Obama rally in Denver on Sunday, but maybe I got to shake the hand of my next Representative. I hope so.

Local politics are cool.

 

Time passages

Just a reminder to all here in the US and associated regions that we shift back from Daylight Saving Time this coming Sunday at 2 a.m. This is the “Fall Back,”…

Just a reminder to all here in the US and associated regions that we shift back from Daylight Saving Time this coming Sunday at 2 a.m. This is the “Fall Back,” so we all get an extra hour. Don’t spend it all at once!

Our brethren over in Europe shifted back last weekend, which might explain things if you keep having phonecon timing problems this week.

Guess I’m going to Hell, then

Of course, Jesus suggested that we judge not, lest we be judged. He also indicated more than once that second-guessing someone else’s relationship with God was, um, ill-advised. Nonetheless, some…

Of course, Jesus suggested that we judge not, lest we be judged. He also indicated more than once that second-guessing someone else’s relationship with God was, um, ill-advised.

Nonetheless, some folks on the Religious Right show no qualms about predicting who’s casting a one-way vote for the Fiery Furnace. Like Jane Porter:

To all those who name the name of Christ who plan to willfully disobey Him by voting for Obama, take warning. Not only is our nation in grave danger, according to the Word of God, so are you.

Wow. I’ve read the New Testament through several times, and I can’t say I remember a warning that God calls on us to vote against Obama.

In one week, America will make a choice. And to those who call themselves “Christian” who are planning on voting for Barack Obama, put down the Obama talking points and read God’s voter guide before you go to the polls.

Wait — I know that voting guide. It talks about loving neighbors, feeding the poor, clothing the naked, visiting the prisoner, supporting the widows and orphans. Wait — is that the wrong guide?

Ah, I do love the ol’ “I know who’s a real ‘Christian’ and who’s not” routine. It usually ends up being associated with stonings and witch burnings.

The particular theological gist of the article is that (a) Obama is not anti-abortion (thus a vote for him, no matter what the reason, is a vote for baby-killing (which, in terms of abortion, is apparently worse than children being killed by bears or righteous warriors sent by God), (b) Obama isn’t rabidly anti-gay (as everyone knows God is), and (c) Obama is a socialist (it’s never quite clear how this ties into the Bible, especially given Jesus’ message about giving to the poor, but I’m sure my interpretation is faulty because I am, after all, voting for Obama). Thus, Obama is inutterably anti-Biblical, anti-God, and anyone who casts a vote for him ought just as well carve the Mark of the Beast (a backwards “B”) on their cheek and get ready for some Chick tract afterworld retribution on their behind.

Obey Him in the voting booth and out of it. If not, do us all a favor and quit calling yourself a Christian.

And some Christians wonder why religious affiliation is flat or declining.

UPDATE: Of course, if you want the above to look relatively calm, considered, and sane, check this out by contrast.

Bringing what sits under rocks into the light

Interesting story on All Things Considered tonight about how the Obama candidacy and its impending success are dragging the real racists out of the rural backwaters and gangland obscurity….

Interesting story on All Things Considered tonight about how the Obama candidacy and its impending success are dragging the real racists out of the rural backwaters and gangland obscurity. Police are seeing an upswing in hate crimes, both trivial (defacing Obama posters) and not.

Part of the problem is that Obama is playing into the neo-Nazi and white supremacist narrative, said Brian Levin, who studies hate and extremism at California State University, San Bernardino. What the groups were saying — “Jews and blacks coming out of the urban areas are going to take over this white nation of ours” — has occurred, he said.

You only have to look to the Internet to see how white supremacist leaders such as David Duke are using Obama to rally their troops. Duke has called Obama a “visual aid for hate groups.” He says an Obama presidency would provide indisputable proof that whites have lost control of America. “This is a cultural and racial battlefront,” said Levin. “Barack Obama is symbol No. 1 of the worst the future has to offer.”

 

Ironically, the white supremacists are actually divided on Obama’s candidacy. Some, for obvious reasons, refuse to vote for him. Others think that a vote for Obama is a positive step toward the impending “race war” due to wrack the country (cf. folks who support Israel as a step toward the End Times).

