https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

"Nice place for us to get charitable deductions here …"

"… Be a shame if somethin' were to happen to it."

Or, as some of the rich put it:

'A major Republican donor, Langone told CNBC in a story published online Monday that wealthy people such as himself might stop giving to charity if the Pope continues to make statements criticizing capitalism and income inequality. Langone described the Pope's comments about a "culture of prosperity" as "exclusionary" statements that may make some of the rich "incapable of feeling compassion for the poor."'

Um, Ken … I think you're missing the point there.

(h/t +Zachary Cook)

Reshared post from +Talking Points Memo

The empire strikes back!

Billionaire Home Depot Founder Says Pope Francis Is Alienating The Rich
Billionaire Home Depot founder Ken Langone has a warning for Pope Francis.

A major Republican donor, Langone told CNBC in a story published online Monday that wealthy people such as himself might stop giving to charity if the Pope continues to make statements criticizing capitalism and income inequality.

Langone described the Pope’s comments about a “culture of prosperity” as “exclusionary” statements that may make some of the rich “incapable …

Your Star Wars biology lesson for today

Heh.

(h/t +Doyce Testerman)

Reshared post from +Joke of the Day

Mice … why did it have to be  mice?

Disney now owns the "Indiana Jones" franchise, except for distribution rights for the first four films which Paramount retains.

So one wonders what's up next? More movies? TV shows? Theme park rides / lands? "Young Indiana Jones" fare?

My favorite comment from below the Variety article: "Marion Ravenwood — Disney’s newest princess" (cue the Disney Princess drinking game fan art …)

Reshared post from +Curt Thompson

Oh my gravy. I haven't seen a single House take over this much fantasy landscape since the Lannisters said 'Screw it, let's just let the little bastard be king.'

Also the rumors that Ford held out on playing Han Solo again until he could get a deal for another Indy movie are …. interesting. And they make sense. And will also, no doubt, pad Mr. Ford's pockets for another thirty years of vanity projects like Morning Glory. (Which was surprisingly good, if you missed it.)

Disney Takes Over Rights to ‘Indiana Jones’ Franchise
The Walt Disney Studios and Paramount Pictures have reached a distribution and marketing agreement for the Indiana Jones franchise. Under the arrangement, Disney gains distribution and marketing ri…

It’s Yoda’s fault

Obi-Wan wasn't responsible for hiding from Luke Vader's relationship to him.  He was just following orders from that little green guy …

Reshared post from +James D.

Interesting!

"Rare Star Wars footage shows real reason Obi-Wan kept Vader's identity secret" – http://www.blastr.com/2013-11-6/rare-star-wars-footage-shows-real-reason-obi-wan-kept-vaders-identity-secret

Rare Star Wars footage shows real reason Obi-Wan kept Vader’s identity secret
You are about to see Obi-Wan (and Yoda) in a whole new light.

If I didn't already have way too many t-shirts

Shiny.

Reshared post from +TeeFury

We're loving how Mount Awesome looks on Silver! Get yours today only at http://teefury.com

Artist of Light (Side of the Force)

Congrats to Jeff Bennett for adding just the right element of anti-schmaltz to Thomas Kinkade paintings.

Star Wars Invades And Improves Idyllic Thomas Kinkade Paintings

"Coming to Your Galaxy This Summer"

The original 1976 teaser-trailer for Star Wars, sans John Williams soundtrack and familiar logo. Who'd've'thunk?

A brief time ago, in a galaxy far, far away

Star Wars, the quick version.  (h/t +Asbjørn Grandt)

Reshared post from +Yumekui Merry

Just bored in the middle of night so I find something fandom … and now 3 hours later I still awake .. Hello Monday.

Making "Star Wars" great again

Some good advice here that, I hope, Abrams takes to heart.

To me, the sweet spot will be finding a sense of simple awe and wonder from the originals — finding a way to make kids as excited as adults (and vice-versa) and that doesn't smack of a commercial ploy to introduce yet another cute set of toy-ready races/robots.

I think Abrams can capture the whiz-bang and the actual writing skills that Lucas fumbled in the prequels. The question is, can he find the emotional heart?

