https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Why Does Obama Hate Baby Jesus So Much?

I mean, look at that Christmas card? Where’s the Christ? Where’s the Family? Where’s a screaming, red-white-and-blue American Eagle protecting the Christ and His Family?  Where’s the Ten Commandments? What sort of sick Muslim Atheists put a dog on their Christmas card?

Thank goodness we have Fox News and Sarah Palin to call this un-America display of crypto-Islamic secularlism for what it is: yet another salvo in the War on Christmas! As passed on by Rachel Maddow:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

The transcript:

All right, America. How offended are you by this? I know, right? How dare they. I mean, Bo Obama on the White House Christmas card? Bo, a dog? A dog on the official White House Christmas card? This is a Holiday travesty, if you ask me.

But don’t worry. Fox News is on this. Fox’s Todd Starnes is on the story, revealing that this is what it says inside the evil dog-​themed White House Christmas card. “From our family to yours, may your holiday shine with the light of the season.”

Where, I ask you, is any mention of Christmas, let alone Christ? I mean, how are we even supposed to know it’s a Christmas card?

And there’s more. According to Fox’s exclusive reporting, holiday presents on the card are placed on a table underneath a poinsettia instead of under a Christmas tree. Now, of course, some pagan traditions have poinsettias as a symbol of Satan. Just saying.

Our friends at Fox knew that on a story this hot, they needed experts to weigh in. Luckily they’ve got former Alaska governor Sarah Palin on payroll. She told the network that she found this White House Christmas card to be a bit unusual. “It’s odd,” she said, wondering why the president’s Christmas card highlights his dog instead of traditions like family, faith and freedom. Governor Palin saying the majority of Americans appreciate more traditional, “American foundational values illustrated and displayed on Christmas cards and on a Christmas tree.”

Like, for example, the Christmas cards of our other not-secretly-Kenyan presidents. Like the ones that they have displayed, right? On their American Christmassy Christian Christmas cards. Like look at President Bush’s card from 2005. Okay, well, maybe not that one. Are those dogs? Yeah. Definitely this one from 2002. You know, I’m actually sort of having a hard time locating the baby Jesus in this one.

I bet we can find him on some Ronald Reagan cards, though. No, not this one in 1983, unless he’s the chandelier. And no, not there either.

Turns out almost every White House Christmas card features some picture of the White House. Or a room in the White House. Or dogs. Which is not a source of outrage to Fox when any other president does it. But it is a source of outrage to Fox and to Governor Palin when this president does it. Why is that, I wonder?

And now is the part where I show you the very, very, very Christmassy emphasis on Christ Christmas cards from Fox itself. Nothing says the little baby Jesus like two foxes roasting the NBC peacock over an open flame while sheep look on in wonder. That’s the holiday card from Fox Business Channel this year. Maybe they’re secretly Kenyan, too. Here’s the Fox News card. If you can’t make out that picture, it is Fox racing down a hill and beating ABC, CBS and NBC. And then there’s us. That’s us. MSNBC and CNN cowering behind a big hill of snow.

All right. As somebody who is being made fun of in the Fox News Christmas card, I think that is a funny card. It is a good Christmas card. Cartoony. I like that. Perhaps we should call Governor Palin and ask her to point out where the family, faith and freedom are in that card. Or maybe we should not do that. At least we shouldn’t do that and call it “news” because to do that would be totally, totally idiotic.

Sometimes Fox seems to parody itself, truly they do. And the remarkable thing is, people watch and listen to these yahoos. They hang on their very word. And, sure as shooting, there are people out there right now, people who can vote, and drive, and carry guns, and write letters to their editor, who are shaking their heads angrily over the breakfast table about how Obama hates Jesus and you can tell because of his un-American, un-Christian Christmas card. Just like these commenters on the Fox story (all sic [sic]):

→ Of course there’s no “Christmas”in his card. First he’s a muslim..second hes a muslim and thrid he doesn’t believe in Christmas..and a dam pointsetta plant with presents under it? WTH? Now that’s just wrong! But yet he can spend 4 million dollars on a CHRISTMAS VACATION? Wake up people!

→ Just because everyone in the U.S. isn’t Christian doesn’t mean that Christmas isn’t a Christian occasion. COME ON!! I guess because we have some foreigners in the country then we can’t call the 4th of July Independence Day?? MIGHT OFFEND SOMEONE. This is really making people angry Cat. Yes, people like you who can’t use your brain! It makes no sense. How about Hanukkah — should we call it something else, try to change it around because everybody is not Jewish? This is the kind of rationale you are using. And it really shows an illogical mind, not a rationale mind! The President just shouldn’t send a CHRISTMAS card if he is afraid to use the word CHRISTMAS. This is lunacy!!

→ There were times when I would say Happy Holiday or MERRY CHRISTMAS and HAPPY NEW YEAR . The war on Christmas is sick and under Obama it is getting out of control. So these days I make it a point as loud as I can (still respectful) MERRY CHRISTMAS, HAPPY NEW YEAR, and GOD BLESS and if so one has a problem with it I will reply to them, the reply depends on how they handle there comment to my MERRY CHRISTMAS, HAPPY NEW YEAR, and GOD BLESS

→ Odd? Not to me! I believed all along that he has a purpose and the United States is NOT his #1 priority. I believe his loyalty is with his Muslim brothers. I am not Jewish but have no problem saying Happy Hanakuh. I am not Irish but have no problem saying Happy St Patricks Day. I do have a problem listening to foul mouth people sitting around me at a ballgame. Every group and organization is fighting for their “rights.” What about the rights of Christians? Obama insulted a lot of people from every race! Besides, Happy Holidays represents what…… Easter?

→ Absolutely right. No one cared about this until Obama started dividing the country. Period.

→ There you go………do you need ANY MORE proof that he is a Muslin?

→ He HATES America.He gets rid of oud day of prayer yet he prays with the muslims???? He wants to get rid of all morals!!! and the best way to do that is get rid of GOD!!! Wake up.