Me? I think the churning and rising of this sort of overt racism is a positive thing. An Obama presidency forces America to face what remains of racism in our psyche, not just in the reprehensible form of the David Dukes of this world, but in more subtle ways. That can only be a good thing, and if the roaches and other slimy critter pour out from under the rocks in the face of Obama in the White House, that will help us deny that they still live among us, or how their hatred has subtle echoes in our own cultural hearts.

The other thing it will do, directly opposite of riling up the racists, is demonstrate to the vast majority who might be a bit leery, a scosh apprehensive, even if they don’t even recognize where that anxiety is coming from, that a black man as President, once you’ve seen it, isn’t all that scary. The best way to combat racism, overt and subtle, is, essentially, to integrate, to let the Other become part of your everyday world. Once you see that a black man on TV every night isn’t something to be scared of, all the rants of the David Dukes become all that much more ridiculous.

(In parallel, I expect that as gays become more openly integrated into society — see California, of course, but also other states where civil unions and even gay marriage have been made legal, and, yet, the societal sky hasn’t fallen and civilization hasn’t turned into some great homosexual debauch — the fear of the unknown will, because it becomes known, diminish, and the doom-saying predictions of the Dobsons of the world that things like California’s Amendment 8 are the Last Straight Hope to protect our Great Christian Nation will be seen as goofy as people worrying about the dire and apocalyptic effects of giving women the right to vote.)

So even though the NPR story tends to get a bit scarifying at times, nearly blaming Obama for riling up all those racists, I think it’s a good thing that the white-first KKK a and neo-Nazi types are creeping out of the woodwork again. Sometimes you just have to turn over some rocks to see what comes scurrying out. Wearing heavy-soled boots, and not being afraid to use them in the circumstance, is highly advised.

The Re(re(re))making of McCain

If the full New York Times magazine cover story “John McCain – The Making (and Remaking and Remaking) of the Candidate” is as fascinating as the NPR Fresh Air…

If the full New York Times magazine cover story “John McCain – The Making (and Remaking and Remaking) of the Candidate” is as fascinating as the NPR Fresh Air interview with the author, Robert Draper, it’s must-read of the inside moves, shifts, and re(re(re))narratives woven by the McCain campaign. Fascinating stuff, and not always the answers that either side has assumed.

Electoral college watch

A week later (and a week before The Big Day), here we are. (+ means an increase, * means unchanged, – means a decrease) Site Obama McCain Toss-Up ElectionProjection.com  375 + 163 -…

A week later (and a week before The Big Day), here we are. (+ means an increase, * means unchanged, – means a decrease)

Site Obama McCain Toss-Up

ElectionProjection.com 

375 +

163 –

Electoral-vote.com

364 *

157 –

17 +

FiveThirtyEight.com

351 +

187 –

Pollster.com

306 +

142 –

90 –

270ToWin.com

277 *

163 *

98 *

Hedgehog Report

364 +

174 –

FederalReview.com

338 *

166 *

34 *

3 Blue Dudes

306 –

157 –

75 +

Electoral Scoreboard

367 *

171 *

 

 

Obama maintains his significant (if electoral-magnified) lead and lock in all the polls and results. Some sites haven’t shifted much in the last week; most of the others have increased Obama’s lead, but nobody has shown McCain gaining any ground, save in increasing some undecided tallies.

The question, of course, is how accurate this is. I think there is nearly zero chance that McCain could actually win, but the above numbers could be volatile for any number of reasons — the oft-touted Bradley effect, dirty tricks and voter suppression, and lazy Democratic voter turn-out in the face of a “landslide” could all drop the Obama numbers from a few key states flipping back. On the other hand, depressed GOP turn-out and the momentum of “winning” could push Obama up higher, though not, I suspect, over 400 as some have suggested.

