https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Routing around the damage

A few days ago, I came across a post from Seki about Veri$ign’s latest Internet power-grab. V$, you see, not only has monopoly control of the .com and .net top…

A few days ago, I came across a post from Seki about Veri$ign’s latest Internet power-grab.

V$, you see, not only has monopoly control of the .com and .net top level domans (TLDs), but it also runs two of the several DNS servers on the Internet, which route requests for given web pages (or e-mail addresses, which becomes important below) to the appropriate machines.

V$ decided, Hey, wouldn’t it be cool if we could boost our bottom line and get people to register more domains with us? What if, whenever someone tried to contact a .com or .net web page that didn’t exist, or which they mistyped the name to, rather than get an Internet protocol standard error page, or if they’ve configured things that way, their default search engine, we instead used our DNS servers to route them over to a search page of our own, identify what sites we think they might want to go to, offer to sell them some domains, include some advertising, and make money from it? Cool!

Well, that’s only speculation on my past as to what they said. I suspect it had a lot more maniacal laughter to it, not to mention a whiff of brimstone.

But, at any rate, that’s what V$ did. They changed the way the Internet behaves, and they did it to line their own pockets.

(I don’t know if Bill Gates is sobbing because he didn’t think of this first, or cackling because Veri$ign is the one company out there that makes Micro$oft look like an Industry Good Citizen.)

This was followed by much outrage, especially when it was discovered that there were more dire consequences. See, lots of sysadmins use systems to validate incoming e-mail. Spammers like to create bogus, nonsensical addresses, so sysadmins run scripts to see if the domains involved, at least, are legit. That doesn’t get rid of spam that has a real address, or that has a spoofed address for some hapless netizen out there, but it’s a good filter nonetheless.

But now that tool is broken. If your request to see if a domain is valid routes through one of V$’s servers, it will come back as finding something (that what it finds is just the V$ search page, not a valid domain, isn’t apparent).

Until Sunday, if the spammer had just made up a string of letters, you could reject the mail right away, knowing it was invalid. Now, it looks like a valid name, so you accept the mail. Your user gets spam. Of course, maybe you bounce the message. In that case, your bounce message gets routed to VeriSign’s very very overloaded machine, so it takes a long time (and possibly a few tries) to bounce it, and then the bounce fails – because there’s nowhere to deliver it – and the sysadmin gets a copy of the spam, complete with records showing why the bounce couldn’t be delivered.
So, thanks to VeriSign, that’s another hundred or more messages a day for tiny sysadmins. Another million for the big guys. A friend of mine is a sysadmin at a major company, and he says this is loading their servers more than SoBig did.

Gee, that’s just swell, guys.

The Internet, though, was designed to be a distributed communciation system that could handle a nuclear war. It’s designed to route around damage, and that’s what’s beginning to happen, both technically and societally. Sysadmins are beginning to manually block the IP addresses of the V$ search page, so that errors come back as errors again. And now the Internet Software Consortium, which publishes the BIND software used on most domain servers, has put just that kind of block into a patch to BIND, so that the blocking takes place automatically.

Good for them.

Veri$ign was unavailable for comment.

Makes the world go round

There may be a few more GOP millionaires in the Senate than Democratic ones (22-18), but if you total up their wealth, it’s a bit more disproportionate … the other…

There may be a few more GOP millionaires in the Senate than Democratic ones (22-18), but if you total up their wealth, it’s a bit more disproportionate the other way.

(via GeekPress)

Just call 1-800-PETARD1 … operators are standing by!

The American Teleservices Association, a telemarketing industry group, isn’t terribly happy with Dave Barry. Seems that Barry published the group’s telephone number in his column a week or two back,…

The American Teleservices Association, a telemarketing industry group, isn’t terribly happy with Dave Barry. Seems that Barry published the group’s telephone number in his column a week or two back, with a suggestion that people call and “tell them what you think. … I’m sure they’d love to hear your constitutionally protected views!”

Thousands of Barry’s readers have done as they were told, forcing the association to stop answering its phones. Callers now hear a recording, which says that because of “overwhelming positive response to recent media events, we are unable to take your call at this time.”

… snicker …

“It’s difficult not to see some malice in Mr. Barry’s intent,” said Tim Searcy, executive director of the ATA, who said the added calls will be costly to his group because of toll charges and staffing issues.