→ He is not a Christian-He is a Muslim-our enemy and hates America and everything it stands for! Everyone that lied and Covered for this muslim to be POTUS should be tried for Treason and put to death! I am sorry-these Radica Muslims want to kill us-he is part of that! He embraces Islam-his words not mine! We HAVE TO GET THIS RADICAL MUSLIM OUT OF OFFICE IMMEDIATELY BEFORE HE LETS THEM COMPLETELY TAKE US OVER AND PUT IN SHARIA LAW! They want Sharia Law so bad -let them leave our Country-A Christian Nation-and go back to their own country! BARACK HUESSIEN OBAMA! WHAT DOES THAT NAME SAY TO YOU? Wake up, and quit being Stupid-Stupid Cannot be fixed! MERRY CHRISTMAS, AMERICA!

Yes, MERRY CHRISTMAS, AMERICA!

(via New Civil Rights Movement)

Yet another reason to oppose Newt

I mean, unless he rejects the support of Wildmon, that is. Which I doubt will happen.

Particularly noteworthy is the main reason Wildmon is supporting Newt, vs. a more evangelical type: because Newt has been so anti-judge of late, and judges are the ones destroying Western Civilization by, y'know, protecting the Constitutional Rights of all those Christian-hating gays and evil stuff like that. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Don Wildmon, Founder of American Family Association, Endorses Gingrich | Right Wing Watch
Don Wildmon, Founder of American Family Association, Endorses Gingrich. Submitted by Brian Tashman on December 20, 2011 – 10:30am. Newt Gingrich today nabbed the endorsement of Don Wildmon, the founde…

True Christians are being persecuted by those who don't recognize them as True…

True Christians are being persecuted by those who don't recognize them as True Christians

In fewer words, according to the SBC's Baptist Press, anything that involves equal treatment of religions, or doesn't actually acknowledge evangelical Christianity as the One True Christianity, is in fact persecution of the One True Christianity, and a sign that our country is falling apart. Because that's what America's all about, I guess. As proof, see the Air Force Academy, where restrictions on jamming the One True Christianity down all cadets' throats is a sign that the Anti-Christ is afoot. Or something like that. Goofy. #ddtb

Embedded Link

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2011/12/15/southern-baptists-admit-that-they-oppose-religious-equality-in-the-military/

Is Barack Obama a Christian?

There are, of course, a plethora of people willing to assert, without hesitation, a resounding, “No.”  These folks, unfortunately, tend to be of the “He does things I don’t like, so he must not be a good Christian like me, so let me figure out some reasons to think that other than that I don’t like him and he scares me” type.

(One might ask what difference it makes, or, more pointedly, who the hell are these people to judge what lies between Obama and his Creator … but that’s what’s called a “nuanced” argument, which means it’s obviously a rhetorical trick of the Devil.)

On occasion, though, someone actually enumerates reasons to deny Obama the label of “Christian”. So it is, most recently, with the “Christian Anti-Defamation Commission” (CADC) which — amidst breathless notes that this is ” the most DANGEROUS election in our history” and requests to “donate online today and join our fight against anti-Christian discrimination” — has come up with:

10 REASONS WHY BARACK OBAMA IS NOT A CHRISTIAN

Note that this is up from their earlier definitive 7 REASONS list. And they are the goofiest retread imaginable of every “Obama’s an un-American, anti-Christian, atheist socialist Marxist Muslim Kenyan Communist” assertion that has been advanced (and debunked) since he started running for President.

Let’s roll the film …

1.) Economics: Obama advocates for failed Marxist/socialist economic schemes that are based on envy and class warfare that divides the country and uses the government to steal from one group to give it to another.

Marxists and socialists the world over are laughing in their beers over the idea that Obama is one of theirs. While his political proposals have been radical from the perspective of a wildly-shifting-right Tea Party GOP, they are nearly all been word-for-word proposals that were backed by such fellow radicals as Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and John McCain as little as four years ago.

By the way, would you call un-Christian someone who defined the highest moral actions to care for the poor and the sick and the hungry, and who repeatedly condemned wealth.  Would such a person be stoking the fires of “envy” and “class warfare”?  Really? Even if he was wandering around 1st Century Judea?

2.) Marriage: Obama abdicated his sworn presidential duty to defend the laws of the United States by refusing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act and even actively worked to undermine the law.

Most fervently anti-gay folks would say, “He violated his oath, therefore he should be impeached.” For some reason, the CADC  takes this more as a “See, he’s not a Christian” thing.

Of course, Christians violate their oaths and promises and fervently prayerful resolutions all the time.  We are, after all, human.  If that makes them non-Christians, then the Apostle Peter was not a Christian based on his failure to acknowledge Jesus three times before the cock crowed.

I’m not saying that Christians violating their oaths is a good thing — but it’s not what defines one as (or as not) a Christian.

Further, Presidential activity to not enforce or follow laws they feel are unconstitutional is not without precedent, either in terms of not protecting a law in court, or in terms of issuing Signing Statements indicating areas of laws that they consider unconstitutional.

It’s not a tactic I particularly care for, but it’s hardly a sign of someone not being Christian.

Indeed, since the oath includes to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution,” one could argue that if a president believes a law or a part of it is, in fact, un-Constitutional, they have a sword obligation to not defend it in court.

3.) Religious Liberty: Obama signed “Hate Crimes” legislation that can result in prosecution for speaking against homosexuality. Even pastors who preach the biblical view of sexuality could face prosecution in certain situations.

Bushwah.   Point to me to one person in the US who has been prosecuted for speaking against homosexuality, or a pastor who preaches their Biblical interpretation that homosexuality is wrong.

Really.

I’m waiting.

Speaking out against homosexuality from the pulpit (no matter how I feel about it) is no more prosecutable as a hate crime than speaking out against women in the workplace, or against the mingling of the races, or how non-Christians are doomed to hell.

All of those counter-examples, if they were used as the basis of a crime, could let it be prosecuted as a “hate crime.” But simply saying them?  That’s protected speech under the First Amendment.  Read about it, some time.