Over in the other races, here’s how things are looking (the top number is the current split; the +/*/- refers to the Democrat numbers):

Site

Senate
(49-49)
 

House
(233-199)
Govs
(28-22)

ElectionProjection.com 

57-41 *

258-177 +

28-22 –
Electoral-vote.com

59-41 +

252-182 –

 

FiveThirtyEight.com

57-41 *

 

Pollster.com

55-38 *

246-166 *

27-21 *

3 Blue Dudes

53-38

 

 

Electoral Scoreboard

53-39 *

 

 

 

It doesn’t seem likely that the Dems will get their filibuster-proof Senate. That may be a good thing, for folks who like a bit of friction in their government. If the GOP uses that slender hold to restrain the wildest of the Democratic majority’s wish lists, that’s all fine and good. If they use it to try and block anything significant, there may be trouble. (I wonder how the whole “going nuclear” thing will play this coming Congress — I lot different, I suspect, from when the GOP were in near-domination.) 

We’ll see in a week.

Things are a scosh crazy right now

I’m not quite sure why. Work has been very busy — reports and system go-lives and personnel issues and a new fiscal year kicking off. Home, too, has had all…

I’m not quite sure why. Work has been very busy — reports and system go-lives and personnel issues and a new fiscal year kicking off. Home, too, has had all sorts of events going on. I’m doing this gaming Lexicon that usually ends up taking a lot more time than “write 500 words” sounds like it should take. There’s karate.  There’s City of Heroes play, complete with Zombie Apocalypse (which seems to be the MMO theme this year). There’s karate. There’s various errands and housekeeping and pumpkin-carving and …

There don’t seem to be enough hours in the day.

I keep making lists of things that need doing, and if I get to about a quarter of them, that seems like a good day. Bills to pay, Thankgivings to send invites for, yards to pay attention to, rooms to tidy up. Too many things. *sigh*

So I apologize for the dearth of posting here. I actually have a ton of links I want to throw out there before the election in A WEEK renders them moot (some non-political posts, too). I am, in fact, looking very much forward to the election, whatever the outcome (which is an easy thing to say when I’m pretty sure the outcome is going to be what I want), since it will reduce some of the election-news-following-frenzy that’s been a good chunk of my online life the last month.

But let it be noted that, even as frenzied as things are, and even this late in the evening, I do want to wish my lovely (and ever-patient) wife a Happy Birthday. Kiss-kiss, love!

 

A “Hail Sarah” Pass

McCain on Face the Nation, with a generally GOP-friendly Tom Brokaw, who keeps raising how pretty much everyone in America thinks Sarah Pallin was about the worst and least-qualified choice…

McCain on Face the Nation, with a generally GOP-friendly Tom Brokaw, who keeps raising how pretty much everyone in America thinks Sarah Pallin was about the worst and least-qualified choice he could have made:

 

The man is grinning so forcibly that I expect his face to crack off. He’s having a hard time stringing more than two-thirds of a Palin talking point together. He very clearly is sorely torqued by having his nose rubbed in the decision, and it’s all he can do to keep from lunging across the table and throttling Brokaw.

You know, there are times when a politician has to make an unpopular decision. something that the public simply doesn’t understand. Heck, Kennedy’s Profiles in Courage is full of ’em.  At some point, when people tell you for the hundredth time that you made an egregious error that you don’t disagree with, if you’re not going to cave, there really is only one way to respond: “Well, that was my decision and I stick by it. Clearly some people disagree, but if they trust me, they should trust this choice. If not, there’s nothing I can do to convince them.” 

What you don’t keep trying to do is mouth the same talking points, hoping that this time, for whatever reason, they’ll stick. That’s a sign of inflexibility, of arrogance, of bad political instinct. It’s trying the same thing over and over again, hoping the results will be different, which is the definition of insanity.

She has more executive experience than Sen. Biden and Sen. Obama, together. She took on the governor of her own party because she had seen what she’s thought was corruption. She’s been a mayor. She has 24,000 people underneath her. Her husband is a, uh, works the third shift on the oil who…in…facilities in the North Slope. He’s a, ah… the-they have a won…she has executive experience…

This country has had eight years of a president who cannot admit he was wrong. Do we need another four?

(via ETEV and Les)

Spooky!

Jack-o-Lantern Time!…

Jack-o-Lantern Time!

Home again

So last evening, after Margie and Katherine were both home, we packed up some bags and headed for … the Denver Zoo. We’d signed up for a special instance of…

So last evening, after Margie and Katherine were both home, we packed up some bags and headed for … the Denver Zoo.

