https://buy-zithromax.online buy kamagra usa https://antibiotics.top buy stromectol online https://deutschland-doxycycline.com https://ivermectin-apotheke.com kaufen cialis https://2-pharmaceuticals.com buy antibiotics online Online Pharmacy vermectin apotheke buy stromectol europe buy zithromax online https://kaufen-cialis.com levitra usa https://stromectol-apotheke.com buy doxycycline online https://buy-ivermectin.online https://stromectol-europe.com stromectol apotheke https://buyamoxil24x7.online deutschland doxycycline https://buy-stromectol.online https://doxycycline365.online https://levitra-usa.com buy ivermectin online buy amoxil online https://buykamagrausa.net

Signs of the times

Cool article about a change in US highway signage, moving away from the Eisenhower Era “Highway Gothic” font to “Clearview,” which is supposed to be more legible at a…

Cool article about a change in US highway signage, moving away from the Eisenhower Era “Highway Gothic” font to “Clearview,” which is supposed to be more legible at a distance, at night, and with impaired vision.  The two signs at right are the old vs. new.

Clearview has been approved by the Feds since 2004, and 20 states have adopted the standard for their new signage. Interestingly, it’s the same typeface adopted by the “new at&t.”

Science/food/linguisitcs trifecta!

Cool post over at “I did not know that yesterday” on whether blowing on food actually makes it cooler — and, if so, why….

Cool post over at “I did not know that yesterday” on whether blowing on food actually makes it cooler — and, if so, why.

Light-weight debate

The whole aluminum vs. aluminium debate is … amusing in how vociferous some folks get about it.  How did the US end up with a different name for the metal…

The whole aluminum vs. aluminium debate is … amusing in how vociferous some folks get about it.  How did the US end up with a different name for the metal than the rest of the world?

It annoyances me

Ugh.  Last weeks meetings were long, and there were many problems and hurdles to overcome — but the biggest was keeping from running screaming from the room (or else going…

Ugh.  Last weeks meetings were long, and there were many problems and hurdles to overcome — but the biggest was keeping from running screaming from the room (or else going postal with a baseball bat) whenever people (far too often) used the word “solution” as a verb, as in, “I need to solution this particular problem” or “We’re here to gather requirements; we shouldn’t be solutioning this yet.”

Um … shouldn’t the verb actually be solve?   

BT07 – If I could create a comic …

Margie asks:  If you could create a comic what would it be? What is the premise? Who would you get as a writer? … artist? … cover art? … inker?…

Margie asks:

 If you could create a comic what would it be?
What is the premise?
Who would you get as a writer?
… artist?
… cover art?
… inker?
… letterer?
… label?

Holy moley.  That’s like being given a million dollars and asking what you’d do with it.

If I had enough imagination to come up with “my” comic book, I’d probably be able to do it myself.  It’s the idea that’s the difficult thing. 

There are so many fabulous writers out there, it would be a bitch to decide.  Brian Bendis.  Neil Gaiman.  Joe Straczynski.  Joss Whedon.  Garth Ennis, Judd Winick.  Peter David. Greg Rucka.  Robert Kirkman.  Bill Willingham.  Kurt Busiek.  James Robinson.   Depending on the story I wanted to tell, any of those might work.  I’m not even going to count some other greats (Miller, Ellis, Moore) who’d make it (rightfully) their story.

The only story that comes to mind (and by “create a comic” I’m assuming this is something new, creator owned, not using any existing properties …) would be to do a EULA-scrubbed variant of my City of Heroes main, Psi-clone, and the Consortium of Justice, examining what it means to actually be a hero — heck, what it means to be a person.  (A theme I usually go back to, you’ll note.)   I’d pull in and examine PC’s backstory, and the contrast to the others around him (various characters you and I have done, maybe some other folks) to poke at the theme, all intertwined (for contrast and to get away from being all-talking-heads, all-the-time) with some Big Plot that needed defeating — which might or might not be related, but the resolution of which would tie in.

I’ve actually considered that in terms of writing it as a novel, and mapped out some dialog between some of my alts (which sounds vaguely disturbing), but as a comic it would have added possiblities.

Given the sort of story I’m thinking, the writers would probably be between Bendis, Straczynski, David, Robinson, or Whedon most likely.  Each would bring some serious strengths of their own, while keeping to the basic theme.

