https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Willow

No, not the Buffy Willow. The Lucas/Howard Willow. In 1988, Ron Howard directed (with George Lucas as the Executive Producer and story writer) Willow, a classic fantasy flick, full of…

No, not the Buffy Willow. The Lucas/Howard Willow.

In 1988, Ron Howard directed (with George Lucas as the Executive Producer and story writer) Willow, a classic fantasy flick, full of magic, non-human critters, sword fights, romance, dark and evil threats, etc. It had all the elements of being as much of a breakthrough for the genre as the original Star Wars was for sf, but, somehow, it never did.

There’s DVD of the film out, now, and, lying on my sickbed yesterday (and with a nap in-between), I watched it, and remembered again both the parts that I love and the parts that don’t quite work.

Warwick Davis is Willow Ufgood, a nelwyn (think hobbit without the furry feet) who inadvertently comes into possession of an incredibly cute little daikini (human) girl. Said infant is, of course, the foretold downfall of the evil Queen Bavmorda, a dark sorceress played to scenery-chewing perfection by Jean Marsh.

Willow’s sort of an everyman character. He wants to be a magician, but instead is the low man on the totem pole in his little hamlet, his farm on the edge of foreclosure, the butt of jokes and ribbing by the nasty village headman, Burglekutt. When it becomes clear that Evil Forces are after the baby, Willow and others are tasked by the village High Aldwin (Billy Barty) to take the baby back to the humans.

Willow eventually discovers the baby’s true nature, and must act as her protector, alongside rogue swordsman Madmartigan, shapechanged sorceress Fin Raziel, and a pair of comic relief (and French-accented) brownies, Franjean and Rool. Arrayed against them are the dark armies of the Queen, led by the fearsome General Kael, and the comely-but-nasty Princess Sorsha. Sorcery, chase scenes, and big battles ensue.

Will Willow gain self-confidence, learn magic, be successful in protecting little infant Elora Danan, and return to his beloved wife and children in one piece? Three guesses.

The movie was filmed on the cusp of the digital cinematography revolution. The digital technique of morphing was first used here, as Willow changes Finn Razael from a possum to various other animals. Still, there were plenty of old-fashioned effects — blue-screen and oversized sets for the diminutive brownies, bits of optical animation and “blue fire,” gorgeous matte paintings supplementing the gorgeous countryside of Wales, New Zealand, and Marin Co. The result is a beautiful film that, at the time, was on the cutting edge, but today feels slightly dated.

A lot of friends of mine at the time criticized Willow as a Lord of the Rings rip-off, but in reality it’s more of a swipe from Lucas’ Star Wars story — the farmer boy in custody of something that the Evil Guys want who eventually comes to understand the power within him, the handsome rogue who reluctantly goes along on the quest and eventually woos the aloof princess, flight to a safe place that turns out to be a trap, etc., etc. Its lack of success versus Star Wars likely comes from a number of reasons.

First, it’s got a lot more story than will fit into its 130 minutes. Despite various dissolves of people journeying across the countryside, there’s not a good sense of time passage, and the result is a film that feels like a choppy number of set pieces. We’re here at the lake. Now we’re here on the mountain. Now we’re here at Tir Asleen. It could almost have been a trilogy of movies in and of itself. (Originally there were to have been two more Willow films, but the narrow margin from the first cause Lucas to have the second two stories published in book form only.)

Secondly, the main character, Willow, is a mixed bag as a protagonist. He spends much of the time simply trying to protect the baby, and the rest he keeps demonstrating how little he knows about sorcery and how easily he’s overcome in combat. He’s oddly impotent for being the title character and hero of the tale. Even his final role in the defeat of Bavmorda is more a matter of his trickery and her clumsiness; granted, he shows a lot of pluck in going into the lion’s den to rescue Elora Danan, but not much effectiveness in doing so.

Willow does have some bright moments. His best are his interaction with his wife and children (and I’ll frankly confess that his reunion with his wife at the end brings a tear to my eye every single frickin’ time I see the movie). Davis does as fine a job with the role as can be done

As for the other characters …

Madmartigan (Val Kilmer) kept reminding me of Han Solo, particularly the ruthless, vain, bloodthirsty mercenary smuggler from the first film. Good with a sword (blaster). Prone to charging his opponents even when outnumbered. Disdainful of the hick he’s working alongside. Shamed into being a good guy. His redemption is as artificial as Han’s, too.