We’d signed up for a special instance of their “Bunk with the Beasts” program, where folks stay overnight at the zoo, taking after-dark tours of the animals and doing various educational things. This particular Bunk experience was enlivened by being the this weekend being the “Boo at the Zoo” event, where folks come, kids in costume in tow, and “trick or treat” at booths manned by local sponsoring businesses.

Hence, this particular evening was called “Bunk before the Boo,” and had a Halloweenish twist to it.

We all met outside the side gate of the zoo at 6 p.m., suitcases and all. We were ushered through the gate into the Gates Building, which has classrooms and meeting rooms, and to a large multipurpose room in its front. This was my first confirmation that we’d all be dossing down, barracks-style, together, as everyone claimed a stretch of wall. Hmmmm … shadows of Mumbai, only with a roof rather than tarps.

Dinner was ready at that point — copious packages of Pizza Hut pizza, plus veggies and lemonade. We also got water bottles, glow sticks, and our program IDs.

After dinner, we broke into three groups, and each of our leaders took us on a 45 minute or so zoo tour. It was a bit less focused than that — one of the volunteer leaders was very new to all this, so her group hung out with ours because she didn’t have her docent patter down. We also had problems with the night vision scopes.

Still, it was fun seeing all the critters who were out at night, or seeing how widely a hippo can yawn when Cheerios are being thrown into its mouth.

After getting back, they had the group break up into three rooms, rotating each 20 minutes. One room was about “slime,” and was supposed to feature some slimey animals (we had one toad), plus the opportunity to make your own slime (water, white glue, borax and green food coloring). That was the weakest of the rooms. The next was the best — dissecting owl pellets (sort of the equivalent of hairballs in cats, but with the bones of the various consumed critters in them, which scientists use to classify what the owls have been eating). For the more fastidious or less interested, there was a craft to make pine cone owls. The third station was “bug bingo” (with various plastic bugs) as well as giving kid a chance to see (or handle in a few cases) a scorpion, a tarantula, and a cockroach.

Snacks were available at the first and third rooms.

Somewhere in the middle of that, I went back to the big room and set up our dossing area — a large air mattress for Margie and me, a small one for Kitten, plus sleeping bags.

After the last of the stations, everyone started getting ready for bed, changing into various publicly acceptable sleeping garb, etc. There was supposed to be a late-night story that Katherine was eager for, but alas the room with the books had gotten locked up, so no story (and no attempt to improvise one).

The drapes were closed, the lights were turned off, and everyone went to sleep.

Actually, that’s pretty accurate. People were well-behaved and sleeping did occur. The room was pretty warm, so the sleeping bags were only marginally necessary. The only problem we had (and it didn’t bug me until the early morning) is that we were right next to one of the doors, which meant the traffic to/from the bathrooms — and the door opening/closing — was right by our heads. Since folks started waking up before 7 a.m. reveille, that lead to a pretty steady stream of in/outs starting around 6.

Upon officially rising at 7, we had a half-hour to get our stuff packed up and out to our cars, after which breakfast was served. Though advertised in advance as goodies from Panera, it was fairly pedestrian cereal + pancakes + egg-cheese breakfast burritos + fruit. Filling, but not particularly intersting.

We had a follow-up tour — all the kids changed into their Halloween costumes — after breakfast. It was called a scavenger hunt, was actually set up as a Q&A on different animals (and would have been suited, based on distrubution, for an all-day tour of the park), but was executed as another docent walk. 

At quarter of 9, the kids were set free to get a 15 minute hop on the rest of the Boo at the Zoo crowds.

BatZ can get incredibly crowded. We heard that, and saw it first-hand. Being deep in the innards of the zoo when cut loose, we got to hit all the southern trick-or-treat locations before the crowds got around. There’s also a timing issue; though the gates opened at 9, crowds didn’t get heavy until about 10:30 or so.