For art — hard to say.  Old faves, like Byrne or Perez, or Hitch, or Kitson, or Paul Smith, or Cassaday?  Those would be appropriately super-heroic — but would I want a more gritty, conversational, realistic style?   Quite possibly.  Maybe Gaydos (Alias) or Maleev (Daredevil), or Michael Lark (Gotham Central)?  I could see either approach.

Alex Ross on covers.  Of course.

As for the label, prolly Image or Dark Horse, just because they welcome more indy types of things, but I don’t have any particular need or affiliation that needs to be me.

Not much more to say than that right now.  But an interesting thought.

(listening to: Beck, Christopher & Tobias & Whedon, “Something to Sing About” from Buffy: Once More, With Feeling)
(listening to: Copeland, Stewart, “Brazzaville” from Rhythmatist)
(listening to: Bega, Lou, “Mambo No. 5 (A Little Bit of …)” from Grammy Nominees 2000)
(listening to: Heart, “Stranded” from Brigade)

Beware counterfeit King James Bibles!

Accept no substitutes! We’re not talking here about those New-fangled Translations of the Devil, like the NIV or the NRSV or the Jerusalem Bible or other such abominations before the…

Accept no substitutes!

We’re not talking here about those New-fangled Translations of the Devil, like the NIV or the NRSV or the Jerusalem Bible or other such abominations before the Lord.  No, we’re talking far greater sins against the One, True, Revealed (and Translated) Word of God, something far worse:  Updated and/or Americanized spelling!

Here are some other ploys that some of these other worldly publishing companies are pulling on an unaware publick. One thing a lot of them do is change the spelling of words that end with the letters o-u-r to the more modern American spelling of o-r.  For example armour becomes armor.  Behaviour becomes behavior.  Clamour becomes clamor.  Colour becomes color.  Endeavour becomes endeavor.  Favour becomes favor.  Honour becomes honor.  Labour becomes labor.  Neighbour becomes neighbor.  Odour becomes odor.  Rigour becomes rigor.  Rumour becomes rumor.  Valour becomes valor and vapour becomes vapor.  Well Brother Nic what’s wrong with that?  Remember what we said about the warning labels?  Remember what the scripture said about a little leaven leaventh the whole lump? 

Now the very worst of this battle of o-u-r vs. o-r comes when dealing with the only begotten Son of God, our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.  The modern day counterfeiters have changed Saviour to Savior.  They have given us a six-letter Savior in place of a seven-letter Saviour.  In Bible numerics seven is the number of completeness, purity, and spiritual perfection.  On the other hand six is the number of man which is earthly not heavenly.  Every one has heard of 666.  It has a bad connotation and is not highly esteemed in Bible numerics. 

The seven-letter Saviour is the only begotten Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ.  The six-letter Savior is the son of perdition, the anti christ. He wants to be like the most High (Isaiah 14:14,) but not in a good way, but in an evil way.  He is not a follower.  He’s a counterfeiter.  Therefore his final destination is the lake of fire.  The new versions, along with the new age movement, and some of the King James Bible counterfeits are preparing the way for this six-letter so called Savior. That’s the way he will spell his name, S-a-v-i-o-r not S-a-v-i-o-u-r.   No thank you Satan.  I’m sticking with the seven-letter Saviour as portrayed in the old black Book that I inherited from my forefathers.

And let’s not even start talking about adding in hyphens — the Punctuation Mark of the Devil!

How can you tell if you have one of Satan’s Orthographers as your Bible publisher?  Here’s a handy checklist:

Scripture Reference

The Real Bible

Counterfeit

GENESIS 1:1

heaven

heavens

GENESIS 1:2

Capital S (Spirit)

lower case s (spirit)

GENESIS 8:1

asswaged

assuaged

GENESIS 11:3

throughly

thoroughly

GENESIS 11:3

morter

mortar

GENESIS 12:1

shew

show

GENESIS 21:26

to day

today

GENESIS 23:8

intreat

entreat

GENESIS 24:57

enquire

inquire

GENESIS 30:37

chesnut

chestnut

GENESIS 31:42

labour

labor

GENESIS 41:38

Capital S (Spirit)

lower case s (spirit)

EXODUS 8:23

to morrow

tomorrow

EXODUS 24:6

basons

basins

EXODUS 25:30

shewbread

showbread

EXODUS 25:30

alway

always

LEVITICUS 25:9

jubile

jubilee

NUMBERS 10:25

rereward

rearward

NUMBERS 22:26

further

farther

1 SAMUEL 18:6

musick

music

PSALMS 149:6

twoedged

two-edged

ISAIAH 59:17

cloke

cloak

MATTHEW 1:19

publick

public

MATTHEW 4:1

Capital S (Spirit)

lower case s (spirit)

LUKE 2:11

Saviour

Savior

PHILIPPIANS 3:17

ensample

example

1 TIMOTHY 6:20

so called

so-called

JAMES 4:14

vapour

vapor

 

You have been warned!