As is the romance that develops between Madmartigan and Sorsha (Joanne Whaley). Sorsha’s character is the most cardboard in the cast, starting off as the evil warrior princess seeking evil mom’s approval, and then falling in love with the (magically) besotted Madmartigan because of some sweet talk and because he Fights Real Good — and not just falling in love, but going wholeheartedly into his camp and against her mom. And nobody says anything, but accepts her as one of the new good guys. Sh’yeah.

(To be fair, a lot of this is fleshed out in deleted scenes from the film, unfortunately not included on the DVD. Still, if we look just at the story as presented, Sorsha and the Sorsha/Madmartigan romance is pretty damned weak.)

The brownies (comedy duo Kevin Pollak and Rick Overton) are intermittently annoying and amusing. Most importantly, they don’t add a single thing to the film or plot, for good and for ill.

Sorceress Fin Raziel (Patricia Hayes) spends most of the movie passing out tidbits of information and nattering at Willow about what a bad magician he is (since he keeps messing up her retransformation). Once in human form, she’s much better, and her battle with Bavmorda is quite entertaining (even if she does fall for the Oldest Trick in the Book).

Bavmorda is nasty, evil, and was probably a delight to play.

The DVD, despite being a “Special Edition,” doesn’t offer that much extra, though what it has is good. A period mini-feature about the making of the movie is fine, a retrospective on the morphing sfx is interesting, and the audio commentary track by Warwick Davis is informative, chatty, and interesting. I’d have very much enjoyed hearing from either Ron Howard or George Lucas, but I suppose they both have much bigger fish to fry. And no deleted scenes (though a couple of glimpses can be caught in the featurette).

Nevertheless, Willow remains a charming, enjoyable film, certainly suitable for the family (though little’uns might get more than a bit scared at Bavmorda’s treatment of Elora Danan). Despite its flaws, it’s still eminently watchable. Especially when you’re stuck on the couch, sick, looking for something heartwarming and not too difficult to follow.

GMs and Players

This week’s RPG WISH question: What is your idea of the relationship between GM and player? Is the GM a host, an adversary, an enabler…?…

This week’s RPG WISH question:

What is your idea of the relationship between GM and player? Is the GM a host, an adversary, an enabler…?

Continue reading “GMs and Players”

Spam, spam, spam, spam …

Today’s backlog of favorite subject lines: My dear dave.hill — My dear scuz.ball. Urgent: Ambitious People Targets! — Your marketing strategy? And quoth the bottom of another unsolicited e-mail ……

Today’s backlog of favorite subject lines:

My dear dave.hill — My dear scuz.ball.

Urgent: Ambitious People Targets! — Your marketing strategy?

And quoth the bottom of another unsolicited e-mail …

This is only one time E-mail and there is no need for removal request. Or you can Block the Senders E-mail Address.

Or I can report you to your ISP, you son of a bitch.

UPDATE: When you’re trying to sell me on your “authentic Italian recipes,” Maria, it would be much more impressive if you knew how to actually spell the Italian words you throw around. Or the English ones, for that matter.

Relaxation

It’s the Friday Five! (Sensing some sort of pattern here …)…

It’s the Friday Five!

(Sensing some sort of pattern here …)

Continue reading “Relaxation”

Standing in the Rainbow

It’s the Thursday Threesome….

It’s the Thursday Threesome.

Continue reading “Standing in the Rainbow”

Thick Thursday

It’s (a day late) The Thursday Thumb-Twiddler….

It’s (a day late) The Thursday Thumb-Twiddler.

Continue reading “Thick Thursday”

Listings

Isn’t it keen that these days there’s so much real estate information available on the web, that folks can search on the Internet through MLS (Multiple Listing Service) data and…

Isn’t it keen that these days there’s so much real estate information available on the web, that folks can search on the Internet through MLS (Multiple Listing Service) data and narrow down on their own the list of houses they’re interested in looiing at?

Yup, it sure is. Which is probably why the National Association of Realtors wants to limit the info that’s available on-line, so that Realtors don’t go the way of travel agents.