Just as the weather the evening before had been pleasant, suited to a light jacket or sweatshirt (a change from the previous nights), the morning was pleasant, no outer garb necessary. In fact, it got a bit warm …

After circumnavigating the zoo, marveling at the baby red pandas climbing a tree, the cute snow leopard cubs playing with a pumpkin, etc., we left around Noon, tired, but with a full bucket o’ Halloween Candy.


 

I have to say that I was a bit disappointed by the Bunk with the Beasts program, though Katherine seemed to have a good time. The food was so-so, and the educational content was pretty light, but in general it just didn’t seem well-organized, in terms of the leaders/volunteers really being clear about what they were doing or what was supposed to happen next or communicating with the visitors. It all had the sense of Amateur Hour, and not necessarily in a good way. That may have been the luck of the draw or it may be something more systemic.

That said, Katherine did enjoy herself. I don’t know if we’ll do this particular trip again, but I am glad we did it at least this once.

Boo at the Zoo

It’s not just for cute purple kittens….

It’s not just for cute purple kittens.

Yes on 8 threatens to “out” No on 8 donors

Not necessarily “out” them as homosexual (since there are plenty of straight supporters of the No on 8 campaign in California), but “out” them to customers, who would then presumably…

Not necessarily “out” them as homosexual (since there are plenty of straight supporters of the No on 8 campaign in California), but “out” them to customers, who would then presumably shun the Godless Commie Marriage-Hating Faggot-Loving businesses who dared speak up for marriage equality.

The letters being received start off nicely enough:

Equality California is advertising on its website that it has received a contribution of at least $10,000 from you. […] We are sure that you would want to review the way that they are using Abbott & Associates’ name, since many more of your clients support traditional marriage than support same sex marriage. A copy of an advertising page from Equality California’s website is enclosed for your information.

 

That’s rather nice of them — offering the opportunity for someone to weasel away from what they’ve done on the pretense that it’s Equality California that’s either lying or betraying the Deep Dark Secret that the contributor gave them money. Note the implicit implication that obviously nobody would openly give to Equality California, or wouldn’t be appalled that their donation had been made public by EC

They offer then to help the contributor make up for “this error.”

We respectfully request that Abbott & Associates withdraw its support of Equality California. Make a donation of a like amount to ProtectMarriage.com which will help us correct this error and restore Traditioal Marriage. A donation form is enclosed. We will be most grateful and will advertise on our website Abbott & Associates’ generous contribution.

 

Isn’t that nice of them? “Back off of your earlier commitment, fork over some dough, and we’ll tell everyone that you’re holy and righteous.”

Then the kid gloves come off. (Emphasis below mine.)

Were you to elect not to donate comparably, it would be a clear indication that you are in opposition to traditional marriage. You would leave us no other reasonable assumption. The names of any companies and organizations that choose not to donate in like manner to ProtectMarriage.com but have given to Equality California will be published. It is only fair for Proposition 8 supporters to know which companies and organizations oppose traditional marriage.

 

Jeez, where does one start? Well, for starters, there’s the false dichotomy. I love and support traditional marriage. I think the dedicated commitment of love before society (and, for those who wish that sort of thing, God) is a truly wonderful thing. So wonderful and powerful and transformative and life-giving that I think it should be open to gay couples, too. I really don’t see the conflict. Are they being disingenuous or simply uncomprehending about that standpoint?

Secondly, unless EC has been telling people that their donations will be Ultra-Top Secret, isn’t ProtectMarriage.com missing the point that these folks have already made their support visible to the public?

No, they’re not missing the point. I’m sure any donor knew they were taking the potential risk of their name being published on some boycott black-list by pro-8 folks. The ProtectMarriage folks could have just gone ahead and done that — but given that there was a chance, just a chance, of getting someone to pony up some money (plus demonstrate some corporate “conversion therap”), it was worth engaging in this extortion-with-sadness routine.

We will contact you shortly to discuss your contribution sincerely hoping to receive your positive response.

 

“Nice reputation ya got here. Be a shame if somet’in’ were t’happen to it.

The Executive Committee of ProtectMarriage.com and the millions of Californians supporting Proposition 8 thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this request.

“Yeah, you better be thinking about those millions of Californians before we blacklist you.”

Disgusting. And these are the purported upholders of all that is good and holy and right?