4 Rules To Make Star Wars Great Again: An Awesome Animated Open Letter To J.J. Abrams [Video]

Google is the new "ask my wife, she keeps track of that sort of thing"

Google is the new "ask my wife, she keeps track of that sort of thing"

People have been decrying the Internet as destroying our ability to remember things (just as the advent of writing down epics was decried by people who said it would ruin our ability to memorize them).  But what it's actually doing is fitting into the niche of "I don't remember that, but I know someone who does" — the spouse who remembers people's birthdays, the friend who knows all about Star Wars trivia, the family member who keeps track of what that other side of the family does.  We've always "Googled" each other — now we have Google to help us do that, too.

I will note that using my blog as an extended memory in a similar fashion — "What restaurant did we go to when we went there? Check your blog" — has already proven itself worth all the effort that's gone into it. It provides, as the article quotes a research, "the thinking processes of the intimate dyad."

Fascinating.

Has Google Destroyed Your Memory? No. It’s Much Weirder Than That.
The following is excerpted from Clive Thompson’s book Smarter Than You Think: How Technology Is Changing Our Minds for the Better, out now from the Penguin Press. Is the Internet ruining our ability to remember facts? If you’ve ever lunged for your smartphone during a bar argument (“one-hit father of…

OMG, Joss Whedon hates "The Empire Strikes Back"!

Except he doesn't. But you'd never guess by some of the kertweetling out there today.

What he actually said was that he though the ending kind of sucked.

'"Empire committed the cardinal sin of not actually ending,” Whedon declares. “Which at the time I was appalled by and I still think it was a terrible idea. It’s a Come Back Next Week, or in three years. And that upsets me. I go to movies expecting to have a whole experience. If I want a movie that doesn’t end I’ll go to a French movie. That’s a betrayal of trust to me. A movie has to be complete within itself, it can’t just build off the first one or play variations.”'

And, I must confess, that while I like "Empire" the best of the original trilogy, I completely agree with Whedon here.  It's not even a cliff-hanger in the traditional sense.  Nothing has been resolved save mere survival, and things are only getting worse, which is fine — except there's no urgency about the reversal, nothing to make you take it seriously.  Our team (except Han) are safe and snug. Lando and Chewie jetting off on a road trip, and Luke and Leia and the droids having a comforting hug standing in front of the picture window and ROLL CREDITS!  There's no finish, just a big, relaxing pause, which is the worst of all worlds.

That doesn't mean I hate "Empire." It means I think the ending kind of sucked.

Why Whedon thinks The Empire Strikes Back was ‘a betrayal of trust’
The Empire Strikes back is considered one of the best sequels ever made. But according to Joss Whedon, it wasn’t perfect. There was one glaring issue that still bugs him to the day.

The law is not good with fuzziness

People tend to think of the law as … well … black and white.  Something is illegal, or it is not.  Or some act is a crime, some item is a weapon of mass destruction, some person is a terrorist … or not.

But definitions are fuzzy things, especially when you have a variety of people doing the defining, and especially when there's an incentive to keep expanding those definitions.  The citizenry shouting loudest to stop terrorists don't necessarily understand who's being defined as a terrorist (or what actions are prosecutable as terrorism) today. 

Which brings us to the NSA's surveillance programs, and the idea that they okay, because, well, it's only being used on terrorists ("But zey vere all bahd!")  Terrorism is a fuzzy label, though, and, worse, once you justify use of pervasive surveillance techniques on terrorists, then who's next?  Child pornographers?  Murderers?  Drug dealers? Movie pirates? Inside traders? Income tax evaders?

The pressure to use these tools, when available, is always there, and "Well, right now we're only use them for X, we'd certainly never use them for Y" is unpersuasive, especially when some folks hear that and start saying, "Well, hey, Y is pretty bad, too, and we've already made the investment, maybe we should …"

Mission Creep: When Everything Is Terrorism
NSA apologists say spying is only used for menaces like “weapons of mass destruction” and “terror.” But those terms have been radically redefined.

It’s a …!