4.) Abortion: Obama’s policies have caused taxpayer funded abortions in other nations and fund of embryonic stem cell research that kills human embryos. He gave $50 million to UN population agency for promoting abortion and working with China’s murderous “one child” policy. He eliminated federal funding for abstinence-only education and overturned the ban on funding abortions within Washington, D.C. During the 2011 budget debates, Obama refused to end funding for Planned Parenthood, almost causing the government to shut down.

Leaving aside your odd view of what it means to “cause” or “promote” abortion (a procedure that is legal within the US), your half-truths about foreign aid, and your askew view of what Planned Parenthood does … your position seems to be is that anyone who is not doing everything they can politically to oppose abortion is, in fact, not a Christian.  Do you advertise that it is a disqualification to Christianity for the majority of Americans who think abortion should be legal in certain circumstances, or even (gasp) at the judgment of the pregnant woman?

5.) Homosexuality: Obama signed a bill repealing the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy which opened the door to open homosexuality in the military.

Of course, homosexuals have served in the military for time out of mind — they just were force to lie about it, officially. Interesting  that you consider lying a better course of action.

Now military chaplains will be pressured to perform homosexual unions.

Except, of course, they won’t, any more than Catholic chaplains are pressured to perform Jewish marriages, or Muslim chaplains are pressured to perform Mormon marriages.

Obama had militant homosexuals as part of his inaugural events and even hosted a reception in the White House celebrating the fortieth anniversary of the homosexual rights movement.

Your position is clearly that anyone who thinks that homosexuals should be seen in public (if not that they shouldn’t be thrown in jail, or perhaps stoned) is not a Christian.  I (and my Christian denomination) reject your base position and that it defines Christianity.

6.) Liberal / Marxist Liberation Theology: Obama sat under a radical, Marxist minister, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, for 20 years and has adopted all of his Marxist ideology.

Well, we’ve already addressed the whole “Marxist” thing. And while there are are aspects of Rev. Wright’s beliefs I don’t agree with, I don’t feel qualified to say that he’s not a Christian, as he identifies himself, and as his congregation identifies itself.

Obama denies Christ’s atonement and mocks the Bible and rarely attends church, yet we are supposed to believe he’s Christian.

Yeah, because a true Christian would never say such denying and mocking things as:

I am a Christian, and I am a devout Christian. I believe in the redemptive death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. I believe that that faith gives me a path to be cleansed of sin and have eternal life. But most importantly, I believe in the example that Jesus set by feeding the hungry and healing the sick and always prioritizing the least of these over the powerful. I didn’t ‘fall out in church’ as they say, but there was a very strong awakening in me of the importance of these issues in my life. I didn’t want to walk alone on this journey. Accepting Jesus Christ in my life has been a powerful guide for my conduct and my values and my ideals.

We’ve had multiple presidents who rarely or intermittently attended church.  George Washington was (in)famous for never receiving communion on those occasions when he attended; was he not a Christian?

Do you really have to attend church to be a Christian?  What’s the creedal basis for that particular assertion?

 Many believe he’s really a Muslim, and for some good reasons.

Yes, because he (gasp) spent some period of life in Muslim countries, and he’s a funny color with a funny name, and there’s a bunch of people who keep calling him a Muslim for nonsensical reasons, and that’s why “many” believe he’s a Muslim.  Oh, wait, none of those are particularly good reasons.

7.) National Christian Heritage: In a speech given in Turkey, Obama said, “we do NOT consider ourselves a Christian nation.”

Really? You’re going to explicitly argue that a prerequisite of being a Christian is recognizing or professing that the United States is a Christian nation?

Which, of course, it’s  not.  Even if  it’s two-thirds-plus made up of people who call themselves Christians … well, we already know a bunch of them are in favor of legalized abortion, and gay rights.  So, really, ironically, by your narrow definition of what it means to be a Christian, we’re not a Christian nation.

Obama’s full quote is:

One of the great strengths of the United States is … we have a very large Christian population — we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.

I for one agree fully. Which, I guess, means I’m not a Christian.

By the way, does this point apply to non-American Christians, too? Do they have to bow down five times a day toward Washington, DC, in order to be considered Christian, too?

Obama intentionally misquotes the Declaration of Independence omitting “our Creator” as the source of our unalienable rights.

Obama has, on occasion, misquoted the Declaration of Independence.  He has, on numerous other occasions, not done so.

8.) Supreme Court Appointments: Justice Elena Kagan is a hardcore liberal on abortion, gun rights and homosexual marriage and is suspected to be a lesbian.

Eek!  Because we should definitely deny someone’s Christianity based on suspicions about someone whom he has nominated to a federal office.

Kagan was confirmed by 67 US Senators.  Are they not Christians? (Some of them may not be.  Most of them claim that they are.  Are you going to campaign against all of them, too?)

Kagan wrote a brief supporting Clinton’s veto of a ban on partial birth abortion. While a Dean at Harvard, Kagan banned military recruiters from the campus. Kagan also opposed the Federal Defense of Marriage Act.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor is a liberal and activist judge who believes courts should make policy not just interpret the constitution. Sotomayor argued for unlimited abortions for any reason throughout pregnancy and for taxpayer funding of abortions.

I could probably add two or three dozen paragraphs explaining how your sound-bite of the record of these two justices is strewn with zany misrepresentation, ad hominem attacks, and the like .   Suffice it to say that neither justice is any sort of proof (one way or the othehr) as to whether Obama is a Christian.

9.) Obama-care: Your tax dollars will pay for abortions …

No, they won’t, because that’s part of the law.

… and the older you get your life will be considered a liability and expendable. Some bureaucrat on a “DEATH PANEL” will ultimately decide if YOUR life is worth saving or not.  

A condition that already exists in the private insurance industry, but has nothing to do with the Health Care Reform Act.  I mean, what is this, 2009?

 10.) Radical Czars:

Oh, Lordy, not the “czars” thing …

Kevin Jennings, Obama’s Safe School “czar,” is a militant, homosexual activist from Massachusetts.