If you want to help get yourself on a blacklist (and what good freedom-loving sort wouldn’t?), visit www.noonprop8.com.

Brain and brain! What is brain?!

Via BoingBoing we get reports of the new front in Creationism/”Intelligent Design,” one that uses a old philosophical idea: Cartesian dualism. Schwartz and Beauregard are part of a growing…

Via BoingBoing we get reports of the new front in Creationism/”Intelligent Design,” one that uses a old philosophical idea: Cartesian dualism.

Schwartz and Beauregard are part of a growing “non-material neuroscience” movement. They are attempting to resurrect Cartesian dualism – the idea that brain and mind are two fundamentally different kinds of things, material and immaterial – in the hope that it will make room in science both for supernatural forces and for a soul. The two have signed the “Scientific dissent from Darwinism” petition, spearheaded by the Seattle-based Discovery Institute, headquarters of the intelligent design movement. ID argues that biological life is too complex to have arisen through evolution.

In August, the Discovery Institute ran its 2008 Insider’s Briefing on Intelligent Design, at which Schwartz and Michael Egnor, a neurosurgeon at Stony Brook University in New York, were invited to speak. When two of the five main speakers at an ID meeting are neuroscientists, something is up. Could the next battleground in the ID movement’s war on science be the brain?

Well, the movement certainly seems to hope that the study of consciousness will turn out to be “Darwinism’s grave”, as Denyse O’Leary, co-author with Beauregard of The Spiritual Brain, put it. According to proponents of ID, the “hard problem” of consciousness – how our subjective experiences arise from the objective world of neurons – is the Achilles heel not just of Darwinism but of scientific materialism. This fits with the Discovery Institute’s mission as outlined in its “wedge document”, which seeks “nothing less than the overthrow of materialism and its cultural legacies”, to replace the scientific world view with a Christian one.

 

If you can’t measure it, observe it, test it, or even demonstrate it’s there, how is that science? 

Or, put another way: Does my cat have a conscious mind? How about that fly buzzing around over there? Or that orchid on the counter? What about this table? How do I know, one way or the other? How do I detect it (or its absence)? (And it gets even sillier to argue when you treat “consciousness” as a code word for “soul”.)

Or, to take another example, if we do finally get a computer that can pass the Turing Test — will that be a proof that it has consciousness? If not, what is the qualitative difference between that computer’s outward expression of consciousness and my own?

Or, put another way, if consciousness is an immaterial thing, when does it develop in human beings? At what point in the womb, or beyond, does it develop? How/why does an immaterial quality have to “develop” at all? Does it actually grow? Does it actually start at the point of conception, or with the first splitting of cells, or what? And how do you know it or point to it or prove it?

Don’t get me wrong:  my own self-image and philosophical belief is that “I” am more than a very complex series of firing neurons and squishy bits in my skull. But that’s my belief; I don’t claim that it’s scientifically proven, or should be the basis for scientific conclusions about reality. I believe in more than the material world; that belief doesn’t constitute proof of same, nor does it mean that scientific models of the material world are wrong or that they need to be changed to include my belief in a consciousness/soul that transcends the confines of the body, any more than my belief that osso bucco is one of the most fabulous foods on Earth mean that everyone on Earth has to eat it, or that cookbooks or cultures that don’t like it as I do to be “overthrown” as clearly not recognizing some intrinsic quality of osso bucco that cannot be pointed at, only “known.”

And despite that deeply held belief, I am not willing to rule out that everything we recognize outwardly as consciousness isn’t a complex interaction of millions of neurons and brain chemicals (which doesn’t mean that there’s no soul; but that’s another discussion). We simply can’t explain it all at this point save in very general terms — but, then, a century ago people didn’t understand about subatomic particles and Strong and Weak Forces and the conversion of matter into energy — but that ignorance of how, say, the sun actually worked didn’t mean that it was really powered by glowing angels or anything immaterial — it meant that we didn’t know, yet, how it worked.

All the immateriality argument seems to contribute is a more comforting legend for the map than “LANDS UNKNOWN” or “HERE BE MONSTERS.” It’s a magical black box argument — “and then a miracle occurs!”

(More on Dualism here.)