Must … resist … laughing out loud … or mentioning … Caller ID I had to purchase … just for this reason …

Barry hardly sounded apologetic. “I feel just terrible, especially if they were eating or anything,” he said. “They have phones like the rest of us have phones. Their attitude seems to be if you have a phone, people are allowed to call you.”

Indeed.

Perhaps they should look into an unlisted number. Or individually ask each person who calls not to call back again. I hear that works …

Okay, pardon me while I go off and collapse in the corner, tears streaming down my face, chortles echoing out into the office space beyond …

(via GeekPress)

The Three-Fingered Salute

So, who invented [Ctrl-Alt-Delete] to reboot (or, these newfangled days, call up the Task List for) a computer? Dave Bradley, who seems to have created a cottage industry in giving…

So, who invented [Ctrl-Alt-Delete] to reboot (or, these newfangled days, call up the Task List for) a computer? Dave Bradley, who seems to have created a cottage industry in giving speeches about the invention (as well as other Olde Days in the PC Biz topics).

(More on the story here.)

(via GeekPress)

Compare and contrast

A very fine analysis of the difference between the music and movie industries, and how their approaches have led to very different public perceptions of them and their products. Where…

A very fine analysis of the difference between the music and movie industries, and how their approaches have led to very different public perceptions of them and their products. Where the music biz has tried to tighten the screws, the movie biz has tried to lure customers. Guess which one’s in better shape.

The best-selling “Chicago” movie soundtrack is available on CD starting at $13.86.
The actual movie, with the soundtrack songs included, of course, plus additional goodies ranging from deleted musical numbers to the director’s interview and a “making-of” feature, can be had for precisely $2.12 more.
Therein lies the problem for a critically wounded music recording industry: The “Chicago” CD looks like a rip-off, and the DVD looks like a steal.

(via Blinne)

Permission slip

An irksome tale and well-written riposte from Anne to someone who thinks researching a paper on the Web means trolling for absolute strangers to write your papers for you. For…

An irksome tale and well-written riposte from Anne to someone who thinks researching a paper on the Web means trolling for absolute strangers to write your papers for you.

For the record (and for Google), if anyone ever receives a note such as that from someone named Katherine Hill over the next fifteen years or so, please feel free to point her here.

And now with your weekend weather …

Scientists have finally been able to pin a particular weather phenomenon to human activity. Temperatures are different on the weekends than during the week. About 35 percent of locations experienced…

Scientists have finally been able to pin a particular weather phenomenon to human activity. Temperatures are different on the weekends than during the week.

About 35 percent of locations experienced a significant weekend effect over 50 years of recordkeeping, the researchers found. In regions such as the Southwest, the Carolinas and Georgia, Sunday and Monday had a consistently larger daily temperature range than other days, with Fridays being the day with the smallest difference between high and low. In many communities the difference in range between weekend and weekdays was nearly 1 degree Fahrenheit (0.5 degree Celsius).
But the weekend effect wasn’t always the same. Many localities in the Midwest had reverse effects, with smaller temperature ranges on the weekend than weekdays. In those regions, Tuesdays and Wednesdays typically had the biggest difference between the daily high and low.

In this map, red indicates the weekends have a higher minimum temp on the weekends; blue means it’s lower. The diameter is realted to the size of the effect, and the solid circles indicate a 95 percent significance.

Scientists don’t know why it’s happening (though there are speculations), nor why the phenomenon is reversed between, say, Billings than Baltimore. But it’s clearly human-related, since Nature really doesn’t distinguish between weekends.

Interesting stuff.

On the case

When I went to elementary school, I carried very little with me. Maybe a book or two, if I had homework, in my hand. Maybe my three ring binder with…

When I went to elementary school, I carried very little with me. Maybe a book or two, if I had homework, in my hand. Maybe my three ring binder with the little pocket in it for pencils and the like. But that was it. Most work was at school, and what there was to do at home only required the book (since, of course, we had paper and pencils at home).

It was only when I reached junior high that I found need for a backpack, since I biked there rather than walking. And that was a simple canvas bag. We had lockers to stuff stuff into.