(via J-Walk)

You learn something new every bloody day

Ichor is pronounced with a long I?  I’ll be damned, apparently so.  I always thought it was pronounced with a short I, like, well, “icky.”  It’s not a word I…

Ichor is pronounced with a long I?  I’ll be damned, apparently so.  I always thought it was pronounced with a short I, like, well, “icky.”  It’s not a word I use in everyday language, but I’m sure I’ve said it that way at various D&D games and nobody’s ever corrected me.

Potpourri for another Friday on Vacation

Robo-Dave suggests: New Baby Names. I’m a big believer in personal freedom and parental autonomy and all that, but … yeesh, I feel sorry for some of these kids. Azorryona,…

Robo-Dave suggests:

  1. New Baby Names. I’m a big believer in personal freedom and parental autonomy and all that, but … yeesh, I feel sorry for some of these kids. Azorryona, Abreeah, Adragus, Azaia, Adler, Amiana, Abrienna, Aven, Axie …
  2. Largest island in a lake on an island in a lake on an island.

  3. The Armageddon Flowchart.

  4. Think those Hummer limos are impressive? Bah. The Midnight Rider has them all beat. I’m actually only half-kidding … and half-impressed.

Potpourri for a Saturday on Vacation

Robo-Dave suggests: Isn’t it odd that, after battling Microsoft for anti-trust violations, the Feds have turned around and given it a monopoly over browser access to things like US…

Robo-Dave suggests:

  1. Isn’t it odd that, after battling Microsoft for anti-trust violations, the Feds have turned around and given it a monopoly over browser access to things like US Customs?  “To access the ACE Secure Data Portal you need a high-speed internet connection and Internet Explorer 5.5 or higher. Please note that the ACE Portal does not function properly with Mozilla Firefox.”  Actually, I’m pretty sure it’s not a conspiracy, just lazy development or shoddy procurement practices.
  2. Did pirates really say “Arrr?” Sadly, not really. (Which, of course, reminds me of the old joke, “What are the two letters of the Pirate Alphabet? ‘I’ and ‘R’ …”)
  3. Someone with time on their hands has an entire site devoted to looking at time travel in movies.  Which is … really cool.  I need to spend way too much time going through this.

100 Words

No, not that 100 Words … in this case, a list (from dictionary editors) of 100 words all high school graduates should know. The editors of the American Heritage® dictionaries…

No, not that 100 Words … in this case, a list (from dictionary editors) of 100 words all high school graduates should know.

The editors of the American Heritage® dictionaries have compiled a list of 100 words they recommend every high school graduate should know.

“The words we suggest,” says senior editor Steven Kleinedler, “are not meant to be exhaustive but are a benchmark against which graduates and their parents can measure themselves. If you are able to use these words correctly, you are likely to have a superior command of the language.”

Now, I am known as a somewhat verbose kinda guy, well-read, with a rich vocabulary and no fear of using it.  I am not only a high school grad, but a graduate of one of the finest liberal arts colleges in the nation. People poke (good-hearted) fun of me for the words I use.

And I tell you that while I recognize all of the words on the list, there are quite a number that I would only understand via context, and several I would need to look up even then —

— which, perhaps, is the Cunning Plan of those dictionary editors.

Not that I have any objection to high school grads knowing and using these words.  But I suspect that there are probably some other words and concepts that I’d be more interested in their knowing (and more certain of their encountering) when they graduate than “jejune” or “moiety” or “quotidian.”  All of which are fine words (and which I now must figure out a way to work into a conversation), but …

Potpourri

I’m not particularly thrilled with China’s human rights record, to say the last, and there’s certainly a degree of “show trial for the world” in this news — but…

