https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

The “Incredibles 2” Official Trailer

The good:

  • The Incredibles!
  • It looks like they’ve successfully spanned the difference between the CG of the original and the stuff that can be done today. It looks very nice, but also clearly an Incredibles movie.
  • More Elastigirl! Woot!

The problematic:

  • I didn’t see anything that really surprised me. Family sitcom, in both situation and comedy. Granted, it’s a short little trailer, and I really don’t want massive spoilers. But I’ve been worried about what they’ll do here, and the answer seems to be “When the wife gets the big important job and the husband has to stay home to watch the kids, hilarity ensues!” — and while that can (and, from the look of things, will) be funny, it’s also not exactly ground-breaking.

Not that anything is going to keep me out of the theaters the weekend of June 15th, but I’m not feeling quite as optimistic as I’d like.

View on Google+

So there’s going to be a “The Boys” series on Amazon?

Garth Ennis’ The Boys was one of my favorites while it was running. The over-the-top violence, cynicism, sex, and ragging on politics and the media and celebrity — well, duh, it was Garth Ennis — were a ton of fun, and something of a guilty pleasure.

Well, I’m tickled that Karl Urban is going to be Billy Butcher. Jack Quaid looks like he’ll look the part of Wee Hughie (the character was originally modeled by Darick Robertson after Simon Pegg).

How the show will actually run remains to be seen. That Preacher‘s Evan Goldberg and Seth Rogen are on executive producers and directors of the first episode should be a good sign.

Hmmm. Now I need to reread the (planned) 72-issue series again.




‘The Boys’: Karl Urban To Play Lead Billy Butcher In Amazon’s Superhero Series
Karl Urban has been tapped to star in Amazon’s straight-to-series superhero drama The Boys. Written by Eric Kripke based on the comic book by Garth Ennis (Preacher) and Darick Robertson, The Boys i…

View on Google+

Movie Re-Review: “The Incredibles” (2004)

There’s so much about this movie that I love, but most of all its focus on a husband and wife who, yeah, do have some problems, but who help each other get past them. Bob and Helen Parr are both great superheroes, and they need each other (with a little help from their friends) to see that.

Full review

Rating: ★★★★½ (with a ♥)

I have a lot of trepidation about the sequel coming later this year. It’s hard to follow up adequately (and a decade-and-a-half later) to something so good on its own.

Definitely one of my desert island flicks.




A ★★★★½ review of The Incredibles (2004)
A fine family movie (about a family!) to watch on a wedding anniversary, and one that’s definitely on my desert island list. What I appreciate more and more each time is how Bob and Helen do (and don’t) work together as a couple, how both of them get opportunities to shine, to be right, to be wrong. This is not a film about a guy whose shrewish wife is holding him back. It’s not a film about a woman who struggles to keep her family together in th…

View on Google+

The “Deadpool 2” Trailer

I generally loathe Deadpool in the comics, but the first movie (when I finally brought myself to watch it) was a hoot-n-a-half, and this one looks even better. Not for the violence or obscenity faint-of-heart, but I’m okay with that in measured doses.

(I think the distinction is cross-overs. I’m fine with stand-alone Deadpool movies, even if they play with Fox’s corner of the Marvel Universe. But I would hate to see him ever, ever, show up in a mainstream Marvel Studios MCU movie. He’s like mint chip ice cream: enjoyable on its own, but not what you want to mix with your fettucine alfredo, your chili con carne, or your PB&J.)

View on Google+

I’m very glad to see “Black Panther” doing really well in theaters

In part because I’m a comics geek and enjoy seeing the success of the MCU as a way to get more fun (and diversely fun) movies based on Marvel characters.

In part because I think it’s very cool that African-Americans get to see characters that look like them, that have intersection with aspects of their lives, etc. Yes, they got that with the Luke Cage TV series (also excellent), but here’s a character who’s even more aspirational, surrounded by other characters (many of them women) who are the same. In many ways, this is Thor for that part of the very under-served audience, and that strikes me as a neat thing (and a clever move for Disney/Marvel).

Also in part, so that people who aren’t African-American (including pasty-whites like me) can see black actors directed by a black director doing cool and admirable and fun things just like we’ve enjoyed white actors being directed by white directors doing), and, just maybe, get over the idea that such a thing is unthinkable for a major action-adventure franchise with big box office.