Ditto for high school. I think I probably went to a larger, zippered bag, since I ended up for a time in a clime that had weather.

In college, again I biked a lot. I had a small zippered backpack that I used to carry the few notebooks or a text or two I needed for the classes that day. Since I lived on campus, it wasn’t that big a deal to go back to the dorm for what I needed.

I am aware that there are changes in tradition and the like over the years. For one thing, kids no longer have to engrave their homework on clay tablets with pointed sticks like I had to back in Babylonia. And I am aware that there is heightened awareness that the Humongous Backpacks sported by some kids are actually so large and heavy that they are causing back problems for the little tots.

What I don’t understand is how this translates into backpacks with wheels and handles, like luggage, for elementary school kids. I mean, big backpacks, obviously designed (Hello Kitty!) for elementary kids, being lugged around by children to elementary school.

Can someone explain this to me? What have they got in there? Why do they need something that large? Has the world gone mad? Or should I just shut up and gum my gruel?

Foolish consistencies

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp — Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) Doyce rants on inconsistencies in the cap liners of 20 oz. bottles of soda. Since I…

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.
&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp — Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882)

Doyce rants on inconsistencies in the cap liners of 20 oz. bottles of soda.

Since I usually go for cans, not bottles, I haven’t noticed. But what really bugs me is inconsistency in 12-pack boxes.

fridgepack.jpgThis summer, Coke introduced the “Fridge Pack” box, which is long and skinny, about two cans high. This is a new innovation compared to previous twelve-pack packaging that’s four cans high (and thus not as deep).

I like it. I like it a lot. I like that I can stack two Fridge Packs on top of each other and have twice as much soda in the space as with a conventional 12-pack.

(Since we have a fridge in the garage that is basically dedicated to beer and soda and water, obviously this is a big thing for us.)

My question is — will this innovation prevail? Or will the older standard prevail? Or, worse, will we end up with two different sizes and shapes of 12-pack boxes?

Or will it turn out that Coke has trademarked, somehow, the long skinny box (not likely, but weirder things have happened), thus forcing a split in the “standard.”

That’s the sort of crap that bugs me.

Game recap

Friday Margie was off playing D&D. I was busy creating cardboard stand-ups a la Steve Jackson Games Cardboard Heroes for my Spycraft campaign (since they’ve not reissued the Modern CH…

Friday

Margie was off playing D&D. I was busy creating cardboard stand-ups a la Steve Jackson Games Cardboard Heroes for my Spycraft campaign (since they’ve not reissued the Modern CH yet). That should make the next session a bit easier, especially with the horde of security robots I … er, never mind.

Saturday

Jackie started her long-awaited module, wherein I play Hanthor the H’Flahmp. And I learned something very interesting, to wit:

In a module designed for high level characters, assume that all or nearly all encounters will factor in that level and be a threat to you, logic be damned. Bad guys, even in obscure little towns, will all effectively be 12th level, too, and be ready to deal with 12th level characters, even if that makes no sense. Consider yourself 1st level, and be appropriately cautious.

So, for example, you’d assume a 12th level, Large, anthropomorphic elephant barbarian, weighing several hundred pounds, with a Fortitude save of +13, could drink a flask of wine doctored with almost anything that wouldn’t outright kill, dissolve, or detonate the average human slob who would be offered same by some shifty merchant in some podunk town, with little or no effect. At least, if you were me, you would. And you’d discover that you were dead stunned wrong, and sit out the ensuing (but quite entertaining) melee.

We still had a lot of fun. And I eventually did get my bath, even with the giant crocodile to contend with (see lessons learned, above). I look forward to the next installment.

Sunday

Doyce ran his first post-split Nobilis game, wherein we’re now two groups of four, rather than a single group of seven (one extra body having been brought in … so far). A little rough getting started, as we had to do some metagaming design work (new Chancel, new Imperator — sort of), and then we were each off on separate tangents, meaning the “take turns” style of game play ensued, which has its plusses and minuses. (The main plus is that folks keeping character logs can catch up during the interval, though it’s a bitch for folks keeping the session log.)

I’m hoping we’ll do more paired and group activities, both to build unit cohesion and so that we can have shorter downtime, but it’s going to be tough: the personalities/realms involved do not lend themselves to easy groupings (insert easy jokes about clumps of mold here), at least voluntarily — either lack of common interest (besides the boss and the chancel) or actual antipathy, at least from the get-go.