  1. I’m not particularly thrilled with China’s human rights record, to say the last, and there’s certainly a degree of “show trial for the world” in this news — but I must confess to a certain degree of admiration for the PRC  sentencing their former FDA (equivalent) director to death for recent scandals in food and drug adulteration — which has been worse in China than in the exports that have made the news over here.  It does make one wonder whether there would be a “deterrence effect” for American officials if faced with similar possibilities.  (via DOF)
  2. Oh, my.  The Mach 5 for the pending live-action Wachowski Bros. Speed Racer movie.  Be still my heart … (via BD)

  3. Has the Miss Universe competition gone post-colonial?
  4. Speaking of which — 500 years of women’s portraiture in Western Art. Gorgeous. (via Ginny)
  5. Maybe it’s just as well that I didn’t have a blog back when Margie and I got married.  The sorts of things that a number of these “wed sites” do are … a bizarre combination of tackiness and exhibitionism that exceed even the usual standards of the blogosphere.  It’s Jerry Springer with hearts and cherubs and streaming video.  Mercifully, Doyce and Kate seem to have a lot more taste than that.
  6. For those who believe in the literal inerrancy of the Bible, and so pooh-pooh things like evil-ution and the Big Bang and similar anti-God so-called-“science” … do you really believe the universe looks like this?  Or do you “pick and choose” your biblical metaphors?
  7. Some common Japanese phrases — phonetically rendered, unfortunately, but still useful.
  8. Book burning — it’s not just for fanatical ideologues any more.  Is the used book market that bad?  I guess so. (via Avo)
  9. Synonyms for drinking/being drunk.

 

Smiling faces, smiling eyes

A recent study indicates that Americans and Japanese read body language and facial expressions differently — in particular, that Americans pay attention to the mouth, while Japanese focus on the eyes…

A recent study indicates that Americans and Japanese read body language and facial expressions differently — in particular, that Americans pay attention to the mouth, while Japanese focus on the eyes (which, in a culture where outward expression of emotion is sometimes frowned upon, are harder to mask).

Which may explain the distinction in American vs Japanese emoticons.  Americans tend to do those little sideways things with the mouth being a key point, while Japanese are horizontal and zero in on the, well, eyes, leaving the mouth more as a spaceholder.

Happy Face:  🙂  vs.  ^_^

Sad Face:  🙁 vs. ;_;

That makes so much sense …

(via BoingBoing)

Plusses (and minuses)

We Episcopalians/Anglicans love our particular language and being all cryptic-like with the stuff we write (yours truly being the exception, of course).  Whereby hangs a tale of little plus…

We Episcopalians/Anglicans love our particular language and being all cryptic-like with the stuff we write (yours truly being the exception, of course).  Whereby hangs a tale of little plus signs (+).

There is a not-terribly-secret code, or shorthand, that plus signs are used in in relationship to clergy in the Anglican world (I’m not sure if the same holds true for Catholics or other hierarchical types).  You’ll see names written with plus signs in front of or behind them, sometimes more than one sign.  You’ll also see clergy signing their names with little plus signs.  Which raises the issue of what it all means.

Well, in this context, the plusses are not “positive thinking” but little crosses.  And the basic code seems to be:

Fred+ = Rev. Fred, a priest.

+Fred = Right Rev. Fred, Bishop of Someplace.

++Fred = Most Rev. Fred, Archbishop of a Province or Equally Significant Area.

Sometimes, in the Anglican world, you’ll also see three plusses, i.e., “+++Fred,” which would indicate that Fred is the Archbishop of Canterbury.

So folks will talk about, on all those Episcopal blogs, “Armstrong+” for Don Armstrong, or “+O’Neill” for Rob O’Neill, the Bishop of Colorado, or “++KJS” for Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori.  (Interestingly, a number of more conservative writers will leave off the plusses when referring to her, to indicate they don’t think she’s a real bishop, either because she’s a raving heretic or she’s a woman or both.  It seems a petty snipe.)

And, of course, you have +++Rowan, the Archbishop of Canterbury (a/k/a the ABC).  And, in keeping with the old “Princes of the Church” model, you sometimes hear (especially in the Church of England) bishops referred to by their See, so “York” for the Archbishop of York (don’t know as I’ve seen that in the Episcopal Church).  And, to make it all Latinate, you’ll not infrequently see the ABC referenced as “Cantuar,” which is the Latin name for Canterbury.

I’ve been sorely tempted to do this plus-sign stuff, just ’cause (a) it’s kind of cryptically cool, and (b) it’s shorter than writing all those titles.  But it’s maybe … too insider shorthand.

