https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Lit.ppt

Maybe this is a little too efficient: Too busy for Cliff’s Notes? Welcome to The PowerPoint Anthology of Literature: Great books distilled to their essence and presented in the most…

Maybe this is a little too efficient:

Too busy for Cliff’s Notes? Welcome to The PowerPoint Anthology of Literature: Great books distilled to their essence and presented in the most efficient form of communication ever devised.

(via Scott)

Trimester, Trilogy, what the hey …

Probably the oddest interpretation of The Lord of the Rings I’ve happened across. Not that I’m saying it’s wrong (and perhaps it explains some of Christopher Tolkien’s cranky possessiveness about…

Probably the oddest interpretation of The Lord of the Rings I’ve happened across. Not that I’m saying it’s wrong (and perhaps it explains some of Christopher Tolkien’s cranky possessiveness about the his father’s work). Hell, I’ve heard weirder theories about other literature proposed with a much straighter face.

By the way, halfway through The Return of the King I figured out that the entire Lord of the Rings saga is an allegory for pregnancy.
Seriously, check it out. You got your Frodo and your Sam, trudging to the Crack of Doom, right? And that’s about as apt a description for pregnancy as you’re likely to find: nine months of trudging to Mordor.

Hot Elf Sex! W00t!

Well, that should certainly increase my hit rate. Anyway, what did Tolkien say about elf sex? An interesting collection of bits and pieces (so to speak) which you can read…

Well, that should certainly increase my hit rate.

Anyway, what did Tolkien say about elf sex? An interesting collection of bits and pieces (so to speak) which you can read what you want into.

(via SfAD)

Bookmobile

I actually have been getting a few books finished, amidst all the other jumble of my life. Here are some quick reviews….

I actually have been getting a few books finished, amidst all the other jumble of my life. Here are some quick reviews.

Continue reading “Bookmobile”

Hmmmmmm …

Word has it that the Heinlein Trust has given the go-ahead for Spider Robinson to flesh out a detailed novel outline called Variable Star. Hmmmm. On the one hand, posthumous…

Word has it that the Heinlein Trust has given the go-ahead for Spider Robinson to flesh out a detailed novel outline called Variable Star.

Hmmmm.

On the one hand, posthumous “fleshing out of a story outline” exercises are rarely satisfying. The recent Dune exercises, and the previous Asimov robot tales stand testimony to that.

On the other hand, Robinson can write, and he has an almost religious respect for Heinlein’s work.

Should be interesting.

Take that, Hans Conried and June Foray!

I discovered that our The Grinch Who Stole Christmas animated DVD (the True Grinch rendition) also has Horton Hears a Who on it. Since this is one of Kitten’s current…

I discovered that our The Grinch Who Stole Christmas animated DVD (the True Grinch rendition) also has Horton Hears a Who on it. Since this is one of Kitten’s current favorites (as a book) we watched it this evening.

The producer of the 1969 show was Chuck Jones, and it shows in the animation. Hans Conried does narrates in his inimitable style, with June Foray doing the few female voices, and Jones himself picking up Horton and others. The music — book by Seuss himself, who also did the teleplay — feels a bit dated, but is still fun (and memorable, esp. the Wickersham Bros. tunes). Padding out the story works okay, but it definitely feels like padding, somewhat muddling the core tale of Horton’s loyalty, that “a person is a person, no matter how small.”

The animation is a bit cheap, but Jones and Seuss’s styles are strangely compatible. Make of tha twhat you will.

When all was said and done, I turned to Katherine. “So, do you like the cartoon, or do you like the book better?”

“That one is the cartoon and that one is the book.” She said this finality.

“Do you like the voices in the cartoon,” I probed further, “or the voices Daddy does in the book?”

“I like the voices in the cartoon and the voices Daddy does in the book.”

Probably the only time I’ll ever get compared favorably to voice artists like that.

Recent books

I have about six books in-process at the moment, plus my weekly comics et al., so my book throughput isn’t always what I wish it were. One reason I read…

I have about six books in-process at the moment, plus my weekly comics et al., so my book throughput isn’t always what I wish it were. One reason I read while walking at lunch …

Book rankings in each section from 1 (bleah!) to 3 (yeah!).

