https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

On the Inequitable Sharing of Risk

One of the drawbacks to our capitalist, business-focused system, is that we privatize profits, but publicize risks. That is to say, when people make a profit from doing something useful, that profit generally goes to those people / that corporation. But when people cause damage in pursuit of profit, those damages generally get paid for out of the public pocket, due to exemptions, loopholes, insurance, court delays, bankruptcies, or just general cheating. The impact of mistakes (or malice) gets absorbed by everyone.

A fine look at the phenomenon and a variety of examples here:
http://www.stonekettle.com/2016/09/standing-rock.html

Tightly coupled to this is the idea that Shit Happens. Mistakes Are Made. Sooner Or Later, Boom.

If someone assures you that something will never leak, that idiot-proof systems will never fail, that everyone is well-trained in all the proper processes, that nobody will ever be negligent or tired or drunk or complaisant or distracted, that nothing can ever, possibly, go wrong here — then they are either Pollyannaesque optimists, or are trying to take advantage of you, most likely in order to shift the risk of their operations to the public who will have to absorb the costs of clean-up and economic damage to people's livelihoods.

 

View on Google+

"Get your frack to Mars"

Humor via Andy Borowitz.




Kochs Hope to Be First to Pollute Water on Mars
Credit Photograph by Universal History Archive/UIG via Getty

View on Google+

America's biggest crop … is lawn grass

Though we're doing our part to reduce that. Both the side and front yard areas that were torn up by the kitchen/basement project will be replanted with … plants. Bushes. Roses. Grasses (of the ornamental kind). Ground cover. Not necessarily xeriscape, but more water-thrifty than the grass all was.

We'll still have a patch of grass in the back, but I'll have to mow that myself. (But not, I fear, with a jaunty smile and pipe between my teeth.)

(h/t +Yonatan Zunger)




How America’s Most Useless Crop Also Became Its Most Commonly Grown One
Contrary to what you may think (and what your food labels may suggest) corn is not the most grown crop in America. The most grown crop is something no one is eating, no one is asking for, and no one is quite sure what to do with. It’s your lawn.

View on Google+

Why we can't have nice things (Rhino Edition)

When folk medicine meets global markets and high profits … the results aren't pretty.

How do you disincent people from paying ungodly amounts for rhino horn, when they are convinced that it will cure impotence and cancer? Well, there are a few interesting ideas here.

'A cunning approach has been devised by a South African firm, Rhino Rescue Project (RRP). For about $600 per beast, RRP drills two holes into a sedated rhino’s horn and pumps in a secret cocktail of toxins into its fibres. Consume powder from that horn and expect a migraine, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, or, after a big serving, permanent twitching due to nerve damage, says RRP’s co-founder, Lorinda Hern. Signs warn of the dangers of illegal horn. RRP has treated more than 300 rhinos in South Africa since 2010. Since the horn is dead material, the firm says there is no danger to the animal.

A private reserve near the northern South African town of Phalaborwa paid RRP to treat about 30 rhinos. “We’re trying anything,” says one of the owners. Locals were invited to watch so word would spread. Poacher incursions dropped from about two a month to just four in two years, with no losses.'




A dilemma of horns
POACHING rhinos is a grisly business. Rather than attract attention with gunfire, many poachers prefer to use a tranquilliser dart to immobilise the rhino and then…

View on Google+

If your pooping causes wildfires, you are doing it wrong

Remarkably, the article indicates it's not the first time this has happened around there.

(h/t +Yonatan Zunger)

Originally shared by +Rugger Ducky:

In the Girl Scouts and later in the Army, I learned the correct way to poop in the woods.

You dig a small hole, squat over it, do your doody, then wipe with a minimal amount of toilet paper. Drop paper in hole. Cover hole with dirt. Leave.

At no point is fire ever involved.

The entire line of thinking here is weird. He set the poopy toilet paper on fire, rather than litter. Dude, you just shit on the side of the road without burying it. A little biodegradable toilet paper is not littering if you're pooping correctly.

Do we need to start having wilderness poop training?




BLM: Pooping cyclist started foothills fire
BOISE — Bureau of Land Management officials say a cyclist who couldn’t hold it is responsible for starting a fire that scorched more than 73 acres

View on Google+

To Me, My X-Flowers!

Blooms of the Atom, Feared and Hated by a World They Have Sworn to Pollinate.

Originally shared by +Brian Gauspohl:

Mutant daisies and other flowering plants popping up in the radiation zone around the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/0723/Are-Fukushima-s-mutant-daisies-a-wonder-or-a-warning nuke atomic flowers mutation japanese tokyo asia pacific environment environmental

   

In Album 2015-07-24

View on Google+

And this is why we can't date nice things

Not that screwing up radio-carbon dating will drive anyone to actually do anything about fossil fuel consumption, or even that ruining such dating is part of a vast fossil fuel industry plot. But … heck, that's annoying, from an historic (and anthropologic) perspective.