From Massachusetts?! Dear Lord, think of the children!

 Radical pro-abortion advocate Kathleen Sebelius is Obama’s Secretary of Health and Human Services. She took a quarter of a million dollars from George Tiller, the notorious late term abortionist.

Would this be the same abortion-crazy Sebelius who just overrode the FDA’s recommendations to make Plan B OTC?  Obviously, she’s being fiendishly crafty with her radicalism.

 Chai Feldblum, a lesbian law professor was appointed to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Feldblum said in any conflict that might arise between religious liberty and homosexual “rights,” she would have a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win.

I will bet you a $10,000 donation to your cause that is not what she said.

So, those are the ten reasons, which I think I can summarize as:

  1. He put forward policy that we dislike, and we’re Christians, so we’ll simply label that as anti-Christian activity.
  2. A bunch of people have said batshit crazy stuff about Obama for the last four years as being a Marxist and a Muslim and an Atheist and someone fiendishly cackling, awaiting the day the DEATH PANELS come to take grandma away and turn her into Soylent Green for the poor.  So it must be true, and therefore Obama couldn’t possibly be a Christian, because there’s no room left on his business card.
  3. He has the nerve to associate with (and even sometimes hire) people who are openly gay (therefore militant homosexuals) or pro-choice (therefore radical pro-abortionists), and therefore he must not be Christian.

Never mind that all this would limit who qualifies as a “Christian” in America to about 10,000 rabid conservatives running around the offices of groups like the CADC.  These folks seem to delight at not just condemning particular actions, but at making judgments as to who is, or is not, a True Christian™ — a club they want to be as elite, and (of course) select as possible, even while lining it up as an ideal that everyone should aspire and kow-tow to.

Now, me, I’d probably leave whether someone is truly a Christian to, oh, Christ.  I might suggest where particular actions or rhetoric don’t line up with what I understand to be Christian ideals (perhaps with a Bible verse or two thrown in), but to actually deny someone’s Christianity?  That takes some special kind of hubris.  Hubris that would have very little problem declaring this post proof that I, too, am not a Christian.

As I read through this, I really considered whether I wanted to go over all the same old arguments about Obama like this.  I mean, there’s really nothing new here.  It’s all been said, and laughed at, before.  But as this list shows, it’s still out there, and folks are still making these ludicrous calumnies against Obama, and (since it seems to be keyed into money-raising efforts), apparently with some success.

To paraphrase the spurious Burke quote  “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil Internet trash is for good men to blog nothing.” And, unfortunately, with the coming election it’s only going to get worse, not better.

Not that I pay much attention to Rick Perry any more, but —- well, actually,…

Not that I pay much attention to Rick Perry any more, but —

— well, actually, it's kind of nice that I don't have to pay much attention to Perry any more. Whew.

Meanwhile, this caught my eye:

“Promoting special rights for gays in foreign countries is not in America’s interests and not worth a dime of taxpayers’ money,” he said. “But there is a troubling trend here beyond the national security nonsense inherent in this silly idea. This is just the most recent example of an administration at war with people of faith in this country. Investing tax dollars promoting a lifestyle many Americas of faith find so deeply objectionable is wrong.” He concluded: “President Obama has again mistaken America’s tolerance for different lifestyles with an endorsement of those lifestyles. I will not make that mistake.”

Not that you'll have the opportunity, Rick, but … this was in response to the Obama Administration saying that it will including gay rights as part of the human rights factors that go into foreign aid decisions. As Obama put it:

“I am deeply concerned by the violence and discrimination targeting LGBT persons around the world,” President Obama said in the memo. “Whether it is passing laws that criminalize LGBT status, beating citizens simply for joining peaceful LGBT pride celebrations, or killing men, women, and children for their perceived sexual orientation.”

From which I can only include that Perry not only thinks that preventing criminalization, violence, or killing of gays or their suporters is to "promote" their "lifestyle," but that he's perfectly okay with those activities going on in other countries. Or, perhaps, our own. A remarkably compassionate conservative moment. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Rick Perry: Support For Gay Rights Abroad Is A ‘War With People Of Faith’ | TPM2012
Rick Perry unleashed a furious response to a White House memo urging the State Department to promote LGBT rights in foreign countries on Tuesday.

“This administration’s war on traditional American v…

When birth control is outlawed, only outlaws — or the elite — will use birth c…

When birth control is outlawed, only outlaws — or the elite — will use birth control

Though I'm sure Newt will know how to score some for his next affair.

I mean, really. Does anyone think that Newt and his various mistresses-turned-wives over the years didn't use birth control? Including birth control methods that would violate that precious "personhood" position?

Of course they did. Because such positions are for political posturing. And, should they actually achieve political and legislative reality, well, they're only for the hoi-polloi, not for folks who can afford (and dodge the legal consequences of) any medication (or procedure) they want. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Under Pressure From Anti-Choice Groups, Gingrich Flips To Anti-Birth Control Position
Although GOP presidential frontrunner Newt Gingrich previously took the view that “personhood begins at conception,” on Friday, Gingrich told ABC’s Jake Tapper that life begins at the “successful impl…

Church bans interracial couples

Obviously I disagree with this particular church's beliefs — but I support their decision, as a private belief group, to define their own membership rules.

The only reason I point this out is that the question all too often comes up about whether the growth of anti-discrimination laws against gays and the spread of gay marriage laws will lead to government crackdowns and persecution of churches that disagree with gay marriage. Not only has such persecution not been demonstrated to date with for churches that condemn homosexuality, but even a socially more extreme case like this (which is not unique) demonstrates it's a non-issue.