Also in part because it seems to be driving some people nuts with frustration, just the sort who should be driven nuts.




‘Black Panther’ Smashes Box Office Records and Hollywood Myths
“Black Panther” arrived to a record-setting $218 million in Presidents’ Day weekend ticket sales in North America and a global total of $387 million.

View on Google+

Movie Review: “Black Panther” (2018)

NO SPOILERS (but I can’t control the comments).

Short Version: I enjoyed Black Panther. I think it is definitely worth going to see.

Longer Version: Black Panther is a very interesting movie, dealing faithfully with the source material, satisfying the sci-fi / super-heroics and beats that one expects from a Marvel Cinematic Universe flick, but with an interesting, refreshing, and even challenging grounding in real world issues.

The first of those issues is race, and it is even more present in the film than I’d expected, but in ways I hadn’t. Systemic racism as well as the colonial past are deeply embedded in this movie — not in a “Kill Whitey” way like some trolls would have you think, but definitely with an unapologetic edge.

But for me, just as interesting is the broader world about Wakanda and their attitude toward it, and how that in turn drives the movie’s immediate and background conflicts. The question of “Who is my tribe, and what is my duty toward them?” plays at multiple levels here, and, as something that remains at the heart of geopolitics today, it gives Black Panther a more mature feel than the (still quite enjoyable) super-powered slugfest of, say, Thor: Ragnarok.

A few other notes:

1. The actors all do a fine job, hero and villain alike. No Academy Award performances here, but also nothing to complain about.

2. Indeed, the villains here are also interesting, a cut above the generic world-conquerers of too many MCU flicks. They also drift furthest from the comics canon in their role in the story (for the better, I’d say). There’s a scosh more nuance here, in some particular cases, which is a nice turn of events.

3. The plot gets a bit overly complex at times, with flashbacks and tech and magic and a lot of interesting characters that we spend a lot of time with (and could easily spend a lot more). At times, that muddies the waters around our main protagonist, to the detriment of the film.

4. Wakanda is beautifully rendered — it felt a bit like Asgard, only (again) grounded in the real world. The blend of high tech, modernism, and traditional African motifs, in everything from the architecture to the technology to the costumes was gorgeously done.

5. While the presence of so many People of Color was noteworthy, it very quickly fell off in my awareness just because of the setting. What stood out more (for me) was the high number of powerful, confident, interesting, agency-possessing, kick-ass women. It was good to see.

6. There are, of course, additional scenes once the credits start rolling — a mid-credits one (as we make the turn from animated top billing credits to the SFX house slow crawl) that serves as a nice denouement to the film as a whole. and an end-of-credits one that addressed a bit of MCU business that reasonably needed addressing for the fans.

7. We saw the movie in 2D. In retrospect, I might have wanted to see it in 3D; there are some scenes where I think that would make it even more visually stunning.

Everyone always says, “How do you rate this vs the other Marvel movies.” I’d put it in the top quartile, certainly. The action is good (if sometimes a bit too CG), the subject matter a bit more complex than “who can punch whom hardest,” and the cast, primary and supporting, were all enjoyable.

[Cross-posted on Letterboxd.]

View on Google+

The “Ant-Man and the Wasp” Trailer

Oh, yes. Ready and waiting.

View on Google+

Books of 2017

Looking at my Goodreads records, in 2017 I read 92 books.

In fiction, I read 26 new books, and reread 27 (including a (re)read of all of Peter David Star Trek New Frontier series and quite a few Rex Stout Nero Wolfe). Nine were 5-star books; I think my favorite new entry, for a variety of reasons, was April Daniels’ Dreadnought, as both a very solid super-hero story and a great coming-of-age / establishing-your-identity sort of story.

In non-fiction, I read 6 new books (most of them audiobooks — the number was down with my commute being in abeyance. I gave 3 of them 5 stars (which seems high — 5 star ratings are sometimes impulsive, I fear). I’ll give top new rating to As I Knew Him: My Dad, Rod Serling, by Anne Serling as a great insight not only into the man (who was far more than a cigarette-smoking creepy voice artist), but also into television and writing of the 50s and 60s.