Knight Life, by Peter David

  • Summary: [2] This is a revised and rereleased version of one of David’s earlier works, wherein Arthur finds himself resurrected and running for mayor of New York, with a child Merlin as his campaign advisor.
  • Entertainment: [3] Light, airy, and amusing, both on (re)takes on the Arthurian legend, as many of the folks from that saga make appearances in one way or another, and on politics (New York politics in particular). David manages a modicum of suspense, particularly as to the outcome of the renascent Arthur/Gwen romance. But most of the book is easy reading, with plenty of duck-out-of-water chuckles and bad puns. Vintage (literally) David stuff. And a sequel should be released in the near future.
  • Profundity: [2] The course of true love never did run smooth. Obsessions can get you in trouble. Trust your feelings, Arthur. Out of the box thinking can come up with some very interesting — and superfially appealing — solutions to intractable social and legal problems. People like a guy on a white horse — and maybe that’s sometimes a good thing.
  • Re-readability: [3] This could easily become a “comfort book.”

The Lord of Castle Black, by Steven Brust

  • Summary: [2] This is the second volume of Brust’s The Viscount of Adrilankha Dumas pastiche. The Empire gets its legs underneath it, Morollan (the titular character) becomes involved in matters, and lots of folks run around doing a lot of sword fighting and exchanging witticisms.
  • Entertainment: [2] The conceit remains entertaining, and is crafted with a now-polished fashion. But it’s almost become too easy, and I almost have the sense that Brust is rushing things along just a tad, to be done with it perhaps. The cast has now gotten so large that it’s easy to lose track of who’s who, who’s whose friend, who’s whose parent, who’s of what House, etc. that may contribute to the sense of a lack of focus. Every character, it seems, needs a parenthetical reference every so often, in a book that is built around parenthetical references, and the result becomes sketchier and sketcher. The lack of remembrance of who’s who isn’t a terrible barrier, though; you just kind of go along and enjoy it anyway.
       At the same time, Brust is finally more substantially dealing with characters we know, or recognize from the Vlad books. Enough of them, from Loraan to Sethra the Younger to the Sorceress in Green, pop up that it begins to feel artificial.
       All that quibbling aside, it’s still a greatly entertaining book, and I eagerly look forward to the next installment. Though, to be honest, I’d rather have another Vlad book.

  • Profundity: [1] Despite Paarfi’s best efforts, there aren’t many.
  • Re-readability: [2] No time soon, though. Unless I need a leg up on understanding the next book.

Speaking of which, Sethra Lavode is due out in April 2004 …

Far out

You may buy this for me. I’ve even put it on my wish list, in case you forget about it. Thank you. (via SEB))…

You may buy this for me.

I’ve even put it on my wish list, in case you forget about it.

Thank you.

(via SEB))

Spinning

Spinsanity has their take on Moore and Dude, Where’s My Country? (further detailed here). To sum up: In his latest book Dude, Where’s My Country? — a polemic against President…

Spinsanity has their take on Moore and Dude, Where’s My Country? (further detailed here). To sum up:

In his latest book Dude, Where’s My Country? — a polemic against President Bush — liberal gadfly Michael Moore again demonstrates why he has a reputation as a slipshod journalist who has trouble getting his facts right.

Two reviews

Amadeus may be crappy history, but it is one kick-ass movie. It’s been too long since I watched it, and now I have a lust for the DVD. The Wolves…

Amadeus may be crappy history, but it is one kick-ass movie. It’s been too long since I watched it, and now I have a lust for the DVD.

The Wolves in the Walls by Neil Gaiman was very good, in a not-unexpectedly surreal way, but I think I’ll wait a year to read it to Kitten.

And that’s how I spent my Friday afternoon. In part, at least.

Not in my name

Michael Moore, suffering from having been out of the headlines for a month or so, has started touting his next book, Dude, Where’s My Country? with seven questions directed at…

Michael Moore, suffering from having been out of the headlines for a month or so, has started touting his next book, Dude, Where’s My Country? with seven questions directed at George Bush. They show all of Moore’s general sense of finesse, fairness, and intelligence. Which is to say, very little.

I have seven questions for you, Mr Bush. I ask them on behalf of the 3,000 who died that September day, and I ask them on behalf of the American people.

How noble of him, to offer to speak on behalf of the folks who died on 9-11. Wonder how they feel about it? Hopefully not the same as I feel about being one of the American people that Moore also offers to ask questions on behalf of.

I can ask my own questions, Mike. Stick to asking them on behalf of your fans and your book sales.