The local sheriff, or the state police, or the FBI, aren't going to prosecute or shut down the Gulnare Free Will Baptist Church about this, even though interracial marriage is legal in Kentucky and recognized by the Federal government. Any results will all be social, not legal (people pointing and laughing, or condemning, or quitting the congregation, or perhaps their larger baptist organization kicking them out). Which is as it should be. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Kentucky church votes to ban interracial couples
Gulnare Free Will Baptist Church votes on resolution that says the church 'does not condone interracial marriage'

In God We All Trust, Or Else

The courts have allowed mention of God in official governmental items such as our money and our national motto and the Pledge of Allegiance under the principle of "ceremonial deism" — the idea that it's not really religion, but more of a tribal traditional sort of thing. Which ought to give anyone who takes such statements seriously the willies …

… but too many other actions demonstrate that a lot of people feel differently, that they see "In God We Trust," for example, not just as a national booyah chant, but a real statement of religious fervor. Such as Georgia, which now has a bill going through its statehouse that would change license from having the issuing county on them (with the option of someone paying for a "In God We Trust" sticker if they so chose ) to having all license plates with the religious motto unless someone wants to pay extra for a county sticker.

This is not, of course, a sign of mutual, communal grunting, but an assertive religious statement. That there's an option to opt out is nice, but that it's an extra pay option is not.

If your religious fervor requires you to proclaim your faith from the back of your car, may I suggest a lovely bumper sticker, rather than compelling all your neighbors to do the same? #ddtb

Embedded Link

Georgia Bill Would Require Religious Display on All License Plates | Americans United

The Consolidated View

Six companies own 90% of what we read, watch, or listen to. Yowzers.

Continue reading “The Consolidated View”

In God I Trust … but I'm not going to presume for you

Not sure how plastering "In God We Trust" around City Hall is somehow speaking "on behalf of our men and women who defend our freedoms, those who are military veterans, reservists and active-duty personnel who live in our community."

Especially when it's done on the basis of "ceremonial deism," which means it's basically just mouthing vaguely religious platitudes by nationalistic rote. If that's what it's meant to represent, then it's an insult to the godly as well as dissenters. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Motto Mania: Calif. Woman Promotes Government-Endorsed ‘In God We Trust’ Signs | Americans United

Every sperm is sacred

So if a religiously affiliated institution (not a church, mind you — though I have my questions about that, too) were to require employees to sign a contract saying that they would not use any of their salary to purchase contraception, would that be legal? Then why give them a "conscience" out in provision of insurance services for contraception?

Unfortunately, it will be no surprise if Obama, with an eye toward next year's election, agrees to the exemption in order to attract/retain the Catholic vote (whether or not the US Bishops actually represent the opinions of American Catholics on the matter or not). #ddtb

Embedded Link

Both Sides Expect Obama to Side with Bishops on Contraception Coverage

Family Faith Freedom Frenzied Freak-Out

 The Family Research Council urgently wants you to know two things:

  1. Obama is out to Destroy Your Religious Freedom by ending Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.
  2. If you send the FRC your money, they will stop Obama from doing this awful thing.

Let’s cut to the plug:

The Obama administration wants to take away your religious freedom-and it is using the U.S. military to do it!

Lovely lead sentence, conjuring up images of jackbooted soldiers marching down your street to take away your religious freedom.  Eek!

Let me quickly explain how.

Please do.

On September 20, Congress’ repeal of the 1993 law prohibiting open homosexuality in the U.S. military became official.

Yes, it did. After endless study, congressional testimony by military leaders, and surveys of military personnel, it was clear that the only thing maintaining the law any more was some folks just don’t like gays.  That didn’t seem a rational basis for exclusion, any more than some folks just not liking blacks was a reasonable basis for them to have to serve in segregated units.

As a Marine Corps veteran, I know that this development will have dire consequences for the majority of the dedicated men and women serving in our armed forces.

Dire! Majority!

Really? Why is that?

Military readiness and combat effectiveness could be seriously compromised just as military leaders warned Congress.

The Joint Chiefs, and the military personnel surveyed, disagree with your assessment of what “military leaders warned Congress.”

And,

  • The quality of life for military families will be impacted through radical changes in their schools and housing located on military bases;
  • Religious freedom will suffer as well as chaplains who uphold the bible’s teaching on homosexuality will open themselves up to disciplinary action, bad fitness reports, and the denial of promotions.

Really?  There will be radical changes in base schools?  Like what? Like they may stock Heather Has Two Daddies in the school library?  What other changes do you suggest will happen because gays are now (openly) serving?

And how will quality of life regarding housing change?  Because some of Those People might have base housing next door?  Welcome to the Real World, folks.  I think you will find having gay neighbors doesn’t really do much harm to the local neighborhood.

Really? Has this happened so far?  I mean, as you pointed out, its been nearly two months since the DADT repeal occurred. Any chaplains been disciplined yet? Surely those brave evangelical Biblical chaplains have continued to speak out! And surely those slavering gay soldiers have just been waiting to pounce!

Funny, I haven’t heard about anything like that happening, either.

Chaplains who uphold the (evangelical) Bible’s teaching on, oh, salvation through Christ Jesus alone (certainly a more fundamental dogma than … have they been persecuted, disciplined, denied promotions for preaching about how Muslims and Jews and atheists and pagans and not-the-right-kind-of-Christians are going to Hell?  Don’t think I’ve heard about that, either.

Family Research Council asks for your donation today to help us continue leading the fight on Capitol Hill, in the media and at the grassroots to defend the troops and your religious freedom.

(Link removed.)

Don’t think for a minute that this assault on religious freedom and traditional marriage is limited to the military. It’s not!

It’s not? Eek!

The experts at FRC …

Experts at … what?

… recognized from the start that the campaign to overturn the law prohibiting open homosexuality in the military was never really about “fairness” …

Really?  Because everyone I ever talked to who believed in the end of DADT always mentioned fairness.

… –or just limited to the military.

Well, there you’re correct … except that it was the military that was expressly forbidding gays to openly serve, and firing them if they were discovered.

It has always been about using the nation’s military to advance a radical anti-family, anti-religious freedom agenda that could never gain approval by voters on its own.

I do not accept the proposition that allowing gays to (openly) serve in the military is radical, anti-family, or anti-religious freedom.