In comic TPBs / graphic novels, I read 15 new, and reread 14 old. Of the five 5-star books, I’ll give my top rating for new reads to Jim Zub’s Wayward Deluxe Vol. 1 as an incredible blend of traditional and new mythmaking, steeped in Japanese culture but with a fresh (and gorgeous) eye.

It’s altogether some have slipped through the cracks here, but that’s a pretty good set of numbers.

 

View on Google+

When Marvel Universes Collide!

This article gets a little breathlessly geeky in places, but there’s no doubt that the folk running Marvel Pictures right now are salivating over finally getting their hands on the X-Men and Fantastic Four franchises — heroes and villains alike.

If they follow their pattern, we’ll see stand-alone films there before any serious integration with the rest of the MCU, though cameos are possible, a la Spider-Man in Civil War. And that’s fine — fitting them into phase 4 and phase 5 is going to be tricky enough without moving too fast.

This also gives Marvel/Disney some greater flexibility with their original core heroes aging out or retiring from their roles. “What the heck do we do with the Avengers if Iron Man, Cap, Thor, and Hulk are all gone?” is a little less urgent a question when there are these additional characters to play with.

For me, what I’m most looking forward to is Ike Perlmutter and Marvel Comics deciding it’s okay to have a Fantastic Four comic book again. The FF’s substantive absence from the Marvel Universe has been unusually refreshing in some ways, but knowing it was driven by Perlmutter not wanting to promote characters showing up in Fox movies was particularly maddening. Those days should be drawing to a close soon.




The X-Men, the Avengers, the Merger, and What It’ll Mean

View on Google+

Movie Review: “Spider-Man: Homecoming” (2017)

Yeah, I know I’m late to the game with this one, because, honestly, I’ve been burned out on Spidey — in movies and comic books — for quite a while.

This movie changed that.

★★★★☆ (with a ♥)

Full Review: https://letterboxd.com/three_star_dave/film/spider-man-homecoming/




A ★★★★ review of Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017)
I lost the thrill with Spider-Man as a character a long time ago. I generally don’t read the comics, and haven’t gone to see any of the movies since the second Andrew Garfield outing. My enthusiasm for Sony and Marvel/Disney coming to a deal to incorporate Spidey into the MCU was more that it was fitting than that I was eager. The new Spidey’s appearance in Captain America: Civil War changed that somewhat, showing us a Spidey that was fun, not we…

View on Google+

“American Gods” is in trouble

We love the Starz American Gods series in its first season. Showrunners Michael Green and Bryan Fuller took Neil Gaiman’s excellent novel about belief, faith, religion, and what Americans truly worship, and made it into an even more excellent and trippy TV series.

Shockingly, the two gents are leaving the show for the second season (though they have already written most of the scripts), due to creative conflicts and budget limitations by the production house, Fremantle Media.

That’s not necessarily a deadly blow, but it’s a huge punch in the face, given the two men have been essentially responsible for the tone and content (beyond Gaiman’s foundational work). That’s not something Fremantle can easily replace well.

I’m not completely blaming Fremantle here — $10M per ep sounds … remarkably high, and that’s what they apparently wanted to stick with. And while I think the show is fantastic, the overall viewership numbers may not have warranted spending a lot more.

Still, it’s a darn shame.




Report: American Gods Showrunners Are Leaving the Hit Show [UPDATE]
Earlier this year, American Gods debuted to loads of buzz and positive reviews. The philosophical, trippy adaptation of the classic Neil Gaiman novel became one of the most talked-about shows of early 2017. But, in a shocking turn, the men responsible for its existence are reportedly exiting the Starz show.

View on Google+

Comic books and dyslexia

Comic books are often recommended for dyslexics for training in reading, as the smaller chunks of text and illustrations can help make meaning clearer. There are typographic ways that comic book letterers could make that even more so, but aesthetics and tradition don’t necessarily make that the highest priority.




How Comic Books Can Get Even Better for Dyslexic Readers
While the medium is relatively accessible for people with reading difficulties, its lettering norms are still leaving some behind.

View on Google+

How do you solve a problem like the Batman?