(And this has been not easy to research, since Google doesn’t let you, y’know, search for “+”.)

And, while I’m deciphering Episcospeech, you will also see (including here) both the “old” abbreviation for the Episcopal Church of the USA (ECUSA) and the new official shorthand of the Episcopal Church (TEC).  About which I’ve previously blogged, but I understand how it can be difficult to tell your players without a program …

So there you have it — the “secret code.”  Any questions?

iAnnoyance

I’m annoyed by the “i” prefix being slapped all over stuff to make it seem cool and hip and hi-tech.  Okay, so if Apple wants to do that as their…

I’m annoyed by the “i” prefix being slapped all over stuff to make it seem cool and hip and hi-tech.  Okay, so if Apple wants to do that as their “thing,” that’s at least a product branding (along with all the gadgets and gizmos that tie into Apple products).

But why on God’s Google Earth has Google changed their personalized home page from “Personalized Google” (or whatever it was) to “iGoogle”?  Truly bizarre, and, yet, annoying.

Oh, well — I am at least comforted that someday it will be seen as a sign of obsolescence or being out of date, and all of those iProducts will get renamed.  At which point I’ll probably bitch about that, too,

And one last bit of Episcotrivia for today

Anyone who ends up reading much of this stuff online will run smack-dab into the unfamiliar terms of “reappraiser” and “reasserter.”  These terms came from Kendall Harmon as replacements…

Anyone who ends up reading much of this stuff online will run smack-dab into the unfamiliar terms of “reappraiser” and “reasserter.”  These terms came from Kendall Harmon as replacements for the “conservative” and “liberal” labels within church debates.

I’ve not used the terms because I found them visually confusing at a glance (starting with “rea-” and a double-consonent, and ending in “-er”) and because most people would be even more clueless about them.  But they’re worth knowing, in case you get caught up in the trivia of the big Episcopal debate.

A reappraiser is someone who is reappraising the traditions of the church, the orthodox interpretation of Scripture, etc., based on their own reason, insight, inspiration, and so forth.  Traditionally such a person is called a “liberal.”  In the context of gay rights, to this person, contemporary thought, scientific research, and the experiences of day to day life force a reinterpretation of what’s been understood in the past to be God’s attitude toward homosexuality, and a reevaluation of the historical context and limitations of scriptural writings and traditional teachings of same.

A reasserter is someone who is reasserting the traditional orthodoxy of the Christian not-so-past as valid, complete, and sufficient.  Traditionally such a person is called a “conservative.”  In the context of gay rights, to this person, it’s perfectly clear what both Leviticus and Paul have to day, as the Word of God, about homosexuality, end of story, game over.   Past theologians and social commentators have agreed with this position; that some contemporary ones disagree is of no consequence. 

I’m not sure how I feel about these particular labels, though they are probably more useful and less stereotyped than the conservative/liberal names.  I probably won’t use them here, though I may feel more free to quote folks who do..

Anyway … so now you know.

Disturbing indeed

Evidently if you write an essay in Chicago that the teacher finds “disturbing,” you can be: Given a poor grade. Called to the principal’s office. Referred for psychiatric evaluation. Arrested…

Evidently if you write an essay in Chicago that the teacher finds “disturbing,” you can be:

  1. Given a poor grade.
  2. Called to the principal’s office.
  3. Referred for psychiatric evaluation.
  4. Arrested for “disorderly conduct.”

The answer, it seems, is D.

 Allen Lee, an 18-year-old straight-A student at Cary-Grove High School, was arrested Tuesday near his home and charged with disorderly conduct for an essay police described as violently disturbing but not directed toward any specific person or location.

[…] The youth’s father said his son was not suspended or expelled but was forced to attend classes elsewhere for now.

[…] Cary Police Chief Ron Delelio said the charge was appropriate even though the essay was not published or posted for public viewing.

Disorderly conduct, which carries a penalty of 30 days in jail and a $1,500 fine, is filed for pranks such as pulling a fire alarm or dialing 911. But it can also apply when someone’s writings can disturb an individual, Delelio said. “The teacher was alarmed and disturbed by the content,” he said.

And what was the disturbing essay that could have pulled down jail time?

 The “key outcomes” this month for the Creative English class was for students to identify and utilize poetic conventions to communicate ideas and emotions. With that in mind, teachers reminded students that if they read something that posed a threat to self or others, the school could take action, said High School District 155 Supt. Jill Hawk.

