https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

You know, folk, there’s a time when it stops being funny

Of course, there’s the irony that, after palling around and praising over and over and over again one of the most brutal and bloodthirsty tyrants on the planet, and one who has literally threatened to obliterate Americans in nuclear fire, Trump would then turn around and talk about how the mainstream media is America’s “biggest enemy.”

So funny to watch the Fake News, especially NBC and CNN,” he wrote. “They are fighting hard to downplay the deal with North Korea. 500 days ago they would have ‘begged’ for this deal — looked like war would break out. Our Country’s biggest enemy is the Fake News so easily promulgated by fools!

But at some point the ironical eye-rolling has to give way to actual alarm over the President of the United States calling major media outlets “Our Country’s biggest enemy”. I mean, those are the kind of things said by dictators and autocrats. Like, say, Vladimir Putin. Or Kim Jong Un.

At what point, one wonders, will the President of the United States actually decide to stop talking and start acting?

And what happens then?

NOTE: It seems likely that Donald didn’t actually write that, given the un-Trumpian “promulgate” and, in fact, that entire “so easily promulgated by fools” line sounds more like something Dr. Doom would say rather than Donald Trump. But it went out under Donald’s personal Twitter account, so one must presume it had his blessing.




After meeting with North Korean dictator, Trump calls press America’s ‘biggest enemy’
Hours after returning from a trip where he lavished praise on one of the world’s worst dictators, President Trump declared that America’s biggest enemy is… “fake news.”

Original Post

History repeats itself

RT @MatthewBevan: Fun fact: In 1971 Richard Nixon triggered a trade dispute with Canada. He called the Canadian PM an “asshole” and a “son…

But they pledged!

RT @jefftiedrich: Fun true fact: North Korea previously pledged denuclearization in 1985, 1992, 1994, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2…

“We’re America, Bitch!”

Witness various senior Administration folk trying to sum up the Trump Doctrine on foreign policy, which the post title is the most provocative example of.

Then there’s “Permanent destabilization creates American advantage,” because being the erratic drunkard down the street who occasionally shoots his gun at the moon and/or passing cars is just what we want to be and do. Oderint dum metuant.

Also suggested: “No Friends, No Enemies” — treating everyone on a transactional, cash-and-carry basis (“What are you doing for me this week?”), because … well, why should we treat Canada any different from Russia, or the UK on a different basis than China? After all, we’re America, and have no need to worry about having allies, because who would dare be an enemy to us?

Sigh. And to think, at one time, the GOP were all gung-ho for Reagan and his “Shining City on a Hill” metaphor for America’s place in the world. What the hell happened?




A Senior White House Official Defines the Trump Doctrine: ‘We’re America, Bitch’
The president believes that the United States owes nothing to anyone—especially its allies.

Original Post

The Great “Negotiator”

So the US has given up, unilaterally and without any agreement by either our own Defense Dept. or our ally South Korea, the joint exercises we have engaged with annually with the South. North Korea always purported to hate these, and sometimes lobbed weaponry around when they happened, but both the US and the South had always maintained they were critical for the conventional protection of South Korea against a conventional attack from the North.

Pfft. Gone. Too “expensive” and, in Trump’s own words (though echoing North Korea’s), “very provocative.”

And what does Donald get in return for this? A vaguely worded pinky-swear by the North, echoing similar pledges in the past two decades, to denuclearize the whole peninsula.

Trump insisted he believed Kim was determined to disarm, adding that at the end of the summit, the North Korean leader had offered to destroy an engine-testing site that is part of the country’s missile programme. “He’s de-nuking,” Trump told ABC News. “I mean, he’s de-nuking the whole place. It’s going to start very quickly. I think he’s going to start now.”

You “think he’s going to start now.” Wow.

Well, at least you know precisely what denuclearization is going to look like, right?