I do, though, believe that removing this legalized prejudice from the military will add to further integration of gays into the civilian population, just as it had an effect when the military ceased its legalized racial prejudice when it integrated blacks and whites together. Study after study shows that the biggest factor in acceptance of gays is knowing them, and having personal, professional, and social familiarity with them.  The  same is true of other races and religions and other things that divide us.  It’s hard to buy the demonizing propaganda that all gays are ravening sex fiends and pedophiles and leather freaks when you meet Tim’s partner Fred at the company Christmas party …

If chaplains can be marginalized for openly opposing same-sex “marriages,” …

They can’t be, except socially.

… which were recently authorized on military bases under the new Department of Defense guidelines, …

The DoD did not “authorize same-sex marriage on military bases.”  It did say that military chaplains who wished to perform such marriages, in states that allow them, could do so, and could do so using facilities on basis if desired.

… how long will it be before your church can no longer preach the portions of God’s word that are politically incorrect?

Um … never?

No form of intimidation will be off the table–revoking a church’s nonprofit status, blocking building permits, imposing restrictive zoning, etc.–in an effort to silence a pastor’s opposition to homosexuality.

Really?  I mean, again, how many churches have been intimidated out of existence,, or had their nonprofit status revoked, or had their building permits canceled, etc., because their pastor spoke out against gays? Or divorce? Or Islam? Or atheists? Or alcohol? Or wars?

How many was that again?

Um … are the crickets chirping your answer?

There’s a growing tendency among Christians today to not get involved with assaults on their faith until it specifically impacts them.

No, there’s a growing tendency among some Christians today to perceive disagreement as assault, and failure of everyone to toe their ideological line as an attack on their freedom.

While what is happening now within the U.S. military may seem to be far removed from where you are, believe me, the threat will soon be at your church’s front door!

That’s right! Gay soldiers might want to actually step inside your church and worship there.  Eek!

Your financial contribution is urgently needed today to help FRC mobilize tens of thousands of Americans like yourself to oppose the Obama administration’s efforts to curtail the rights of military chaplains and our pastors to preach the full word of God.

Which efforts are completely imaginary. Can we contribute Prozac instead?

FRC is currently working overtime in Washington, DC to garner support to overturn the new Department of Defense guidelines allowing chaplains to officiate at same-sex “weddings” on military bases …

So you’re defending religious freedom … by restricting the religious freedom of chaplains to officiate at same-sex weddings?

See, this is what drives me nuts about the FRC and their “we’re being abused and marginalized and infringed upon!” rhetoric.  It’s not just that they want to be sure they can do what they feel religiously bound to do … they want to be sure that nobody else can do things they religiously disagree with.  And they call that “religious freedom.”

… and to make sure DOMA is applied to the military.

At the moment, it is.

FRC will also call for a legal challenge against the Defense Department for not following DOMA, the federal statute which prohibits same-sex “marriages” and, consequently, federal benefits for same-sex couples.

Gosh, that seems unfair. Oh, wait, I’m not allowed to use that radical word.

By the way, DOMA doesn’t “prohibit same-sex ‘marriages'”.  Marriage remains a state-by-state set of laws (You know how you love state laws when they do the things that you like, but prefer federal laws when some states don’t do the things you like? And you know how you love churches being able to do what they will religiously, except when it comes to marrying gays if their faith says they can.).

What DOMA says is that the federal government will only recognize marriage, for purposes of federal benefits, between a man and a woman.  It also says that the states that don’t recognize gay marriage have an “out” from the Constitutional “full faith and credit” clause when it comes to not having to respect gay marriages that occur in other states.  State X may allow First Cousins to marry, and State Y doesn’t, but if First Cousins marry in State X, State Y recognizes that marriage, as does the Federal Government.  DOMA says that, in the case of (eek!) gays, neither State Y nor the Feds have to recognize the individuals as married.

It is unfair.  And it’s of dubious constitutionality, which it is under attack for in the courts.

It is a challenging battle, but we are committed to sharing the truth in love . . . no matter the cost, no matter how long it takes. And with your help and the Lord’s blessing, we will prevail.

You shan’t have my help, FRC.  And I seriously doubt you have the Lord’s blessing.  Might as well give it up now, and use that money for feeding the poor, clothing the naked, caring for orphans and widows, all those things that Jesus actually talked about.

So please give generously to this vital effort to keep our military, marriage and religious freedom.

Except that none of those things is actually threatened so as to need preservation. So it’s not really a vital effort.

Finally, as we enter the season of Thanksgiving, our staff and I thank you in advance for your prayers and financial support.

Well, I’ll keep you in my prayers, how’s that?

God bless you and God bless America.

And “bless your heart.”

God is my co-pilot, Jesus is my Secretary of Defense

I am really curious to see — if, as Bryan Fischer (dolt) claims, the Command-in-Chief absolutely must be a Christian, and not a Mormon (sic) or Muslim — how he'll react to a Romney/Obama presidential race. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Fischer: Our Commander-In-Chief Must Be A Christian
Earlier this year, Bryan Fischer explained that our nation's military must be filled with "men of Christian faith" so that when it comes time to formulate battle plans, "their minds are going to be quickened by the Holy Spirit of God" and they will develop plans that will lead to victory.
Fischer returned to the topic on his program yesterday and reiterated his point about just how important it is that our military be run by Christians, stating that if we have a Muslim or a Mormon in the Whit…

No more "Bullying for Jesus"?