Heh.Reshared post from +Philosoraptor

These aren't the droids you’re caring for

On the horrifying tales and subjugation of sentient, feeling robots in the Star Wars universe. "We seem to made to suffer. It's our lot in life." Not quite so funny as it once seemed.

Inequality in Star Wars: George Lucas Doesn’t Care About Metal People
The war crime plays out like so. Two heroic Jedi storm onto the bridge of the enemy ship. They cut through the bridge’s crew, until the only targets left standing are a pair of unarmed battle droids. These rail-thin, vaguely snouted robots are the blaster fodder of the prequel-era Star…

When "The Empire Strikes Back" was but a dream

In 1979 I was graduating high school — and the idea of a "Star Wars" sequel was amazing, even while the idea of a "Star Wars" media empire was … to cross movie properties … "Inconceivable!"

Retro Thing: Tiny 1979 Article About “The Empire Strikes Back”
Back Before modern-day spoiler alerts, internet script leaks, and trailers that ruin any sense of surprise or suspense, we had to rely on genre magazines like Cinefantastique to dig up even the tiniest morsels of info – even about films as big as “The Empire Strikes Back”.

An unused "Star Wars" ad campaign

Hmmm … even though the success of the original Star Wars movie in 1977 was due (it was said) to resurrecting the joy of the Saturday afternoon movie serial, I don't think explicitly marketing it that way would have been very successful.

Ironically, the success of Star Wars led to a "Buck Rogers" TV series in 1979 and a Flash Gordon movie in 1980. 

Reshared post from +Mark Means

Movies

I'm glad they didn't go with this concept and have to wonder just how many people would have said "Buck Who?", "Flash Who?" if they had.

Squabbling over the Goose that Lays the Golden Eggs

Legal wrangling over Star Trek (Paramount owns the rights to the movies, but CBS owns all the TV shows as well as the characters, which Paramount must then license) means that J. J. Abrams will more likely focus more on Star Wars in the future (where Disney owns everything).  

On the one hand, it's frustrating to see this kind of copyright / trademark / intellectual property tug-of-war interfere with Cool Things happening.  CBS and Paramount both used to be part of a single media company, Viacom, but spun their separate ways a while back, leading to the mess.

On the other hand, had it been up to Abrams and his Bad Robot firm, there would not have been any more Star Trek: The Original Series marketing of stuff (so as not to cause "brand confusion" with the rebooted modern franchise). Which would have been highly annoying.  Having a unified vision isn't always a good thing …

(h/t +Les Jenkins)

How the Battle Over ‘Star Trek’ Rights Killed J.J. Abrams’ Grand Ambitions
The franchise’s licensing and merchandising rights are split between CBS and Paramount which created headaches for the multihyphenate’s production company Bad Robot

RT @stoneymonster: @asymmetric…

RT @stoneymonster: @asymmetricinfo The end of WWII to Star Wars was a shorter time period than Star Wars to now.

***Dave Does the Comics – Issue 50 (5 May 2013)

Wow! The 50th issue of my podcast. Who’da thunk it?

On the other hand, it’s also been two months since my last installment, rather than the normal one month. Mea culpas all around — I’ll try to do better.

The problem is … however will I cover all the great comics that have come out over the past two months, even if I narrow it down to just the books I’ve read? Let’s find out …

[powerpress]

The covers below are for the issues I gave an individual review of; hover over the covers below to see the ratings out of 5 stars (with an occasional added comment), and click to embiggen.




BEST COVER: World’s Finest #12
BEST ALL-AGES: Vader’s Little Princess

BEST COLLECTION: Hawkeye, Vol. 1
BEST COMIC: Young Avengers #4


Subscription info for this podcast can be found here. See you back on (if all goes well) the weekend of June 8th!

The Star Wars Hyperverse

It's arguably the messiest meta–mega-franchise going, because what's canonical and what's not, combined with it's incredible pop culture reach across time and space makes it huge.  

Ultimately, arguing over what's canon, or whose Star Wars is better or worse or "more official," is like arguing between Hesiod or Ovid or Bullfinch or Xena as to which is the "better" Greek mythology. Enjoy what you enjoy.

You Take Your Star Wars—I’ll Keep Mine | Tor.com
You take your Star Wars, I’ll keep mine.