Missing from the joint statement was the definition, promoted up until now by the Trump administration, of complete, verifiable, irreversible dismantlement (CVID). Asked at a press conference why those terms were not included, Trump said: “There was no time. I am here one day.”

Well, I’m glad you gave it all so much due thought and consideration, Donald, before kicking an ally to the curb and giving way on a concrete and verifiable activity in return for your telepathic belief that Kim is going to follow through on just what he’s failed to follow through on multiple times.

And you were there only one day, so those four words couldn’t somehow be included in the text of the agreement? Gee, if only you had a State Dept. that could, I don’t know, do much of anything, they might have had this all set up to go when you arrived for your “one day” rush visit. Or maybe if you had bothered to stick around for more than one day, you might have been able to actually get the agreement that the North is almost certain to violate to have some teeth in it.

This would be a world embarrassment no matter who the president was. That it was this particularly president who has always boasted that he can win any negotiation, and artfully manage any deal he pleases … well, it would be funny, except for how it involves, y’know, North Korea and nuclear weapons.

Kim played Trump like a sohaegeum. And he’ll never admit it, even if he realizes it.




US to suspend military exercises with South Korea, Trump says | US news | The Guardian

Original Post

Winning Friends and Influencing People (Let the World Burn Edition)

The most generous and charitable interpretation I have here is that Donald felt he had to do something to stand tall and bold as he goes to visit his new bestie, Kim, and he just did it with that ham-handed, narcissistic flare that we’ve all come to know and cringe at.

Or we can go back to the interpretation of our Diplomat-in-Chief that he has no concept of “win-win” — that everything is a zero sum game where there is a winner and a loser, and compromise is the mark of a loser, so if he (and he alone) is not the clear winner, then he’s being made the loser.

Is the US strong enough to kick the EU, Canada, Japan, and, heck, let’s add Mexico (for NAFTA), and China (who Trump is separately trying to foment a trade war with) to the curb and still survive?

Maybe. We’re still a top-notch economy, even the top-notch economy. We could probably hurt any of them, even all of them, more than we’re hurt.

But we’ll be hurt. We’ll be badly hurt. Lost jobs that rely on imports. Lost jobs that rely on exports. Resources that have to be brought in from overseas. Huge hikes in labor rates. Increased cost of everything.

And that’s just in this country. Because even if we do “win,” the economies of all those other countries tank, which not only means a hella human suffering (yes, folk, even furriners can suffer, including people living in nations with marginal economies that will be hit even harder by a worldwide depression, let alone the beneficiaries of all the charitable / human aid work done by the wealthy countries that won’t be able to afford it any more), but a lot of wealth held by Americans will evaporate, too.

And if we get all of them working against us … well, Donald won’t care, because he’s set for life (in theory), or isn’t likely to live another twenty years. We, and our children, will be living a lot longer, and it won’t be pretty.

I mean it. The consequences of a gooftastic Donald Trump meeting with North Korea could lead to some very quick international horror, suffering, and loss of life. Declaring trade war on the rest of the world could be, if it seems possible, even worse, and for a lot longer.




World Leaders React to Trump’s Bizarre Attacks on Canada

Original Post

What a way to run a dairy industry

So, let me get this straight.

In Canada, the government restricts the overall supply of dairy — controlling both domestic production and imports. As a result, Canadian dairy farmers are quite well off, the cost (about 40% higher) is spread out amongst consumers, but the consumers are generally okay with paying higher prices to have a healthy dairy industry that includes both large producers and small mom-n-pop concerns.

In the US, dairy producers are encouraged to produce as much as they can, leading to a glut on the market, prices crashing below the cost of production, bankrupt farms, rising suicide rates, and farmers literally dumping 100 million gallons of milk last year … and then the government gets into various payment schemes to cover some of them them for their losses, leading to an incremental tax burden that everyone hates.

And Canada still ends up importing more milk than the US imports. And US restrictions on dairy imports from Canada remain significantly more stringent as a percent of total domestic production than the Canadian ones.