I commented in my review of Justice League that the movie has a terrible power imbalance problem, and this article (which has SPOILERS) extends on that to note that the DCEU in general has a terrible problem with Batman in particular. Perhaps because of too many Frank Miller Dark Knight re-readings (yes, looking at you, Zack Snyder), Ben Affleck’s Batman [1] does exactly the flashiest but least useful thing as Batman: strength training and buying / building bigger and flashier vehicles in order to compete with metahumans like Aquaman, Wonder Woman, Superman, and the various cosmic monsters they’re fighting. And that’s a prescription for failure, both for the character and for the use of the character in the DCEU movies.

Batman, from a comics perspective, has four advantages:

1. Superb Training, letting him take out any mook he runs into and survive any more powerful foe. This isn’t just being a bruiser; it’s being a more effective fighter.
2. A Keenly Analytical Mind, letting him be the detective who susses out ever clue and who knows all the hidden information, the strategist whose long game is always five steps ahead of everyone else (including the villain), and the tactician who can respond to abrupt changes of circumstance both in and out of battle.
3. Masterful Psychology, letting him half-win most battles before they are fought, through intimidation, fear, bluff, and timely reveals of himself or information or other forces he’s put into play.
4. Indomitable Will, letting him parlay his strategic sense and his ability to survive into eventual victory, and victory as often as not on his own terms, without compromising aspects like being unwilling to kill.

His 5th advantage, massive disposable income (and the only one that gets flagged in the JL movie, repeatedly) is nice, but only as valuable as the first four. I mean, Tony Stark has gobs of money, too, but who would you most want on your side (or most fear being on the other side)?

It’s those four attributes that make Batman one of the DC “Trinity,” capable of standing alongside Superman and Wonder Woman. And none of them are on display in JL or in BvS, just a brooding, bloodied bruiser with expensive weapons that get immediately torn apart.

There’s a new non-Affleck Batman movie on DC’s schedule, and plenty of indication that this particular Batman won’t be returning for future DCEU engagements. So here’s a chance for WB/DC to fix this problem, before they do serious damage to an incredible character.

——

[1] I keep calling him the Ben Affleck Batman, though it’s unclear to what degree the actor should take credit/blame for all this. This is, though, clearly also the Zack Snyder Batman.




Justice League proves that the DC Extended Universe doesn’t know what to do with Batman
The villains and fights keep getting bigger. And that hurts Batman the most.

View on Google+

Why I am not necessarily a good judge of comic book-related pop culture

Because I was not in the least bit confused by the Justice League post-credit cameo that this article is all about. Indeed, that was one of the least-confusing parts of the movie.

But, then, I’m probably part of the “certain geek circles” that the author snarks at. And, also, I’ve been buying and reading comics since that character’s creation date (indeed, I have the comic it happened in), so, again, no surprises. Also, I watch TV super-hero stuff, so also no surprises from that vector.

In fact, the author’s suggestion that the character was confused for a different character (color schemes, people!) was, in fact, confusing to me.

I have to assume the author was trolling a bit.

(The only spoiler in the article is the identity of one of the characters in the post credit scene at the end of Justice League. So … avoid it if that’s at all important to you.)




Explaining That ‘Justice League’ Post-Credits Scene

View on Google+

A No-Spoiler 13-Item Quickie Review of “Justice League”

I was really hoping WB/DC would be surprisingly successful with this one, despite all the warning signs. Instead, it’s a cluttered, uneven, multiple-writers-awkwardly-edited-together mess. I mean, it’s not horrible, and I’ve spent money to go see more disappointing movies … but, honestly, while it was fun going and seeing it with my teenager, I sort of wish I’d waited for it to come available on streaming video.

I will endeavor to avoid anything that speaks to more than what was visible in the trailers. There’s at least one significant reveal that will be spoiled very quickly, but not by me.

1. The movie is famously a Zack Snyder movie that (due to tragedy in Snyder’s private life) Joss Whedon had to come in and finish, complete with partial rewrites and re-shoots, and no doubt with studio folk sticking their oars in.

The result is a movie with too many moods, too many characters, too many stories, and too much that just doesn’t quite mesh together, from plot lines to fight sequences.