Our reliance on fossil fuel combustion is ruining carbon dating | Ars Technica
Releasing ancient carbon into the atmosphere is prematurely ageing the Earth.

View on Google+

The hidden costs (and benefits) of electric vehicles

A new study appears to be the most thorough yet on the second order pollution impact of electric vehicles. First order effects — actual pollution out of the tail pipe — makes EVs look much cleaner, but getting into things like how the electrical power for them is produced in the first place can make for a very different picture; in areas that use dirty power (from coal, for example), EVs may net out as greater polluters.

This has been speculated about for a long time, but it's not a death knell by any means for the whole idea of electric vehicles. For example, the article notes that electrical energy generation in the US is getting steadily cleaner (recent SCOTUS ruling notwithstanding), and that could easily tip the balance, as could greater improvement in battery efficiency (driven by faster evolution as more EVs come on the market).

It is certainly useful to remember that any comparison of A and B needs to take into account more than just A and B in a vacuum. But by that token, it doesn't appear that the pollution cost of petroleum extraction and refining and transport was considered in the balance sheet of petrol-based cars (at which point the pollution cost of sourcing the fuel for electrical generators also needs to be considered).

It's never simple, and the data is often up to criticism, but it's worthwhile to keep poking at it.




How much do electric cars actually pollute? | Ars Technica
A new assessment suggests more than we think, outside of a few large cities.

View on Google+

RT @Pontifex The earth, our home, is beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth.

RT @Pontifex The earth, our home, is beginning to look more and more like an immense pile of filth.

View on Twitter

Beautiful Bird Pix

A look at the 2015 Audubon Photography Awards. These are all really stunning, and any of them would make fabulous desktop wallpaper.

(Plus, +Scott Randel — an Avocet!)




2015 Audubon Photography Awards
Winners and runners-up from the 2015 Audubon Photography Awards competition.

View on Google+

Graffiti vs Mother Nature

I'm not all that sanguine about street art on other people's property to begin with. Sure, something really artistic on something blighted, that's easy to aesthetically justify. Defacing something that had its own beauty of place and aesthetic intent? That's rude, at the very least.

Extending that to national parks — something preserved with aesthetic intent, and owned by everyone, myself included, the tagging of natural features (or even artificial structures) is a sketchy thing to do at best (so to speak), but it also has a "broken window" effect: even if someone's art is the greatest thing since Alma-Tadema, violating that social convention opens that space up to art and messaging that simply won't be.

As to the sentiment, "If provoking outrage is not part of your intention as a graffiti artist, why do it?" … well, that just sounds like you're being a dick, not an imp or gadfly.




Graffiti artists’ move to national parks shocks nature community
Andre Saraiva is an internationally known graffiti artist. He owns nightclubs in Paris and New York, works as a top editor of the men’s fashion magazine L’Officiel Hommes and has appeared in countless glossy magazines as a tastemaker and bon vivant.

View on Google+

DO NOT TAUNT THE MONKEY

One has the sense that Dude taunts a lot of people who he thinks won't face kick him. He miscalculated this time.

Originally shared by +Boing Boing:

Gentleman flips off monkey. Monkey returns insult with a face kick. http://boingboing.net/2015/04/29/gentleman-flips-off-monkey-mo.html

 

View on Google+

Teddy Roosevelt is spinning in his grave

The Senate GOP, with just a few hold-outs (and grudging kudos to Corey Gardner, R-CO, for being one of them), voted a budget amendment to support the sell-off of federal lands — including National Forests — to states. Only National Parks, Wildernesses and Monuments would be excluded (for now).

Because, y'know, who cares about future generations? We have oil, gas, mineral and lumber interests who need new lands now.

(As +George Wiman, note this in the margins when someone says there is no difference between Republicans and Democrats.)




Republican Senators Just Voted To Sell Off Your National Forests
Our public lands — including National Forests, wildlife refuges and wilderness areas — are arguably our greatest treasure. Well, almost every Republican Senator just voted to sell them to the highest bidder. This is what you can do about it.

View on Google+

The Future Is Renewable. The Nazca Lines Aren't

I'd love to know who in Greenpeace's Office of Showy Publicity Stunts thought that driving out to the Nazca lines in Peru and hiking into the middle of them, to put a sign on the ground, to send a "message" to a meeting whose delegates were going to be flying past, all the while causing irreparable damage to a World Heritage Site, was a good idea.

While the dolts from Greenpeace managed not to actually scuff up any of the actual figures (in particular, this famous hummingbird), they did manage to carve out some freaking pathways through walking through the site (http://imgur.com/gallery/0WTMM has a good image of that) — pathways that, given the geological nature of the site and the utter lack of rain in the area, will be there … um, yeah, pretty much forever.

If anyone had bothered to do their homework, they'd have known that nobody gets to walk down there unless with all sorts of serious authorization and with special broad shoes to avoid scuffing up the terrain.

Dolts. And worse. Both for the damage they'd done (idiots) but for discrediting anything having to do with their message about the environment, renewables, or anything else.