We’ll see how it goes.

Why we need gay marriage

I, in my capacity as a Vestry member at our church, received a long, heart-felt letter from a parishioner over the weekend, regarding the actions at the latest Episcopal General…

I, in my capacity as a Vestry member at our church, received a long, heart-felt letter from a parishioner over the weekend, regarding the actions at the latest Episcopal General Convention. After giving his reasons as to why the GC’s actions regarding gays had stuck in his craw, he said that he had to withdraw his participation in and support of the parish.

The guy’s not a raving reactionary, either. But there was something very clear from his letter.

First off, there was the objection to homosexual behavior, in the context of Biblical teaching, in general. Not much that can be done there, aside from patience. But the other half of his objection was that ECUSA was essentially creating a double-standard — approving of (or at least not condemning) non-marital sexual activity for gays.

And, ultmately it’s that simple.

I believe it’s better to teach that homosexuality is okay, and so homosexuals are expected to follow the same formal rules as heterosexuals, than to teach that homosexuality is okay, and it’s okay for them, but not straights, to shack up with each other.

I mean, it can be taught that the sort of relationships that gays ought to be in are what we expect from straights as well — faithful and committed and loving reflections of God’s love for us, etc., etc., but those can too easily be weasel words. Lots of straight people profess such relationships, too — is the church now going to say that it’s okay for them to live together without benefit (and blessing and commitment) of marriage? Probably not.

I actually do believe that this effective double-standard is going to have a more negative effect, in the short and long run, than simply marrying gays. People are often less upset about right or wrong than they are about fair and unfair.

This was reflected in the parish meeting we had a few weeks ago, too. A lot of the folks who stood up, wondering what we were teaching our children, were not just concerned about the homosexuality issue, but the “shacking up” issue, too. How do you teach Susie that the church doesn’t approve of her moving in with Bob, but wouldn’t object per se to her moving in with Lori? Broad, profound, true but fuzzy outlines like loving/caring/committed/faithful are open to interpretation. Having that marriage certificate isn’t.

And, yes, there are plenty of non-marital relationships that are as strong as, or more nurturing than, plenty of marital relationships out there. But it seems to me the church should be working on converting those non-marital relationships into marital ones, not effectively encouraging them for a new set of people.

So, if the Episcopal Church is going to accept gay relationships (which I think it should), then it should, as quickly as possible, move to coming up with a way to formalize and bless those relationships as marriages. Not simply condone them but not let them go any further. Not devise a “Marriage Lite” in the form of civil unions and specialized blessing ceremonies. But open the doors and let ’em in as first class married couples. It will drive some folks away, to be sure, but taking half-way measures is, I think, driving even more away.

Doin’ Dad Proud

Sunday morning, after brunch, we headed off to B&N pick up Katherine some books. More on that below, perhaps. So we got into the store, and wandered back toward the…

Sunday morning, after brunch, we headed off to B&N pick up Katherine some books. More on that below, perhaps.

So we got into the store, and wandered back toward the Kid Section. Katherine found about a dozen things that she wanted between Point A and Point B, of course, none of which were suitable. (I fear that by the time she is ready to appreciate Uno, she will no longer appreciate Hello Kitty, so getting a Hello Kitty Uno Set is probably right out.)

But once we were in the Kid Section, books and similar paraphernalia were utterly passe. Instead, her whole attention, vision, very existential being was focused on one thing, and one thing only: the train.

(B&Ns have a wooden train set in their Kid Sections, to give kids things to play with while Mom & Dad look around for books for them. It works, and while kids being distracted from looking at books themselves is probably a bad thing, being distracted from pulling several dozen books at random off all the shelves is probably a good thing, so it’s a wash.)

So while I browsed books, Katherine played with the trains. And there were maybe four or five other kids there, doing the same thing, younger and older, with other parents hovering nearby.

And she was the best-behaved of the lot.

Not perfect, by any means. Not a paragon. But rather than screaming and yelling and pitching a fit (or a caboose) when her train ran into the barrier of someone else’s train (or someone else standing in the way), Katherine just insistently hooted, “Toot-toot!” and waited fro them to clear the track.