In that latter point, the climactic fight sequence in particular feels like it went through too many drafts and tweaks. The pacing is awful (violent action! incidental dialog! critical moment! people running off! desperate fighting! people chatting!), and the sense of menace never builds beyond “So precisely how will they defeat the bad guy, because there’s absolutely no tension that they won’t, or even that anyone will get killed in the process.”

(Spoiler: They defeat the bad guy.)

2. There’s an effort to give every hero their own character arc. This works well for some (Flash), less well for others (Cyborg). While I laud the effort, it also means that we spend a lot of time distracted from the main plot by character engagement with their supporting cast. That we have, if not origin stories then heavy background stories, detracts from the core tale being told here.

There’s some very interesting thematic work around broken people having to be convinced that they are not only heroes, but can inspire others to greatness (and, indeed, have to, because everyone’s acting like hopeless nihilists since Superman got killed, two or three or four DCEU movies ago). Indeed, it’s a theme that’s actually explicitly stated in a couple of the better scenes. Unfortunately, it vanishes for long stretches of time, and too often when it comes up (as in the film’s wrap-up) it’s handled ham-handedly.

There are also elements of the “How difficult it is to bring a bunch of reluctant people with clashing personalities together onto a team” trope, but besides a few brief flashes of interpersonal conflict, that all sort of gets lost in the busy action of the final act.

3. Power balance is always a trick in super-group films. Avengers figured out how to have both Thor and Black Widow, Hulk and Hawkeye, all as effective combatants in battle. This movie has everything from a hero who can single-handedly beat the bad guy (as is clearly demonstrated, such that they have to keep coming up with poor reasons to distract them) to a guy whose power is that he’s rich enough to buy expensive vehicles that immediately get trashed, and there’s never a sense that they contribute equally to the team’s efforts. This makes the battle sequences feel terribly imbalanced.

4. The Big Reveal I mentioned (but won’t spoil) has some of my favorite moments in the movie (in terms of personal moments), but the underlying “What exactly is going on here” is muddied, and the whole thing feels anticlimactic both in what happens on-screen and in its effect on the world beyond.

5. For a movie with a Jack Kirby Fourth World villain and creatures and tech and so forth, nearly everything actually Kirbyesque was scrubbed out of the story except for the names and a few visuals. The movie was dying for some follow-up to the villain’s defeat. But we never got it.

Indeed, if you made the villain Mongul and replaced the parademons with generic alien mooks, it would make no different to the film. That’s poor use of the source material.

6. As the previous point suggests, the (virtually) moustache-twirling maniacal god-like CGI villain is about as interesting and realistic and engaging as that description makes him sound.

Also, how dreadfully convenient that the Bad Guy grunts in this movie are mindless aliens. This lets the Good Guys basically slaughter them without any moral issues being raised, I guess.

7. There are some fun uses of musical cues for these heroes that reference back to many-decades-ago cinematic versions of them. That’s helped in part by having Danny Elfman (who also did the Michael Keaton Batman films) doing this score. The problem is, Elfman is so over the top when in dramatic mode, that the movie’s effort to balance epic with personality moments and character humor jars.

8. Why is that guy in sweat pants? Because that’s not what he was wearing in the previous scene.

9. Flash kind of runs funny. His arm movements look more like swimming. That said, he’s my favorite character in the movie. Even if too many of his beats parallel the TV show, I would still like to see a solo movie with him.

10. Too many of Batman’s movements look CG or guy-wired. Yes, I realize that real people (let alone Ben Affleck) can’t do Batman-class stunts. They just need to be done better somehow.

11. All that Amazonian armor that got developed for Wonder Woman and which was available for use in shooting this movie? Nah, they went with something different, both for Modern-Day Amazons (more skin) and Bygone Age Flashback Amazons (leather, and lots more skin). Because Zack Snyder, apparently.

12. We saw the movie in 3D (because of timing issues). No problems with it, but I didn’t feel like it made the movie much better.

13. The movie has two end-credit scenes — one about a quarter of the way through, one at the very end. Both are worth waiting for, and are in their own way more enjoyable / engaging than much of the main movie.