Of course, there’s a lot of other info that Realtors can provide that isn’t easily encapsulated on-line. Info on neighborhoods, on builders, and so forth. Lots of value there to add, and wouldn’t it make everyone’s life easier if the average buyer could make a first pass on the data before they start taking up a Realtor’s time?

Information priesthoods have always come crashing down, sooner or later, and the Internet has only accelerated that trend. If the NAR thinks they can hold back the tide on this, then they are setting themselves up to be made obsolete.

Saying grace

Doyce has a reminiscing post today about grace before meals, citing Bigwig’s post on the same topic. So why not weigh in myself? Grace, for me growing up, was an…

Doyce has a reminiscing post today about grace before meals, citing Bigwig‘s post on the same topic. So why not weigh in myself?

Grace, for me growing up, was an exceptional thing, by which I mean it was the exception rather than the rule. We’d say grace at big family dinners on holidays — Thanksgiving, Christmas, Easter. It was part of the pomp and circumstance of such meals, alongside the good china and the silverware.

In recent years, I note that my parents say grace before every meal. Or at least every meal that I’m at with them (which may mean something different altogether).

I’ve tended to try and follow that earlier example, though (plus doing it at meals when my folks are visiting). It’s tough, both because such big meals tend to somewhat chaotic affairs, and so remembering that one extra item is difficult, and because we often as not have folks over for such meals whose religious tastes or affiliation are not the same as ours, and thus might feel uncomfortable with the whole Saying Grace thang.

Which brings me to Dave’s Philosophy of Prayer. Bigwig asks, rightly, whether God “sweats the little stuff,” i.e., cares whether we pray before meals. And I’d have to answer, in terms of “Will lightning fork down from the heavens and fry the turkey if we don’t pray over it?” that clearly the answer is “No.” Indeed, I opine that God doesn’t care about prayer in terms of needing it, or wanting it for its own sake.

Prayer’s use, in my own philosophy (or theology, I suppose) is not to the prayee, but to the prayer, the person saying the words. It’s an opportunity to remember that connection between God and Man, to remember things we are thankful for (but may not have articulated, even to ourselves) and things we are in need of (ditto). It’s a reestablishing, a reminder of that link, even if it’s brief, formulaic, and unilateral, not unlike sending a Christmas card to an old friend.

The words may be rote, to the point of meaninglessness, but, in a sense, they remain useful because they are making time, even a few moments, for God. The words matter less than the sentiment, the intent, the act. (And to the extent that they become rote, they become meditative as well.)

The common Episcopal grace I’ve learned is, Bless, O Lord, Thy gifts to our use and us to Thy service. Not a bad prayer, at that. Maybe something I ought to say more often.

Blahg

I’ve been fighting with a head cold the past few days, and today I decided to stop trying to fight through it and let it do it’s thang. So, today,…

I’ve been fighting with a head cold the past few days, and today I decided to stop trying to fight through it and let it do it’s thang.

So, today, I’ve been dozing fitfully on the couch, which was far less enjoyable than it might sound if one were actually feeling well and not suffering from a head/nose/eyes full of snot.

Hence the dearth of postings.

We will return to your normal daily blog tomorrow. Maybe.

Picture Perfect

It’s been a nice summer, and I have pictures.   …

It’s been a nice summer, and I have pictures.

Kitten loves books. Mint In Box Shake, shake, shake

Comics on my mind

Actually, I have snot on my mind. Or at least my brain. But while sitting here at home, checking my office mail and blowing my nose a lot, the least…

Actually, I have snot on my mind. Or at least my brain. But while sitting here at home, checking my office mail and blowing my nose a lot, the least I can do is mention some comics that sank to the bottom of the stack (where the best is saved for last) of late.

Continue reading “Comics on my mind”

Man’s gotta know his limits

Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), our sometimes whacky local congressman, has decided to blow off his original term limits pledge. As he enters the race for this third term, which he’d promised…

Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), our sometimes whacky local congressman, has decided to blow off his original term limits pledge. As he enters the race for this third term, which he’d promised when first running would be his last, he’s told his supporters that a decision on a fourth term will “not be made solely on the issue of term limits.”

Bully for him.