Peru, according to the articles, is trying to make sure these yahoos don't leave the country, as they can be charged for the damage and given jail time. Which strikes me as perfectly appropriate..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazca_Lines
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/10/peru-legal-action-greenpeace-stunt-nazca-lines
Video showing the damage: http://elcomercio.pe/peru/pais/lineas-nasca-marcas-dejadas-greenpeace-son-irreparables-noticia-1777541
Before: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2f/Lignes_de_Nazca_D%C3%A9cembre_2006_-_Colibri_1.jpg
After: http://time.com/3627655/peru-greenpeace-nazca-crime/

(h/t +Isaac Sher)




Greenpeace activists damage Peruvian heritage site to send environmental message
Greenpeace apologized to Peru today for placing a gigantic banner promoting renewable energy on the site of the Nazca Lines, an ancient heritage site, reports the BBC. The damage caused by the…

View on Google+

Hi-ho, Hi-ho, to smog check I must go…

Hi-ho, Hi-ho, to smog check I must go…

View on Twitter

High Efficiency Washers are that way with money, too

Apparently, with the introduction of more and more high-efficiency washers, detergent manufacturers are seeing their business drop — as people start paying attention to how much detergent they pour in, and thus need to buy less detergent.

Efficient, indeed.

Originally shared by +Les Jenkins:




Detergent Companies Are Unhappy With Our Efficient Washing Machines
High-efficiency washing machines, which use less water to clean your clothes, are an advance that most customers seem to like. Do you know who doesn’t like them, though? Detergent manufacturers. Wi…

View on Google+

The Tale of the City Raccoon and the Country Raccoon

Raccoons are disturbingly clever. And, apparently, we're making them more that way.

(Perhaps our future is not a Planet of the Apes, but a Planet of the Raccoons.)

Originally shared by +George Wiman:

Cities are apparently making raccoons smarter, by giving them progressively more complicated problems to solve, coupled with meaningful rewards. A model for education?




The Intelligent Life of the City Raccoon – Issue 18: Genius – Nautilus
Toronto resident Simon Treadwell wheeled a garbage bin onto a snow-bound lot next to his property one evening this past winter. Inside…

View on Google+

Is there a literally God-given right to pollute?

Assuming the folk in question are sincere in their theology-based energy policy, maybe someone needs to frame this to them as a test from the Lord. "Would you say that folk near Las Vegas should all be going in and gambling because the Lord gave them all those casinos? Or that they have a special challenge to find favor in His sight by resisting such temptation to follow the path of sin and greed?"




Alabama state officials: We won’t comply with the EPA because God gave us coal
Alabama state officials say that EPA carbon standards violate God’s law. Seriously.

View on Google+

The decline and fall of the Aral Sea

I suspect there are a variety of lessons here. I also suspect they will not be learned.

(h/t +Asbjørn Grandt)

Originally shared by +Linda Dee:

The shrinking of the Aral Sea has been called "one of the planet's worst environmental disasters
#ENVIORMENT #LAKES #SCIENCE #DISASTER #savetheplanet

The Aral Sea (Kazakh: Арал Теңізі Aral Teñizi; Uzbek: Orol Dengizi; Russian: Аральскοе Мοре Aral'skoye Morye; Tajik: Баҳри Арал Bahri Aral; older Persian: دریای خوارزم‎ Daryâ-ye Khârazm) was a lake lying between Kazakhstan (Aktobe and Kyzylorda provinces) in the north and Karakalpakstan, an autonomous region of Uzbekistan, in the south. The name roughly translates as "Sea of Islands", referring to about 1,534 islands that once dotted its waters; in Old Turkic aral means "island" and "thicket".[3]

Formerly one of the four largest lakes in the world with an area of 68,000 km2 (26,300 sq mi), the Aral Sea has been steadily shrinking since the 1960s after the rivers that fed it were diverted by Soviet irrigation projects. By 2007, it had declined to 10% of its original size, splitting into four lakes – the North Aral Sea, the eastern and western basins of the once far larger South Aral Sea, and one smaller lake between the North and South Aral Seas.[4] By 2009, the southeastern lake had disappeared and the southwestern lake had retreated to a thin strip at the extreme west of the former southern sea; in subsequent years, occasional water flows have led to the southeastern lake sometimes being replenished to a small degree.[5] The maximum depth of the North Aral Sea is 42 m (138 ft) (as of 2008).[1]
time lapse below
Drying of the Aral Sea: Timelapse

 

View on Google+

This is the way the world (looks after it) ends

It's a relatively recent (1920s) city, turned to ghost town by flood immersion and subsequent recovery. Or a perfect set for your post-apocalypse movie feature.




This Ghostly Town Spent 25 Years Underwater Before Resurfacing
At one time, Epecuén was a booming resort city: a grand town on a beautiful lake, attracting vacationers from all over Argentina in the 1920s with its revitalizing salt waters. There were hotels, nightclubs, and restaurants. Today, it’s a thicket of bleached white ruins, latticed with rusted steel and fallen power lines.

View on Google+