So, naturally, Trump (along with congresscritters from dairy states) blames the whole situation on Canada and is ticked off that the Canadians are being really, really unfair.




Why Canadian milk infuriates Donald Trump | World news | The Guardian

Original Post

Trump wants to ban German luxury cars

I would love to figure out if this is driven more by some vague sense that the US luxury auto market needs protection, or because Angela Merkel hasn’t been sufficiently fawning to him. His reported comment that he doesn’t want to see a single Mercedes or BMW driving down Fifth Avenue, unfortunately, doesn’t give us a clue to anything but his daftness.

As the article notes, both BMW and Mercedes-Benz have plants inside the United States (in South Carolina). Will those plants be shut down by the US, or by a retaliatory measure from the Germans? How will those voters act in November?

Trump’s escalating trade wars with, apparently, everyone, may or may not succeed in proving that the US economy is still number one, but regardless the cost in US jobs, and in US consumer price increases, will be staggering.




Trump to impose total ban on luxury German cars: report
President Trump wants to impose a total ban on the imports of German luxury cars, according to a new report from

Original Post

Trump got played by Kim

Kim comes out as a negotiating peer of the US, and arguably as earnest a peacemaker/seeker as Trump. Great deal-making, Mr. President.




Art of the Fail
Art of the fail.

View original

Propaganda 101

This article hits on two levels: the first, countering defenses of the mass shooting of Palestinian protesters by IDF troops a few weeks back; the second, an examination of how propaganda and monstrously crafted arguments to defend monstrous acts can be so effective.

Worth a read, in particular for the latter part, as that applies to so much we see around us.




Propaganda 101: How To Defend A Massacre | Current Affairs

View on Google+

Trump loses in a congressional face-down on ZTE

Apparently, even GOP lawmakers aren’t interested in helping a Chinese tech company prosper in the face of actions that supported folk we may have actual troops fighting against soon.




House panel rebukes Trump, upholds sanctions on Chinese tech megafirm – POLITICO

View on Google+

The Diplomatically Influential President

Watching Trump flail about as his much-bragged-of North Korea deal starts to go south would be highly amusing … if we weren’t talking about torquing off an unstable autocrat who is armed with nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles.




Donald Trump’s warning to Kim Jong-un: make a deal or suffer same fate as Gaddafi | US news | The Guardian

View on Google+

I’m shocked, SHOCKED, to discover North Korea is playing games with Trump

I mean, the only person who might act as though Kim was dealing in good faith, given how the DPRK has treated every single other US President, would be a zany narcissist who thinks all he has to do is walk into a meeting room and everyone bows down to his Elite Deal-Making Skills. Oh, wait …

North Korea is rapidly moving the goal posts for next month’s summit between leader Kim Jong Un and President Trump, saying the United States must stop insisting it “unilaterally” abandon its nuclear program and stop talking about a Libya-style solution to the standoff.

[…] “However, if the U.S. is trying to drive us into a corner to force our unilateral nuclear abandonment, we will no longer be interested in such dialogue and cannot but reconsider our proceeding to the DPRK-U.S. summit,” he said, using the abbreviation for North Korea’s official name. He also questioned the sequencing of denuclearization first, compensation second.

North Korea is the international Lucy-with-the-football, more than happy to bob, weave, delay, play for time, and ask for favors up front of any concessions on their part, before yanking the football away and letting people who thought they were in serious negotiations with them fall flat on their backs.

Far better presidents than Trump have gotten caught in the same pattern.

The biggest danger here is the Donald becoming so incensed over having been played and being made to look the fool that he pursues a more dire punishment of North Korea. …

WaPo: North Korea expands threat to cancel Trump-Kim summit, saying it won’t be pushed to abandon its nukes




washingtonpost

View on Google+

Because, of course, the North Korea stuff was going way too smoothly

The DPRK always goes ape over US/South Korea military exercises. But apparently they had advance warning about this one (as usual), and nobody was expecting things to get all contentious with all the upcoming talks and summits in the works.