In sum …

As I mention above, the obvious comparison in movies is between this film and Avengers. In my opinion there’s no comparison. Not only did Marvel set up most of the Avengers with their own establish-the-character solo movies beforehand (meaning audiences came in already engaged and knowledgeable about their background and personalities and capabilities), but the handling of character conflict, difficulties in building a team, and the overall smoothness of the plot and pacing of the battles in Avengers was significantly better handled than in Justice League.

And, even more fundamentally, while Avengers left me wanting more (I want a Hulk movie! I want a Black Widow and Hawkeye movie! I want another Avengers movie!), with Justice League I didn’t really find myself rooting enthusiastically for the heroes. All of them were, at various times, kind of jerks, or weak, or uninspiring, and I never really saw them meshing well as a team.

As a result, if you told me this is the final Justice League movie, I wouldn’t be pining for what else might have been, and if this were the last time we saw most of the individual characters, I wouldn’t send nasty letters to Warner Bros., either. I want more Flash, I want more Wonder Woman, I want … well, the others can have cameos in those films.

Bottom line: you could do worse than seeing Justice League, but wait until you can order it on-demand at home.

View on Google+

Brian Bendis moves from Marvel to DC

Which means absolutely nothing to people who don’t read comics, but is akin to Jack Kirby’s famous move from Marvel to DC back in the early 70s (where he promptly created the New Gods and a host of of other zaniness).

Bendis has been one of the preeminent comics writers at Marvel for a decade and more. To my mind, his greatest strength is in dialog — having characters talk like real people — and in showing that you can actually make dialog tell a story in what is primarily a visual medium.

While I’m eager to see what he does over on the DC side of things, my biggest regret in his leaving Marvel is that he’ll no longer be involved with the Jessica Jones character, which he co-created and has had great creative success with.

I look forward to seeing what comes next.




Marvel Comics Star Brian Michael Bendis Moves to Rival DC

View on Google+

We might finally get an “Avengers vs X-Men’ (etc.) movie

That is, if the current negotiations to sell 21st Century Fox’s studio/media properties to Disney comes to pass.

I’m not usually big into major media consolidation, but I’m willing to do it so that Marvel Studios could get the X-stuff back and the Fantastic Four. Wowzers.




21st Century Fox has been holding talks to sell to Disney: Sources
21st Century Fox has been holding talks to sell most of the company to Walt Disney Co., sources say.

View on Google+

The “Black Panther” Trailer

Dexterous and strong and bold hero? Kick-ass supporting women? High-tech African nation? Check, check, and check.

Yeah, I am so there.

(The sound track for the trailer isn’t quite my cuppa, but I’m still so there.)

View on Google+

Oh, and there was a final trailer for “Justice League”

More fun than Batman v Superman, but less interesting than Wonder Woman.

The interactions between the heroes is what should make this movie, not the SFX set piece battles, and I’m not sure how much of that we’re seeing.

Bruce and Diana acting as the “grown ups” for the family is … cute.

Aquaman, aside from having horrible tactics, seems to be much more of the happy warrior than the sullen warrior he was first showcased as. Flash is the excited kid, which is fun. Cyborg … um … flies?

Not much sense of the menace involved here (I mean, I know what it is, but the trailer doesn’t give us much in the way of stakes).

That said, it all seems pretty battle-heavy, sort of a Michael Bay version of the Justice League.

I’m more interested than I’ve been previously (so success for the ad there), but I’m still a lot more excited about Thor: Ragnarok.

View on Google+

“Batman: The Animated Series” is coming to Blu-Ray

Welp, that’s going on the Christmas list … in 2018. There’s discussion in the comments about what the Blu-Ray release will improve from the DVD box sets — the picture should be crisper, and the sound quality likely better. For me the big bonus is freeing up about three inches of video shelf space.

I just posted the other day about some of the history behind BTAS. The article quoted there, plus this announcement, are part of the 25th Anniversary (!) of the show, which was a ground-breaking super-hero animation effort in style and substance. Glad to see it’s going to be getting a more convenient format with better quality.




At Long Last, Batman: The Animated Series Is Coming to Blu-Ray
Batman: The Animated Series turned 25 this past September, and while it’s one of the most beloved animated shows of the past three decades, it’s been confined to DVD box sets for years. That’s about to change, because the animated Dark Knight is finally coming to HD.

View on Google+