And with that caveat, the actual assignment:

“Write whatever comes to your mind. Do not judge or censor what you are writing.”

[…]  Emling provided a reporter with a copy of the class assignment, which was titled “Free Writing.” It advised students to “write non-stop for a set period of time. Do not make corrections as you write. Keep writing, even if you have to write something like, ‘I don’t know what to write.’

And the actual essay.  Which is disturbing only because it’s just a goofy teen-angsty rebellious stream-of-consciousness bit of drivel that quotes bad bands and references video games. 

And for this?

The English teacher read the essay and reported it to a supervisor and the principal. A round-table discussion with district officials conveyed, with lively debate, and they decided to report it to the police.

“Our staff is very familiar with adolescent behavior. We’re very well versed with types of creativity put into writing. We know the standards of adolescent behavior that are acceptable and that there is a range,” Hawk said.

“There can certainly be writing that conveys concern for us even though it does not name names location or date,” he said.

Now, one can possibly understand, given the whole Virginia Tech thing, a teacher being really concerned by an essay and taking some sort of action — heck, even, maybe, referring it to the police to investigate.  But calling this “disorderly conduct,” an actual crime? 

Not particularly fond of the kid or his essay, but it’s not disorderly conduct.  It’s just bad writing.  I mean, if bad writing is a crime — I’m in real trouble.

(via BoingBoing)

There, They’re and Their

Yeah, this one bugs Doyce as much as it bugs me.  How to Use There, Their and They’re.  A nice test: Test your usage. When you use any of these…

Yeah, this one bugs Doyce as much as it bugs me.  How to Use There, Their and They’re.  A nice test:

Test your usage. When you use any of these three words, get in the habit of asking yourself these questions:

  • If you wrote there, will the sentence still make sense if you replace it with here? If so, you’re using it correctly.
  • If you chose their, will the sentence still make sense if you replace it with our? If so, you’ve chosen the correct word.
  • If you used they’re, will the sentence still make sense if you replace it with they are? If so, you’re on the right track!

The “export death and violence” Bush quote

I was digging into my referrer logs today, just for giggles, and ran across some Usenet references.  I followed them, and found this page on, of all things, alt.guitar.amps. It…

I was digging into my referrer logs today, just for giggles, and ran across some Usenet references.  I followed them, and found this page on, of all things, alt.guitar.amps. It linked to this page of my blog, where I refute (shamefully, without citation) this quote attributed to George W. Bush:

George W. Bush did not say:

We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of our great nation.

 The quote is from Bob Woodward’s Bush at War, and sometimes this is mentioned (Woodward’s name giving it a certain cachet).

But Woodward never attributes this quote to Bush. Instead, he records it as being said by an unindentified CIA or Special Forces trooper at a 9/11 memorial they’ve built in the Afghan mountains during the first mission into Afghanistan.

 After someone pointed to my page as a counter-proof, they were shouted down by someone else who pointed to all sorts of other Internet citations that claimed Bush did say it, so nyaaah (we are talking, of course, about Usenet …).

If someone’s citing me in an argument, I have a stake in things.  So inquiring (and OCD) minds want to know the truth.  And so, naturally, I turned to Google.  The phrase is still quoted by people to this day as a Bush utterance, so the truth of the matter seems more than just an academic concern.  If he said it (or if Woodward says he said it) then that’s useful information.  If not, then let’s know that, too.

(All the bolding below is mine, just to show things up.)

The citations that this is a Bush quotation are numerous.  That’s not surprising, since it would be a great zinger against him.  In addition to the above, it shows up all over the place — but, suspiciously, rarely quoted at length, or in context, and often with the smell of “I read this quote there so I used it here” about them, or “I got this from Agnes, who got it from Jim, who got it from Louise, who got it from …”

There’s this article by Michael Ortiz Hill.

In Bush at War Bob Woodward writes, “Most presidents have high hopes. Some have grandiose visions of what they will achieve, and he was firmly in that camp.”

“To answer these attacks and rid the world of evil,” says Bush. And again, “We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of this great nation.” Grandiose visions. Woodward comments, “The president was casting his mission and that of the country in the grand vision of Gods Master Plan.”

(In turn cited here.) That’s closely echoed in another article at the same site by William Cook.

Bob Woodward’s deferent, perhaps even obeisant homage to “Dubya” in his recent book, Bush at War, contains this troubling observation: “The President was casting his mission and that of the country in the grand vision of God’s Master Plan.” This frightening perception followed the President’s declamation, “We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of this great country and rid the world of evil.”