Continue reading “Not in my name”

Lord, it’s hard to be humble …

The hubristic perqs of being being a best-selling author: After the publication of the The Queen of the Damned, I requested of my editor that she not give me anymore…

The hubristic perqs of being being a best-selling author:

After the publication of the The Queen of the Damned, I requested of my editor that she not give me anymore comments. I resolved to hand in the manuscripts when they were finished. And asked that she accept them as they were. She was very reluctant, feeling that her input had value, but she agreed to my wishes. I asked this due to my highly critical relationship with my work and my intense evolutionary work on every sentence in the work, my feeling for the rhythm of the phrase and the unfolding of the plot and the character development. I felt that I could not bring to perfection what I saw unless I did it alone. In othe words, what I had to offer had to be offered in isolation. So all novels published after The Queen of the Damned were written by me in this pure fashion, my editor thereafter functioning as my mentor and guardian.

“Let her edit cake.”

Too many tomes

Aye, and surely John Kovalic knows too well the weakness that besets me and my first mate. To the plank with him!…

Aye, and surely John Kovalic knows too well the weakness that besets me and my first mate. To the plank with him!

For Us, the Living

Early, “rediscovered” pieces of literature are often a mixed bag. The academics like them, because they provide insights into the author’s development. Completists like them because they, well, want things…

For Us, the LivingEarly, “rediscovered” pieces of literature are often a mixed bag. The academics like them, because they provide insights into the author’s development. Completists like them because they, well, want things to be complete. Readers — are often disappointed.

Still, I’m sort of looking forward to the new Heinlein book coming out. It’s actually his first novel, and while such bits are usually rejected because they’re, well, bad, Those in the Know say it’s because Heinlein was way ahead of his time.

“For Us, the Living” was written by Heinlein about 1938-9, before he wrote his first sf short, “Lifeline.” The novel, “For Us, the Living,” was deemed unpublishable, mainly for the racy content. So racy is/was the content that in the 1930s the book could not even have been legally shipped through the US mail! For this reason, after a few publisher rejections, the novel was tabled by Heinlein, but the content was mined for his later stories and novels. A fellow named Nehemiah Scudder even appears in “For Us, the Living.” It’s important to point out that according to those favored few who have thus far read this long lost Heinlein novel, it did not go unpublished because it was bad–they say it’s quite good, though clearly a first novel by the author (it has a two and a half page footnote!). It was unpublished because the mores and culture of the time would not allow it.
“For Us, the Living,” was put aside, and eventually lost. The Heinleins apparently destroyed all copies they had. And because at the time it was written Heinlein was not a member of the science fiction community, no other sf writers knew about it. He had let one or two friends read it, and it is by a long trail through one of them that this rarest of treasures was located.

There’s quite a bit more info here, too, which says it’s “not as polished” as his later work, but is quite different from anything written then or today, with lots of explorations of alternative sexual mores (and economics) from the perspective of a contemporary pilot thrown into the future.

I dunno. I love Heinlein’s work, but his earliest stuff is more than a bit stiff. And while his “racy” stuff was okay, a lot of it came forty years or more after this book, which is an infinity in writing years. And if Heinlein could get a bit pendantic about his social concepts in his later works, in his earlier works it was positively deadly.

Still, it’s one more thing I’m looking forward to coming out this winter.

(via Uncle Bear)

Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About the Cthulhu Mythos …

… but were sane enough not to probe too deeply … No, actually it’s a heavily hyper-linked essay about the hystory of the Mythos — the collection of writings by…

… but were sane enough not to probe too deeply …

No, actually it’s a heavily hyper-linked essay about the hystory of the Mythos — the collection of writings by various authors (starting, of course, with Lovecraft) about Cthulhu and the Elder Gods and the Great Old Ones and related critters. Good reference.

(via Uncle Bear)

Argh

I have rule books to read. Game stuff to write up. Weeks of comic book backlog. Three or four other books I’m in the middle of. Etc. Etc. Etc. Bad…

I have rule books to read.

Game stuff to write up.

Weeks of comic book backlog.

Three or four other books I’m in the middle of.

Etc. Etc. Etc.

Bad timing for The Lord of Castle Black to come out, I guess.

Not that it’s going to stop me from reading it.

Slipped disc

I’ve never read any of the Discworld novels by Terry Pratchett, but, if I do, I will definitely rely on this map of their interrelationships. Cool. (via BoingBoing)…

I’ve never read any of the Discworld novels by Terry Pratchett, but, if I do, I will definitely rely on this map of their interrelationships. Cool.

(via BoingBoing)

Only the gods are real

A fine site with both annotations of all the gods in Neil Gaiman’s American Gods, and pictures of the carousel at the House on the Rock. Fun. (via Gaiman)…

A fine site with both annotations of all the gods in Neil Gaiman’s American Gods, and pictures of the carousel at the House on the Rock. Fun.