And if she sometimes didn’t notice when she was in someone else’s way, when it was pointed out, she moved, rather than ignoring the situation or pitching a fit (etc.).

It was really pretty keen, and made a nice follow-up to the earlier morning activities.

See, Sunday was Kitten’s first day of Sunday School. No more sitting in the Nursery during the service and playing with toys, pulled into the church for Communion at the end, but now it was time for actual Scholastic Education into Theological Verities and Religious Inquiry. Or, failing that, learning songs about Joy and Jesus and drawing with crayons.

Problem is (aside from her seriously missing playing in the Nursery), the Sunday School is about half an hour or forty-five minutes, encompassing only the first half of the service. In the middle, whilst announcements about various goings-on are made, the kids are sent back into the sanctuary to sit with their parents, tra-la.

Well, I wasn’t ready for that. And Katherine, whose gyrations and antics and desire to be entertained are okay for the five-to-ten minutes during and after Communion, found herself (or her parents) tested by a half-hour of prayers and responses and kneeling and similar church-going activities. Not a happy mixture.

Not that she was a crazy girl or anything (once she was informed that climbing over the back of the pew was Not Allowed), but she was active, she wanted Mommy & Daddy’s attention, she wanted to go back and forth along the kneelers from one end of the pew to the other, she wanted to play with her stuffed kitty, and have Mommy & Daddy play, too, etc.

The good news was, there was nobody else in our pew.

The bad news was, we were sitting (as is our wont) in the front right pew, literally in front of God and Everybody.

Hrm.

So afterwards, I cast my mind back on when John and I were young’uns at church, back up in the Bay Area. And what I remembered (aside from the threat of Dire Paternal Discipline afterwards) was that we had little religious prayer books and the like to look at and keep us entertained whilst the adults were doing That Boring Stuff.

So that’s why were picking up books, to keep her entertained in the pews. And that’s why it was nice to see that Katherine actually could behave herself.

Hey … I wonder if we could bring one of those train sets to the church …

“Toot-toot!” “Amen.”

Take my love, take my land, take me to the trophy stand …

Firefly won an Emmy. Granted, it’s a “sf ghetto” award of “Outstanding Special Visual Effects For A Series,” but, still, it beat an episode of Buffy and three episodes (!)…

Firefly won an Emmy. Granted, it’s a “sf ghetto” award of “Outstanding Special Visual Effects For A Series,” but, still, it beat an episode of Buffy and three episodes (!) of Enterprise.

Doyce notes that Buffy never won an Emmy. To be fair, the only thing it was ever likely to win was something of this sort — and Buffy‘s fx were never anything to write home about.

I agree

I may change my mind after the fact, but that’s my present opinion. (via Doyce)…

I may change my mind after the fact, but that’s my present opinion.

(via Doyce)

Kitten Kuteness Katch-up

Katherine is now old enough to understand what “We’ll be right back” means on the TV … that there’s “more” of the show coming, and Daddy should not change the…

Katherine is now old enough to understand what “We’ll be right back” means on the TV … that there’s “more” of the show coming, and Daddy should not change the channel yet!

Of course, she doesn’t yet understand that the message is also used when just the end titles are coming up.

Ah, well. That disillusionment will come soon enough.

On the other hand, she’s exceedingly cute when she goes “Zoom! Zoom!” with a towel at her neck as a cape. I just wish she wouldn’t do it going down stairs ..

If it’s an alternate Friday …

… then it must be “Margie is off playing D&D and I’m watching movies and doing fun stuff” Night. Jeez, The Mummy was a fun movie. Action, horror, humor, romance,…

… then it must be “Margie is off playing D&D and I’m watching movies and doing fun stuff” Night.

Jeez, The Mummy was a fun movie. Action, horror, humor, romance, and faboo score by Jerry Goldsmith — it’s Indiana Jones Meets the Mummy, and I mean that in the best possible way. Everyone in the cast does a fine job, and it makes for just plain ol’ good watching. For sheer, mindless entertainment value, this one would make it on my Desert Island list.