Michigan's House did not include the "sincerely held religious belief or moral conviction" exemption it its version of the widely-lambasted anti-bullying bill, and it appears the Senate may have gotten the message as well. Nice to see sense and fairness prevail. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Bully For Michigan!: Religion Exemption For School Harassment May Fail | Americans United

Religious Freedom doesn't mean you get paid for following your religion

No, really.If you blink reading this story, you almost miss it amongst the wailing and gnashing of teeth about how the state is oppressing the Church, that "religious protection" is at risk, and how "faith-based agencies" are being prevented from exercising their faith.What's at stake here is that the state was paying the Church, under contract, for adoption service.s With that contractual money came contractual rules — one of which is that folks receiving adoption and foster care services money not be allowed to discriminate against same-sex couples.The answer is clear and obvious: if you're not willing to abide by the rules, don't take the money. If it's a faith-based priority, then you are welcome to do what you want … with private funds and donations. But expecting the state to fund you with no strings attached is a mook's game — and a great example of why the separation of church and state is such a great idea for the state and churches.Whining that it's unfair and oppressive for the taxpayers to impose conditions on what you can do with their money is … well, whining. And unbecoming. #ddtb

Embedded Link

Illinois bishops announce shutdown of adoption services :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)

Bishops in three Illinois dioceses announced Nov. 14 that they have dropped their lawsuit against the state and will shut down their adoption and foster care programs, after a civil union law re…

Speaking of Dolts

While I'm sure there will be plenty of grist for the dolt-blogging mill when Barton cranks out his next pseudo-historical epic, net-net I'd rather he didn't, because a chunk of the population (including, but sadly not limited to, Bryan Fischer, but most especially folks who aren't Right-Wing spokes-zanies) will end up believing what Barton has to say about Thomas Jefferson.

Though anyone whose resume includes "As Seen on the Glenn Beck Show!" should be given all due respect. Which, is to say, very little. #ddtb

Embedded Link

David Barton Intends To Report The Truth On "The Jefferson Lies" | Right Wing Watch
David Barton Intends To Report The Truth On "The Jefferson Lies". Submitted by Kyle Mantyla on November 14, 2011 – 2:42pm. A few weeks ago, an atheist group put up a billboard in California …

Unblogged Bits (Fri. 16-Sep-11 1731)

Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries ….

  1. Hagee: Harry Potter, Secular Humanism Ruining America – Can you find me a case of a kid being “taught witchcraft” by Harry Potter? Because I keep trying all those spells in the books, and I just can’t seem to get them right.
  2. Robert Reich Debunks the Six Big Lies About The Economy – “The greatest enemy we have is mass cynicism. When people really get to the point where they think nothing can be done, the other side wins.”
  3. If You Already Hate Windows 8 Then You Hate Technology [Windows 8] – “If you’re not intrigued by Windows 8 and Metro, if you can’t recognize that it’s a big leap forward, if you’re not excited about what it means for you, personally then you don’t really care about technology; you care about brands. You care about platforms. You care about politics. You’re a fanboy.”
  4. Update on the Cranston West High School God Banner Lawsuit – I, for one, marvel at the cognitive dissonance of one school committee member asserting (favorably) it’s an explicitly moral and religious expression, and the others trying to argue that, no, it’s just “tradition.”
  5. Superman is a profane dick – Wait, “as a Christian” this guy is okay with Batman or Green Arrow or Green Lantern taking the Lord’s name in vain, but he “draw the line” at Superman? (And a just-off-the-farm pre-classic Supermman at that?) That’s just … silly.
  6. Perry, Texas and Stimulus Spending – “You can argue over whether the stimulus bill created enough jobs given the amount of money spent. You can argue over whether the cost of those jobs was too high because of the debt increase that resulted from the spending. But to argue that the spending didn’t create a single job is so mind-numbingly idiotic that it could only be said by a Republican presidential candidate.”
  7. Metro-style Internet Explorer 10 ditches Flash, plugins – While it’s an interesting idea, I’m not particularly interested in living without my LastPass or my Xmarks. Sorry, IE10Metro.
  8. Dr Oz crosses the line – Don’t let your fancy-schmancy chemistry get in the way of my big publicity moment!
  9. Do users change their settings? » UIE Brain Sparks – I’m one of those obnoxious types who makes a beeline to the Options / Preferences menu. I learn a lot about a program that way.
  10. You Don’t Make Social Security More Solvent By Eliminating Its Funding Base | ThinkProgress
  11. Perry Once Bashed Financial Industry For Being ‘Run On Greed,’ Now Wants To Repeal Wall St. Reform | ThinkProgress – Sorry, “overregulation” of the finance industry is part of what “problem,” Rick? Certainly not Wall Street bank profits, which are looking extremely healthy.
  12. Texas School District Looks To ‘Abstinence-Plus’ Curriculum After ‘Abstinence-Only’ Proves Ineffective | Mediaite – Well, there’s a bit of sanity for a change. Personally (and as the father of an 11yo girl), I think abstinence is a fine goal, but including realistic info on contraception and safe sex is critically important, too.
  13. The Colbert Report doing a segment on DIA’s conspiracies | The Spot — Denver, Colorado politics and government news — The Denver Post – Exxxxxcellent. (And, btw, that’s the first pic of the Demon Horse of DIA that actually looks halfway decent.)
  14. Epic fight choreography: Kirk vs. Gorn – Boing Boing – Ha! We actually just watched this ep last night. The sad thing is, this is the best action sequence in the episode.
  15. Colorado’s 300 days of sunshine claim: It’s a myth, and state’s climatologist tells us why – Denver News – The Latest Word – But I still like the weather here. 🙂
  16. Google LatLong: South Sudan is now official on Google Maps
  17. John Lewis And 50 Other Congressmen Ask Georgia Parole Board To Grant Troy Davis Clemency | ThinkProgress – Nobody’s suggesting setting the guy loose (which is a completely different question), but there seems way too much doubt to morally support an execution in this case.

Unblogged Bits (Thu. 8-Sep-11 2330)

Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries ….