 (Note that the quotes don’t quite match, which seems odd.) (Cook is in turn cited here.)

Someone mentions the “end of the book” as a location, but still attributes it to Bush:

Woodward ends his book with another quotation from the president, uncomfortably apposite: “We will export death and violence to the four corners of the Earth in defense of our great nation.”

It’s not just sources on the left, but a review of the book by Georgie Anne Geyer, in Pat Buchanan’s American Conservative, again says:

And Woodward ends the book with another quote from the president, in which he again reflects the obsessive chaos theory of the neoconservatives surrounding him like sentinels and for whom Iraq has become the sina quo non of political existence: “We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of our great nation.” Whew.

One of those armchair psychoanalysis efforts on Bush also mentions the quote in order to prove a point: 

Bush has rather unconvincingly denied that he holds the end times view that Christ’s return will be heralded by a cataclysm in the Middle East. But there are signs that he may hold this apocalyptical idea of world history and that he may be both seeking to avoid the biblical cataclysm and to “bring it on.” In his Jan. 10, 2007, speech he called the Iraq war part of the “decisive ideological struggle of our time” and described the absolute catastrophe he is sure would ensue from “failure” in the Iraq war. He has said repeatedly that he believes he is engaged in a mission to “rid the world of evil” and told Bob Woodward that he would willing to “export death and violence to the four corners of earth in defense of this great nation,” which to him is clearly a Christian nation.

 That reference actually has a citation, a foreign policy paper by Stephen Zunes:

Even more disturbingly, Bush has stated repeatedly that he was “called” by God to run for president. Veteran journalist Bob Woodward noted, “The President was casting his mission and that of the country in the grand vision of God’s Master Plan,” wherein he promised, in his own words, “to export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of this great country and rid the world of evil.”

But Zune doesn’t give his source (though he’s in turn quoted here).

The “Bush” quote also shows up here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and a host of other angry op-ed pieces, blog screeds, and sig lines.

 In the meantime, what of those who argue otherwise (or, rather, provide a different citation for the quote, one that doesn’t include George W. Bush)?

This Peter Symon review of the book (hardly by a Bush supporter), includes the following:

Woodward’s book opens on the morning of September 11, 2001, the day of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon. But rather than start this review with the events of that day and their consequences I will quote the very last few paragraphs of Bush at War and then wind back the clock to the events of that day.

Woodward says: “On February 5, 2002, about 25 men representing three different Special Forces units and three CIA paramilitary teams gathered outside Gardez, Afghanistan, in the east, about 40 miles from the Pakistani border.

“It was very cold, and they were bundled in camping or outdoor clothing. No one was in uniform. Many had beards. The men stood or kneeled on this desolate site in front of a helicopter. An American flag was standing in the background. There was a pile of rocks arranged as a tombstone over a buried piece of the demolished World Trade Centre. Someone snapped a picture of them.

“One of the men read a prayer. Then he said, ‘We consecrate this spot as an everlasting memorial to the brave Americans who died on September 11, so that all who would seek to do her harm will know that America will not stand by and watch terror prevail.

‘We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defence of our great nation.'”

 A similar quote from the end of the book is given here.  Slightly more summarized, the Afghanistan scenario is echoed here (again, not at all by a Bush apologist): 

Woodward tells of a religious prayer meeting on February 5, 2002, attended by 25 men — including three different Special Forces units and CIA paramilitary teams. After a prayer and the invocation of September 11, one of the attendees — speaking for the group — pledged, “We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of our great nation.”

 Similarly, the Socialist Worker Online, claiming the book is actually meant to support Bush, quotes it similarly:

The book closes with a description of U.S. Special Forces and CIA paramilitary troops in occupied Afghanistan dedicating a makeshift monument to the victims of the September 11 attacks. After reading a prayer, a U.S. operative “consecrates” the monument with these words: “We will export death and violence to the four corners of the Earth in defense of our great nation.” These words remind readers of what’s really going on in Bush at War.

 And this article by G. Pascal Zachary — again, critical of the book — notes:

Oddly, the strongest parts of “Bush at War” take place on the ground in Afghanistan. Woodward intersperses his account of Washington meetings with the exploits of the first CIA team sent into Taliban territory. The team, codenamed Jawbreaker, is shown handing out cash to Afghan warlords. Woodward remains uncritical of these CIA agents, and of the Pentagon Special Forces units who later join them. He ends the book with a strange image of a group of them creating a 9/11 memorial in the Afghan mountains. One of the Americans vows, “We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth in defense of our great nation.”