Will this put the kibosh on Trump’s summit with Kim? Will Trump cancel the military exercise? Will he bluster and call off the meeting himself? Is Kim bluffing? Is Trump?

We shall see.




North Korea cancels high-level talks with the South

View on Google+

Yup! Those bullets just fired themselves!

Are there Hamas leaders who knew that (continuing) protests at the perimeter of the Gaza Strip would likely draw gunfire from the Israeli Defense Forces? Sure. Are there some who are cynically satisfied that scores have been killed and possibly thousands injured by live fire at Palestinians by the IDF? Probably.

But it takes two to tango, Messrs. Kushner, Shah, and Trump. Even the most cynical moves on the part of Hamas leadership couldn’t work if the IDF and the government that controls it weren’t willing to fire into crowds of protests with live ammunition, in the face of no actual reported injuries, let alone deaths, among the Israeli troops.

Placing the blame for this solely on Hamas while proclaiming this a “great day for Israel” (as the President has) shows either rank ignorance or callousness, or a Trumpian combination of both.




White House backs Kushner, blames Hamas for Palestinian deaths

View on Google+

Still not clear what Trump is on about regarding ZTE

Is it a sop to American high-tech companies that were suppliers to the Chinese telecomm giant?

Is it negotiating tactics regarding other Chinese trade kerfuffles?

Is it that the original charges against ZTE were filed during the Obama Administration, so Trump thinks this is more dismantling of the Obama legacy?

Because, frankly, tweeting “Too many jobs in China lost” seems kind of weird from the America First president, especially since ZTE got slammed in the first place for violating sanctions against Iran and North Korea, tools that Trump has repeatedly relied upon, doubled down on, and generally treated as acts of paramount national interest.

Now he seems to be saying, “Yeah, we need to impose new sanctions on Iran, and even take action against our allies if we’re not happy with how they follow suit, unless, of course, they’re a giant Chinese company, in which case we’ll roll back any punishment for violating sanctions.”

It’s still a head-scratcher.




President Trump Puts ‘America First’ On Hold To Save Chinese Jobs : The Two-Way : NPR

View on Google+

The Trump of the Deal

So basically Trump demonstrated leadership by not engaging with Iran, by avoiding negotiations with our frenemies China and Russia, and getting our actual European allies to agree to all sorts of concessions and come supplicate themselves to keep the deal in place, only to throw them under the bus.

It has been said by many others before me, but Trump could not be doing more to destroy American influence and global power if he were an actual Russian agent. This man’s narcissistic buffoonery will take decades to recover from, if ever.




‘Defective at its core’: How Trump opted to scrap Iran deal
WASHINGTON (AP) — It was all there on paper in black and white, down to the precise number of centrifuges: the terms of a potential “fix” that President Donald Trump had demanded

View on Google+

Standing Together

Robert Reich: “International cooperation is an opportunity to promote peace and stability — a win-win proposition. But Trump views cooperation as dfeat. It is a dangerous zero-sum logic that will only isolate American from the rest of the world.”

We are stronger standing together than fighting to be on top. https://t.co/QP6gWB63IZ

A better deal

“I’m sure I can make us a better deal!” https://t.co/KJ3QGvnEVi

Dupes, Duplicitous, or Dolts?

The great question that we cannot now determine, but that will eventually be pretty firmly established (based on historiological precedent), is whether the GOP collaborators of Trump are (a) bedazzled by his rhetoric into believing that what he says will happen will actually happen, (b) pragmatically and hypocritically going along with the Donald because that’s their only hope for political (personal and party) survival, or (c) idiots.




Republicans Agree That Trump Will Easily Convince Rest of World to Rewrite Iran Deal That Took Two Years to Negotiate
After abandoning an agreement that restrains Iran’s nuclear program, the GOP says, we must find a way to restrain Iran’s nuclear program.

View on Google+