(via Ginny)

Ding!

Grats to Les for hitting 6K entries at Stupid Evil Bastard. Yes, my own “superstar” (his word, not mine) post count is at over 13K — but, as he also…

Grats to Les for hitting 6K entries at Stupid Evil Bastard. Yes, my own “superstar” (his word, not mine) post count is at over 13K — but, as he also notes, he has a “staggering” 72K comments there, whereas I’m at 24K.

So congratulations, Les, both for a very, very respectable milestone as well having gathered together such a vocal community.

***Dave Does the Election – Staying Up Late on a Thursday Edition

I need to make this quick, so a bit more bullety, a bit less paragraphic. MCCAIN Senator, I’m shocked! How could you endorse redistribution of wealth like that? Oh, wait,…

I need to make this quick, so a bit more bullety, a bit less paragraphic.

MCCAIN

  1. Senator, I’m shocked! How could you endorse redistribution of wealth like that? Oh, wait, that was back in 2000. Hmmmm … but would this count as an issue you’ve flip-flopped on? Say it ain’t so, John.
  2. Remember, when terrorists endorse McCain, it’s a trick, but when they endorse Obama, it’s for real. Right.
  3. Can John McCain still win? “Anything’s possible” — but how precisely can he go about it?

PALIN

  1. The NeedlessMarkupGate Scandal continues to dog poor Gov. Palin. Since the clothing was a gift from the RNC to her family, some people are wondering when she’ll be paying the $50K in gift taxes she’ll owe on it. Some other people are surprised that McCain is wholeheartedly supporting her for it, given that five years ago he was supporting legislation to forbid just that sort of thing (something about how having campaigns pay for clothing and other personal items would seriously “erode public confidence”).  On the other hand, Fox News is all over how unfair it is for the media to dwell on personal grooming expenses of candidates.
  2. Maybe Palin can pay back the GOP for some of those dresses by suing SNL for slander, as Newt Gingrich suggests she do. Yeah, great idea there, Newt. (Hey, weren’t you a big tort reform guy once upon a time?)
  3. Is Palin being stupid or disingenuous here, first saying she won’t call Obama a socialist, then talking about how Obama’s policy proposals are all socialist? Hmmmm, maybe both.
  4. A tip to the Governor: when you (incorrectly) rag on an opponent about his being willing to sit down with terrorists and dictators “without preconditions,” you might want to actually have figured out what preconditions you yourself would insist upon. D’oh!
  5. Okay, it’s a cheap shot but a funny one.

OBAMA

  1. Why are Republicans voting for Obama? Just listen.
  2. Why is Obama winning? Steady temperment and thoughtful decision-making. What novel attributes for a president!
  3. Unlike some candidates, the Obama family isn’t dropping $150K for a wardrobe.
  4. This picture was from earlier this summer, when Obama visited Hawaii and threw a lei into the ocean where his mother’s ashes were scattered. Very quietly touching.
  5. Mad props to Ron Howard (et al.) for this little film and being willing to, um, humiliate himself in order to get his message of support for the Obama campaign out.

OTHER RACES

  1. Rep. Bachmann says she doesn’t actually think Obama is anti-American, really, at least not to speak of — she just got tricked into saying it by a nasssssty interviewer. Sorry, Ma’am, Gov. Palin already used that excuse. Of course, Bachmann is also telling the press one thing, and telling her far-right audiences (whom she’s hitting up for money, since the GOP’s abandoned her) something quite different.
  2. Rep. Hayes, who I featured the other day first saying “liberals hate America” and then his campaign saying he flatly denied saying that, now denies denying that he said it. Are you keeping up here? But don’t worry, Rep. Hayes, evidently calling liberals “anti-American” is the “in” thing in your crowd.I’d love to see Marilyn Musgrave get retired. Talk about an embarrassment to our state.
  3. I knew Colorado’s Amendment 48 was bad news, but I hadn’t realized Chow heinous it is.
  4. I live in a nice, conservative suburb of Denver, Tom Tancredo Country, one of those places where almost every local contest goes to the (R)s. Yet, astonishingly, Arapahoe County is now considered a swing disctrict! Yow!