Sure, it’s self-serving. Finding himself on the bleeding edge of extremist anti-immigrant fever, he’s enjoying being at the head of the parade. But he also makes a good point:

“I find myself in a position of leadership with regard to this issue,” he wrote. “Literally thousands of Americans from every part of the nation have sent us small donations with notes of encouragement.” Tancredo added that while he realizes, “no one is indispensable,” anybody who follows him would have to “start all over at square one.”

While I don’t like where he’s leading, I think it is important that politicians get an opportunity to lead — said opportunity to be cut off by the voters (remember them?), not by term limit laws.

If the voters decide that Tancredo is a flake, or that he ought to be held to the limit he originally promised, then they should have the right to vote him down. If they think he’s the great man on a white horse since [fill in the blank], they should get to vote that way, too.

It seems that at least one term limits proponent has come around to that way of thinking, too.

Attack of the Buggy Whip Manufacturers

An interesting study is out arguging that RIAA and MPAA companies need to stop exerting all their time, effort and congressional influence on fighting piracy and file-swapping, and instead just…

An interesting study is out arguging that RIAA and MPAA companies need to stop exerting all their time, effort and congressional influence on fighting piracy and file-swapping, and instead just try to learn how to make a buck at it.

“What we don’t see is a real questioning of business models,” said Ashley Steel, a partner in KPMG’s Information, Communications and Entertainment practice. “They complain about the Napsters,” she said, referring to the bankrupt music-swapping site that was found to violate U.S. copyright laws. “But why do the Napsters exist? Because the marketplace wants them.”
Steel said that if the issue “is not on boardroom table…then that boardroom has problems.”

It’s ironic that such stalwarts of commerce are so quick to try and battle against market forces.

Pop

Pop-up ads are the bane of the Internet. Everyone hates them with an undying passion. Many people go to great lengths to install software on their PCs that will block…

Pop-up ads are the bane of the Internet. Everyone hates them with an undying passion. Many people go to great lengths to install software on their PCs that will block them, even at the extent of some inconvenience or lack of functionality.

So why, in the name of all that’s holy, are TV networks beginning to look at popup ads on TV shows?

Well, money, duh.

As an “NYPD Blue” rerun unspools on Court TV, the screen shrinks and shifts. Up from the bottom rises a message: This episode of the famed cop show is brought to you by Planters’ nuts, the salty Kraft Foods Inc. snack. As a movie plays on AOL Time Warner Inc. cable-counterpart TNT, a quiz runs across the bottom of the screen, asking viewers a question about the film. It’s sponsored by United Parcel Service Inc. Earlier this year, TNT tested a tactic that had a message from an American Express Co. financial-services operation appear — just as Steve Martin faced a particularly thorny money decision during “Father of the Bride II.”

Of course, this is all evolutionary, not revolutionary. Networks have been putting “ghosts” in the lower corner of the screen for years — first, unobtrusively, to identify the channel as it was searched past, more recently to tout new or upcoming shows they want you to watch. And end-titles on TV shows have been mangled and squeezed into reduced real estate for some time now, as “what’s up next” blurbs keep you from seeing any of the production details of what you just saw.

It’s just experiments, for now, and certainly, for the present, such ads will be relatively small, relatively unobtrusive … for so long as the viewer is highly sensitive to them.

Once it becomes the norm, though — i.e., when folks stop noticing them at that level — expect that the networks will start selling bigger, more obtrusive ads.

After all, the common wisdom goes, as long as you’re getting noticed, that’s the important thing, right?

(via Blogcritics)

And the chain will set you free

Indepedent coffee houses often tremble and protest when Starbucks, like the Star Wars Empire, moves into town. But, remarkably enough, Starbucks may actually be increasing the business for independent coffee…

Indepedent coffee houses often tremble and protest when Starbucks, like the Star Wars Empire, moves into town.

But, remarkably enough, Starbucks may actually be increasing the business for independent coffee houses. While Starbucks’ revenue continues to grow, so do indies in aggregate, and indies often find that their business continues or increases when Starbucks moves in.