  1. Colorado doctors still accepting money from drug companies – The Denver Post – Caesar’s doctor must be beyond reproach.
  2. 5 Things That Are Way Easier Than They Look in Movies | Cracked.com – It’s amusing that, for all the things that movies make seem so easy, that there are things that movies make look overly hard (or, at least, “professional”).
  3. Rick Perry Says It’s ‘Misinformation’ To Suggest He Wants To Abolish Social Security | ThinkProgress – Methinks the candidate demurreth too much.
  4. 4th Circuit Upholds Rule of Law in Healthcare Case | People For the American Way Blog – Good news for ACA proponents (e.g., self), but … I’m always a bit hinky about “standing” rulings (as they cut in all directions in often nonsensical ways). I am glad to see that the individual mandate is recognized by a court as the equivalent of a federal tax; I think, on that basis, it will be far more difficult to challenge as something outre.
  5. APOD: 2011 September 4 – In the Shadow of Saturn – Glorious. You want justification for NASA’s budget? Here you go.
  6. Relive 45 years of Star Trek in one handy timeline – Nice.
  7. Get the dayum gubmint out of our lives! – Wait …. was Bachmann (and her cohorts) advocating price controls? No, of course not. That would offend her (et al.) corporate sponsors.
  8. So is Boehner suggesting the US government regulate all drug prices?: John Aravosis (DC)
  9. John Boehner: Most Americans Would Choose Football Over The President – If the GOP were really interested in reducing the role of the President to that of Prime Minister, it might be a defensible position. But I have no doubt that the disrespect that the GOP presently shows to Obama will be denounced as near-treason at such time as the GOP retakes the White House. I hate hypocrisy.
  10. Amazon cuts deal with California on Sales Tax collection – Interesting. Well, perhaps the Affiliate programs will then return to Colorado …
  11. Press reaction: Rick Perry, shallow thinker – My initial impression of Perry was that he was a slick Texan politician mouthing conservative thinking to earn votes. I’ve become more and more convinced I was giving him far too much credit.
  12. Junk Code – SMBC September 08, 2011 – Django!
  13. What Good Is a Legal Right to Record Police Activity – If the Cops Target You When You Do It? – Until the police who abuse their powers actually face penalties for their actions, they will continue to abuse their power … and discredit the law throughout society.
  14. Publishers Are Squandering Their Cachet On Imprints – Unknown but class-sounding imprints are of value only when there’s a base assumption of quality. I have to wonder — if publishers insist on maintaining these “elite” imprints, will they eventually subtitle them (“Gnosticon – a Random House imprint”)?
  15. Unclear on the concept – “Science is not determined by public opinion, and you don’t settle it by running a poll. Shall we vote on math, chemistry, physics, psychology, history, literature, and Spanish, too?”
  16. Quote of the Day – Yup.
  17. Judge Rules That South Bend City Council Cannot Give $1,200,000 to Private Catholic School – No, they can’t. And they shouldn’t. If a church school really a new football field and athletic track, I’m sure the faithful will support them in the effort without involving all the taxpayers of the city.

Unblogged Bits (Fri. 12-Aug-11 2330)

Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries ….

  1. Al Mohler on Adam and Eve vs. The Facts – A nice examination of skepticism vs denialism.
  2. Democratic Dolchstoßlegende by David Atkins – I got a call today from the Obama 2012 campaign, which started with thanking me for my support and invoking Karl Rove to trigger my fear response. And I cut off the nice lady and said, “I’m not giving anything right now, thank you,” and hung up. I have little doubt that, as things presently stand, I’ll be voting for Obama next year, and I’ll probably make contributions — perhaps even to the presidential campaign. But I also don’t mind letting the Obama campaign know that I’m not just automatically forking over the moolah and support just yet, and they can’t just assume my devotion to the cause.
  3. KOA 2011“TIME LAPSE” | Don’t Panik! – If you always were wondering about that big campout we go on each June … well, here’s a better rendition than all of my posts combined. Thanks, Mark!
  4. United Nations Affirms the Human Right to Blaspheme | Politics | Religion Dispatches – If God is angered by blasphemy, God has the prerogative to punish it, not the state.
  5. Joe. My. God.: TX Gov. Rick Perry: Social Security And Medicare Are Totally Unconstitutional – And here’s the man who wants to be President so he can follow up on just that belief.
  6. Fischer: God Only Allows A Woman To Be President As A Last Resort – Hmmm. Will anyone ask Bachman or Palin what they think about that?
  7. Can’t Emphasize This Enough – “The movement conservatives have all come out of the closet – even the ones on the federal bench. They smell a final victory: a return to Gilded Age America.” Which is great, if you’re one the lucky fractional percent who have the gilt.
  8. Microsoft Awarded With Patent For Sliding Mobile Device. Wait, What? – What the –?
  9. Book Ban: Virginia Bans Sherlock Holmes From School Libraries – Stupid, stupid rat creatures …

Unblogged Bits (Thu. 4-Aug-11 1731)

Links (most recent first) that caught my eye, but did not warrant full-blown blog entries ….

  1. NYT: Only ‘Liberal Critics’ Call AFA A Hate Group – But remember, we all know we have a “liberal media” …
  2. Reid Raises Prospect Of Not Appointing Anyone To Super Committee If Republicans Remain Intransigent – I still predict we’ll end up with three no-taxes Republicans, two moderate Dems, and one Blue-Dog Dem. So the GOP will win. Again.
  3. Scientists confirm evidence of liquid water on the surface of Mars – Cool!
  4. 10 Things You Probably Didn’t Know About the Original Star Trek – Okay, I admit, I actually didn’t know a couple of these items (but knew several of them).
  5. No, Peter Parker Isn’t Dead, Black, Or Gay: Media Blatantly Attempts To Gin Up Outrage Over ‘New Spider-Man’ – Yeesh.
  6. Pelosi: Republicans Aren’t Interested In Deficit Reduction, They Are Interested In Destroying Government | ThinkProgress – “Kill the Beast.” What’s remarkable is how much they’ve progressed in that goal in just a couple of years.
  7. Cantor: Entitlement Promises ‘Frankly, Are Not Going To Be Kept For Many’ | ThinkProgress – Except, of course, for ExxonMobil, et al.
  8. Color video from Hiroshima – Boing Boing – “The US Military may have successfully covered up video that showed the brutality of atomic warfare, but, in the intervening years, we saw the brutality of war (in general) in Vietnam and we saw what acute radiation poisoning can do the human body in Chernobyl. Secrets don’t stay buried even when secrets stay buried.”
  9. mental_floss Blog » Who Was General Tso? – He was certainly no chicken.