Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond (1997) Overall Writing Info Re-Readability Audio Info: Diamond’s book is subtitled “The Fates of Human Societies,” and attempts to address a basic…
Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond (1997)
| Overall |  |
| Writing |  | Info |  |
| Re-Readability |  | Audio |  |
Info: Diamond’s book is subtitled “The Fates of Human Societies,” and attempts to address a basic — yet potentially inflammatory — question: Why did Eurasians conquer, displace, or decimate the Native Americans, Australians, and Africans, instead of the reverse? For much of the past centuries the answer has usually been (even if politely) racist, nationalistic, or even reliant upon “God’s favor” — and for the past decade or two, even asking the question could get you stoned as either a cultural revisionist or a bigot .
Diamond, an evolutionary biologist, rejects arguments that the peoples of any particular continent or region are somehow inherently better than others, and instead goes back to first causes. He presents a persuading case that environmental and geographical factors — ease of communication and cultural spread, population size potential, and availability of suitable candidates for domestication of plants and animals — gave Eurasia with its broad temperate latitude east-west a catalyzing leg up on other parts of the world that they simply could not overcome before Eurasians brought “guns, germs, and steel” to decimate and conquer the other populations of the world.
It’s actually fascinating stuff, especially as factor after factor builds on one another. Along the way, Diamond presents interesting info on evolutionary biology (of course), ethnology, and the history of agriculture, technology, and trade, While there may be room to argue with some of his points or whether he’s disregarding other factors (especially since his emphasis is on the macro, not the variations of the micro, on factors measured in millennia, not decades or even short centuries), anyone considering this overall question in the future will have to take into account the information he presents here.
Writing: Jared writes like an academic, piling evidence on top of evidence, often with lengthy lists of animals and plants and cases to demonstrate his various arguments. At times, it gets to be a bit much, especially when he recaps previously demonstrated points. The slow, steady pace is both convincing and, at times, maddening.
Re-Readability: I’m not sure how likely I am to want to re-listen to the book — it does get a bit much at times with its catalog of supporting evidence. However, I actually have an urge to read the book itself, which would allow a bit more selectivity in the data dump, as well as focus on the parts I found most interesting..
Audio: This is an abridged recording — six hours on five CDs. Grover Gardner’s narration is dry and pedantic and perfect for the subject matter. The recording quality is clear and crisp. The writing style is such that the arbitrary interruptions of audiobook listening in the car worked just ifne.
Overall: I liked this book. It was interesting info, if sometimes a bit slow and repetitious. It’s garnered a lot of criticism as being “politically correct,” which I really don’t see, and on ignoring IQ tests (right) and social/cultural movements of the past few centuries (which had little effect on the events leading to Eurasian conquest of the world) or just those who want to impose a value judgment on who “won” or “lost.” While Diamond expresses his opinion in places, he identifies it as such, and generally he rests his conclusions on facts and fact-checkable assessments — and it’s there that folks who disagree with him ought to be focusing their attention, agreeing or disagreeing as they will.
I found the book well worth the time, though, reading/listening to, and recommend it to others who are willing to plow through a lot of broad science and history and listen to a lot of lists in order to gets some very intriguing and entertaining nuggets of understanding.