A third of Americans who drink coffee away from home order gourmet coffee from a specialty shop, according to Mintel. Many people believe that Starbucks increases the overall market, attracting new customers to the product who then patronize the independent provider next door. “When a Starbucks opens, it educates the market, expanding it for everyone,” says Bruce Milletto, president of Bellissimo Coffee InfoGroup Inc., a Eugene, Ore., company that provides consulting services to independent coffeehouses.
The coffeehouse may be that rare thing in retailing — a concept that doesn’t heavily favor chains. Never mind that critics of Starbucks routinely compare it with Wal-Mart Stores Inc. Starbucks simply doesn’t enjoy the advantages that have made Wal-Mart the bane of countless Main Street retailers — lower prices, longer hours, wider selection. The Starbucks offering isn’t less expensive or more extensive than the independent’s, and the chain’s hours often are shorter.
This may be why, contrary to popular perception, independents still dominate the industry. Independents and small chains boast a 61% share of the industry, says Mintel. In fast food, by contrast, independents and small chains hold only a 27% share, according to Technomic Inc., a Chicago food-consulting firm. Indeed, the coffeehouse industry boasts only one big chain — Starbucks, with 3,167 company stores in the U.S. Of the countless others that have tried mimicking it, not one has matched its success. The nation’s second-largest chain, Diedrich Coffee Inc., of Irvine, Calif., boasts only 237 U.S. stores.

Frankly, I like Starbucks. And the one by our Safeway is convenient enough that we often grab a (pricy) bite to eat and caffeine to quaff when we go shopping. But I’ve patronized the indies, too, and am glad they’re there. I’ll never be the type to hang out at the coffee shop and blog, or chat with the other regulars. But when I look for someplace convenient, I’m not married to any one brand or logo. If the coffee (or coffee drinks) are good, I’m there.

Everybody’s a critic

Or can be, if you sign up with Blogcritics.org, where whatever you want to cover in the music, video, or book world can be published somewhere other than on…

Blogcritics.org
Or can be, if you sign up with Blogcritics.org, where whatever you want to cover in the music, video, or book world can be published somewhere other than on your own little blog. Hoo-hah!

So any reviews I do ’round here, expect to see there, too. Or vice-versa.

If there’s any money left over

Okay, it’s not a personal VTOL car, but owning a kit for 3,000 brick, 3-foot long LEGO Imperial Star Destroyer would be pretty keen. Especially since it comes with a…

Okay, it’s not a personal VTOL car, but owning a kit for 3,000 brick, 3-foot long LEGO Imperial Star Destroyer would be pretty keen. Especially since it comes with a (to scale) Rebel Blockade Runner.

Sweet.

(via SfAD)

Tonight’s Special Quiz

There’s one “sport” in which neither the spectators nor the participants know the score or the leader until the contest ends. What is it? What famous North American landmark is…

  1. There’s one “sport” in which neither the spectators nor the participants know the score or the leader until the contest ends. What is it?
  2. What famous North American landmark is constantly moving backward?
  3. Of all vegetables, only two can live to produce on their own for several growing seasons. All other vegetables must be replanted every year. What are the only two perennial vegetables?
  4. Name the only sport in which the ball is always in possession of the team on defense, and the offensive team can score without touching the ball?
  5. What fruit has its seeds on the outside?
  6. In many liquor stores, you can buy pear brandy, with a real pear inside the bottle. The pear is whole and ripe, and the bottle is genuine; it hasn’t been cut in any way. How did the pear get inside the bottle?
  7. Only three words in standard English begin with the letters “dw.” They are all common. Name two of them.
  8. There are fourteen punctuation marks in English grammar. Can you name half of them?
  9. Where are the lakes that are referred to in the “Los Angeles Lakers?”
  10. There are seven ways a baseball player can legally reach first base without getting a hit. Taking a base on balls — a walk — is one way. Name the other six.
  11. It’s the only vegetable or fruit that is never sold frozen, canned, processed, cooked, or in any other form but fresh. What is it?
  12. Name six or more things that you can wear on your feet that begin with the letter “S.”

Continue reading “Tonight’s Special Quiz”

This-or-That: The Movie!

It’s the Tuesday This-or-That:…

It’s the Tuesday This-or-That:

Continue reading “This-or-That: The Movie!”

Signs

Fascinating NY Times article on the redesign of signage at New York airports. I admire good signage. Particularly when I travel. (via xBlog)…

Fascinating NY Times article on the redesign of signage at New York airports.

I admire good signage. Particularly when I travel.

(via xBlog)