THE CAMPAIGN

  1. Who is a Real American? Here are some suggestions of what Americans (at one of them) wants. Sounds like a pretty good list to me.
  2. Election 08 as a Dungeons and Dragons campaign – Kind of goofy, but with some amusing points.
  3. Was a McCain volunteer brutally attacked for her political beliefs? Um, chances look high that it was a hoax. Even Michelle Malkin, God help us, doesn’t believe the story. What’s remarkable (and scary and disgusting) is checking out the linkbacks at the bottom of the Malkin article, most of which are drinking-the-koolaid “See! See the Muslim-thugocracy black-on-white violence inherent in the Obama candidacy! Help! We’re being oppressed” kind of insane crap. I mean, these people really believe that the Obama Campaign is sending black thugs with knives to beat up and intimidate McCain supporters (and the only reason we don’t hear about it is because of a media conspiracy, of course). Yeesh.
  4. Do most Americans love taxes? I think most Americans think taxes are necessary, and even a civic duty. But I don’t think they love them.
  5. The GOP Intellectual Wing who’ve been banished and battered for daring to suggest that Obama might be a better candidate and that the Republican Party has strayed from its core vision, continue to speak out. I must confess to a bit of schadenfreude, but I honestly do wish them well in flushing the fat cats and social conservatives from their party.
  6. Why it’s criitical that people vote.
  7. Why it’s critical not just to beat the Republicans, but to beat them badly.

And so it goes. And so I go … to bed.

“And he thinks taxes are so patriotic you should render all your money … unto the government …”

John McCain doesn’t really “approve this message” — but it sure sounds like it was generated by his campaign …    (via BD and Michael)…

John McCain doesn’t really “approve this message” — but it sure sounds like it was generated by his campaign …

  

(via BD and Michael)

Dagnabbit, it’s Rovean, not Rovian!

Actions and strategies done by or in the manner of Karl Rove should be referred to as Rovean. The man has silent e at the end of his name, and all…

Actions and strategies done by or in the manner of Karl Rove should be referred to as Rovean. The man has silent e at the end of his name, and all the examples I could think of (Lockean, Humean, Shakespearean) simply use the rule of tacking an -an to the end to create an adjectival form. You’d only change it to an -ian if is name ended in -i or a consonant.

Alas, a search on Google gives me 7,810 hits for Rovean, 387,000 for Rovian.

Criminy sakes, the man has even corrupted English grammar …

 

It’s possible to be for without indulging in the against

I picked up Katherine from school and headed off for our semi-regular Wednesday errands: a stop by the comic book store, and picking up a take-and-bake pizza from Papa Murphy’s….

I picked up Katherine from school and headed off for our semi-regular Wednesday errands: a stop by the comic book store, and picking up a take-and-bake pizza from Papa Murphy’s.

“Yay! I saw an Obama-Biden!” she proclaimed from the back seat as we wended through neighborhoods.

“Yay!” I agreed.

“Boo!” she said, as we passed by a house whose lawn was festooned with McCain-Palin and local race GOP banners.

A moment to ponder.

“Y’know,” I said, “I think it’s okay to cheer for my candidate. But I don’t think it’s nice to boo people who support the other person.”

A pause. “Okay.” Another pause. “A bunch of people at school were saying bad things about the people for president that they didn’t like.”

I think for a moment. “It’s a real temptation to say that a candidate you don’t like is stupid, but I think it’s better to cheer for your candidate than to say mean things about the other candidate. It’s okay to say that you disagree with what a candidate says. Or that you don’t think a candidate is the best choice for president. But you shouldn’t be mean to other people.”

It’s tough being partisan in a positive, constructive fashion, or to focus on issues rather than just taking shots at the opposition. I am very painfully aware of that, even as a profoundly Nice Guy. 

My hope is that, whatever political beliefs Katherine develops for herself, she’ll remember that the expression of those beliefs is just as important. We cannot be a society of Us vs. Them, especially when They are only a few percentage points of the populace away from Us. It’s okay — expected, even important — to differ on the issues. But I’m not comfortable with name-calling in the Third Grade, where Katherine is, let alone among adults.