And, frankly, so is Them!. It’s the grand-daddy of all Giant Radioactive Mutant Critter flicks, with a fine cast that can actually keep a straight face. And, frankly, I grew up with those storm drains in LA, and I could well believe that colonies of giant ants could be lurking down there …

The next logical step …

Of course, this one I’d have a hard time disagreeing with. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) continued its legal campaign today as it filed suit against Share Bear…

Of course, this one I’d have a hard time disagreeing with.

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) continued its legal campaign today as it filed suit against Share Bear in federal court. …

Just plain folk

A fascinating — and disturbingly fawning — Homes and Gardens article from November 1938, on “Hitler’s Mountain Home” at Berchtesgaden. All visitors are shown their host’s model kennels, where he…

A fascinating — and disturbingly fawning — Homes and Gardens article from November 1938, on “Hitler’s Mountain Home” at Berchtesgaden.

All visitors are shown their host’s model kennels, where he breeds magnificent Alsations. Some of his pedigree pets are allowed the run of the house, especially on days when Herr Hitler gives a “Fun Fair” to the local children. On such a day, when State affairs are over, the Squire himself, attended by some of his guests, will stroll through the woods into hamlets above and below. There rustics sit at cottage doors carving trinkets and toys in wood, ivory and bone. It is then the little ones are invited to the house. Coffee, cakes, fruit and sweets are laid for them on trestle tables in the grassy orchards. Then Frauen Goebbels and Goering, in dainty Bavarian dress, arrange dances and folk-songs, while the bolder spirits are given joy-rides in Herr Hitler’s private aeroplane.

Charming.

(via BoingBoing)

UPDATE: The publisher of the magazine, still going strong in Britain, has asked that the reproduced pages be taken down

The Pause that Confuses

Two years ago, yesterday, an incredible, massive, horrific act of terror and violence occured in this country. Since then … nada. Why? Was it an all-or-nothing gasp of an organization…

Two years ago, yesterday, an incredible, massive, horrific act of terror and violence occured in this country.

Since then … nada.

Why?

Was it an all-or-nothing gasp of an organization far less organized and potent than we know (or are being told), and so no longer much of a threat?

Was it all a big conspiracy by the cabal of Bad Men Who Run Things, to get us all running around in chicken-squawking alarm, thus more easily manageable?

Have the terrorist organizations been so damaged (or their sponsors so cowed) by US actions since then that no further attack has been possible? If so, have we accomplished our purpose, do we need to maintain our vigilence, or should we press our advantage?

Have the “homeland security” measures taken by the Bush Administration been so effective that they’ve forestalled further attacks? Should we know that? Can we know that?

Were our protections already so good that the 9/11 plot was even more of an aberration than it would seem, the one-in-a-million shot inevitably paid off?

I mean, I can’t believe that, two years later — a couple of Christmasses, some Fourths of July, a 9/11 anniversary or two, not to mention a pair of wars launched — there was no “magic moment” when, if they could, al Qa’eda (or others) would not have struck. Two years in Geopolitical Time is like two years in Internet Time — a lifetime. It’s possible that OBL or his heirs are still slowly plotting and putting things together with infinite patience for an even greater attack — but, jeez, even a few less dramatic acts of terror would have had an amazing impact.

Unless that’s their plan — having struck out at the US, seen the response, and realizing the next step needs to go for the jugular, not the balls.

I don’t know.

I don’t know the answer. I don’t know we’ll know for another decade or three or ten. If ever. But it would sure be nice to, to know what’s known in the halls of power, here in the US, and in Paris, and London, and Riyadh, and Karachi. Not to mention in a cave in Afghanistan, or a small house in Tikrit, or ….

The problem is, not knowing, we, as an electorate, can only guess, and try to elect the folks we feel we can trust to act wisely, with restraint when needed, with vigor when needed, whether we think They know all the answers we don’t or not.

And I’m not sure we, as an electorate, can afford to guess wrongly.

UPDATE: Here’s someone else who’s noted the same thing — and therefore concludes that everything is just peachy and terrorism is simply a government bogeyman. Riiiiiiight.

Note to Self

When going to rob a convenience store with my buddy, be sure and get the plan thrashed out beforehand. Oh, and cut back on the brewskis beforehand. First things first….

When going to rob a convenience store with my buddy, be sure and get the plan thrashed out beforehand.

Oh, and cut back on the brewskis beforehand. First things first.

(via Blather)