Other Afghanistan citations can be found here, here, here,

Interestingly, the question of which source is correct is played out at Axis of Logic, where someone questions the quote and cites the Afghanistan locale.  The site owner says the person who’d attributed it directly to Bush had, in turn, gotten it from several other “mainstream” sources, about as well-researched as the above blubs (in fact, including several of them), and so stuck by it. 

Wikiquote, though, agrees in refuting the Bush sourcing of the quote, as does the late, lamented SpinSanity.

And what of the book itself?  I don’t have a copy, but the contents are scanned by Amazon.  Go here, and search for “four corners” and the “Back Matter” of the book.  There it is, page 352, smack-dab in Afghanistan, Dubya present, if at all, only in spirit.  (And if I’d gone there first, I might well have written a far shorter post.)

Even without the book, though, my judgment would be with the Afghanistan citation.  It has full, contextual quotes from the book, it’s supported by more believable people, and it lacks the subtle variations in text (“defense of this great country” or “defense of our great country,” or “this great nation,” etc.) that make the others less credible.

And … what’s, then, the point of this way-too-much-Googling?  Just this:  the truth matters.  When we fail to dig out the truth, or research it when there’s a question, or simply take the easy road of repeating what we’ve heard, we do the truth no service.  Indeed, one of the great criticisms of George W. Bush has been his truthfulness, or lack thereof; using misquotations and half-truths to attack him does the cause no favors.  Use his own words to hang him, if you will, not words you wish he’d used, or think he would have used if he’d thought of them.

I do understand the sentiment, mind you.  There’s a lot of anger, and angst, and disgust, and discomfort with George W. Bush and his various actions, domestically and internationally.  Finding him saying he’s going to “export death and violence to the four corners of the earth” (especially if you truncate the “defense”  and “rid evil” parts) is a money quote that’s hard to resist, even when it’s refuted (and especially when everyone else is using it).

But, y’know, there’s tons of “I cannot believe Dubya said that” material out there.  Why keep holding onto something we’re pretty sure he didn’t say when there’s so much other ammo lying on the ground?  If you think Bush is a force for deceit and trickery in this country and the world, don’t use the devil’s own tools.  Keep the moral high ground.

Don’t be about the truthiness, but be about the truth.  In the long run, it prevails.

Words mean things

A Note from Your Author:  Hey — y’know, a little “Wow, Dave, you’ve been doing that 100 Words thing every weekday for over a month, and, y’know, that’s not only impressive…

A Note from Your Author: 

Hey — y’know, a little “Wow, Dave, you’ve been doing that 100 Words thing every weekday for over a month, and, y’know, that’s not only impressive in and of itself, but you’ve actually done some kinda keen things with it” love wouldn’t be met with a stony silence by me.  Nor would the occasional comment over there.  🙂

What’s in a company name?

Cool Wikipedia page on company name etymologies. eBay — Pierre Omidyar, who had created the Auction Web trading website, had formed a web consulting concern called Echo Bay Technology Group….

Cool Wikipedia page on company name etymologies.

eBay — Pierre Omidyar, who had created the Auction Web trading website, had formed a web consulting concern called Echo Bay Technology Group. “Echo Bay” didn’t refer to the town in Nevada, “It just sounded cool,” Omidyar reportedly said. Echo Bay Mines Limited, a gold mining company, had already taken EchoBay.com, so Omidyar registered what (at the time) he thought was the second best name: eBay.com.

ELF — French oil company, its name is an abbreviation of Essence et Lubrifiants de France (Oil and Lubricants from France).

ESPNEntertainment and Sports Programmming Network

Epson — Epson Seiko Corporation, the Japanese printer and peripheral manufacturer, was named from “Son of Electronic Printer”

Esso — the enunciation of the initials S.O. in Standard Oil of New Jersey.

Exxon — a name contrived by Esso (Standard Oil of New Jersey) in the early 1970s to create a neutral but distinctive label for the company. Within days, Exxon was being called the “double cross company” but this eventually subsided. (Esso is a trademark of ExxonMobil.) Esso had to change its name in the USA because of restrictions dating to the 1911 Standard Oil antitrust decision.