(via Gaiman)

Film and books

Sneak, sneak, sneak … Watched Sneakers on DVD last night, and it remains a favorite film of mine, marred only by some Movie-GUI problems in a few scenes. The marvelous…

Sneak, sneak, sneak …

Watched Sneakers on DVD last night, and it remains a favorite film of mine, marred only by some Movie-GUI problems in a few scenes. The marvelous cast — Redford, Poitier, Kingsley, Aykroyd, Emory, Phoenix, McDonald — take a relatively light caper flick, and make it something special. Everyone gets a moment to shine, as things rollick from witty to grim and back. It’s a story of obsession, redemption, and trust in both yourself and your friends. Great, great, great fun, and definitely on my “desert island” list.

And, frankly, it’s a great RPG flick, too. You can see each of the team as player characters, each with their own foibles, talents, and personalities. Heck, there’s even a “the quest is over, how do you want to be rewarded by the gods” scene at the end.

“You won’t know who to trust …” I like it.

The film also has a memorable bit of personal trivia about it. When I was on my “three hour tour” up in Martinez, Calif., Margie and I took a trip over to the City at one point, and I made a special point of driving to the spot, by the base of the Bay Bridge, where Bishop and Crease go to make the drop-off (it’s dressed as an outdoor cafe in the movie, though it isn’t). Margie, for whom the side trip was a surprise, thought it was one of my more charmingly geeky moments, and take a lot of pride in that assessment.

HornblowerAvast there …

I’ve been slowly re-reading C.S. Forrester’s Hornblower novels. These stories of a British naval officer during the Napoleonic wars are not only a lot of fun as historical recreations, but I relate a lot to the title character — driven by duty, internally deeply insecure, all that good stuff. Less so than I once did, mind you — frankly, Hornblower is an emotional wreck, and could use some good counselling and about a year’s sabbatical. But, still, the contrast between the external hero and the internal doubter is a powerful one, and makes this lengthy series of books — written out of chronological order, in the 30s-60s — a damned good read, as victory is again and again snatched out of the jaws of defeat, but all too often with only emotional ashes to savor afterward.

I didn’t much care, by the bye, for the A&E Hornblower movies a year or two back. I much prefer the 1951 Gregory Peck film, which conflates the first three (written) novels.

Rrg. And, also, argh.

Gee, thanks, Mary. I really needed my blood pressure raised by your suggesting I read this article on censorship of textbooks. The article focuses on Diane Ravitch’s book The Language…

Gee, thanks, Mary. I really needed my blood pressure raised by your suggesting I read this article on censorship of textbooks.

The article focuses on Diane Ravitch’s book The Language Police, and its description of how forces on both the Right and the Left force textbook publishers into creating inoffensive pabulum that won’t offend either, but won’t excite kids about reading, either. Some examples of what you’re not supposed to see in school books:

– Stories or pictures showing a mother cooking dinner for her children, or a black family living in a city neighborhood (because such images are thought to purvey gender or racial stereotypes).
– Dinosaurs (because they suggest the controversial subject of evolution).
– Narratives involving angry, loud-mouthed characters, quarreling parents or disobedient children (because such emotions are not “uplifting”).
Owls are out because some cultures associate them with death. Mentions of birthdays are to be avoided because some children do not have birthday parties. Images or descriptions of a mother showing shock or fear are to be replaced by depictions of both parents “expressing the same facial emotions.”

This all stands as another example of how the agenda tends to get set by the vocal, rigid extremes, exacerbated in this case by the buying power of a few states (California and Texas) exerting an untoward influence on the textbook publishing business.

What these groups on both the right and left have in common, Ms. Ravitch notes, is that they all “demand that publishers shield children from words and ideas that contain what they deem the `wrong’ models for living.” Both sides “believe that reality follows language usage,” that if they “can stop people from ever seeing offensive words and ideas, they can prevent them from having the thought or committing the act that the words imply.”

I think that was the theory of Newspeak in 1984, too. Yeesh.

While censors on the right aim “to restore an idealized vision of the past, an Arcadia of happy family life” in which Father knows best, Mother takes care of the house and kids, and everyone goes to church on Sundays, censors on the left believe in “an idealized vision of the future, a utopia in which egalitarianism prevails in all social relations,” a world in which “all nations and all cultures are of equal accomplishment and value.”

In other words, all the flavor and controversy of a Star Trek: TNG episode.

Pardon me while I go find something improperly interesting to read to Katherine …